TikTok might be going around Apple's in-app purchase rules for its coins

Another day, another company tests Apple’s resolve. This time, it’s TikTok allegedly violating the company’s rules for apps, with the video platform seemingly allowing some users to purchase its coins directly from its website. TikTok has apparently given some iOS users the option to “Try recharging on tiktok.com to avoid in-app service fees” — namely Apple’s 30 percent commission on purchases.

According to photos shared on X (formerly Twitter) by David Tesler, co-founder of the app Sendit, TikTok is prompting users to save around 25 percent when purchasing coins (used to tip creators) thanks to lower third-party service fees. They can then use Apple Pay, PayPal or a credit or debit card to complete their transaction. It’s unclear why only some users have access to this circumnavigation; one hypothesis is the feature was turned on for individuals who previously purchased a large number of coins.

Apple notably kicked Fortnite off its app store in 2020 after Epic Games introduced discounts on the game’s currency for anyone who directly purchased it. The incident set off a multi-year legal battle, with Apple reinstating Epic Games’ developer account in March after the European Union began looking into the situation. More recently, Apple has faced pushback from Spotify and rejected updates that would have displayed the music streamer’s pricing and allowed in-app plan purchases. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/tiktok-might-be-going-around-apples-in-app-purchase-rules-for-its-coins-134527587.html?src=rss

TikTok might be going around Apple's in-app purchase rules for its coins

Another day, another company tests Apple’s resolve. This time, it’s TikTok allegedly violating the company’s rules for apps, with the video platform seemingly allowing some users to purchase its coins directly from its website. TikTok has apparently given some iOS users the option to “Try recharging on tiktok.com to avoid in-app service fees” — namely Apple’s 30 percent commission on purchases.

According to photos shared on X (formerly Twitter) by David Tesler, co-founder of the app Sendit, TikTok is prompting users to save around 25 percent when purchasing coins (used to tip creators) thanks to lower third-party service fees. They can then use Apple Pay, PayPal or a credit or debit card to complete their transaction. It’s unclear why only some users have access to this circumnavigation; one hypothesis is the feature was turned on for individuals who previously purchased a large number of coins.

Apple notably kicked Fortnite off its app store in 2020 after Epic Games introduced discounts on the game’s currency for anyone who directly purchased it. The incident set off a multi-year legal battle, with Apple reinstating Epic Games’ developer account in March after the European Union began looking into the situation. More recently, Apple has faced pushback from Spotify and rejected updates that would have displayed the music streamer’s pricing and allowed in-app plan purchases. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/tiktok-might-be-going-around-apples-in-app-purchase-rules-for-its-coins-134527587.html?src=rss

TikTok might be going around Apple's in-app purchase rules for its coins

Another day, another company tests Apple’s resolve. This time, it’s TikTok allegedly violating the company’s rules for apps, with the video platform seemingly allowing some users to purchase its coins directly from its website. TikTok has apparently given some iOS users the option to “Try recharging on tiktok.com to avoid in-app service fees” — namely Apple’s 30 percent commission on purchases.

According to photos shared on X (formerly Twitter) by David Tesler, co-founder of the app Sendit, TikTok is prompting users to save around 25 percent when purchasing coins (used to tip creators) thanks to lower third-party service fees. They can then use Apple Pay, PayPal or a credit or debit card to complete their transaction. It’s unclear why only some users have access to this circumnavigation; one hypothesis is the feature was turned on for individuals who previously purchased a large number of coins.

Apple notably kicked Fortnite off its app store in 2020 after Epic Games introduced discounts on the game’s currency for anyone who directly purchased it. The incident set off a multi-year legal battle, with Apple reinstating Epic Games’ developer account in March after the European Union began looking into the situation. More recently, Apple has faced pushback from Spotify and rejected updates that would have displayed the music streamer’s pricing and allowed in-app plan purchases. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/tiktok-might-be-going-around-apples-in-app-purchase-rules-for-its-coins-134527587.html?src=rss

May Is Here to Shower You With Tons of New Sci-Fi, Fantasy, and Horror Books

May has a little bit of everything for genre fans spread across its dozens of new sci-fi, fantasy, and horror book releases: space operas, doomsday cults, apocalyptic mysteries, fantastical romances, haunted mansions, dimensionally displaced vampires, badass wasteland motorcycle couriers, and more!

Read more…

Rabbit denies claims that its R1 virtual assistant is a glorified Android app

The Rabbit R1, a pocket-sized AI virtual assistant device, runs Android under the hood and is powered by a single app, according to Android Authority. Apparently, the publication was able to install the R1 APK on a Pixel 6a and made it run as if it were the $199 gadget, bobbing bunny head on the screen and all. If you already have a phone and aren’t quite intrigued by specialized devices or keen on being an early adopter, you probably didn’t see merit in getting the R1 (or its competitor, the Humane AI Pin) in the first place. But this information could make you question the device’s purpose even more. Rabbit CEO Jesse Lyu, however, denied that the company’s product could’ve just been released an Android app.

