So THAT'S What Curry Is: The Difference Between The Spice, The Leaves And the Dish

If you’re a curry fan, you may have noticed the term “curry” refers to a great many varieties of foodstuffs. It can get very confusing.

There are curry leaves. Then there’s curry, the famous spice. And then curry is also the general name of a type of stewed dish.

So before you enjoy another bowl of Thai curry soup or use another teaspoon of curry powder, it’s time you know what’s what when it comes to all things curry. We’re going to start with the basics: the leaves.

What are curry leaves? 

Curry leaves are an herb cultivated from the curry leaf tree (Murraya koenigii) and are largely used in South Indian cuisine. Do not confuse them with curry powder, which is a mixture of ground spices that may or may not contain ground curry leaves. And do not confuse the curry leaf tree with the curry plant. (The curry plant might make you think of curry, but it is in fact not edible.)

Curry leaves belong to the citrus fruit family. The leaves are glossy green and have a very powerful aroma. There’s a citrus quality to them, naturally, but also something else that’s both bitter and sweet. There are many ways to cook with curry leaves, but they are often used in a similar fashion to bay leaves ― though they’re often first fried in oil to release their flavor. 

You can find curry leaves at Indian and Asian food markets. Fresh leaves can be stored in the freezer, too. Just know: once you start cooking with curry leaves, you’ll never look back. And they are not a substitute for curry powder. Which leaves us with another question…

What is curry powder?

Curry powder can be a lot of different things. Actually, that’s exactly what it is: curry powder is a combination of a bunch of spices. A quick search for curry powder will result in pages of recipes for how to make your own. It can range from five ingredients to more than 10, and it can include spices such as: cumin, coriander, turmeric, ginger, dry mustard, fenugreek and black pepper. 

The idea of “curry powder” is a British one. (It resembles the North Indian spice mix garam masala, but it isn’t a spice mix most Indian cooks would recognize.) British manufacturers came up with curry powder in an attempt to create a ready-made flavor that could recreate the flavors of South India that British colonists came to love.

In fact, the term curry for Indian cooking is also British in origin ― they lumped all the savory, spiced Indian dishes into one category called curries. You can’t go to India and order a curry ― it just doesn’t exist.  The British word curry was likely derived from the word Kari, which is the word for sauce in Tamil, a South Indian language.   

So, what are “curries?”

Curries are what happened when the Brits invented the term and introduced it to the rest of the world. It was first used to refer to a meat or vegetable dish cooked in a spiced gravy and served with rice. As a result of trade this dish was introduced to the rest of the world and each country that adopted it made it their own.

In Japan, a curry is often a mild, sweet dish of meat, vegetables and gravy served with rice. In Thailand, curry has incorporated many of the nation’s regional ingredients ― such as fiery chiles and coconut milk ― and it is more soup-like. In Jamaica, they’re most famous for their goat curry that uses allspice and pimento. And in India, curries don’t exist. (But if you were to order a Malai Kofta, Matar Paneer, or Dum Aloo, you’d get what you probably think of as a curry.)

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=5890a65de4b080b3dad6fbc9,5671b849e4b0dfd4bcc044e9,559fc4fee4b01c2162a647f9

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump Shows Us How Disturbed Our America Actually Is

Into the Whirlwind
Cross-posted with TomDispatch.com

He’s huge. Outsized. He fills the news hole at any moment of any day. His over-tanned face glows unceasingly in living rooms across America. Never has a president been quite so big. So absolutely monstrous. Or quite so small.

He’s our Little Big Man. 

I know, I know… he induces panic, fear, anxiety, insomnia.  Shrinks in liberal America will tell you that, since November 2016, their patients are more heavily medicated and in worse shape.  He’s a nightmare, a unique monster.  It’s been almost two years since he first entered the presidential race and in all that time I doubt there’s been a moment when the cameras haven’t been trained on him, when he wasn’t “breaking news.”  (By May 2016, he had already reportedly received the equivalent in “earned media” of nearly $3 billion in free advertising.)  He and his endless controversial statements, flubs, tweets, lies, insults, boasts, tales from outer space, and over-the-moon adjectives are covered daily the way, once upon a time, only Pearl Harbor or the Kennedy assassination was.

