Edie Windsor To Receive Huge Honor From The Trevor Project

LGBTQ icon and marriage equality plaintiff Edie Windsor will be honored with the Icon Award at the 2017 TrevorLIVE New York fundraising gala.

The annual fundraising event supports the efforts of The Trevor Project, the nation’s leading nonprofit dedicated to suicide prevention and crisis intervention for LGBTQ youth.

“Edie has proven herself to be a true pioneer in the fight for LGBTQ rights for decades,” Trevor Project Interim Executive Director Steve Mendelsohn said in a statement to HuffPost. “She has fought relentlessly for marriage equality, and remains a trailblazer and inspiration to the LGBTQ community across the world. We’re honored and delighted to present The Trevor Project’s Icon Award to Ms. Windsor for exemplifying leadership with strength, poise, courage and fearlessness.”

Windsor was at the heart of United States v. Windsor, a case that led the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and open the doors for same-sex couples to receive the full legal benefits of marriage.

“Being honored by The Trevor Project is a very big deal for me,” Windsor said. “I’m thrilled and humbled to be recognized by an organization that does so much for our LGBTQ young people. The fact that The Trevor Project continues year after year to be there 24/7 helping prevent suicide and averting crisis gives us all a future we can believe in.”

Imagine Dragons lead singer Dan Reynolds is also slated to be honored at the 2017 TrevorLIVE New York fundraising gala, being named Trevor Hero Honoree. Imagine Dragons will also perform at the June 19 event, which will be held at the Marriott Marquis in New York.  

Head here for more information.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Mariachi Band Takes On 'Grease' Song In Unexpected Cover

If you love genre-bending covers of classic songs, you’ll fall hard for Mariachi Entertainment System’s version of “Hopelessly Devoted To You.”

A mariachi-style version of the ballad, performed by Olivia Newton-John as Sandy in the 1978 hit film “Grease,” was posted on the band’s Facebook page on May 24. The video had racked up more than 291k views and 6,700 shares by Tuesday afternoon. 

Though the San Antonio-based group’s cover is a departure from their usual work, which typically consists of mariachi versions of video game music, Facebook commenters are already making requests for similar covers. 

Mariachi Entertainment System is just one of many bands that have given popular movie and television tunes a mariachi twist. Watch their cover of “Hopelessly Devoted To You” in the video above.

H/T mitú

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Former 'Bachelorette' Contestant Michael Nance Dead At 31

Michael Nance, a former contestant on “The Bachelorette,” has died. He was 31. 

A representative for the Austin Police Department confirmed the news to TMZ, telling the outlet they received a call around 2 a.m. on Monday. Nance was unresponsive when police arrived at the scene. He was pronounced dead shortly after. 

A cause of death has not been released, People reports, though the outlet notes it does not seem to be the result of foul play. A spokes An autopsy was performed Tuesday but it may take weeks to get results from toxicology reports.

In his “Bachelorette” introduction video, Nance, who was a musician, revealed he struggled with an addiction to prescription pain meds in the past. 

Nance appeared on Season 8 of “The Bachelorette,” which featured Emily Maynard. Upon hearing the news, Maynard took to Twitter to express her condolences. 

Other members of “Bachelor” Nation, such as Sean Lowe and Chris Bukowski, also expressed their grief on Twitter. 

ABC has yet to release a statement addressing the sad news, but we have reached out and will update this post accordingly. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Billy Eichner: ‘Fully Formed’ LGBTQ Characters, Stories Needed

We have seen a ton of progress on television. If you compare things to when I was a kid, things have drastically changed. Thankfully, I get to take advantage of that. I’m on multiple shows this year of all different genres from “Billy on the Street” and “Difficult People” and “Friends From College” to “American Horror Story” and “Bob’s Burgers” and other things. The great thing
is that’s not that unusual.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

An Endangered Lizard From Indonesia May Hold The Key To Treating Superbugs

Komodo dragons, the 10-foot, 300-pound lizards found in Indonesia, do not bite humans unless attacked, but when they do, it can prove deadly. Not only is the venom in their teeth potentially fatal, they may also harbor bacteria in their mouths that is dangerous to their prey (typically, deer and pigs).

The question of whether Komodo dragons deliver fatal bacterial infections to their prey when they bite has been somewhat controversial: A 2013 study, refuting previously accepted common wisdom, swabbed the mouths of 16 captive Komodo dragons and found they had less bacteria than other predators, such as lions. 

Nonetheless, Komodo dragons in the wild eat carrion and live in environments rich in bacteria yet rarely become infected, though local prey such as water buffalo do. And one reason may be because of a special resistance to dangerous bacteria in the form of cationic antimicrobial peptides, a type of protein that fights off harmful bacteria and that researchers have found in the animals’ blood.

