Hasta La Gadget!

Four Wordle puzzles at once? That was so five hours ago. Now, a site called Sedecordle has come up with a version that lets you do no less than 16 Wordle-style puzzles at a time, following the path of Octordle (eight), Quardle (four) and Dordle (two). 

When I checked out a Sedecordle puzzle, I thought “that’s not so bad” before I realized it didn’t fit on the screen and I had to scroll (and scroll) to reach the end of the puzzle. Sedecordle ups the ante on Octordle in terms of the number of guesses too, giving you 22 shots at each puzzle compared to 13. That increases your odds of avoiding a failure that would really suck if you got, say, the first 15 correct. 

With Wordle becoming an online phenomenon, clones have taken over app stores, with some dubious versions even tacking on hefty subscription charges. At least online versions like Sedecordle are expanding on the idea by adding an element of challenge — though 16 puzzles is maybe taking it a bit too far. 

I would love to tell you that I tried to do one, but even Quardle is a huge time sink that has been driving users mad. Suffice to say, you’d have to be a massive Wordle fan and slightly masochistic to try one four times that size. Much as folks expanded on the original Rubik’s cube with up to 22 sides, knock-offs are now taking Wordle to its logical, very silly conclusion. 

Government officials in Hong Kong are going ahead with a plan to test all of the city’s 7.5 million people for covid-19, according to a new report from Bloomberg News. And anyone who refuses to get tested could face a fine of over $1,000.

Read more…

Elon Musk tweeted an image comparing Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to German dictator Adolf Hitler early Thursday. And while Musk’s legion of fans will no doubt claim it’s “just a joke,” it’s still jarring to see the richest person on the planet compare world leaders in functioning democracies to…

Read more…

The U.S. Olympian “almost started crying” after a heartwarming gesture from Italy’s Sofia Goggia.

As both the Chrome and Firefox browsers approach their 100th versions, what should be a reason for the developers to celebrate could turn into a bit of a mess. It turns out that much like the Y2K bug, the triple-digit release numbers coded in the browsers’ User-Agents (UAs) could cause issues with a small number of sites, Bleeping Computer reported. 

Mozilla launched an experiment last year to see if version number 100 would affect sites, and it just released a blog with the results. It did affect a small number of sites (some very big ones, though) that couldn’t parse a user-agent string containing a three-digit number. Notable ones still affected included HBO Go, Bethesda and Yahoo, according to a tracking site. The bugs include “browser not supported” messages, site rendering issues, parsing failures, 403 errors and so on.

How could such a silly thing be happening? “Without a single specification to follow, different browsers have different formats for the User-Agent string, and site-specific User-Agent parsing,” Mozilla explained in the blog. “It’s possible that some parsing libraries may have hard-coded assumptions or bugs that don’t take into account three-digit major version numbers.” 

Luckily, developers for both browsers have a plan. If there are issues with sites that can’t be resolved before the versions are released, both browsers will freeze the version numbers at 99 in the UA strings or inject code overrides to fix the problems. Both have also asked developers to test their sites with Firefox/Chrome 100 user agents. The browsers are set to arrive on March 29th and May 3rd for Chrome and Firefox respectively — hopefully like Y2K, it’ll be much ado about nothing..