Hasta La Gadget!

“The body of the report is complete and there is general agreement on that,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said.

The talk show host mocked Graham’s relentless shilling for the Republican Senate candidate.

A week ago, the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) petitioned the Board of Supervisors for permission to deploy robots that can kill suspects under specific circumstances. Now, the board has approved the petition with a vote of 8 vs. 3 despite strong opposition from civil liberties groups. Under the new policy, robots can be used “as a deadly force option when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers are imminent and outweigh any other force option available to the SFPD.”

The city’s police force has over a dozen robots at the moment, which are equipped with the capability to provide video reconnaissance and to diffuse bombs. None of them have weapons and live ammunition, the SFPD says, and there are no plans to fit them with any. However, they can now be deployed with explosives attached “to contact, incapacitate, or disorient violent, armed, or dangerous suspect,” an SFPD spokesperson said. “Robots equipped in this manner would only be used in extreme circumstances to save or prevent further loss of innocent lives,” they added.

As NPR notes, SF officials have to define the authorized uses of its robots and other military-grade equipment due to a California law that went into effect this year. Aaron Peskin, a Board of Supervisor member, added a line to the SFPD’s original draft policy that said: “Robots shall not be used as a Use of Force against any person.” But the SFPD amended the proposal to allow the use of robots as “a deadly force option.” The board approved that version of the policy with additional amendments, stating that officials can only use robots with explosive charges after they had exhausted all alternative force or de-escalation tactics. Also, only a limited number of high-ranking officials will be able authorize the use of robots as a deadly force option. 

Among all of San Francisco’s supervisors, only Shamann Walton, Dean Preston and Hillary Ronen voted “no” on approving the policy. Preston called allowing the SFPD to use robots to kill people “deeply disturbing” and a “sad moment” for the city. In his full statement, he said that giving the police the power to arm remote-controlled robots will “place Black and brown people in disproportionate danger of harm or death.” Meanwhile, Rafael Mandelman, who supported the use of robots as a deadly force from the beginning, defended his vote and said that the final version of the policy “lays out reasonable restrictions on the use of robots” despite “the hyperbole expressed by many who oppose” it.

Mandelman also told Fox KTVU that it would be irresponsible not to make plans to use robots in life-threatening situations. Matthew Guariglia of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told the news organization, however, that by equipping robots, “[w]e are going to lessen the burden of using deadly force from having to pull a gun and pull the trigger to a button on a remote control.”

OnePlus is joining the ranks of Android vendors committing to longer-term support. The Oppo brand is promising four years of major OxygenOS updates for “selected” phones launching in 2023 and later. They’ll also receive five years of security patches. The company hasn’t named devices, but it won’t be surprising if the company prioritizes higher-end phones like the unofficially expected OnePlus 11 series.

The phone maker also teased some features coming to OxygenOS 13.1 when it ships in the first half of 2023. The new software will include a revised always-on display with Spotify support, AI-guided memory management that boosts performance, Dolby Atmos-based spatial audio (built in tandem with Google and Dolby), a second-gen private data space and a new “Aquamorphic” design language.

The policy puts OnePlus roughly on par with Samsung, which touted four years of Android upgrades and five years of security fixes for flagship phones. Google started delivering five years of security updates starting with the Pixel 6 family, but is only guaranteeing new versions for three years. Apple typically provides five years of major revisions for iPhones and occasionally releases critical security fixes for older models.

The pledge may be worth considering if you’re determined to have the latest software features throughout the practical lifespan of your phone. It’s still common for other Android brands to offer fewer updates, and Motorola even drew criticism for initially planning just one update for the Edge line in 2020. As with Samsung’s approach, though, you can’t expect this longevity across the range — you may have to settle for less if you can only afford a budget model.

Kristi Noem, the governor of South Dakota, has signed an executive order prohibiting government employees, agencies and contractors from downloading and using TikTok on state-owned devices. In her office’s announcement, Noem said she issued the order due to growing security concerns that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been using the social media app to gather information from American users and leveraging it to manipulate them. The order is already in effect and also prohibits government personnel from visiting the TikTok website on browsers.

“South Dakota will have no part in the intelligence gathering operations of nations who hate us,” Noem said. “The Chinese Communist Party uses information that it gathers on TikTok to manipulate the American people, and they gather data off the devices that access the platform.”

US officials have been raising security concerns about TikTok, which is owned by Chinese company ByteDance, over the past few years over the belief that the Chinese government is using it to gather data. In 2020, then-President Trump attempted to block TikTok and WeChat in the US. While that didn’t quite go anywhere, nearly the entire US military had banned the app on government-issued devices, calling TikTok a “cybersecurity threat.” A couple of Republican Senators also introduced a bill in the same year that would ban all government employees from using TikTok on work-issued smartphones. 

More recently, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr asked Apple and Google to remove the app from their stores after a BuzzFeed News report came out that China-based ByteDance employees repeatedly accessed US users’ private information. TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew assured Republican Senators in a letter after the report came out that the company is working with Oracle to protect the data of its users in the US “with robust, independent oversight.” He also said that TikTok is working towards fully pivoting to Oracle cloud servers in the US to be able to delete US users’ data from its own systems.

But Chew’s assurances weren’t enough to assuage officials’ fears: FBI Director Chris Wray warned US lawmakers earlier this month that the Chinese government could use TikTok to launch “influence operations” through its recommendation algorithm or to “technically compromise” millions of devices. A TikTok spokesperson told Reuters that the “FBI’s input is being considered as part of [the company’s] ongoing negotiations with the US government.” They added that TikTok is confident that it is “on a path to fully satisfy all reasonable US national security concerns” after working with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States over the past few months.