Florida Just Became The Latest State To Abolish The 'Tampon Tax'

Florida just joined the growing list of states that have put an end to the so-called “tampon tax.” 

Florida Gov. Rick Scott signed a law on Thursday making feminine hygiene products including tampons, pads and menstrual cups tax-exempt, the AP reports. The law goes into effect in January.

The measure was part of a larger $180 million tax cut package. 

The majority of states across the country subject menstrual products to sales taxes because they’re considered a “luxury” item.

But opponents of the standard argue that feminine products are a necessity and that taxing them is effectively a tax on menstruation. (The Tax Foundation, the conservative-leaning non-profit, has countered that ideally, sales tax should apply to all consumer products, regardless of whether they’re a “necessity” or “luxury.”)

According to the AP, Florida now joins 13 other states that, in addition to Washington D.C., have exempt menstrual products from sales tax or do not have a sales tax at all. Measures doing away with the tax have enjoyed unusually bi-partisan support in state legislators, prompting media outlets to call them “viral legislation.” Florida, for example, is a politically purple state with a decidedly mixed record on reproductive and women’s rights ― yet the change was supported by progressive and conservative lawmakers alike.

“This common sense legislation will result in a tax savings for women all over the state who purchase these necessary products,” Sen. Kathleen Passidomo (R-Naples), who originally filed the bill, said in a press release

However, not all states have jumped onboard. California, a traditionally blue state, tried to pass such a measure last year. It failed when Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed it despite broad support in the House and Senate.

“Women have no choice but to buy these products,” said one California assemblywoman who championed the California bill.

“You can’t just ignore your period,” she added. “It’s not like you can just ignore the constant flow.”

Estimates suggest that women spend more than $18,000 on their periods over the course of their lifetime, between pads, tampons, birth control and new underwear. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Denis Johnson, Acclaimed Author Of 'Jesus' Son,' Dead At 67

Writer Denis Johnson, the author of the modern classic short story collection Jesus’ Son and National Book Award-winning novel Tree of Smoke, died on Thursday at 67.

His death was confirmed to the Associated Press by Jonathan Galassi, president of Johnson’s longtime publisher, Farrar, Straus & Giroux. Fellow writer and friend Chris Offutt also confirmed on Twitter, noting that Johnson was “at home, peaceful” when he died. 

Johnson was best-known for his 1992 Jesus’ Son, a collection of linked short stories set in a gritty realm of drug addiction, violence, and casual destruction. The stories, narrated by a young drifter named Fuckhead, drew attention for the stylishly jumbled narratives and neon-bright prose. The collection was adapted into a 1999 film starring Billy Crudup.

His 2007 novel Tree of Smoke, a hefty book about CIA operations in Vietnam during the war, won the National Book Award and was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. His novella Train Dreams, first published in the Paris Review in 2002, came out as a book for the first time in 2011. It was shortlisted for the 2012 Pulitzer Prize, but the fiction prize that year went, controversially, unawarded

Johnson’s body of work ran far deeper than his most famous titles, however; he penned plays, poetry collections, screenplays, journalistic works, and numerous novels. His last novel, The Laughing Monsters, came out in 2014 and received comparatively unenthusiastic reviews. HuffPost deemed the book, a brooding spy caper set in Sierre Leone, “a compelling read” constructed of “stripped-down, evocative prose,” yet “disappointingly underbaked.” 

A powerful inspiration to many American writers, Johnson’s reputation amongst the literati has never faded. His distinctive, arresting style and capacity for human insight can be found in stories like “Car Crash While Hitchhiking,” “Happy Hour,” and “Emergency,” and in his ongoing influence on contemporary fiction writers.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Billionaire Who Made Fortune Polluting Oceans Will Donate Wealth To Clean Them Up

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

This story is part of a series on ocean plastics.

Our oceans may have found an unlikely savior.

Norwegian billionaire Kjell Inge Røkke, who accrued his wealth in part through offshore oil drilling, announced this month that he’s donating the majority of his wealth to help save the oceans. Røkke is funding a 600-foot research yacht, which will tackle some of the most pressing environmental concerns of our time ― including how to rescue endangered species and eliminate plastic trash from our big blue seas.

“There may not be any economic rationale for the private construction of such a ship, but the case is compelling from the oceans’ point of view,” Røkke said in a statement. 

News of the research vessel comes at a time when environmental experts are growing increasingly concerned about the state of our oceans, while the public remains mostly uninterested. 

Among a number of initiatives, the Research Expedition Vessel will remove 5 million tons of plastic a day from the oceans and melt them down. Some of the plastics will be used for fuel for the ship, and those that can’t be used for other purposes will be returned to waste management facilities on land.