Think of him as the end of the world as we, or maybe anyone, including Vladimir Putin, knew it.  To me, that means one thing, even though most of you won’t agree: I think we owe Donald Trump a small bow of thanks and a genuine debt of gratitude.  He’s teaching us something invaluable, something we probably wouldn’t have grasped without him.  He’s teaching us just how deeply disturbed our American world actually is, or he wouldn’t be where he is.

A Quagmire Country

Think of him as a messenger from the gods, the deities of empire gone astray.  They sent us a man without a center, undoubtedly because 17 years into the twenty-first century our country lacks a center, and a man without a fixed opinion or a single conviction, except about himself and his family, because this country is now a swirling mess of contradictory beliefs and groups at each other’s throats.  They sent us our first billionaire president who left countless people holding the bag in his various, often failed, business dealings.  He brings to mind that classic phrase “those that sow the wind, shall reap the whirlwind” just as we’re now reaping the results of the 1% politics that gained such traction in recent years; and of a kind of war-making, American style, that initially seemed aimed at global supremacy, but now seems to have no conceivable goal.  We’re evidently destined to go on killing ever more people, producing ever more refugees, cracking open ever more nations, and spreading ever more terror movements until the end of time.  They sent a man ready to build a vanity wall on the Mexican border and pour more money into the U.S. military at a time when it’s becoming harder for Americans to imagine investing in anything but an ever-more powerful national security state, even as the country’s infrastructure begins to crumble.  They sent a billionaire who once deep-sixed a startling number of his businesses to save a country that couldn’t be more powerful and yet has proven incapable of building a single mile of high-speed rail. 

Into this quagmire, the gods dispatched the man who loves MOAB, who drools over “my generals,” who wants to build a “big, fat, beautiful wall” on our southern border, but was beyond clueless about where power actually lay in Washington.

He’s a man with a history but without a sense of history, a man for whom anything is imaginable and everything is mutable, including the past.

He’s a man with a history but without a sense of history, a man for whom anything is imaginable and everything is mutable, including the past.  In this, too, he’s symptomatic of the nation he now “leads.”  Who among us even remembers the set of Washington officials who, only a decade and a half ago, had such glorious dreams about establishing a global Pax Americana and who led us so unerringly into an unending hell in the Greater Middle East?  Who remembers that those officials of the George W. Bush administration had another dream as well ― of a Pax Republicana, a one-party imperial state that would stretch across the American South deep into the Midwest, Southwest, and parts of the West, kneecapping the Democratic Party for an eternity and leaving that artifact of a two-party past confined to the country’s coastal areas.  Their dream ― and it couldn’t have been more immodest ― was to rule the world and its great remaining superpower for… well… more or less ever. 

They were to dominate America and America was to dominate everything else in a way no country in history ― not the Romans, not the British ― had ever done.  As they saw it, in the wake of the implosion of the Soviet Union, there would be no other superpower, nor even a bloc of great powers, capable of obstructing America’s destined future.  They and their successors would see to that. 

The United States would be the land of wealth and power in a previously unimaginable fashion.  It would be the land that made everything that went bang in the night ― and in that (and perhaps that alone) their dreams would be fulfilled.  To this day, Hollywood and its action films dominate planetary screens, while American arms merchants have a near monopoly on selling the world their dangerous toys.  As our new president recently put it, their energies and those of the U.S. government should remain focused on getting countries across the globe to engage in “the purchase of lots of beautiful military equipment.” Indeed.

As for the rest of their dream of geopolitical dominance, it began to come a cropper remarkably quickly.  As it turned out, the military that American presidents regularly hailed in these years as the “greatest force for human liberation the world has ever known” or “the finest fighting force in the history of the world” couldn’t even win wars against lightly armed insurgents or deal with enemies employing roadside bombs that could be built off the Internet for the price of a pizza.  The U.S. military (and its allied warrior corporations) turned out not to be a force for eternal order and triumph but, at least across the Greater Middle East and Africa, for eternal chaos and the spread of terror movements.  They were the whirlwind, which meant that neither that “pax” nor that “Americana” would come to pass.

