House Intelligence Committee To Subpoena Trump’s Lawyer And Former National Security Adviser In Russia Probe

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― The House Intelligence Committee approved subpoenas for President Donald Trump’s personal attorney and his former national security adviser on Wednesday, as part of the panel’s ongoing investigation into Russian election meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign.

The subpoenas are part of an effort by congressional investigators to obtain testimony, personal documents and business records from Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn, and their business firms.

“We hope and expect that anyone called to testify or provide documents will comply with that request, so that we may gain all the information within the scope of our investigation,” Reps. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the two members leading the investigation, wrote in a statement. “We will continue to pursue this investigation wherever the facts may lead.”

Flynn, who resigned from his position as national security adviser in February after The Washington Post revealed that he had mischaracterized his conversations with Russia’s ambassador, is facing subpoenas from the Senate Intelligence Committee for a separate Russia probe. Flynn has resisted cooperating with those subpoenas, citing his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. 

Schiff told reporters last week that the committee was preparing to subpoena Flynn after he declined to voluntarily turn over documents requested by congressional investigators. “The Fifth Amendment right not to provide materials or documents is limited,” he said last week.  

Cohen told CNN on Tuesday that he would testify if he were subpoenaed.

The committee also approved subpoenas seeking information on requests made by former Obama administration officials to unmask the names of individuals mentioned in classified surveillance reports, the Wall Street Journal reported. The subpoenas reportedly focus on requests made by former national security adviser Susan Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan and former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power. 

Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) alleged earlier this year that former Obama administration officials improperly unmasked the names of Trump surrogates last year as part of an effort to spy on the campaign. Nunes was never able to substantiate those claims, which appeared to be based on documents supplied to him by the White House. He stepped down from heading the Russia investigation earlier this year, but maintains his position as chairman of the committee. Nunes still has a say in deciding which subpoenas the committee issues as part of its Russia probe, CNN reported last week. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Margaret Atwood And Other Library Heroes Are Teaming Up To Help The NYPL

Speculative fiction queen Margaret Atwood has done so much great work, and she’s getting recognized more and more these days. She’s lending her newly heightened cachet to a worthy cause: Encouraging New York Public Library patrons to sign a petition in support of continued funding for the city’s libraries.

In an letter headlined “There are no public libraries in The Handmaid’s Tale’s Gilead,” Atwood drew a clear line between access to books and having a free and open society:

There are an infinite variety of tyrannies and dystopias, but they all share one trait: the ferocious opposition to free thought, open minds, and access to information. Where people are free to learn, to share, to explore, to feel and dream, liberty grows.

This is why the library matters so much. It is a democratizing and liberating force like none other.

Hear hear.

“It’s no coincidence,” she added, “that there are no public libraries in the dystopia I wrote about in my novel The Handmaid’s Tale.” For those who have been eagerly binging on the foreboding Hulu adaptation of her book, that comparison is chilling.

Atwood’s letter is part of a letter-writing campaign, headed by literary luminaries including Malcolm Gladwell and Junot Diaz, urging the city to allocate more funding in 2018 for New York City public libraries, Brooklyn Public Library and Queens Public Library: $34 million in additional operating funds and $150 million in capital funding. The requested funding would be used, respectively, to expand library services (even keeping some branches open all week) and to perform necessary maintenance, according to the NYPL. 

All too often, local governments target libraries for budget cuts at the expense of the mission of providing accessible education and literacy to the public. In the midst of all the political chaos today, Atwood and her fellow literary advocates remind us, we can’t lose sight of the power of free access to learning and literature.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58e7de23e4b058f0a02f0adb,58eb8840e4b00de141050bef,591db7d6e4b094cdba51e629,58fb7c79e4b00fa7de14c20c,58e65ba3e4b06a4cb31002e5,58ef93ece4b0bb9638e1fcb5,58d916f1e4b03787d35a6294,58bf30a7e4b0d1078ca1f754

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump Quitting Paris Climate Deal Is About Ideology, Not Business

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Quitting the Paris Agreement, as President Donald Trump is reportedly poised to do this week, will have steep political and economic costs.

But for an embattled president, it does do one thing: It fulfills a campaign promise popular with his base.

If Trump does indeed pull the U.S. from the deal, the country will join Syria and Nicaragua as the only nations not to ratify the historic accord. The U.S. took a lead role in brokering the agreement, and leaving it would be a deeply isolationist move that could weaken the nation’s bargaining power in other agreements.

As the U.S. retreats, China is primed to become the new moral leader on this issue. Earlier this month, President Xi Jinping announced a $900 billion fund to invest in infrastructure and clean energy projects abroad.

The economic consequences could be worse. The United Nations estimates that the U.S. stands to lose jobs in the rapidly growing clean energy industry ― estimated to be worth $6 trillion by 2030 ― to Europe, India and China. Countries that tax emissions may put tariffs on American-made imports. And big companies that expect the U.S. to eventually regulate carbon are likely to see ditching the deal as delaying the inevitable, while also sowing the sort of instability that investors don’t like.

The decision would also defy the desires of many major corporate and fossil fuel interests. Oil giants including Exxon Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell have pleaded with the administration to stay in the deal, as have coal producers and corporate behemoths such as Walmart, General Mills and DuPont, all of which operate internationally.

The deal is popular with the public. Sixty-one percent of Americans say the U.S. should stay in the deal while just 17 percent support backing out, according to a HuffPost/YouGov poll taken this month. Even ousted Fox News pundit Bill O’Reilly urged Trump to keep the U.S. in the pact last November.

