Google Search Will Help You Find A New Job

Finding a new job isn’t exactly the easiest thing in the world, especially in today’s economy and where a lot of jobs are starting to see robots replace humans. However if you are looking for a job, there’s a good chance you might have tried more established job seeking websites, but it seems that might no longer be necessary.

Google has announced a new feature that will be part of Google Search called “Google for Jobs”. If you’re wondering why this sounds familiar, it is because last month Google had already announced the initiative, but it looks like the feature is now ready for primetime and should be more accessible by the masses.

According to Google, “Today, we’re taking the next step in the Google for Jobs initiative by putting the convenience and power of Search into the hands of job seekers. With this new experience, we aim to connect Americans to job opportunities across the U.S., so no matter who you are or what kind of job you’re looking for, you can find job postings that match your needs.”

Now all users have to do is search for jobs on Google and it will bring up some pretty detailed results. Users can even search for jobs that are near them if they are unwilling to travel too far. Google has no plans to replace job seeking websites, and instead will be working with the likes of LinkedIn, Monster, and so on, so do check it out if you are interested in finding some new work.

Google Search Will Help You Find A New Job , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

HTC Expands The Vive’s Availability In The US

Are you thinking about getting your hands on the HTC Vive but didn’t know which retailer to get it from? This seems to have been an issue at the start where availability of the VR headset was somewhat limited, but the good news is that HTC has decided to make your life a bit easier by expanding its availability in the US.

Ultimately this means that you will be able to find more retailers online that will be stocking the headset. This includes the likes of Best Buy, Walmart, Jet, and B&H as some of the additional retailers that will be carrying the device. According to HTC Vive’s US GM Dan O’Brien, “These retailers mark a massive expansion of our online retail presence and are a testament to VR’s march toward the broader consumer market.”

He adds, “Interest in VR and Vive continues to grow. Paired with recent news with Apple, Google and Intel, we’re seeing major retailers and direct-to-consumer companies endorse Vive as the premier VR experience.” As it stands, the HTC Vive is currently the most expensive VR headset in the market at the moment, especially when you consider that its rivals, such as the Oculus Rift, recently underwent a price cut of $100.

However according to HTC, “We don’t feel the need to cut the price of Vive, as we’ve had incredible success, and continue to see great momentum in market.”

HTC Expands The Vive’s Availability In The US , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

WhatsApp Extends Support For BlackBerry & Nokia Devices

As you might have heard, about a week ago WhatsApp reminded some of its legacy BlackBerry and Nokia users that support for the app would be ending on the 30th of June. Now we can only imagine that the number of users on these older platforms probably can’t be that much, which is why WhatsApp is choosing to focus their efforts on newer devices.

However the good news is that if for some reason you are still holding onto a BlackBerry 10 or BBOS device, or a device that runs the Nokia S40 platform, you might be interested to learn that it appears that WhatsApp has extended support for both platforms to December 2017 and December 2018 respectively. This is according to Dutch website WhatsAppen (via Gadgets 360) and @WABetaInfo who noticed these changes in an update to the app.

However it is possible that the Nokia S40 platform support extension to December 2018 could be a typo, since we’re not sure if there is any reason why that particular platform would warrant an extra year over BlackBerry 10 or BBOS 7+ devices, but either way it seems that these users have at least until end of the year to keep using the app on their handsets.

There was no mention of the Nokia Symbian S60 platform so presumably that will go ahead as scheduled and support for that will end on the 30th of June.

WhatsApp Extends Support For BlackBerry & Nokia Devices , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Update To Google Allo Now Lets Users Start Duo Calls

Last year Google launched two new apps in the form of Allo and Duo. The former is Google’s new messenger platform that appears to be the consumer replacement of Hangouts, while Duo basically allows users to make video calls, and more recently thanks to an update, audio calls as well.

However both apps for the most part existed separate of each other and despite launching at the same time, don’t seem to have much to do with each other, at least until now. In a tweet by Amit Fulay, Google’s head of product for Allo and Duo, it seems that the apps are slowly starting to integrate with each other as Allo users can now start a Duo call right from within the app itself.

This means that if you decided that you’d rather voice or video call the Allo user you’re talking to right now, you won’t have to swap to the Duo app to start the call, but rather you can start it within the Allo app itself which should save users some precious seconds. It almost feels like a no-brainer feature that should have been included from the start, but we guess better late than never.

The update to the app should already be live in the Google Play Store so head on over if you’d like to get your hands on the latest version.

Update To Google Allo Now Lets Users Start Duo Calls , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Sony Xperia XZ Premium Now Available In The US

Earlier this year at MWC 2017, Sony took the wraps off their latest smartphone in the form of the Sony Xperia XZ Premium. Many were wondering if the handset would find its way to the US, especially when you consider how the US is one of the markets that Sony had previously announced that they would be reducing their focus on.