“Komodo dragons are known to harbor high levels of bacteria in their mouths. They don’t suffer from negative effects of bacteria in their own mouths,” said Barney Bishop, one of the study’s authors and an associate professor at George Mason University’s chemistry and biochemistry department. 

Using the peptide in the dragon’s blood as inspiration, the researchers designed a synthetic chemical called DRGN-1, which imitates Komodo dragon blood.

As superbugs become more resistant to antibiotics, scientists are turning toward bioprospecting ― or looking to nature for potential medicines. In a recent study published in Biofilms and Microbiomes, researchers from George Mason University found an answer in Komodo dragons, which are native to Indonesian islands.

“We thought the best place to look was animals that are known to thrive under adverse conditions,” Bishop said. 

Since the 1940s, antibiotics have reduced deaths from infectious diseases, but they’ve become so widespread that the bacteria the antibiotics are supposed to kill have adapted. Now, every year, at least 2 million people become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and at least 23,000 people die from their infection.

The military’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency funded this research, hoping the team could look to “extreme animals” to find new ways to defend against infections. This could possibly lead to new drugs to fight superbugs and protect people from bacterial bioweapons.

“We’re in an age of emerging antibiotic resistance,” said Monique van Hoek, one of the study’s authors and an associate professor at George Mason University’s National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases. “We think it’s very important to take these new approaches to discover new ways to kill bacteria. By going into nature, we’re finding a new starting point for this.”

The team found that when DRGN-1 was used to treat infected wounds, these wounds healed significantly faster than untreated wounds or wounds treated with other peptides. That’s in part because DRGN-1 breaks down biofilms, a film of bacteria that sticks to a wound’s surface, which is not addressed by conventional antibiotics.

“It both clears the bacteria out of the wounds and it helps the wounds to heal,” van Hoek said.

The Komodo dragon is currently a vulnerable species with about 6,000 animals remaining, but the researchers collected less than four tablespoons of blood for testing from Tujah, a captive Komodo dragon that lives in the St. Augustine Alligator Farm Zoological Park in Florida. Tujah was not harmed in this process.

“This allows us to test endangered animals or very small animals because we don’t need a very large sample,” van Hoek said.

Bishop and van Hoek, who have been collaborating on antimicrobial discovery research since 2009, have also studied American alligators, Chinese alligators, Siamese crocodiles and saltwater crocodiles for possible treatment.

Right now, the DRGN-1 research is still in the preclinical phase, and the team is at the early stages of trying to commercialize the peptide. But down the road, DRGN-1 may help fight the superbugs of the future.

“When we started this project, it was a high-risk project. The DTRA took a gamble on us,” Bishop said. “The fact that we saw a complexity of peptides from the animals we’re testing on, there’s still a lot to learn. It’s very enriching.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

GOP Rep. Says He's Not A Climate-Change Denier, Then Casts Doubt On Basic Fact

Rep. Mark Walker (R-N.C.) doesn’t deny the climate is changing, but he does deny the basic facts underpinning that conclusion.

On Tuesday, at a town hall in Graham, North Carolina, the GOP representative responded to a constituent’s question about climate change by simultaneously acknowledging it exists ― and denying humans are responsible for it:

Walker told the crowd of around 75 people he doesn’t doubt the climate is shifting, but that he is unsure “how much of it is man-made,” and that acting to curb the causes might be too burdensome.

A broad scientific consensus, based on large amounts of data, points to human activity as the primary culprit for climate change. Put simply, as human emissions of heat-trapping gasses like carbon dioxide have spiked, so have global temperatures. 

Walker’s logic may be baffling, but it’s a common Republican refrain that appears designed to acknowledge climate change’s threats while simultaneously denying any responsibility for addressing them.

That basic premise is clearer on Walker’s 2015 campaign website, where he accused the “secular left” of using climate change as “a political football.”

“Much of the ‘so-called’ science of climate change is contested though it’s made a few politicians quite wealthy,” his position reads. “I believe that God provided the earth to us and we have a responsibility to conserve and respect the environment. When companies damage or abuse our environment, they should be held accountable.”

Tellingly, that last sentence ― the one about holding companies accountable for damaging the environment ― no longer appears on Walker’s website.

In April, Motherboard examined Walker’s voting record and labeled the representative an outright “climate change denier,” as opposed to merely having a “poor climate change voting record.” 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

So, Here's Kathy Griffin Holding A Very Fake, Very Bloody Donald Trump Head

This feels like an “America’s Next Top Model” challenge gone so horribly wrong. 

