California's Brutal Storms May Have Killed Over Half Its Monarch Butterflies

California has been enduring a winter of wild weather, and it’s not just humans that have suffered for it. A new count of monarchs in the state turned up a disturbing low number of the endangered butterflies.

Read more…

Eight months post-Roe, reproductive-health privacy is still messy

Data privacy awareness boomed last June when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, limiting access to safe, legal abortion. Now, eight months later, privacy experts say not to let your guard down. Legislative bodies have made little progress on health data security.

We give up so much data each day that it’s easy to tune out. We blindly accept permissions or turn on location sharing, but that data can also be used by governing bodies to prosecute civilians or by attackers looking to extort individuals. That’s why, when SCOTUS declared access to abortion would no longer be a constitutional right, people began to scrutinize the amount of private health data they were sending to reproductive-health apps.

“The burden is really on consumers to figure out how a company, an app, a website is going to collect and then potentially use and share their data,” Andrew Crawford, senior counsel, privacy and data, at the Center for Democracy and Technology said.

There aren’t widespread industry standards or federal legislation to protect sensitive data, despite some increased regulatory action since last year. Even data that isn’t considered personally identifiable or explicitly health related can still put people at risk. Location data, for example, can show if a patient traveled to receive an abortion, possibly putting them at risk of prosecution.

“Companies see that as information they can use to make money,” Jen Caltrider, lead at Mozilla’s consumer privacy organization Privacy Not Included, told Engadget. Research released by Caltrider’s team in August analyzed the security of 25 reproductive-health apps. Eighteen of them earned a privacy warning label for failing to meet privacy standards.

So, what’s left for users of reproductive-health apps to do? The obvious advice is to carefully read the terms and conditions before signing up in order to better understand what’s happening with their data. If you don’t have a legal degree and an hour to spare, though, there are some basic rules to follow. Turning off data sharing that isn’t necessary to the function of the app, using encrypted chats to talk about reproductive care, signing up for a trustworthy VPN and leaving your phone at home if you’re accessing reproductive health care can all help protect your information, according to Crawford.

While industry standards are still lacking, increased public scrutiny has led to some improvements. Some reproductive-health apps now store data locally as opposed to on a server, collect data anonymously so that it cannot be accessed by law enforcement or base operations in places like Europe that have stronger data privacy laws. We spoke with three popular apps that were given warning labels by Privacy Not Included last August to see what’s changed since then.

Glow’s Eve reproductive-health app introduced an option to store data locally instead of on its server, among other security measures. Glow told Engadget that it doesn’t sell data and employees are required to take privacy and security training.

A similar app, Flo Health, has introduced an anonymous mode and hired a new privacy exec since the report. The company told Engadget that it hopes to expand its anonymous mode features in the future with additions like the ability to stop receiving IP addresses completely.

Clue, another app that landed on the warning list, adheres to the stricter privacy laws of the European Union known as General Data Protection Regulation, co-CEO Carrie Walter told Engadget. She added that the company will never cooperate with a government authority to use people’s health data against them, and recommended users keep up with updates to its privacy policy for more information.

But there are no one-and-done solutions. With permissions changing frequently, people that use health apps are also signing up to consistently check their settings.

“Apps change constantly, so keep doing your research, which is a burden to ask consumers,” Caltrider said. “Use anonymous modes, when they’re available, store things locally, as much as you can. Don’t share location if you can opt out of location sharing.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/eight-months-post-roe-reproductive-health-privacy-is-still-messy-160058529.html?src=rss

The Funniest Tweets From Women This Week

“what doesn’t kill you makes you kind of nervous for the rest of your life.”

5 Ways To Smarten Up Your Apartment Security As A Renter

When you’re renting an apartment, your security choices may be limited, but we have some tips for how to bulk up your home security without losing your deposit.

Learning To Replace Ignition Coils On Your Car Is Easy, And Could Save You A Ton Of Money

Replacing ignition coils is a do-it-yourself repair that’s relatively easy, but more importantly, could save you a good chunk of cash when maintaining your car.

Blumhouse Has Found Its Next Horror Universe

Agatha: Coven of Chaos’ Okwui Okpokwasili has joined David Gordon Green’s Exorcist remake. Cowboy Bebop creator Shinichiro Watanabe’s new sci-fi movie gets a gorgeous new poster. Plus, what’s coming on the season finale of Kung Fu, and the next episode of The Flash. Spoilers get!

Read more…

Meta drops the price of its Quest Pro VR headset to $999

The Meta Quest Pro’s original $1,500 sticker has been a major obstacle to adoption, but it won’t be a problem for much longer. Mark Zuckerberg has revealed on an Instagram channel that the Quest Pro price is dropping to a more palatable $999. And if you don’t need high-end virtual reality, the 256GB Quest 2 will now sell for $429, or just $30 above the usual price of the 128GB version. The reduced prices are meant to help “more people get into VR,” Zuckerberg says.

The lower prices come ahead of a next-gen consumer Quest headset expected later this year. In that regard, the cheaper Quest 2 could help Meta clear inventory before the new model arrives. If you’re happy with the current capabilities, though, this is an easier way to get into standalone VR while still having plenty of room for apps and games. With that said, this is also a backtrack — Meta raised prices last August to compensate for higher manufacturing costs.

Both reductions also reflect Meta’s struggles to pivot to the metaverse. While it remains committed to the concept and is pouring 20 percent of its 2023 spending into its Reality Labs division, that unit continues to lose billions of dollars per quarter. The better prices could get headsets into the hands of more customers and, by extension, help with the adoption of Horizon Worlds and Meta’s other projects.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/meta-drops-the-price-of-its-quest-pro-vr-headset-to-999-153753541.html?src=rss

Paula Abdul Explains Why Being Voted Off ‘American Idol’ Was Good For Jennifer Hudson

“People that don’t need to win end up winning big time,” Abdul said on Hudson’s talk show.

Tech That Keeps You From Doing These Chores Ever Again

From the much-loved Roomba to robots that clean our windows, pools, and toilets, this tech might just keep you from doing these chores ever again.

East Palestine Derailment Triggers ‘an Uneasy Feeling’ in a Growing Petrochemical Hub

This story was originally published by Grist. You can subscribe to its weekly newsletter here.

Read more…