Experts, including the World Wildlife Fund, which Røkke has partnered with, agree that collection isn’t enough. That’s why the researchers on board the ship will also work to develop plastic alternatives and identify ways to keep plastics from entering the ocean to begin with, Nina Jensen, CEO of WWF Norway, told HuffPost. WWF works to protect endangered species and natural places.

A devastating amount of plastic gets dumped or leaches into marine waters regularly. While precise figures are challenging to nail down, one of the best estimates available says 19 billion pounds of plastic wind up in the ocean every year.

At this rate, there will be more plastic than fish (by weight) in the ocean by 2050.

Additionally, due to overfishing, pollution and other issues, more than a third of populations of marine fish, mammals, birds and reptiles have been lost since the 1970s, according to WWF. 

It’s unclear how much the construction of the REV will actually cost, but its proposed amenities and research initiatives are expansive. Outfitted with two helipads and modern laboratories, the REV will accommodate 60 scientists and 40 crew members, and it may be the largest yacht in the world when it’s delivered in 2020, according to Business Insider. 

WWF Norway will be charged with helping to develop the project and will reach out to scientific communities, among other tasks. An independent committee will be responsible for choosing projects to pursue, and researchers from all over the world will have a chance to apply.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=59104e54e4b0d5d9049dc664,590816f6e4b05c397681f20b,591c586ce4b0a7458fa49711,590c1a02e4b0104c734db229

Worth $2.7 billion, Røkke owns nearly 67 percent of Aker BioMarine, a shipping and offshore drilling conglomerate, according to Forbes. Jensen admitted that it might seem unusual for an environmental group to partner with an oil tycoon, but that such collaborations are necessary to make significant progress.

“One of Nina Jensen’s guiding principles is that the world would be a much better place if we spend more time talking to those we disagree with, rather than just spending time with like-minded people,” Heidi Katrine Bang, public relations manager at WWF Norway, told HuffPost.

WWF Norway and Røkke first began working together about a decade ago, Bang added. Though they disagree on a number of issues, including oil exploration, they will continue to have ongoing discussions about those differences, Jensen told Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten. Røkke will continue to be involved with Aker. 

We will still challenge Mr. Røkke when we disagree with him,” Jensen told Aftenposten.

In addition to conducting research, the REV will be available for private charters, which will help generate funding. It will also be used privately by the Røkke family, but it’s primary purpose will be to identify how to better protect the oceans and marine life. 

“We probably know more about outer space than the ocean space,” Røkke wrote said in a statement released by WWF. “The research vessel facilitates increased knowledge of the challenges, and for finding measures of improvement. The focus is on possibilities and solutions.” 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Enemy Of My Enemy Is My Friend: What Neo-Nazis Like About ISIS

After 18-year-old Devon Arthurs converted to a violent, fundamentalist version of Islam about a year ago, he didn’t stop posting on the white supremacist messaging board he frequented. Nor did he avoid sharing a house with three roommates, who he later told police were all neo-Nazis. 

For a time at least, these adherents of seemingly opposing extremist ideologies appeared to coexist under one roof in an upscale condominium complex in Tampa, Florida. 

Now, however, Arthurs is in jail on murder charges, one roommate is in a federal detention center on charges of possessing explosives, and the other two roommates are dead. 

Last Friday, Arthurs walked into a nearby smoke shop with a gun and held three people hostage. When police arrived, they negotiated for the release of the hostages. Several minutes later, Arthurs surrendered.

He made references to “Allah Mohammed” during his arrest, according to the police affidavit, and then led police to his apartment across the street. Inside were the bodies of two of his roommates: 22-year-old Jeremy Himmelman and 18-year-old Andrew Oneschuk. 

Arthurs later gave a full confession, according to a police affidavit, explaining that he and his two slain roommates, along with a third roommate, Brandon Russell, had all “shared a common neo-Nazi belief” until Arthurs’ conversion to Islam. The families of Himmelman and Oneschuk have strongly denied that the two were neo-Nazis.

Arthurs told police he shot Himmelman and Oneschuk because they “disrespected his Muslim faith.” He had “become angered by the world’s anti-Muslim sentiment,” the affidavit stated, and thought the murders would “bring attention to his cause.”

He also accused his roommates of plotting a domestic terror attack. When federal authorities subsequently searched the apartment, they discovered a package containing “explosive precursors” addressed to Russell, along with other bomb-making materials.

And in Russell’s bedroom, FBI agents found Nazi propaganda and a framed photo of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.  

Russell, a 21-year-old Florida National Guardsman, was later arrested in Key Largo. Court documents state that he admitted to being a leader of the same neo-Nazi group of which Arthurs had once been a member: the Atomwaffen Division. 