While Rome Burned…

Meanwhile, back at home, a gerrymandered, near-one-party state did indeed come into existence as the Republicans swept most governorships, gained control of a significant majority of state legislatures, nailed down the House and the Senate, and finally, when Little Big Man entered the Oval Office, took it all.  It was a feat for the history books ― or so it briefly seemed.  Instead, the result has been chaos, thanks in part to a Republican Party that is actually three or four parties and a president barely associated with it, as a war of all against all broke out.  None of this should have been surprising, given a congressional party that had honed its skills not on ruling but on blocking rule.  In the last months, it has largely proved incapable even of ruling itself, no less the wild man and his unpredictable team of advisers in the White House.

From his “big, fat, beautiful wall” to his “big league,” “phenomenal” tax plan to his “insurance for everybody” healthcare program, the president promises to be the living proof that the long dreamed of Pax Republicana is just another form of war without end on the domestic front. 

His victory was, in a sense, a revelation that both political parties had been hollowed out, as every Republican presidential candidate except him was swept unceremoniously off stage and out of contention in a hail of insults.  Meanwhile, the Democratic Party, by now a remarkably mindless (and spineless) political machine without much to underpin it, came to seem ever more like the domestic equivalent of those failed states the war on terror was creating in the Greater Middle East.  In short, American politics was visibly faltering and, in the whirlwind that deposited Little Big Man in office, a far wider range of Americans seemed in danger of going down, too, including Medicaid users, Obamacare enrollees, meals-on-wheels seniors, and food stamp recipients in what could become a slow-motion collapse of livable lives amid a proliferation of billionaires.  Think of us as a nation in the process of consuming itself, even as our president turns the White House into a private business.  If this is imperial “decline,” it’s certainly a curious version of it.

Think of us as a nation in the process of consuming itself, even as our president turns the White House into a private business.

It was into the growing hell that passed for the planet’s “sole superpower” that those gods dispatched Little Big Man ― not a shape-shifting creature but a man without shape and lacking all fixed ideas (except about himself).  He was perfectly capable of saying anything in any situation, and then, in altered circumstances, of saying the opposite without blinking or evidently even noticing.  His recent trip to Saudi Arabia was a classic case of just that.  Gone were the election campaign denunciations of the Saudis for their human rights record and for possibly being behind the 9/11 attacks, as well as of Islam as a religion that “hates us”; gone was his criticism of Michelle Obama for not wearing a headscarf on her visit to Riyadh (Melania and Ivanka did the same), and of Barack Obama for bowing to a Saudi king (he did, too).  Out the window went his previous insistence that any self-respecting American politician must use the phrase “radical Islamic terrorism,” which he carefully avoided.  And none of this was different from, say, swearing on the campaign trail that he would never touch Medicaid and then, in his first budget, offering plans to slash $880 billion from that program over the next decade.

Admittedly, Donald Trump ― and yes, that’s the first time I’ve used his name, but there was no need, was there? ― has yet to appoint his horse (or perhaps his golf cart) as a senator or, as far as we know, commit acts of incest in the tradition of Caligula, the first mad Roman emperor.  Yet in many ways, doesn’t he feel something like an updated version of that figure or perhaps of Nero who so famously fiddled ― actually, according to historian Mary Beard in her book SPQR, played the lyre ― while Rome burned?

It could be assumed that the gods who sent him into the Oval Office at such a moment have a perverse sense of humor.

Fortunately, unlike every psychiatrist in town, I’m not bound by the “Goldwater Rule,” which prohibits a diagnosis of a public figure you haven’t personally examined. While I have no expertise in whether Donald Trump has a “narcissistic personality disorder,” I see no reason not to say the obvious: he’s a distinctly disturbed individual. That he was nonetheless elected president tells us a good deal about where we are as a country today. As Tony Schwartz, who actually wrote his bestselling book The Art of the Deal, put it recently, “Trump was equally clear with me that he didn’t value ― nor even necessarily recognize ― the qualities that tend to emerge as people grow more secure, such as empathy, generosity, reflectiveness, the capacity to delay gratification or, above all, a conscience, an inner sense of right and wrong.”

Now, that should be frightening. After all, given who he is, given his fear of “losing,” of rejection, of not being loved (or more accurately, adulated), of in short being obliterated, who knows what such a man might do in a crisis, including obliterating the rest of us. After all, he already lives in a world without fixed boundaries, definitions, or history, which is why nothing he says has real meaning.  And yet he couldn’t be more meaningful. He’s a message, a warning of the first order, and if that were all he were, he would just be an inadvertent teacher about the nature of our American world and we could indeed thank him and do our best to move on.