The good news is that last month it was confirmed that it would be available stateside and sure enough if you liked what you saw, you’ll be pleased to learn that the handset is now available for purchase via the likes of retailers such as Amazon. The handset is priced at $800 and it is unlocked meaning that customers won’t be tied to any particular carrier.

At the moment it is unclear if any of the major carriers plan on offering the handset via installment plans, but until then we guess this is the only option available to customers out there for now. It is a rather pricey phone, but considering that you’ll be getting specs such as a 5.5-inch 4K LCD display and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset under the hood, we guess perhaps your purchase could be justified, so head on over to Amazon if you’d like to get your hands on it.

Sony Xperia XZ Premium Now Available In The US , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Coming 2018, the Jaguar E-PACE is a new compact SUV

Jaguar is adding a new SUV to its line-up, with the Jaguar E-PACE promising both performance and compact dimensions. The smaller sports utility vehicle will join the larger Jaguar F-PACE in the automaker’s line-up, following market trends away from sedans and instead toward SUVs and crossovers. It’s proved a successful strategy for Jaguar. While stablemate Land Rover has a long … Continue reading

Senate Republicans Don't Really Care About The Loathed AHCA Process

WASHINGTON ― Senate Republicans are speeding toward a vote next week on their Obamacare replacement bill, even as GOP lawmakers can’t answer simple questions about the legislation, express frustration with the brazenly secretive and closed process, and don’t appear to have the votes yet for passage.

Republicans expected to get more details on their Affordable Care Act rewrite during a closed-door meeting Tuesday with Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price. Instead, they got more vague happy talk from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and a speech from Price on what HHS has been doing to rein in Obamacare.

With Senate Democrats badgering Republicans about how they’re ramming this bill through ― no hearings, no markups, hiding the bill from members ― some GOP lawmakers are now acknowledging that the process has been less than stellar.

When Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was asked whether this bill should be a template for lawmaking in the future, he sarcastically answered that “this is exactly the kind of legislative process our Founding Fathers had in mind,” going on to explain that he was obviously concerned the Senate may be voting on a health care bill next week that members won’t have seen.

But when reminded that he could withhold his support for the legislation until the process had improved, McCain said he couldn’t “say no to something I haven’t seen.”

It was a similar story with Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who told reporters that he’s advocated for an open process from day one. “But again,” Corker said, “when you’re dealing with things which are being done here in a totally partisan way ― which is understandable ― I mean, that’s the way reconciliation works.”

After all their complaints about the way in which Democrats passed a second part of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 ― the first part of the legislation passed with 60 votes and was the product of more than 100 hearings ― Republicans have turned around and proceeded to use a legislative process that the Senate historian says has not been so secretive nor so partisan since World War I.

And if any Republican actually cared that the Senate GOP was acting in this manner, the senator could stand up and refuse to vote for the bill until the process improves.

Conversely, part of the reason the Senate is in this procedural position is because Democrats have been clear that none of them will vote for this bill, and even with the brazen GOP attempts to shut them out of the process, Democrats have struggled to mount an effective response to the legislative railroading, resorting to stunts and dilatory tactics in hopes of blocking a bill they have not seen.

On Tuesday, Democratic Sens. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Cory Booker of New Jersey and Brian Schatz of Hawaii took a cab to the Congressional Budget Office to search for the legislation. They ended up, as they expected, empty-handed.

At a late-night Senate session Monday, Democrats decried the process on C-SPAN2, but it seemed to do little to win over their Republican colleagues or whip up the kind of outrage Republicans managed in 2010. In fact, even as Senate Republicans acknowledged the poor process, they maintained that their process was still somehow better than the Democrats’ in 2010 ― a blatant mischaracterization of how Obamacare was actually passed.

But all the GOP congressional shenanigans will be for naught if McConnell can’t get the bill through his chamber. And if McConnell really is intent on a vote next week, he will have to work expeditiously to build a coalition of 50 votes ― a coalition he doesn’t appear to have at the moment among the Senate’s 52 Republicans.

McConnell faces vote problems from both conservatives and moderates. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) have all expressed frustration with a number of provisions that they deem insufficient toward repealing Obamacare. They want a quick phaseout of the Medicaid expansion, the removal of certain regulations (like the protections for people with pre-existing conditions) to lower premiums and the abolishment of the taxes created under the Affordable Care Act. Paul has also resisted the creation of new tax subsidies to help pay for health insurance, a signal that his vote may not ever be gettable, though he and his staff have worked hard to not be written off in the negotiations.