In a statement sent to Android Authority, Lyu said: “rabbit r1 is not an Android app.” He added that the company is aware that there are “unofficial rabbit OS app/website emulators out there” and is discouraging their use. “We understand the passion that people have to get a taste of our AI and LAM instead of waiting for their r1 to arrive,” he continued. “That being said, to clear any misunderstanding and set the record straight, rabbit OS and LAM run on the cloud with very bespoke AOSP and lower level firmware modifications, therefore a local bootleg APK without the proper OS and Cloud endpoints won’t be able to access our service. rabbit OS is customized for r1 and we do not support third-party clients. Using a bootlegged APK or webclient carries significant risks; malicious actors are known to publish bootlegged apps that steal your data. For this reason, we recommend that users avoid these bootlegged rabbit OS apps.”

Android Authority admitted that Spotify integration and other features probably wouldn’t work when the R1 is installed on a phone, because it was created to run on the company’s specialized firmware. However, it promised a follow-up story delving deeper into the subject. 

The R1 has the capability to book you an Uber, find you titles to songs stuck in your brain or look for recipes that can incorporate ingredients you have in your fridge, among other things a virtual assistant or an AI chatbot can do. When Rabbit CEO Jesse Lyu introduced the R1 at CES 2024, he demonstrated how it can be trained to do a variety of other tasks when he taught it to generate an image using Midjourney. Engadget Deputy Editor Cherlynn Low found it more fun and accessible than the $700 Humane AI Pin, but she remains skeptical about the usefulness of AI devices overall. It may still be too early to tell whether they have the potential to become a must-have product for your daily life or the high-tech equivalent of single-use kitchen tools. We’re already in the midst of testing the R1 and will publish a review soon to help you decide if it’s worth giving the product category a chance. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/rabbit-denies-claims-that-its-r1-virtual-assistant-is-a-glorified-android-app-123049869.html?src=rss

Francis Ford Coppola's Megalopolis Might Have Some Sci-Fi Among Its Many, Many Elements

In his vast career, Francis Ford Coppola has made masterpieces (Apocalypse Now, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II, The Conversation), cult classics (Bram Stoker’s Dracula, The Outsiders), and curious whatsits (The Godfather Part III, Peggy Sue Got Married). Which will Megalopolis be? While the world waits to see

Read more…

The Morning After: Our verdict on the Beats Solo 4 headphones

Beats today announced the Solo 4, a $200 set of familiar-looking cans with significant upgrades inside, even if they look almost entirely the same as the Solo 3.

At this price, the Solo 4s don’t have any active noise cancellation and, according to Billy Steele, who tested the new headphones, they sound a bit thin. However, sound is generally improved, and the boost to 50 hours of playback (along with USB-C) is a major improvement over the predecessor. They’re available to buy now.

TMA
Engadget

Beats also surprised us with new sub-$100 Solo buds, wireless (non-ANC) earbuds with 18 hours of playback. One focus is comfort, with ergonomic acoustic nozzles and vents assisting with audio performance and relieving the pressure on your ears. The Solo Buds will be available in June for $80.

— Mat Smith

Lorelei and the Laser Eyes preview: This may be my GOTY

What to expect from Apple’s Let Loose iPad event

The excellent and customizable Arc Browser is now fully available on Windows

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao sentenced to four months in prison

​​You can get these reports delivered daily direct to your inbox. Subscribe right here!

Instagram is overhauling its recommendation algorithm for Reels to support and increase “original content.” It could greatly impact aggregator accounts and other accounts that mostly report other users’ work. The company is also changing how it ranks Reels to boost smaller accounts.

The app’s changes around “original content” could be pretty immediate. Instagram says it will actively replace reposted Reels with the “original” clip in its suggestions when it detects two pieces of identical content. Aggregator accounts that “repeatedly” publish posts from others will be penalized even more harshly. I’ve come across many accounts (often through Reels) that are simply the same viral clip (that isn’t even original) posted and reposted as far as I was willing to scroll. These changes could shrink the chances of coming across lazier content like that.

Continue reading.

The Federal Communications Commission has slapped the largest mobile carriers in the US with a collective fine worth $200 million for selling access to their customers’ location information without consent. AT&T was ordered to pay $57 million, while Verizon has a $47 million fine. Meanwhile, Sprint and T-Mobile are facing a penalty with a combined amount of $92 million, as the companies merged two years ago. Apparently, the carriers sold “real-time location information to data aggregators,” and this data ended up “in the hands of bail-bond companies, bounty hunters and other shady actors.”

Continue reading.