Unfortunately, there’s another factor to take into account. Humanity had, in the years before his arrival, come up with two quite different and devastating ways of doing ourselves in, one an instant Armageddon, the other a slow-motion trip to hell. Each of them threatens to cripple or destroy the very planet that has nurtured us these tens of thousands of years. It was not, of course, Donald Trump who put us in this peril. He’s just a particularly grim reminder of how dangerous our world has truly become.

After all, Little Big Man now has unparalleled access to the most “beautiful” weapons of all and he’s eager to update and expand an already vast U.S. arsenal of them. I’m talking, of course, about nuclear weapons. Any president we elect has, since the 1950s, had the power to take out the planet. Only once have we come truly close.  Nonetheless, for the control over such weaponry to be in the hands of a deeply unpredictable and visibly disturbed president is obviously a danger to us all.

It could be assumed that the gods who sent him into the Oval Office at such a moment have a perverse sense of humor. Certainly, on the second of those deadly dangers, climate change, he’s already taken action based on another of his fantasies: that making America great again means taking it back to the fossil-fueled 1950s. His ignorance about, and actions to increase the effects of, climate change have already taken the U.S., the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases on the planet, out of the climate change sweepstakes and into uncharted territory. These acts and the desire to promote fossil fuels in every way imaginable will someday undoubtedly be seen as crimes against humanity. But by then they will already have done their dirty deed.

If luck doesn’t hold, Donald Trump may end up making Caligula and Nero look like statesmen.  If luck doesn’t hold he may be the Littlest Big Man of all.

Tom Engelhardt is a co-founder of the American Empire Project and the author of The United States of Fear as well as a history of the Cold War, The End of Victory Culture. He is a fellow of the Nation Institute and runs TomDispatch.com. His latest book is Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World.

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Book, John Dower’s The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World War II, as well as John Feffer’s dystopian novel Splinterlands, Nick Turse’s Next Time They’ll Come to Count the Dead, and Tom Engelhardt’s Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=590f858de4b0f711807245e6,585bd2fee4b014e7c72eda79,5925a76be4b00c8df2a0e7f8

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Artist Protests 'Fearless Girl' By Installing Urinating Dog At Her Feet

The “Fearless Girl” statue ―- the one installed adjacent Wall Street’s charging bull during this year’s Women’s History Month ― has a new decrier.

Sculptor Alex Gardega told The New York Post that the proud, gangly young woman “is corporate nonsense.”

“It has nothing to do with feminism,” the artist went on. “And it is a disrespect to the artist that made the bull. That bull had integrity.”

To protest, Gardega put up a work of his own: a shoe-sized pug urinating at the girl’s ankles. Unlike “Fearless Girl” and the financial district’s renowned bull, the dog is a carefully stylized work, rather than a realistic one.

“I decided to build this dog and make it crappy to downgrade the statue, exactly how the girl is a downgrade on the bull,” Gardega told the outlet.

Gardega isn’t the first to voice concern with “Fearless Girl,” which HuffPost’s Emily Peck dubbed an example of pinkwashing. Several critics have dismissed the small Wall Street addition as a sheeny, infantilizing attempt at feminism.

The creator of the bull sculptor, Arturo Di Modica, has claimed the city violated his legal rights by permitting the statue’s placement at all. He’s suing State Street Global Advisors, the investment management firm that placed “Fearless Girl” near his work, for trademark and copyright infringement.

NY1 News reports that Gardega’s “Pissing Pug” has since been removed. “Fearless Girl” artist Kristen Visbal has yet to make a statement about the ordeal.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Alanis Morissette’s 'Jagged Little Pill' Is Getting Turned Into A Musical

You oughta know that your favorite ‘90s woman rocker is headed for the theatre.

Alanis Morissette, whose Grammy-winning album “Jagged Little Pill” you’ve probably wailed along to with a hairbrush mic, will have her album adapted into a musical next spring.

Diane Paulus ― of “Hair” and “Finding Neverland” fame ― will head up the production, and “Juno” writer Diablo Cody is writing the book.

According to a press release, Cody and Morissette are basing the musical’s story on “a modern and multi-generational family and their complex dynamics, touching on issues of gender identity and race.”

“The chemistry between all of us is crackling and I feel honored to be diving into these songs again,” Morissette said in a statement.