Earlier this week on an Atomwaffen Division message board, members mourned Himmelman and Oneschuk, posting photos of their “fallen Aryan brothers.” Many also argued that Russell should have dealt with Arthurs long ago. 

Russell, one member wrote, was “sympathetic towards Salafism,” the ultra-conservative brand of Sunni Islam Arthurs had embraced, “and its [sic] come back to ruin his life basically.”

The Atomwaffen Division is a small group, known previously to the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League only for posting racist recruitment flyers on college campuses. 

But in January a “source” close to the group spoke to Radar magazine, detailing the Atomwaffen Division’s penchant for celebrating Islamic extremism. 

The source told the magazine that the Atomwaffen Division often used the slogan “Osama was Right” and that its leader had praised Omar Mateen ― the man who massacred 49 people at a gay nightclub in Orlando in 2016 before declaring allegiance to ISIS ― as a “hero.” 

When Arthurs converted to Islam, a friend told the Tampa Bay Times, Atomwaffen Division members didn’t immediately kick him off the group’s message board, even when Arthurs listed his political affiliation as “Salafist National Socialism.” They made fun of him, but he seemed to still be largely ingratiated with the group. 

And even earlier this week, while many Atomwaffen Division members memorialized Arthurs’ alleged murder victims, at least one member of the message board appeared to condone his crime. 

“He shouldn’t have done what he did but I’m not gonna shit on him for it,” someone wrote. “Islam openly commands to kill nonbelievers if they are at war with Islam and right now the U.S. is at war with Islam so when American Kuffar die it’s nothing I’ll get upset over.” 

“Fuck off… you race traitor Muslim cunt,” another member responded. 

The administrator for the Atomwaffen Division’s message board, hosted on IronMarch.org, also made an announcement this week: “All Muslims have been isolated and ejected from the group.”

The story of a neo-Nazi in Florida converting to Islam and then embracing a violent, fundamentalist version of the religion might sound anomalous, even absurd. But experts say what happened with Arthurs isn’t unheard of.

Moreover, there’s often ideological crossover ― and even mutual admiration ― between neo-Nazis and Islamic extremists, even if many in the neo-Nazi community are rabidly Islamophobic. 

Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University at San Bernardino, pointed to the story of Ahmed Huber, a Swiss neo-Nazi who converted to Islam and was later accused by the U.S. government of funneling money to al Qaeda.

A 2002 CNN segment shows the inside of Huber’s study, where he proudly displayed photos of Adolf Hitler and Osama bin Laden. 

Levin told HuffPost that Huber, who died in 2008, embodied many of the shared ideologies of neo-Nazis and Salafist jihadis. Namely, he was anti-American, anti-Semitic, and against the meddling of Western powers in other countries. 

Then there’s David Wulstan Myatt, a prominent neo-Nazi in Britain who converted to a Salafist jihadi brand of Islam in the early 2000s.

His new religion, Myatt wrote in an essay explaining his conversion, was “the only force that is capable of fighting and destroying the dishonour, the arrogance, the materialism of the West.” 

“For the West, nothing is sacred, except perhaps Zionists, Zionism, the hoax of the so-called Holocaust, and the idols which the West and its lackeys worship, or pretend to worship, such as democracy,” he wrote.

And in February of this year, a man known only as “Sascha L.” was arrested in Germany for attempting to kill police with explosives. 

Authorities later uncovered evidence that Sascha had been a neo-Nazi, a political stance that apparently inspired him in 2013 to post paranoid videos in which he accused Muslims of trying to implement Sharia in Germany. 

Yet German authorities believe a year later he converted to a fundamentalist branch of Islam and had since been spreading symbols of the Islamic State online. 

Matthias Quent ― director of the Thuringian Center for Documentation and Research Against Group Focused Enmity at the Institute for Democracy and Civil Society in Germany  explained that “on one hand, the hate groups of the far right need the Islamist terrorism to scapegoat Muslims and to legitimize their law-and-order ideology.” 

But on the other hand, he said, neo-Nazis and radical Islamists share one major “ideological link”: anti-Semitism. 

He pointed to how members of the far-right in Germany, along with racist figures in the U.S. like David Duke, attended a 2006 Holocaust denial conference in Iran hosted by that country’s former extremist president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. 

There are also many German neo-Nazis, Quent said, who often express “sympathy” for “the unscrupulousness and the will of the islamists and their anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism.”  

This is true in the U.S. as well. In a recent Atlantic profile of Richard Spencer, the American white supremacist troll, Spencer speaks admiringly of ISIS, calling it an “identify movement” and a “grassroots movement” with its own “ideas.” 

