Nearly 200 Congressional Dems File Emoluments Lawsuit Against Donald Trump

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – More than 190 Democratic lawmakers sued President Donald Trump in federal court on Wednesday, saying he had accepted funds from foreign governments through his businesses without congressional consent in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The complaint said Trump had not sought congressional approval for any of the payments his hundreds of businesses had received from foreign governments since he took office in January, even though the Constitution requires him to do so.

The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment but has said Trump’s business interests do not violate the Constitution. The Trump Organization has said it will donate profits from customers representing foreign governments to the U.S. Treasury but will not require such customers to identify themselves.

At least 30 U.S. senators and 166 representatives are plaintiffs in Wednesday’s lawsuit, representing the largest number of legislators ever to sue a U.S. president, according to two lawmakers who are among the plaintiffs.

The Constitution’s “foreign emoluments” clause bars U.S. officeholders from accepting payments and various other gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval.

“The president’s failure to tell us about these emoluments, to disclose the payments and benefits that he is receiving, mean that we cannot do our job. We cannot consent to what we don’t know,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal, one of the lawmakers bringing the lawsuit, in a conference call on Tuesday.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_2’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Representative John Conyers, another plaintiff, added: “President Trump has conflicts of interest in at least 25 countries, and it appears he’s using his presidency to maximize his profits.”

The Justice Department declined to comment.

Similar lawsuits have been filed in recent months by parties including a nonprofit ethics group, a restaurant trade group, and the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia.

They allege that Trump’s acceptance of payments from foreign and U.S. governments through his hospitality empire puts other hotel and restaurant owners at an unfair disadvantage and provides governments an incentive to give Trump-owned businesses special treatment. 

RARE TO SUE PRESIDENT

In a motion to dismiss one such lawsuit on Friday, the Justice Department argued that the plaintiffs had not shown any specific harm to their businesses, and that Trump was only banned from receiving foreign government gifts if they arose from his service as president.

On Monday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said “partisan politics” was behind the lawsuit by the Maryland and District of Columbia officials.

Lawmakers rarely sue the president, so there are few federal court decisions the legislators can cite to prove their legal standing to bring Wednesday’s case, said Leah Litman, an assistant professor specializing in constitutional law at the University of California, Irvine.

“But the constitutional provision they’re suing to enforce gives them a role in how it’s carried out, and that gives them a powerful standing argument,” Litman said.

The lawmakers in Wednesday’s lawsuit will be represented in court by the Constitutional Accountability Center, a public interest law firm in Washington. Each lawmaker is paying a share of the legal fees from personal or campaign accounts.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

CNN's Kirsten Powers Shuts Down Ex-Trump Aide’s Sexist Dismissal Of Kamala Harris

A former aide to President Donald Trump got schooled live on CNN after his sexist dismissal of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).

Jason Miller, now one of Trump’s in-house surrogates at the network, accused Harris of “hysteria” for her dogged line of questioning during Tuesday’s testimony from Attorney General Jeff Sessions before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

CNN political analyst Kirsten Powers wouldn’t let him get away with it. 

“How was Sen. Harris hysterical?” she asked on “Anderson Cooper 360” on Tuesday night. “I don’t really understand that. I mean, she was asking some tough questions.”

Miller claimed Harris’ questions amounted to a “completely partisan screed.”

POWERS: “But how was that hysterical?”  

MILLER: “From my perspective ― my, I would say, objective perspective ― I mean it was … it didn’t seem like there was any effort to try to get to a real question or get to the bottom of it.”

POWERS: “I think she asked a lot of questions, actually. She was very dogged, there’s no question, but I wouldn’t say she was any more dogged than Ron Wyden [D-Ore.] was, would you? Would you say that?”

MILLER: “Look, I have my opinion on that. I think she was hysterical. I don’t think that Sen. Wyden was really trying to get to the bottom of answers either.

POWERS: “But he wasn’t hysterical and she was. OK, I just wanted to clear that up. Got it.”

Another CNN Trump surrogate, Jeffrey Lord, eventually jumped in to claim that “hysteria is a neutral quality.”

Powers wasn’t having any of that, either. 

“And yet it’s just women that usually are called hysterical,” she said. 

“Hysteria” has historically been used to dismiss women going back to the word’s Greek root, which means “uterus.” 

See the full exchange, posted online by Media Matters, above. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Uber board member resigns after making a sexist remark

Are you familiar with David Bonderman? If not, you might now remember him as the Uber board member who resigned because he made sexist remark during a meeting meant to address the company’s toxic, misogynistic culture. At the meeting, board member Ar…

Galaxy S8 Active might be close, pops up at Geekbench

While rumors claim that the Galaxy Note 8 might just be two months away, a different somewhat flagship smartphone might actually be closer. While Samsung has thankfully stopped making half a dozen “spinoffs” of its flagship brand, it still hasn’t thrown in the towel when it comes to its “Active” line of smartphones. Yes, there will apparently also be a … Continue reading

Sony's fantastical Toio cubes combine robotics with papercraft

Sony’s made some endearingly offbeat electronic toys over the years — looking at you people who gave your Aibos funerals. The company’s newest addition to its crowdfunding site, First Flight, is likely to evoke the same response. Say hello to the To…

Google Might Have Sold Over 1 Million Pixel Handsets

Over the years with the various release of Nexus devices, Google has never really been one to share how many units they’ve sold, and without fail every year we will get a new Nexus handset. Some have been well-received, some not so much, but for the first time ever we could be getting an idea of how well the Google Pixel handsets have been sold.

In a report from ArsTechnica, it seems that what gave away the sales figures was the install figures for the Pixel Launcher on the Google Play Store. It has been noted that the Pixel Launcher is an exclusive to the Pixel phones, which means that the number of installs on the Play Store should roughly equate to the number of units sold, which right now is sitting at the 1,000,000-5,000,000 mark.