But by canceling the deal, Trump will make good on a 2016 pledge, appeasing ardent supporters and a small group of donors. He’d also win the approval of a handful of congressmen who made their names railing against widely accepted science.

“What we’re seeing is Trump being true to what got him elected, which is playing to a particular segment of the population,” said former Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.), the executive director of the conservative environmental advocate RepublicEN. “He’s dancing with those who brung him. That’s the one thing that I think he understands.”

It’s unclear whether, or when, Trump will announce plans to withdraw. The country cannot officially begin the process of pulling out until November 2019 under the terms of the deal.

Taking the U.S. out of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change would be the fastest and most drastic way to scrap the Paris Agreement, as it would completely withdraw the country from international talks on global warming. Trump instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to draft plans to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, but said nothing of the UNFCCC, according to a report Wednesday from the London-based nonprofit Responding to Climate Change.

Trump has already axed policies that are key to meeting the U.S. targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris Agreement, and outlined plans for an aggressive increase in fossil fuel production over the coming years. The voluntary accord obliges its signatories to come together every five years to set new, more ambitious goals in hopes of capping global warming at no more than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above pre-industrial temperatures. Withdrawing cements the fact that the U.S. will go it alone, come what may.

“I see this as mostly an exercise in honesty,” said Josiah Neeley, director of energy policy at the conservative think tank R Street Institute. “It would have been inauthentic for the administration to stay in. It’s not true to them, it’s an honest assessment of where they want to go and what the country is going to do regardless.”

Deciding whether the nation should leave the accord split the White House into two camps.

In a twist, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson reportedly acted as one of the “adults” in the Cabinet, advocating for pragmatic market incentives to reduce emissions, such as a tax on carbon. Tillerson is an authority on climate policy from his nearly four decades at Exxon Mobil, and the company is a top funder of climate science denial.

Behind Tillerson was Energy Secretary Rick Perry, who had seen the success of wind energy during his time as Texas governor; Defense Secretary James Mattis, who understood the security concerns unfettered global warming pose to the military; United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, who as South Carolina governor courted wind energy giant General Electric to her state; National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn, a former Goldman Sachs executive who knew the value of hedging bets on climate science; and Ivanka Trump, the president’s eldest daughter who Politico named the “climate czar” last year because of her plans to champion the science behind global warming. 

The side that opposed the climate deal took a more radical, ideological approach fueled by the belief that the overwhelming consensus among climatologists that the Earth is warming due to human activity is a conspiracy.

One of the foremost advocates for withdrawal appeared to be chief strategist Steve Bannon, a doctrinaire nationalist skeptical of global alliances like the United Nations and the European Union. The withdrawal camp also included EPA chief Scott Pruitt, who in his previous post as Oklahoma’s attorney general sued the agency more than a dozen times and cultivated such close ties to a gas company that he once allowed its lawyers to send a complaint to the EPA under his letterhead.

They were joined by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who has said it is unfair for the U.S. to fund renewable energy development in poor countries based on a theory; a handful of House Republicans; and 22 GOP senators who said staying in the Paris Agreement made the administration vulnerable to lawsuits by environmentalists.

Asked to ascribe motivations to that group, George Frampton, co-founder of the Partnership for Responsible Growth, a D.C.-based conservative group advocating for a carbon tax, chortled: “You want me to psychoanalyze Steve Bannon?”

“It’s a refusal to engage in the fact that we are in a global economy and a set of global relationships,” Frampton said. “Working together with other countries on climate change is actually a tremendous economic and competitiveness opportunity. But in the same way that they don’t see working with allies on a lot of other things is in our best interest and represents leadership, they don’t see applying the same lesson to climate change.”

By leaving the Paris Agreement, Trump plays to a handful of “thought leaders on the right,” said Joseph Majkut, director of climate policy at the libertarian think tank Niskanen Center.

“The America-first, nationalistic narrative is satisfied by pulling out of the Paris Agreement, which is a non-binding, cooperative agreement,” Majkut said. “There’s no real policy win that comes of this. It’s purely a political symbol.”

Early in any administration, the narrative of achieving campaign promises can be a grounding force, particularly for a White House faced with the high-profile failures. The House bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act has paltry public support and could be difficult to pass in the Senate. And Trump’s temporary ban on travelers from several Muslim-majority countries has been struck down by every judge it has come before.

“It’s easy to see him viewing this as a victory,” Majkut said. “He stumbled in achieving a lot of campaign promises, this is one that doesn’t require congressional consent, and a judge can’t get in the way.” 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=592dae29e4b0c0608e8bb885,5922e848e4b094cdba55ba51,592ddb6ae4b055a197cdea89,591f1134e4b03b485cb119cf,5909ee4ce4b02655f842f072

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A CALL TO MEN: Honoring the Next Generation of Manhood

One of the most common misconceptions about feminist work is that it is a movement solely for and about women and that men are excluded as allies or beneficiaries. But in truth feminist issues are not just “women’s issues,” they are human issues. Ultimately it is about the right of each of us to embrace our full humanity, reach our full potential, and be our authentic selves. And this mandate includes men and boys, who are just as harmed by destructive, limiting gender roles and stereotypes, as well as the belief that somehow women are inferior. We see evidence of this playing out in many disturbing ways in our culture, in how society and the media encourage and glorify “masculine” qualities like aggression, domination, and violence, and how if boys show emotion, they are often called a “sissy” or told to “toughen up” or to “be a man.” Not only do these messages take a toll on a boy’s or man’s personal sense of self and life experience, but they negatively affect all those around him, whether through cultivating sexist attitudes and behavior or perpetrating acts of violence and sexual violence, which are now manifesting in epidemic proportions. To address societal ills like sexism, discrimination and violence against women, feminist work must not only come to the aid of those who are affected and victimized, but also focus on prevention by addressing harmful societal and cultural norms that are often the root cause.