Kathy Griffin has made a career out of shocking her public by telling stories of Lindsay Lohan’s fire crotch and simulating oral sex with Anderson Cooper on CNN, but she took things to a whole new level with this controversial photo shoot.  

Shot by celebrity photographer and director Tyler Shields, the comedian stares the camera down in one photo, as she holds what resembles the bloody head of president Donald Trump.

“Kathy is all about pushing the limits and she went above and beyond on this one. Now lets just hope she stays out of jail,” a representative for Shields told HuffPost. 

In other (and considerably less gory) photos shot by Shields, Griffin poses by the pool in a revealing leather getup as a man holding a camera stands above her. 

Besides drumming up publicity, we’re not entirely sure what the photo shoot is for, but considering Griffin has made her distaste for the president abundantly clear, we doubt she’ll be apologizing anytime soon. 

HuffPost has reached out to Griffin’s representatives and will update the post accordingly. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Portland Train Attack Suspect Found Fodder For Dark Worldview Online

Jeremy Joseph Christian may have acted alone, but his violent racism had company online.

On a train in Portland, Oregon, Friday, Christian allegedly targeted two women, one of whom was wearing a hijab, with anti-Muslim slurs. When bystanders tried to intervene, Christian stabbed three people, according to police. Two died, and the third victim is expected to survive.

But long before the incident on the train, Christian said he was ready to kill in the name of white supremacy. A deep dive into his social media shows a man who found comfort in violent and often fake news sites and memes ― including anti-Muslim and other racist rhetoric.

He regularly shared anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic content.

In March 2016, Christian shared a fake news article showing Hillary Clinton in a Hijab claiming she was “in the pocket of Pakistani Muslims.”

“I’ll knock that Hijab off her faster than you can say Burka in Pig Latin if she steps in Rip City,” he wrote. 

On his profile, Christian stated matter-of-factly that he wanted to kill Clinton and her supporters along with Donald Trump. He also said he wanted to murder Jews and Muslims, and generally cause mayhem.

He shared memes depicting dead Jews in mass graves during the Holocaust, and swore that he’d “defend Nazis” until “victory.”

He initially supported Bernie Sanders ― a point white supremacists and ultra-conservative sites have highlighted in the wake of the attack ― but then appeared to switch to supporting Trump in November.

“Fuck Yeah!!! Trump is the Anti-Christ!!! I should have voted for him!!” he wrote at the time. He was also quick to declare allegiance to the president should be become “the next Hitler.”

In public, he marched as a neo-Nazi.

Local authorities knew Christian as a white supremacist prior to the train attack. On April 29, police confiscated a baseball bat from him at a “March for Free Speech” rally, but later said they didn’t believe him to be a threat.

As Christian marched in a parking lot throwing the Nazi salute and spouting racial epithets during the rally, marchers flanked by men with “Don’t Tread On Me” and “Trump” flags screamed, “He’s not with us!”

His anti-Muslim sentiments were not his alone.

Right-wing sites and groups offered different takes on Christian’s alleged actions in the wake of the attack. Some said he was an “equal-opportunity hater.”

Neo-Nazi site the Daily Stormer came to Christian’s defense, saying that he was “defending himself.” Andrew Anglin, who runs the site, worried that he’d be blamed for the attack. Instead, Anglin said, it’s Muslims’ fault for being in the U.S. in the first place.

“Again, it has to be said: when our people attack their people (if that indeed is what happened), the reason is the same as when the opposite happens: it is because they are in our countries in the first place,” Anglin wrote.

Sentiments like these used to be confined to the dark corners of the internet. But they’ve found more prominent places in the national discourse over the last year, thanks in part to Trump’s nativist campaign. He suggested a national Muslim database before his election, and afterward worked hard to try to keep people from several Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S.

The Southern Poverty Law Center reports that the radical right and hate groups were more successful in entering the mainstream in 2016 than over the last half century. There were over 2,200 “anti-Muslim bias incidents in 2016,” according to a report from the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Christian was scheduled to be arraigned Tuesday on murder charges.

America does not do a good job of tracking incidents of hate and bias. We need your help to create a database of such incidents across the country, so we all know what’s going on. Tell us your story.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Public Narrowly Agrees With Court's Decision Not To Reinstate Travel Ban

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Americans generally agree with a federal appeals court’s decision not to reinstate President Donald Trump’s travel ban, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll, although opinions on the ban itself remain mixed.

By a modest 6-point margin, 45 percent to 39 percent, respondents say the court made the right decision in refusing to reinstate Trump’s March executive order suspending refugee admissions and banning travel to the U.S. by non-visa-holders from six Muslim-majority countries. Judges in Hawaii and Maryland halted key provisions of the order before the ban could go into effect.