TMA
Engadget

Fujifilm’s Instax cameras have been around for a while, but the new Instax mini 99, which was released this month, looks more like my X-T2 and other Fujifilm models than yet another plasticky Polaroid. From a distance, it looks like a pricey digital camera, but it costs only $200. It also has modes and filters to customize your tiny instant photos. That flexibility, combined with the understated look, makes for an instant camera I might actually buy (and use).

Continue reading.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/the-morning-after-our-verdict-on-the-beats-solo-4-headphones-111559935.html?src=rss

Francis Ford Coppola's Megalopolis Might Have Some Sci-Fi Among Its Many, Many Elements

In his vast career, Francis Ford Coppola has made masterpieces (Apocalypse Now, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II, The Conversation), cult classics (Bram Stoker’s Dracula, The Outsiders), and curious whatsits (The Godfather Part III, Peggy Sue Got Married). Which will Megalopolis be? While the world waits to see

Read more…

Firefly CEO Envisions Independent Lunar Missions Amidst Growing Commercial Demand

Firefly Aerospace CEO Bill Weber envisions a future where the company conducts fully commercial lunar missions independently of NASA. Despite currently relying on NASA funding and partnering with SpaceX for launches, Weber sees enough commercial demand to support Firefly’s solo lunar ventures. This perspective reflects the shifting dynamics of the space industry, increasingly driven by commercial interests inspired by SpaceX’s success.

The burgeoning space economy is forecasted to reach $1.8 trillion by 2035, with commercial sectors such as supply chain and consumer goods driving growth. Firefly, founded in 2017, positions itself as an end-to-end space transportation company, aiming to handle every aspect from launch to satellite deployment. The company’s focus on in-house capabilities, including manufacturing and testing facilities, enables rapid production and response times.

BLUE GHOST MISSION 2 – LUNAR LANDER RENDERING (Image by Firefly)

Despite having launched only three rockets successfully, Firefly’s streamlined processes allow for efficient scaling. Automation has significantly reduced production time and costs, positioning the company competitively within the market. While historically limited to launch vehicles and satellites, the commercial space sector is expanding, with NASA relying on private companies to advance lunar exploration.

Firefly’s upcoming Blue Ghost lunar mission, backed by NASA, signals a significant step towards independent lunar operations. Scheduled for launch on a SpaceX rocket, followed by a mission aboard Firefly’s medium launch vehicle (MLV) in 2026, these endeavors pave the way for commercial lunar exploration. By accommodating commercial payloads alongside NASA experiments, Firefly aims to diversify its revenue streams and achieve profitability by the end of the decade.

Weber emphasizes the importance of a diversified revenue structure, leveraging Firefly’s engineering and manufacturing capabilities across multiple missions.

While Firefly remains open to collaboration with NASA as a paying customer, its long-term vision involves self-sustained commercial operations in space; This strategic approach aligns with the evolving landscape of the space industry, characterized by increased commercialization and innovation.

Firefly CEO Envisions Independent Lunar Missions Amidst Growing Commercial Demand

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Microsoft and OpenAI sued yet again by Chicago Tribune and New York Daily News

A group of publications that include the Chicago Tribune, New York Daily News and the Orlando Sentinel are suing Microsoft and OpenAI, as reported by The Verge. The eight publications in this particular lawsuit, all owned by Alden Capital Group (ACG), are accusing the companies of “purloining millions” of their copyrighted articles “without permission and without payment to fuel the commercialization of their generative artificial intelligence products, including ChatGPT and Copilot.” 

This is but the latest lawsuit filed against Microsoft and OpenAI for their use of copyrighted materials without express consent from publishers. The New York Times also famously sued the companies late last year, alleging that they’ve used “almost a century’s worth of copyrighted content.” Their products can regurgitate Times’ articles verbatim and can “mimic its expressive style,” the publication said, even though they didn’t have a prior licensing agreement. In a motion seeking to dismiss key parts of the lawsuit, Microsoft accused the Times of doomsday futurology by claiming that generative AI can pose a threat to independent journalism. 

ACG’s newspapers complain of the same thing, that the companies’ chatbots are reproducing their articles word-for-word shortly after they’re published without a prominent link back to the sources. They included several examples in their complaint. In addition, the chatbots are apparently suffering from hallucinations and are attributing inaccurate reporting to ACG’s publications. The publisher argued that the defendants pay for the computers, the specialized chips and the electricity they use to build and operate their generative AI products. And yet they’re using copyrighted articles “without permission and without paying for the privilege” even though they need content to train their large language models. The plaintiffs referenced OpenAI’s previous admission that it would be “impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials.”

OpenAI is no longer a non-profit company, the plaintiffs said, and is now valued at $90 billion. Meanwhile, ChatGPT and Copilot have added “hundreds of billions of dollars to Microsoft’s market value.” The publications are seeking an unspecified amount in damages and are asking the court to order the defendants to destroy GPT and LLM models that use their materials. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/microsoft-and-openai-sued-yet-again-by-chicago-tribune-and-new-york-daily-news-085501073.html?src=rss