If the three conservatives stick together, they alone have the votes to sink the Senate’s chances of an Obamacare repeal. But giving in to those demands would jeopardize many more votes from other parts of the GOP conference, and McConnell has basically said the pre-existing condition protections will not be dropped from the Senate bill as they were in the House version ― a condition for the support of many Senate moderates.

McConnell is basically gambling that he can get Paul, Cruz and Lee (or at least one of them) to accept a partial repeal as a step in the right direction, and he may, at least partially, be right. None of those conservatives has taken a hard line on what he needs at a minimum to support the bill.

Cruz repeatedly told HuffPost on Tuesday that “the most important issue” with the health care bill is that it lower premiums. “That’s my No. 1 priority on Obamacare, because it’s the biggest reason that people are unhappy with Obamacare,” Cruz said. But asked repeatedly whether he would vote against a bill that didn’t lower premiums and kept those so-called community rating provisions that ensure sick people are charged the same as healthy people, Cruz dodged the question, again and again, coming up with new ways to restate that his central focus was on lowering premiums.

That unwillingness to take a firm stance on any issue could be gamesmanship, as conservatives seek to avoid marginalizing themselves, but it also may be a recognition that they ultimately won’t be the ones who derail an Obamacare repeal.

Asked if he would really stand up to President Donald Trump on this health care bill, Cruz returned to his central focus: “From the beginning, I have been very clear with the president, the vice president and with members of both houses that our focus has to be on lowering premiums.”

Cruz’s refusal to be tied down may be a reflection of the political reality. He is up for reelection in 2018, and, despite his popularity in Texas, he faces stiff competition in Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), meaning he will need the Republican base’s support ― something that may have already been jeopardized with his up-and-down relationship with Trump.

Lee and Paul may have more latitude to vote against the president’s wishes, but they also may be withholding support just to force the legislation further to the right. As Cruz noted Tuesday, Senate GOP leadership hasn’t decided how much of the Obamacare taxes will be repealed, and it’s still in flux how fast the Medicaid expansion would be phased out. Senators desperately want a seat at the table as those questions are sorted out.

On the other side of the conference, some moderates may also be playing a similar game. From the beginning, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) has looked like one of the toughest votes to win over, and yet she has seemed more amenable in recent weeks, narrowing some of her problems with the legislation to its cuts in Planned Parenthood funding and its quicker phaseout of the Medicaid expansion. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) has also expressed similar reservations, along with some Alaska-specific issues, but she hasn’t ruled out voting for the bill.

“You don’t know until you see it, right?” Murkowski said Tuesday about specifics in the bill. “What we’re trying to do is get a health care system that’s not only good for Alaska, but it’s also good for the country.”

And then there are the concerns of other senators ― particularly the ones from states that greatly benefited from the Medicaid expansion. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) have both shown willingness to end that expansion, but they want to do it over seven years, not the three that McConnell and conservatives favor.

Just how long they would go for, and whether a shorter timeline might cost McConnell their votes, is unknown, but they, too, want a seat at the table.

Which is all to say there are many Republican senators who could potentially vote no, especially if it’s clear McConnell doesn’t have the votes. Would Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.), perhaps the most vulnerable Republican up for reelection in 2018, really vote for the bill if it’s going down?

McConnell has said he will put the bill on the floor with or without the votes. But a failed vote would almost certainly make it more difficult for senators to change their votes later ― a fact that may cause McConnell to pull the bill at the last minute next week.

Part of the reason the House was successful in passing its health care bill was that Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) didn’t force members to go on the record until leaders were sure they had the votes. In fact, one of the reasons the bill may have gotten through the House was that Democratic opposition let up after Republicans didn’t seem to have the votes, with leaders then able to speed the bill through the chamber once they had an agreement between conservatives and moderates.

In the end, that may be the real legislative template McConnell is using.

Jonathan Cohn contributed to this report.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Lenovo laptop concept flexes like a yoga mat

Lenovo isn’t done making exotic concept devices… far from it. The PC maker has unveiled a laptop concept whose centerpiece is a flexible screen that runs right up to the keyboard. It’s not joined by a hinge, it is the hinge — you’d fold it up like…

Intel gives up on competing against Raspberry Pi

Say goodbye to Intel’s Edison, Joule and Galileo compute modules. The company has unceremoniously canceled its developer kit lineup, which were meant to give it a foothold in the burgeoning Internet of Things arena, ZDNet reports. Additionally, Intel…

Twitch and Blizzard partner for broadcasts and 'Overwatch' loot

Twitch and Blizzard are teaming up in a big way this year. First up, if you’re a Twitch Prime member you’ve got some loot boxes coming your way for Overwatch. “Starting June 20th, Twitch Prime members will receive an Overwatch Golden Loot Box contain…