A 57 percent majority of Americans are aware that the ban is not currently in effect, while 14 percent believe that it is, and 29 percent are unsure about its current status.

Just over half of those polled say the judicial system should have the power to halt the ban, while about one-third say it should not.

“Laid bare, this Executive Order is no more than what the President promised before and after his election: naked invidious discrimination against Muslims,” U.S. Circuit Judge James Wynn wrote in a concurring opinion that the ban is likely unconstitutional. “Such discrimination contravenes the authority Congress delegated to the President in the Immigration and Nationality Act … and it is unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.”

Most Americans, 52 percent, believe the ban is intended to target Muslims, with just 31 percent saying they don’t believe it is.

Still, opinions about the ban itself remain split and have changed little from past HuffPost/YouGov surveys, with 44 percent in favor and 43 percent opposing the ban. (For a variety of reasons, different pollsters have found significantly varying responses to the measure, with HuffPost/YouGov surveys registering among the lowest levels of opposition.)

Views of all aspects of the travel ban remain deeply divided along political lines. Ninety-four percent of Trump voters, for instance, approve of the ban, compared to just 9 percent of those who supported Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in last year’s election. Eighty-nine percent of Clinton voters, but just 16 percent of Trump voters, believe the judicial system should have the power to halt the ban.

Both sides, however, are unhappy with the way the order has been carried out so far. Just one-quarter of Americans, including 13 percent of Clinton voters and 36 percent of Trump voters, think the government has done a very or somewhat good job of carrying it out. Twenty-three percent of Americans say the government has not done a very good job, with another 30 percent saying it has not done a good job at all.

Use the widget below to further explore the results of the HuffPost/YouGov survey, using the menu at the top to select survey questions and the buttons at the bottom to filter the data by subgroups: 

The HuffPost/YouGov poll consisted of 1,000 completed interviews conducted May 25-26 among U.S. adults, using a sample selected from YouGov’s opt-in online panel to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population.

HuffPost has teamed up with YouGov to conduct daily opinion polls.You can learn more about this project and take part in YouGov’s nationally representative opinion polling. Data from all HuffPost/YouGov polls can be found here. More details on the polls’ methodology are available here.

Most surveys report a margin of error that represents some, but not all, potential survey errors. YouGov’s reports include a model-based margin of error, which rests on a specific set of statistical assumptions about the selected sample, rather than the standard methodology for random probability sampling. If these assumptions are wrong, the model-based margin of error may also be inaccurate. Click here for a more detailed explanation of the model-based margin of error.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

White House Dodges Questions About Kushner's Meetings With Russians

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

White House press secretary Sean Spicer dodged questions Tuesday afternoon about President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and what Trump did or didn’t know about Kushner’s meetings last year with Russian officials.

“Mr. Kushner’s attorney has said that Mr. Kushner has volunteered to share what he knows with Congress about the meetings,” Spicer told reporters during the daily press briefing.

The Washington Post and other major outlets reported last week that Kushner and Russian officials discussed the possibility of opening up a secret channel for communications last year. But Spicer argued he could not address those claims because the stories were “unconfirmed” and based on “anonymous sources.”

Yet just a few hours before the briefing, Trump himself tweeted out a Fox News story that had no named author and was based on anonymous sources, and that also confirmed such discussions took place.

The Fox story claimed that it was Russian officials, and not Kushner, who proposed a backchannel for communications between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

When asked whether the president’s tweet meant Trump acknowledged that the backchannel discussion had occurred, Spicer dodged again. “What I just said speaks for itself,” he answered.

Fox News’ version of events, which it said came from one anonymous source “familiar with the matter,” contradicts numerous reports from news outlets including The New York Times and The Washington Post. Those reports said it was Kushner who first raised the possibility of a secret communications channel, an idea that the Russians ultimately rejected.

Kushner’s meetings have attracted the attention of the FBI in its ongoing investigation into Russian efforts to disrupt the 2016 presidential election and potential contact between Trump campaign staff and Russian officials.

Earlier this month, Trump reportedly retained a team of experienced Washington attorneys to help him navigate the ballooning investigations by the FBI and congressional committees, which have so far enveloped his former national security adviser, his son-in-law, numerous campaign officials, and as of late Tuesday morning, his longtime lawyer, Michael Cohen.

Trump fired former FBI director James Comey in late April, a decision for which the White House and the president have offered a variety of conflicting justifications. Since then, the Department of Justice has named a special counsel and the investigation has continued.

Spicer concluded the briefing on what has become a familiar point of contention between the White House and the press: namely, Trump’s frustration with the “perpetuation of false narratives” and the news media’s “use of unnamed sources.” 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.