Men are becoming increasingly aware of and concerned about these forces in our society and are looking to break free and speak out against them (see my previous piece, Activist Men React to Locker Room Talk). We need to support this growing movement and create even more awareness about the increasing numbers of men and organizations (and women as allies) who are working to create a different culture.

A CALL TO MEN has pioneered this work by educating men all over the world on “healthy, respectful manhood.” Founded by Tony Porter and Ted Bunch in 2002, A CALL TO MEN is an internationally recognized violence prevention organization and a respected leader on issues of manhood, male socialization and its intersection with violence, and preventing violence against all women and girls. One of its latest initiatives, the LIVERESPECT curriculum, empowers middle and high school boys to better understand healthy versus unhealthy relationships and make better decisions for themselves and those around them. Recent research shows that schools that implement the LIVERESPECT curriculum find measurable changes in attitude and awareness, leading to decreased incidents of dating violence, sexual assault, bullying and homophobia.

I was fortunate to be able to attend an anniversary gala last week in New York City, where supporters came together to celebrate 15 years of A CALL TO MEN’s work and inspiring vision: to create a world where all men and boys are loving and respectful and all women and girls are valued and safe. The event was headlined by actor and activist Matt McGorry, and emceed by MSNBC Anchor Richard Lui. It honored “the Next Generation of Manhood” and other champions on these issues, including political activist and feminist organizer Gloria Steinem, Joe and Alice Torre, chairman and president of the Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation, and Alan Gardner, senior vice president, human resources, Verizon Communications.

I had the pleasure of speaking to some of those in attendance about what they value most about A CALL TO MEN’s work, how they view the changing role of being a man today, and how women can create space for men doing this work.

Here are some select excerpts from my conversations with Tony Porter, Gloria Steinem, Matt McGorry and Gwen Wright.

Tony Porter, CEO, A CALL TO MEN

Marianne Schnall: As you look back on the past 15 years, what are you most proud of about A CALL TO MEN’s work?

Tony Porter: Before 1994, when VAWA got signed, there weren’t many men involved at all. If you were in law enforcement, women would engage in you. If you were a lawmaker, women would engage in you. Maybe you can work in a batterer’s program, but there weren’t many places for men. It was purely seen as a women’s issue and we weren’t doing prevention work. We had our hands full holding the men accountable and providing services for those who’ve been victimized. So when we started talking about prevention, it was new and it wasn’t widely accepted. Women approached it with great caution and suspicion for all the obvious reasons. To be here tonight—15 years later—surrounded by actors, athletes, leaders in business and philanthropy, it’s no longer abnormal for men to be in this space. We have come from a time where there were two or three other men in the audience, to now—this is huge.

MS: What do you see as the organization’s most critical work going forward?

TP: Our most important work right now is engaging men to work with boys. For example, we have our LIVERESPECT curriculum in schools across the country where coaches and teachers can reach boys with messages of equality and respect in middle and high school.

I was visiting one of the schools in South Bend, Indiana, and I sat in on a curriculum session with a group of sixth-grade boys. They were talking about the “objectification of women.” [laughs] I know six weeks before they started the class, they did not know what objectification of women meant! But now, I’m listening to these 12-year-old boys talking about the objectification of women, that these are things we have to stop and change. That’s the stuff that’s really, really exciting me.

We also work a lot with coaches and mentors to do the same thing—fight the constant onslaught of negative messages that society throws at our young boys that tell them women and girls are property, that they have less value, that they are sexual objects.

In all the places we can, we want to show men how they can infuse messages of healthy, respectful manhood, gender violence prevention, challenging these rigid social norms, and helping our boys by creating space for them to be okay with their authentic selves.

MS: How can we engage more men in this work?

TP: When we started talking about healthy, respectful manhood, we opened the doors for men to get involved in a meaningful way. As we promote healthy, respectful manhood, we decrease violence and discrimination against all women and girls. And by incorporating the conversation in manhood, we allow men to have a voice. So we’re creating that space by broadening the scope. A big part of our work is with men who have influence and men who have platforms, really engaging them to become the voice and understanding that they can talk about healthy manhood. So at the end of the day, men might not even know they’re doing domestic and sexual violence prevention, because they are talking about being healthy men, but the two are inextricably linked.

Gloria Steinem, lecturer, writer, political activist and feminist organizer, honored with A CALL TO MEN’S Envisionary Award

Marianne Schnall: You’re being acknowledged tonight as being one of the champions of this organization and this cause. Why do you value and support the work of A CALL TO MEN?

Gloria Steinem: First of all, it’s always been about escaping gender prisons and race prisons and becoming unique humans and also sharing our humanity. And it’s not always as easy for people in a position that’s supposedly privileged to give up privilege. And actually, it should be, because, I mean, I don’t want to be just with white people, and men don’t want to be just with men. But I think because men, in a way, have more choice and choose not to take privilege, that they deserve our gratitude especially.

MS: What do you see as A CALL TO MEN’s greatest accomplishments over the past 15 years?

GS: I think each male human being who grows up because of A CALL TO MEN knowing that he can be a whole human being and not be stuck in a gender prison is the triumph, because then he will be a model to others. He’ll raise his own children, and the children will grow up knowing that men can be nurturing. He will not perpetuate violence against females that is the only way to keep the extreme of gender going—so it’s the root of everything from human relationships to world peace.

MS: This event honors the next generation of manhood. How do you see the role of manhood changing?