And yes, hits like “Ironic” and “Hand in My Pocket” will be worked into the musical, which will premiere May 2018 in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Bachelorette Told A Cheating Bro To GTFO, And It Was Glorious

Bachelorette Rachel Lindsay had to get no-nonsense with a contestant on Monday night, after Episode 2 of Season 13 revealed one suitor had been hiding a girlfriend.

Teasers made clear that the episode’s final date, a group outing to play basketball with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, would turn dramatic for all the wrong reasons when a young woman showed up claiming one of the bachelors had been dating her until his departure ― and never broke up with her.

The cad turns out to be DeMario, a contestant who first appeared on “After the Final Rose” suggesting that he and Rachel elope to Vegas on the spot. The woman who crashed the episode claimed he dated her for seven months, then simply stopped texting her three days before he met Rachel on the “ATFR” special. “He still has keys to my place,” she told the shocked Bachelorette.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Many viewers have been watching DeMario skeptically after Rachel’s friend Whitney Fransway, a fellow “Bachelor” alum, warned her on the premiere that the gentleman might not have the best intentions. But Rachel seemed torn between skepticism at his cockiness and attraction to his clever references and serious good looks.

Once his ex showed up on the scene, however, Rachel was all business. Like a good attorney, she gave DeMario a chance to defend himself as he proceeded to destroy his own case. First pretending to have never met the woman, he then admitted they’d been involved. He denied ever having had keys to her place, then admitted he did ― but claimed to have mailed them back to her. (His ex hilariously shot down this claim, retorting, “I check my mailbox EVERY DAY!”) 

“I’m not here to get played,” Rachel finally snapped. “So I’m gonna need you to get the fuck out.”

And with that, DeMario’s stint on “The Bachelorette” came to a humiliating end ― or did it? The episode ends with a cliffhanger, as he returns to the mansion to interrupt the cocktail party and plead his case.

It’s tough to imagine this womanizer getting another shot after Rachel’s tough-but-fair dismissal. But no matter what happens, we’ll always have that truly iconic send-off.

For more on the episode, subscribe to HuffPost’s “Here to Make Friends” podcast on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts!

 

 

Do people love “The Bachelor,” “The Bachelorette” and “Bachelor in Paradise,” or do they love to hate these shows? It’s unclear. But here at “Here to Make Friends,” we both love and love to hate them — and we love to snarkily dissect each episode in vivid detail. Podcast edited by Nick Offenberg.

Want more “Bachelorette” stories in your life? Sign up for HuffPost’s Entertainment email for extra hot goss about The Bachelorette, her 31 bachelors, and the most dramatic rose ceremonies ever. The newsletter will also serve you up some juicy celeb news, hilarious late-night bits, awards coverage and more. Sign up for the newsletter here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Missing Louisiana Teen's Sister: 'She Is Our Heart And We Want Her Home'

A Louisiana woman has taken to social media in a desperate effort to generate leads in the search for her missing sister.

“We miss her [and] we love her,” Lori Landry Sonnier said in a video posted to the “Finding Daisy Lynn” Facebook page on Saturday. “I don’t care what’s happened, what’s been done … she is part of our family. She is our heart and we want her home.”

Jacquelyn “Daisy Lynn” Landry, 18, was last seen on Thursday, when she left her Lafayette home to go to a friend’s house, according to Sonnier. Landry never arrived and no one has heard from her.

Lafayette’s KATC-TV 3 reported Landry’s phone is either turned off or the battery is dead. Family members say the teen has never gone this long without being in contact with them.

“We are still looking for our girl,” reads a Tuesday post on the “Finding Daisy Lynn” Facebook page. “Pray and pray hard for our baby girl and her safety.”

Landry is described as a white female, about 5 feet tall and 105 pounds, with brown hair and blue eyes. She has a tattoo of a Chinese symbol above her left breast, a small triangle tattoo on the inside of her right wrist, a burn mark above her right breast and a burn mark on the outside of her left forearm, according to the Lafayette Parish Sheriff’s Office.

Anyone with information about Landry’s whereabouts is asked to call the Lafayette Parish Sheriff’s Office at 337-232-9211 or Crimestoppers at 337-232-TIPS.