“They’ve built themselves up fast, from nothing,” Spencer said. 

However according to Levin, the California State professor, the most unifying characteristic between neo-Nazis and Salafist jihadis might be psychological. 

“The bottom line is this: Extremism does not attract the most stable of people,” he said. “Much of the appeal of extremist ideology is not only based on doctrine but on the kind of empowerment it yields to the follower.”  

“And sometimes,” he said, as in the case of Arthurs, “you trade in one kind of extremism for another.” 

America does not do a good job of tracking incidents of hate and bias. We need your help to create a database of such incidents across the country, so we all know what’s going on. Tell us your story.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Devon Gales Was Paralyzed Playing Football. He Just Walked Again.

The word “comeback” is overused in sports, but in the case of Devon Gales, it might not be strong enough.

On Sept. 26, 2015, Gales, a receiver for the Southern University football team, became paralyzed from the waist down when he blocked the University of Georgia kicker on a kickoff return and shattered his C6 vertebra.

On Thursday, Gales posted a video of himself walking. He had help ― but wow.

“I’m on the way!” he wrote.

If you need inspiration or you’re feeling sorry for yourself, watch this clip.

Gales stood for the first time in February, Gridiron Now previously reported.

According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Gales was being treated at the Shepherd Center in Atlanta and has now moved back home to Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Here’s to more progress.

H/T Sports lllustrated

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why Trumpcare Is Giving Senate Republicans Heartburn

Very soon Senate Republicans will have to decide what to do about Trumpcare. Their choices are severely limited. 

The Congressional Budget Office has made it crystal clear that the House version of Trumpcare will cause 23 million Americans to lose their health coverage. 

Which means that unless Senate Republicans repudiate their own Congressional Budget Office (whose director they appointed), they’ll have to either vote to take away healthcare for 23 million people, or come up with their own plan. 

But if they try to come up with their own plan, they’ll soon discover there’s no way to insure those 23 million without (1) mandating that healthy people buy insurance, so that sick people with pre-existing conditions can afford it; and (2) keeping the existing taxes on rich people so that poor people can afford to buy health insurance. 

In other words, they’ll be back to the Affordable Care Act.

Some Senate Republicans will no doubt claim that the Affordable Care Act can’t be sustained in its present form because private insurers are beginning to bail out of it.

That’s an awkward argument for Republicans to make because Republicans themselves have been responsible for this problem. 

In 2010 Congress established “risk corridors” to protect insurers against uncertainties in setting the level of insurance premiums when they didn’t know who would sign up. Since then, Republicans have reduced or eliminated this backup. And the Trump Administration has done everything possible to generate even more uncertainty among insurers. 

The obvious solution is to restore this backup and reduce uncertainty, in order to attract insurers back in. 

This is surely better than repealing the Affordable Care Act and taking away health insurance coverage for 23 million people.

The only alternative is a single-payer plan – Medicare for all – that would provide universal coverage more cheaply than our present system, as embraced by most other advanced nations.

But Senate Republicans won’t get near a single payer. 

Which means, as a practical matter, they have no choice. They may wrap it up in different garb and call it by a different name, but in the end the logic is unavoidable: They’ll have to strengthen the Affordable Care Act. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Survey Shows Women Are More Worried About AHCA Than Men

A recent SurveyMonkey poll found that a majority of women between the ages of 18-64 are worried that they could be “worse off” if the Affordable Health Care Act is passed ― but men are less likely to share that opinion. 

The survey, conducted between May 15 and May 22, found that younger women between the ages of 18-34 are also more opposed to the AHCA than older women aged 36-64, with 59 percent of young women fearing they’ll be worse off with the AHCA, whereas only 49 percent of older women feel the same. That said, all women are still more worried about what the AHCA could mean for them than men. 

Less than half of men between the ages of 18-34 polled think that they would be worse off with the proposed changes ― the survey found that 44 percent of young men think that they would be worse off with the AHCA, and 39 percent of men aged 35-64 feel the same. 

The differences of opinion in gender are certainly understandable given the nature of the legislation. Under Trumpcare, the cost of pregnancy could increase by 425 percent, and sexual assault could be considered a preexisting condition, as could postpartum depression and having a C-section.  

The findings are part of an overall national disapproval of the AHCA. In fact, a recent HuffPost/YouGov poll found that the approval rate for the AHCA is at a dismal 26 percent. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Mom's Rant About End-Of-The-Year Half Days Goes Viral

The end of the school year can be a chaotic time between the teacher gifts, report cards, special events and summer planning. And then there are those half days…

This mom is not having it.