GS: I think probably the most fundamental is men being raised to raise children, whether they have children or not, because that is how they develop all those qualities that are wrongly called feminine. I mean you and I as little girls and young women were more or less trained to be patient and pay attention to detail and be kind and empathetic—and boys need that too. And women need to be in the world and also express ourselves as ambitious, as dreamers, and as all the things that are wrongly thought of as masculine.

MS: I can’t help but acknowledge we are witnessing an extreme version of masculinity exhibited in our president right now…

GS: Yeah. Well, I think the election of Trump was a perfect storm of different forces. Among the biggest forces—and referred to by the code of “Make America Great Again”—is going back to an old race and sex hierarchy. He, of course, who in no way measures up to anybody’s idea of masculinity, is therefore especially obsessed with masculinity and has always been a racist. He and his father were convicted of massive discrimination in their housing projects by the Civil Rights Commission of the Justice Department long ago and have continued to practice racism. So I do think “Make America Great Again” is a code for let’s go back to the old hierarchy again.

MS: As you know, Feminist.com and I have an initiative with Michael Kimmel and his Center called Women & Men as Allies, inspired by our belief that men need to be included in feminist work. In my opinion, this needs to happen much more than it does. How can—and should—feminist women create space for men in this work?

GS: Yes, of course! The whole idea is we create space for each other by being whole people and reaching out to others as individuals and by doing each other the favor of telling the truth and expecting others to tell us the truth and naming injustice or hurts as they come along so we can heal them.

MS: Is there a call to action for men tonight?

GS: One call to action would be just to imagine that they were exactly the same person with the same humor and faults and talents and everything, and were born female. What would their lives be like? That’s the key to empathy, and it’s the key to empathy for me too. Imagine what would my life be like if I were born male or born a person of color—there’s nothing more important than empathy. And as an assumption of empathy, simple kindness.

Matt McGorry, Actor and Activist, Gala Keynote

Marianne Schnall: Why do you value and support the work that A CALL TO MEN does?

Matt McGorry: I think it’s important because it’s a conversation that’s not happening often enough. It took 28 years of my 31-year-old life to really first be introduced to a lot of these concepts. And I think I grew up in a fairly progressive liberal household and have been a part of theater and the arts for a long time where we theoretically tend to be more liberal and “in touch” with our feelings and things like that. But it really wasn’t until a couple of years ago that I started becoming aware of them in a very conscious way, and it really sort of changed my own life. And I’ve realized how important it is, that I don’t want men to be going through their lives not having had these conversations, in many cases for the sake of women and girls and gender non-conforming people, but also for the sake of men in our own humanity, in our own goodness. Without these principles, I don’t feel like I can be the best person that I can be.

MS: This event honors the next generation of manhood. Is manhood going through changes? What do you see as the role of a man today?

MM: I’d like to think it’s going through changes. I think these conversations are becoming more commonplace. From my understanding, the way it sort of seems when you’re in it is it never quite seems fast enough—we’re always sort of focused on creating the next thing and creating the next shift and getting to the next goal. But even in my own life, I’ve seen my friends and the people that I know changing with these conversations we’ve been having, and that for me is in some ways some of the most rewarding parts of the work: to really see those changes up close and personal. Regardless of the fact that I might be a public figure—just literally doing the thing that I’m asking other men to do and seeing the rewards in my life and how that starts to shift the culture.

As far as the future goes, I think there’s going to be a lot more of elevating this issue. I think, obviously, with what’s going on in Washington now, this is such an important time to be having this conversation. The conversation about what it means to be engaged in “locker-room” talk and even to be the Billy Bush and on his side of it and to really think, like, how many times have we been in situations where we’re sort of silent or supporting someone in inappropriate behavior and comments? Now that this has sort been unearthed in a way for a lot of men, I think it’s time to really dig in and sort of parse apart what we have.

MS: What is your call to action for men tonight?

MM: I think in many ways, it’s to understand that thinking that we’re not a part of the problem is not the same as being a part of the solution. Being a “good guy” doesn’t take us out of what I feel is the obligation to actively be creating a shift.

It’s funny, after spending 28 years of my life not knowing anything about this, you start to look back and really see some of the ways that—even being what I would consider a “good guy”—you have holes in your own logic and the things that you think simply by growing up in a culture that is sexist and racist and all the other things. Things are normalized, right? If they weren’t normalized, we’d be asking ourselves all the time as men, “How the fuck is it possible that violence against women is in epidemic proportions?” So part of that is de-normalizing what we see all around us and understanding that it doesn’t have to be this way, and we can and should be a part of changing that. So I think for me, that’s really what it is. It’s moving from a place of passivity to understanding that being non-sexist is not the same as being anti-sexist. And educating ourselves and understanding that by virtue of seeing my life through the eyes of a man, there are going to be large gaps in understanding and that I have to do the work of really educating myself on those issues, which allows me to have a little more perspective that I can bring in to my groups of male friends, and the men that I know, and my followers and everyone else.

Gwen Wright, executive director of the New York State Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence, served for ten years as president of the board of directors of A CALL TO MEN

MS: Why do you value and support the work that A CALL TO MEN does?

Gwen Wright: I value and support their work because I have a son. My son is now 34, married, and has two kids. His youngest is a 20-month-old little boy. When I first started doing this work 30 something years ago, I really didn’t think a lot about men’s engagement or working with men or anything. And then I realized as my son was getting older that there needed to be a new paradigm for him that wasn’t the paradigm that I grew up with. And I knew Tony and Ted, and when they were starting A CALL TO MEN, they reached out to me and said tentatively, “This is our thought. Do you want to be involved?” And I said, “I will, but I will step in cautiously, because I don’t know where this is going, and I don’t know what’s going to happen.” And I think we created something miraculous.