David Lohr covers crime and missing persons. Tips? Feedback? Send an email or follow him on Twitter.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=5900ca91e4b0026db1dd744a,57ad8158e4b007c36e4e2218

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Barack Obama Couldn't Look Happier Hanging Out With Prince Harry

While most of us were getting our grill on this past Memorial Day weekend, two of the world’s most popular figures were also hanging out. 

Prince Harry hosted world traveler and former POTUS Barack Obama at Kensington Palace on Saturday. The two were photographed together wearing nearly identical suit jackets and white collared shirts, a look Obama has perfected post-presidency. 

Though the two were all smiles in their photo together, Prince Harry and Obama spoke about serious topics, according to the official Kensington Palace Twitter account. 

“They discussed support for veterans, mental health, conservation, empowering young people and the work of their respective foundations,” the tweets said. “@BarackObama also offered his condolences to the victims of the Manchester attack and support for those recovering from injuries.” 

The two have met a few times over the past couple of years and it’s clear they enjoy each other’s company: 

Last year, the Obamas collaborated on a cheeky video for Prince Harry’s foundation, called the Invictus Games. The queen herself even let out a little trash talking! 

BOOM.

The HuffPost Lifestyle newsletter will make you happier and healthier, one email at a time. Sign up here.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58ca8154e4b0be71dcf1c23e,586e5e06e4b0c56eb4b73c51,585369e2e4b08debb78860c4

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

BLM Co-Founder's Ode To Black Women During Commencement Speech

Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza had a poignant message about the power of black women for the 2017 graduates of San Fransisco State University.

Garza, who completed her masters program in ethnic studies at the school, spoke on behalf of the graduates at the school’s commencement on Thursday. She dedicated her entire speech to the tireless work of black women throughout America’s history. 

In the speech, Garza praised the persistent black women who came before us, saying they are the reason why women like Garza can do the activist work of today:

“Were it not for black women, there would be no Underground Railroad, no one to campaign against black bodies swinging from trees like strange fruit, there would be no protest songs like the ones that came from the toes through the womb up through the lungs and out of the brilliant mind and mouth of Nina Simone. There would be no black women voting like the 96% of us who did vote and said hell no to this administration.

There would be no America were it not for black women. This is an ode to black women— because black women are magic.”

#SFSU graduate Commencement speaker and co-founder of Black Lives Matter Alicia Garza gives a passionate speech about powerful black women. #sfsu2017

A post shared by San Francisco State University (@sanfranciscostate) on May 25, 2017 at 10:17pm PDT

The activist recalled the words so often said to her and other black women in an effort to hold them back: “She can’t. She shouldn’t. She’s too young. She’s too smart for her own good. She’s too… disruptive.”

But Garza credited long-gone female activists with not listening to all that negativity, as now there would be no global movement for black lives. 

“We, I, you and me— we owe everything to black women,” she said. “Yes— all lives, all contributions. But this— this is bigger than all that. This is about black women, cisgender, transgender, no gender, disabled, queer, immigrant black women who time and time again keep trying to tell y’all and more than that… keep showing y’all. We are magic.”

Watch Garza’s full speech in the video above.

H/T Cassius Life

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Secret Behind The Dum Dums Mystery Flavor, Revealed

Some of life’s mysteries can’t be explained, but the mystery behind Dum Dums’ mystery flavor ― and why it’s so hard to pinpoint ― has finally been solved.

Dum Dums’ mystery flavor, which is indicated with a purple wrapper covered in question marks, is not a surprise fruit flavor, but really just a genius idea born out of a candy company’s need to save time and maximize profits. 

Rather than stop the lollipop machines to clean out a flavor while transitioning from one to the next, Akron Candy Company just continues running the machines to create a new combo flavor. That means some lollipops have a mixture of two different flavors ― and those are the lollipops that are labeled as “mystery.” 

Our friends at Eater explain it all in the video above. Watch it and learn ― but be prepared, you’ll never be able to feel the same way about eating Dum Dums again.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58dd2c9de4b08194e3b7dffa,579f93dfe4b00e7e269fff58,5720c4c3e4b01a5ebde40738,56310c47e4b0631799107ac1

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Apple hints you should wait to buy that MacBook Pro

If you needed a clue that Apple might be launching new Macs at WWDC, you just got it. Typical free shipping times for 15-inch MacBook Pro orders have slipped from same day to 3-5 business days in many countries, pushing deliveries to June 6th or lat…