On May 23, blogger Susannah B. Lewis, aka Whoa Susannah, posted a video rant on Facebook

 “What’s the point of the end-of-the-year half day?” she asks in the video. “That just means I “half” to get up at 6:30, drag these kids out of bed, send them to school for three hours to get hyped up on sugar, high fructose corn syrup, Pixie Stix and doughnuts and cupcakes, and then I ‘half’ to go get them before the sugar high has even worn off.” 

Lewis’ video has reached over 3.6 million views. Educators and fellow parents flooded the comments section to share their same woes.

The following day, Lewis shared a photo of her son during his final half day at school. 

Best of luck, mama!

 

H/T Today

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Taiwan's Marriage Equality Ruling Brightens Outlook For LGBTQ Rights In China

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Taiwan’s decision giving same-sex couples the right to marry has proved a shot in the arm for China’s gay rights movement, but it is likely to be many years before Beijing approves similar measures, amid deep-rooted opposition in some quarters.

Until 2001, China listed homosexuality as a mental disorder, but it is not illegal to be gay. Many large cities have thriving gay scenes, although gay men and women still face a lot of family pressure to get married and have children.

China sees Taiwan as a wayward province to be brought under Beijing’s control by force if necessary, and considers its people to be Chinese citizens. Proudly democratic Taiwan has shown no interest in being ruled by China.

Wednesday’s decision, the first such ruling in Asia, cements Taiwan’s position as a beacon of liberalism in the region.

But mainstream Chinese media either ignored the decision by the island’s constitutional court, or focused on the small numbers of Taiwan protesters against it. The decision had “caused controversy,” the state-run Xinhua news agency said.

However, it was only a matter of time before China approved same-sex marriage, the English version of the Global Times, published by the official People’s Daily, said.

“The ruling proves that same-sex marriage is acceptable in Chinese culture, and is likely for the Chinese mainland to legalize gay marriage within a decade,” Li Yinhe, a sociologist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the paper.

But the far more widely read Chinese version of the paper confined its reporting to the Taiwanese side, with no direct mention of how it could affect China.

Still, the news caused a massive spike in readership of the topic on Weibo, China’s answer to Twitter, drawing millions of views and many broadly supportive comments.

Taiwan’s decision would help promote the same-sex marriage issue in China, said Li Tingting, a gender equality and gay rights activist detained in 2015 for trying to fight sexual harassment.

“This is the broad trend of the times. It doesn’t hurt anybody else,” Li, who is better known by the pseudonym Li Maizi, told Reuters.

“But the problem is society is too conservative. Many people have never had any contact with anyone gay.”

As if to underscore that view, a Chinese academic denounced the news in an open letter on the site Confucian Web, urging parents in Taiwan to move to China to keep their children from contracting AIDS.

Such attitudes were disappointing and upsetting, said Wei Xiaogang, who works for the Beijing Gender Health Education Institute on gay rights and gender issues, but he felt reaction in China had been generally positive.

“It raises the visibility of equal marriage in China, and if more places in Asia approve this, China will feel like it won’t want to be left behind,” Wei told Reuters, though he could not predict how long that could take.

Government reaction in Beijing was muted.

A spokesman for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office said he had seen the news, but referred a question on recognition of same sex marriages performed in Taiwan to the “relevant specialist department”, without offering details. (Editing by Clarence Fernandez)

 

 

 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Gina Prince-Bythewood Becomes First Woman Of Color To Direct A Super Hero Movie

Gina Prince-Bythewood is adding a historic achievement to her filmmaking career.

Deadline reported Thursday that Sony Pictures has tapped Prince-Bythewood to direct the forthcoming Spider Man spinoff film, “Silver & Black.” The film, which was originally written by “Thor: The Dark World” writer, Christopher Yost, will find Prince-Bythewood rewriting the script and becoming the first woman of color to direct a superhero movie.

Based on Marvel’s legendary Spider Man characters, Black Cat and Silver Sable, the film will follow Spider Man’s mercenary antagonist and ally (Silver Sable) and an acrobatic cat burglar (Black Cat), who has a romantic history with Spider Man, according to Marvel’s site.

Prince-Bythewood, who just directed the season finale of her Fox drama series, “Shots Fired,” will also direct the pilot for Marvel’s upcoming series “Cloak & Dagger.

Prince-Bythewood is just the latest in the growing list of black filmmakers, including Cheo Hodari Coker (“Luke Cage”), Ryan Coogler (“Black Panther”), and Mara Brock and Salim Akil (“Black Lightning”), who are also helming Marvel projects.

“Silver & Black” is scheduled to hit theaters in October 2018.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.