MS: This event honors the next generation of manhood. How do you see the role of a man today? Is it changing?

GW: Well, again, I kind of relate it to my son. My son is a very different man than my father or my brother. And by that I mean that he is very much committed and connected to his children and how they are raised, and he’s very much committed to an anti-sexist way of living his life. So it is a constant conversation that he and his wife have. And his friendship network has to match. So I think that for the next generation, A CALL TO MEN is providing a new way of living, and that’s what I appreciate.

MS: How can—and should—feminist women create space for men in this work?

GW: That was my challenge, but I think that the way that we could and the way that we should is to recognize that we share this world. And in order for us to have true freedom, we have to engage with men to support that effort. We can’t do it on our own. If we’re all here on the one side doing it, and they’re still doing their own thing, it just cuts us off at the knee, so I think that we have to engage if we truly want freedom.

To learn more about A CALL TO MEN’s work, visit www.acalltomen.org.

***

Marianne Schnall is the founder of What Will It Take Movements, a media, collaboration, learning, and social engagement platform that inspires, connects, educates and engages women everywhere to advance in all levels of leadership and take action. She is also a widely-published journalist whose writings and interviews have appeared in a variety of media outlets including O, The Oprah Magazine, Marie Claire, CNN.com, Forbes, the Women’s Media Center and The Huffington Post. She is the co-founder and executive director of the women’s website and non-profit organization Feminist.com, as well as the co-founder of the environmental site EcoMall.com. She is the author of Daring to Be Ourselves: Influential Women Share Insights on Courage, Happiness and Finding Your Own Voice and What Will it Take to Make a Woman President? Conversations About Women, Leadership, and Power. You can visit her website at www.marianneschnall.com.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

President Tweets Nonsense, World Somehow Surprised

Like what you read below? Sign up for HUFFPOST HILL and get a cheeky dose of political news every evening!

Both Hillary Clinton and Kathy Griffin criticized President Trump this week — at last, some good news for the guy. Trump is planning on pulling the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement — he’ll be in a stronger bargaining position when most of the signatories are below sea level. And we were asleep when Trump accidentally fired off that unplanned tweet last night, but are thoroughly peeved that our song, “Now Watch Trump Slip, Now Watch Trump Covfefe” hasn’t caught on with teens. This is HUFFPOST HILL for Wednesday, May 31st, 2017:

EAT IT, EARTH – Congratulations to Alaska’s Mat-Su Valley on its stellar 2030s Pinot Grigio vintages. Alexander C. Kaufman: “President Donald Trump plans to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change, multiple outlets reported Wednesday. This would make the United States one of just three countries outside the historic pact to reduce planet-warming emissions. Trump pledged during his campaign to ‘cancel’ the deal, but delayed a decision for months amid a split in the administration on the issue. But in recent weeks, the camp opposing the accord seems to have convinced the president to abandon it ― despite few political advantages and harsh economic and diplomatic consequences. Trump tweeted Wednesday morning that he will make an official announcement on the Paris agreement ‘over the next few days’” [HuffPost]

MAKE AMERICA PREGNANT AGAIN – Also the title of Jeff’s debut R&B album. Check it out.  Laura Bassett: “A draft of the Trump administration’s new birth control coverage exemption has leaked, and it is far more wide-reaching than had been predicted. The new rule amends the Obama administration’s coverage requirement to allow any employer, school or insurance company to opt out of covering contraception due to any moral or religious objection, Vox reported Wednesday. Even massive for-profit companies with no religious affiliation will be able to deny birth control coverage to their female employees…. In the Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration deemed birth control an essential health service and required most employers to cover the full range of contraceptives in their insurance plans at no cost to women. The rule carved out an exemption for houses of worship and an accommodation for religiously affiliated non-profits, but the Trump administration has decided that requiring anyone to cover birth control violates religious freedom.” [HuffPost]

Haircut: Ashley Alman (h/t Sam Stein), Sam Stein (h/t Elise Foley)

HE’S COMEYING TO GET YOU, POTUS – Eric Lichtblau: “Fired FBI director James Comey plans to testify publicly in the Senate as early as next week to confirm bombshell accusations that President Donald Trump pressured him to end his investigation into a top Trump aide’s ties to Russia, a source close to the issue said Wednesday…. Comey is unlikely to be willing to discuss in any detail the FBI’s investigation into the charges of possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign — the centerpiece of the probe, this source said. But he appears eager to discuss his tense interactions with Trump before his firing.” [CNN]

The House intelligence committee approved subpoenas for Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen today.

Like HuffPost Hill? Then order Eliot’s book, The Beltway Bible: A Totally Serious A-Z Guide To Our No-Good, Corrupt, Incompetent, Terrible, Depressing, and Sometimes Hilarious Government

Does somebody keep forwarding you this newsletter? Get your own copy. It’s free! Sign up here. Send tips/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to eliot@huffpost.com. Follow us on Twitter – @HuffPostHill

WHITE HOUSE TALENT POOL NOT GREAT – Great benefits! Meet and work with interesting people! Watch Sean Spicer clean Jared Kushner’s Berluti loafers with his tears! Andrew Restuccia and Josh Dawsey: “President Donald Trump’s effort to fill hundreds of vacant jobs across the federal government has hit a new snag: Russia. Potential hires are paying close attention to the expanding investigations, which have now begun to touch senior Trump aides, with some questioning whether they want to join the administration. Four people who work closely with prospective nominees told POLITICO that some potential hires are having second thoughts about trying to land executive branch appointments as federal and congressional investigations threaten to pose a serious distraction to Trump’s agenda.… According to the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service, the White House has announced nominees for just 117 of the 559 most important Senate-confirmed positions.” [Politico]