The Play Store doesn’t give us an exact figure so take it with a grain of salt for now, but given that the app recently crossed into the 1,000,000 mark, it is safe to say that Google has sold at least 1 million units of the Pixel phones. Of course whether or not this is an accurate figure remains to be seen, but like we said this is the first time that we have a rough idea of how well Google’s smartphone efforts are going, but what do you guys think? Does it seem pretty accurate?

Google Might Have Sold Over 1 Million Pixel Handsets , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Apple’s Chipset Architect Is Now Leading Google’s SoC Efforts

Apple has never been one to shy away from trying to make their own hardware, presumably because this cuts down on being dependent on third-party companies, as well as allowing them a greater degree of control on how their hardware and software works with each other. This has resulted in the A-series of chipsets found in iPhones and iPads.

However it seems that Apple could have lost one of their key architects in the form of Manu Gulati, who in a report from Variety has apparently left Apple to work for Google and will now be leading Google’s own SoC efforts. This was confirmed by Gulati’s public LinkedIn profile in which his new job listed is for the lead SoC architect at Google.

This also highlights how it appears that Google is interested in making their own chipsets. Google has been relying on third-party chipsets for the longest time ever, such as Qualcomm in which quite a few Google Nexus and Pixel products are found to be powered by Qualcomm’s technology.

We’re not sure when Google will ever debut a device that will be powered by their own chipsets, but perhaps the shift from the Nexus to Pixel branding, as well as certain Pixel-exclusive features, could be a sign of things to come, but either way it’s just something we’ll have to wait and see if it comes to fruition.

Apple’s Chipset Architect Is Now Leading Google’s SoC Efforts , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

A Fully Specced Out iMac Pro Could Cost You $17,000

At WWDC 2017 last week, Apple took the wraps off a new iMac aimed at professional users in the form of the iMac Pro. The idea is that this would be a very powerful iMac desktop that offered up the processing and graphical power that professionals might need in the form of an all-in-one desktop.

As expected the iMac Pro does not come cheap with Apple revealing that the base model would be priced starting at $4,999. The base model is already pretty powerful, but we suppose there are some who might require something a bit more, so the question is if we were to fully spec out the iMac Pro, how much would it cost? According to the folks at ZDNet, it could set you back a whopping $17,000.

Note that Apple has yet to reveal the processor that they will be using for the iMac Pro, so ZDNet is basing their estimates on the Intel Xeon E5-2697. They have also factored in things like how much of a markup Apple could charge, and are also basing things like RAM upgrades on how much Apple is charging right now for existing devices.

Based on all their calculations, they have estimated that the total cost of a fully specced out iMac Pro would cost customers $17,299. Note that this is an estimate which means that it might not be 100% on the mark, and it could less or more at the end of the day. Exactly who will need or pay for such a machine remains to be seen, but chances are it will be a fairly niche market. The iMac Pro is currently set for a release in December, so we will have to wait until then to see how accurate these estimations are.

A Fully Specced Out iMac Pro Could Cost You $17,000 , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Mario Kart VR Will Be Finding Its Way Into A Japanese Arcade

In recent times we’re starting to see more gaming developers give existing franchises a VR makeover. For example during E3 there were announcements like DOOM: VFR, Fallout 4 VR, and Skyrim VR, all of which are based on existing titles. Now it looks like Mario Kart could also be getting the VR treatment.

Bandai Namco has recently launched a trailer for its VR Zone Arcade in Shinjuku, Japan where based on its trailer, it looks like one of the VR games that is being offered is Mario Kart where gamers will be able to enjoy the game using a HTC Vive VR headset while sitting inside a Mario Kart replica.

Not much is known about the game at the moment, although judging from what we can tell, gamers will be able to use the motion controls of the HTC Vive to perform actions in the game, such as launching attacks at other players. In a way it is surprising to see Mario Kart arrive for VR as Nintendo hasn’t really said much about it.

That being said, there were some rumors about the Nintendo Switch supporting VR, but Nintendo hasn’t really mentioned anything about that yet. Also with the launch on the HTC Vive, we have to wonder if the game could eventually find its way outside of the arcade, but until then we guess the only way you’ll be able to play it is in Japan.

Mario Kart VR Will Be Finding Its Way Into A Japanese Arcade , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Office For Mac 2011 Runs Into Problems With macOS High Sierra

If you’re looking to use Microsoft’s Office for Mac 2011 suite of productivity apps with the latest version of macOS High Sierra, you might be disappointed to learn that you could run into some performance issues. In a report from AppleInsider, it has been discovered that Office for Mac 2011 will not play nicely with the latest version of macOS.

This is actually something that Microsoft has noted as well in a support document that they have not tested Office for Mac 2011 in High Sierra yet, and that support for the 2011 version will also be coming to an end on the 10th of October, 2017. “Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and Lync have not been tested on macOS 10.13 High Sierra, and no formal support for this configuration will be provided. All applications in the Office for Mac 2011 suite are reaching end of support on October 10th, 2017.”

In AppleInsider’s testing, they found that when using the latest version of Office for Mac 2011, they noticed that there was a lot of crashing, user interface oddities, and that uninstalling and reinstalling the apps did not seem to help. Like we said, ultimately this means that if you do plan to upgrade to High Sierra, you might want to consider the newer versions of Office for Mac.

That being said, AppleInsider also noted that the latest build of Office for Mac 2016 isn’t quite perfect either as they did run into some issues, but nowhere quite as bad. However it is more than likely that Microsoft will eventually sort this out for when High Sierra is released later this year.

Office For Mac 2011 Runs Into Problems With macOS High Sierra , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.