On a related note, look who’s actually willing to come aboard! “The New York Times reported on Friday that Corey Lewandowski, the former Trump campaign manager who attempted to turn his links to the president into a lobbying career, is ready to join a new White House war room intended to sharpen the administration’s adversarial message. On Tuesday, Axios reported that David Urban, a longtime Republican lobbyist and former adviser to Trump’s campaign, could take over as White House chief of staff ― replacing Reince Priebus.” [HuffPost’s Paul Blumenthal]

WHITE HOUSE REFERRING RUSSIA QUESTIONS TO OUTSIDE COUNSEL – This is also a great opportunity for Spicer to expand his briefing phrasebook beyond its only phrase, “The president’s tweet speaks for itself.” John T. Bennett: “In a strategy shift, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on Wednesday for the first time referred a reporter’s question about the president’s actions in regard to the FBI’s Russia probe to an outside counsel. On Tuesday, Spicer jousted with several reporters during his daily briefing when they posed questions about Russia or a handful of ongoing congressional and federal probes. But a day later, during a briefing that lasted just under 12 minutes, Spicer signaled the White House has decided to let Trump’s private lawyers field those inquiries.” [Roll Call]

COVFEFE-GATE – Jordan Fabian: “White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Wednesday offered a cryptic explanation for President Trump’s incomplete, misspelled tweet that went viral overnight. ‘The president and a small group of people know exactly what he meant,’ Spicer told reporters…. Shortly after midnight, Trump tweeted, ‘Despite the constant negative press covfefe.’ The message unleashed a torrent of reactions from Twitter users who tried to define the term — or simply made fun of it. “ [The Hill]

This could be interpreted as good news for Sean Spicer? “Most Americans think President Donald Trump hurts his own cause when he speaks on behalf of the White House, according to a new Monmouth University survey. Sixty-one percent say Trump does more to hurt than help the presidency by speaking out, with just a third of those polled seeing his statements as mostly helpful. White House press secretary Sean Spicer and Trump counselor Kellyanne Conway, two of the president’s most prominent surrogates, fare better.” [HuffPost’s Ariel Edwards-Levy]

LEAN IN, GURRRL – This isn’t as good as the “Jerk Challenged By Ex-Wife For Reelection” story that crops up in one of America’s municipalities every few years, but still. Kristina Peterson: “Former Democratic Rep. Brad Ashford is considering mounting a challenge to the Republican who beat him last fall. So is his wife. Mr. Ashford and his wife, Ann Ferlic Ashford, haven’t decided yet which spouse will take on GOP Rep. Don Bacon, who is representing their swing district based in Omaha, Neb. They have, however, consulted their friends, three children and assorted Democratic officials in both Nebraska and Washington for advice on who is best for the challenge…. The couple, who have been married almost 25 years, said they are consulting, but not pressuring, their children. All five family members are on a text message chain through which they send frequent dispatches.” [WSJ]

WE’RE SO SCREWED – Igor Bobic: “Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) told a constituent last week that God can solve the problem of climate change if the global phenomenon truly exists. The 66-year-old Republican, who is a climate change skeptic, made the remark at a town hall in Coldwater, Michigan, on Friday. ‘I believe there’s climate change,’ Walberg said, according to a video of the exchange obtained by HuffPost. ‘I believe there’s been climate change since the beginning of time. I believe there are cycles. Do I think man has some impact? Yeah, of course. Can man change the entire universe? No.’ … ‘Well, as a Christian, I believe that there is a creator in God who is much bigger than us. And I’m confident that, if there’s a real problem, he can take care of it.’” [HuffPost]

DAILY CALLER NOT GREAT: REPORT – To be fair, the “Flagrantly racist, conservative word vomitorium” scene is pretty crowded right now. You gotta stand out somehow. A.C. Thompson: “On May 14, The Daily Caller, a popular conservative website, published a news story about recent protests in Charlottesville, Virginia. Led by prominent white supremacists and anti-Semites, the protesters, some carrying the battle flag of the Confederacy, expressed their anger over the city’s plans to remove a large monument to Robert E. Lee…. The story, it turned out, also carried some critical omissions: It didn’t disclose that its author, Jason Kessler, is supportive of white supremacist groups, and on the day of the march had himself made a speech to the protesters in which he praised fascist and racist organizations, thanked a prominent Holocaust denier, and declared the beginnings of a cultural ‘civil war.’” [ProPublica]

AWFUL PERSON DUMPED FROM AWFUL PROGRAM IN WAKE OF AWFUL DECISION – Now do the rest of CNN. Maxwell Strachan: “CNN has decided to end its decade-long relationship with Kathy Griffin as a result of the comedian’s controversial photo shoot, in which she held a prop that resembled the bloodied head of President Donald Trump. Griffin has been a regular feature of CNN’s New Year’s Eve coverage since 2007, when she first co-hosted the festivities with Anderson Cooper. Griffin initially defended the photo shoot with celebrity photographer and director Tyler Shields as a work of art when the photos were first released Tuesday. Later that night, as the criticism grew louder, she apologized and said she had asked Shields to take down the photo. ‘I beg for your forgiveness. I went too far. I made a mistake and I was wrong,’ she said.” [HuffPost]

BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR – Here are two dogs fighting water from a hose in slow-motion.

RICH PEOPLE SETTLING DOWN IN KALORAMA HEIGHTS – And here you are trying to scrape together some dollars for a down payment on that Trinidad one-bedroom. Krissah Thompson, Kathy Orton and Emily Heil: “Looks like former president Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama are putting down deeper roots in Washington: After renting a Kalorama home for their post-White House stint, the couple have purchased the eight-bedroom, nine-and-a-half-bath home for $8.1 million, according to property records. The Obamas have said they plan to remain in D.C. while their younger daughter, Sasha, finishes high school at Sidwell Friends. After leaving the executive mansion in January, the family settled into a rental home owned by Bill Clinton press secretary Joe Lockhart and his wife, Giovanna Gray Lockhart, an 8,200-square-foot home that was built in 1921 and renovated in 2011.” [WaPo]

COMFORT FOOD

Drone surfing looks awesome.

– We never thought of Rube Goldberg machines as dramatic until we watched one be narrated on Japanese TV.

– Comparing an iPhone 7 plus to a movie camera.

TWITTERAMA

Got something to add? Send tips/quotes/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to Eliot Nelson (eliot@huffpost.com)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

LeBron James Talks Vandalism, Racism: ‘Being Black In America Is Tough’

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

LeBron James’ Los Angeles home was vandalized with a racial slur on Wednesday morning, an incident that the LAPD is investigating as a hate crime.

On the eve of the NBA Finals, James spoke about the incident during a press conference Wednesday afternoon. He stressed that “racism will always be a part of the world and of America” and how Americans still have a long way to go.

The basketball star also made reference to the murder of Emmett Till ― a 14-year-old boy who was brutally killed in 1955 after being accused of whistling at a white woman. He said the vandalism on his home immediately made him think of Till’s mother’s decision to hold an open-casket funeral so that everyone in the world could see what racist ideals had done to her son.

James stressed the importance of talking about race relations, finding a shred of hope in the incident for its ability to shed light on what it means to be black in America and “continue to keep the conversation going.”

The latter sentiment likely sounds familiar because James spoke out about racism just a few weeks ago when Baltimore Orioles outfielder Adam Jones was the target of racial slurs.

“Racism is gonna be a part of time forever, I believe, but I think for us, the people that have the opportunities to have a voice and people that have an opportunity to have some play on the youth that’s coming up, we have to lead them the best way we can, and we have to live with the results…” James said in response to what happened to Jones. “It’s a real, real longer conversation, but if we can keep the conversation going, I think it helps.”

After hearing what happened to James’ home, Jones returned the favor in speaking out and tweeted out this show of support:

“No matter how much money you have, no matter how famous you are, no matter how many people admire you: Being black in America is tough,” James said during the conference. “We got a long way to go for us as a society and for us as African-Americans until we feel equal in America.”

James will play in his third consecutive NBA Finals with the Cleveland Cavaliers against the Golden State Warriors starting Thursday.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Obamas Buy Their D.C. Rental Home

Barack and Michelle Obama are now Washington homeowners.

The former president and first lady bought the nine bedroom, eight-and-a-half bathroom home in D.C.’s historic Kalorama neighborhood that they had been renting since leaving the White House in January. They closed on the $8.1 million purchase on Wednesday, according to property records. 

The Obama family has said they plan to stay in D.C. at least until their youngest daughter, Sasha, finishes high school. Their oldest daughter, Malia, will head to college in the fall. 

“Given that President and Mrs. Obama will be in Washington for at least another two and a half years, it made sense for them to buy a home rather than continuing to rent property,” Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement. 

The Obamas were renting the 8,200-square-foot home from former President Bill Clinton’s press secretary, Joe Lockhart, and his wife, Giovanna Gray Lockhart.

See photos of the Obamas’ D.C. home.

The sprawling Tudor home was built in 1928 and renovated in 2011. It includes an au pair suite, sprawling gardens, an oversized terrace, a two-car garage and a “gated motor court for 8 to 10 vehicles,” according to the property listing.

The Obamas will also hang on to their $1.5 million six bedroom, six bathroom home in Chicago’s South Side neighborhood of Kenwood ― to the chagrin of some neighbors who don’t want the home to be a tourist attraction. The forthcoming Obama Presidential Library will be built nearby.

Neighbors in the posh Kalorama neighborhood include Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos; first daughter and adviser Ivanka Trump and her husband, White House senior advisor Jared Kushner; and Dianne Bruce, the fur-draped, wine-sipping neighbor who broke new ground in the art of schadenfreude. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Funny How Trump Was Cool With Ted Nugent Joking About Killing The President

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

President Donald Trump, along with many others, was understandably disgusted this week by a photo of Kathy Griffin in which she is seen holding a prop resembling a bloodied and beheaded version of the president’s head.

Early Wednesday morning, Trump called the photo “sick” and said Griffin “should be ashamed of herself.”

It’s an entirely justifiable reaction to a photo that has gotten Griffin fired from her gig as co-host of CNN’s New Year’s Eve programming.

But it’s also worth noting that Trump had a much different reaction when someone who later supported his run for president also joked about killing the commander in chief. 

In the lead-up to the 2012 presidential election, musician Ted Nugent made comments at a National Rifle Association meeting in St. Louis that, like Griffin’s photo, led to an investigation by the Secret Service

“We need to ride into that battlefield and chop their [the Obama administration’s] heads off in November,” Nugent said at the time.

He added, “If Barack Obama becomes the next president in November, again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year.”

Trump addressed Nugent’s comments directly. But rather than saying the musician should be “ashamed” of himself, as he said of Griffin, Trump declared that Nugent demonstrated “the anger people have towards” then–President Obama, even if his “figure of speech” was a bit “unfortunate.”

Nugent would go on to become one of Trump’s loudest supporters once he officially launched his presidential campaign, saying at one point that “Donald Trump is as close to Ted Nugent as you’re going to get in politics.”

He would go on to say other things too, like a joke about assassinating Harry Reid, and that Obama and Hillary Clinton “should be tried for treason & hung.”

Nevertheless, Trump invited Nugent to the White House last month, where he posed for a photo with a man who has repeatedly called for the deaths of high-level government officials.

On Wednesday, Politico reporter Matthew Nussbaum asked White House press secretary Sean Spicer how Griffin’s photo compared to Nugent’s past comments.

 “Obviously [Griffin’s] conduct has been widely condemned, and it’s not a partisan thing to say joking about violence toward the president is unacceptable,” Nussbaum began.

“But on that note, I wanted to ask about Ted Nugent, who joked multiple times about assassinating President Barack Obama, who said Hillary Clinton should be hanged. He was invited to the White House for dinner by President Trump. Do you believe that was appropriate? And if Trump is offended by this incident, why was he not bothered by all of Mr. Nugent’s comments?”

Spicer all but balked at the question. 

“I’d have to look back and see what those statements were and what the reaction was at the time,” Spicer said.

Nussbaum gave an example: when Nugent said that Obama should “suck on [his] machine gun.” Spicer had no answer and moved on to the next question.

Anyway, here’s a photo of Ted Nugent and President Trump in the White House together in April. Kind of funny, all things considered. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Ex-Teacher Pleads ‘Not Guilty’ In Alleged Kidnapping Of High School Girl

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The 50-year-old former teacher accused of abducting a 15-year-old girl in Tennessee has pleaded not guilty to federal kidnapping charges.

The attorney for Tad Cummins entered the plea for his client in a new court filing, waiving Cummins’ presence at his arraignment Thursday.

Cummins was indicted May 18, on charges of obstruction of justice and “transporting a minor across state lines for the purpose of engaging in criminal sexual conduct.”

A former Culleoka Unit School health science teacher, Cummins is accused of abducting the teen from Columbia on March 13. He kidnapped the girl, according to police, more than a month after a student reported seeing Cummins kiss her. He was formally dismissed the day after the teen was reported missing.

On April 20, a tip to the police led authorities to a remote area of Siskiyou County, California where they found the missing teenager and Cummins. The cabin they were staying in at the time is more than 2,000 miles from where the search began.

After Cummins’ arrest, his wife, who filed for divorce while he was on the run, said he’d confessed in a jailhouse call that he “slept with” the teen. Authorities have yet to confirm the allegation. The victim’s age makes any sexual contact between the two statutory rape in the state of Tennessee.

In addition to the federal charges, Cummins faces charges in Tennessee, which include aggravated kidnapping and sexual contact with a minor.

Cummins is being held without bond in federal custody, where he faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted of the charges he faces.

David Lohr covers crime and missing persons. Tips? Feedback? Send an email or follow him on Twitter.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=5903820ee4b0bb2d086e2fa3,58fe0ab5e4b06b9cb9189b70

Need help? Visit RAINN’s National Sexual Assault Online Hotline or the National Sexual Violence Resource Center’s website.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Man's Spit Links Him To Cold Case Murders Six Years Later: LAPD

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

After six long years, authorities say a suspected killer is behind bars thanks to saliva collected from a sidewalk.

Geovanni Borjas, 32, of Los Angeles County, was charged on Tuesday for the 2011 rape and murder of Michelle Lozano, 17, and Bree’Anna Guzman, 22, after his DNA was found to match evidence from both killings, police told reporters on Tuesday.

Los Angeles police said they recovered DNA evidence from both crime scenes and entered it into their local and national databases, but there was no match. They did, however, find someone in the database whose DNA was similar to the DNA at the crime scene: Borjas’ father.

The elder Borjas had been arrested years earlier for a non-sexual assault crime, police said, which meant his DNA was already in the system. His son, however, only had a minor criminal record, so authorities had to obtain his DNA some other way.

They did that by following Borjas until he spit on a sidewalk, LAPD Chief Charlie Beck said.

Once entered into the database, DNA from the recovered saliva sample matched the DNA at both Lozano and Guzman’s crime scenes, Beck said.

In addition to two counts of murder and rape, Borjas was charged with one count of kidnapping, according to prosecutors.

“DNA collection at time of arrest allowed us to connect this monster to the deaths of these two young women,” Beck said.

Richard Duran, Guzman’s father, choked up at Tuesday’s press conference as he publicly thanked local authorities for never giving up in their pursuit of his daughter’s killer. 

Lozano was the first of the two victims. The teenager was out walking on Easter when she went missing. Her naked body was later found in a broken container that had been dumped off a freeway, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Guzman was walking to a pharmacy the day after Christmas when she went missing, Beck said. Her body was found a month later near a freeway, prosecutors said.

Borjas’ criminal history includes an ex-girlfriend’s three-year domestic violence restraining order against him. Among other things, she accused him of breaking her nose, choking her and pushing her down some stairs, according to the Los Angeles Times.

In court on Tuesday, Borjas pleaded not guilty to the charges. His defense attorney also requested bail for his client, who he said has a fiancee and a child. That request was denied.

If convicted, Borjas faces the death penalty or life in state prison without the possibility of parole, the district attorney’s office announced.

“A decision on whether to seek the death penalty will be made at a later date,” the office noted in a release.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=591c8ca4e4b034684b08d532,58779d66e4b086a337b6f6c7,56989f29e4b0778f46f8f131,5633cfbce4b0631799126b80

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.