Hasta La Gadget!

Blizzard is making some major changes to Overwatch 2 for its Season 15 update, including adding all new gameplay in the form of a perks system and the return of loot box rewards, on top of the new heroes and skins.

Overwatch 2 has been through several changes since it left early access in 2023, many of which brought the game from the revamped structure that made it a sequel to something that works more like a free-to-play version of the original Overwatch. Perks are legitimately new, though. Now during a match you’ll be given two opportunities to pick a perk for your hero. One minor perk after leveling up for the first time, which adds smaller upgrades like a passive ability or a cooldown reduction, and one major perk that can alter the play style of your hero. For example, Torbjorn can pick from turrets that stick to ceilings and walls (a frankly diabolical upgrade) or an even more powerful “Level 3 turret.”

Blizzard Entertainment

As a reward for your hard work in-game, Blizzard is also adding to Overwatch 2‘s battle pass system by reintroducing loot boxes as another way to get cosmetics. You can earn loot boxes by completely weekly and event rewards, and you’ll get one Legendary Loot Box for having the Free Battle Pass or two Legendary Loot Boxes for having the Premium Battle Pass, as well. Beyond publishing drop rates for boxes, Blizzard is guaranteeing that “a Rare or better item will drop in every single box, with an Epic item within five consecutive boxes and a Legendary item within twenty consecutive boxes.”

Blizzard Entertainment

Coming a bit later in Season 16, Overwatch 2 will get an entirely new “Stadium” game mode that draws clear inspiration from competing shooters Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant. In a Stadium match you’ll be placed on a team of five fighting to earn currency across seven possible rounds. In-between rounds you can spend that currency to unlock upgrades and customize your abilities as you play. Stadium will also let you pick between the traditional first-person mode or a new third-person mode, which should make it easier to aim some of the wilder abilities you can unlock during a match.

The cherry on top to all these changes are new quality of life features Blizzard plans to add this year, like the ability to ban specific heroes from a match, and vote on maps you want to play. Of course, there are also two new heroes in the works: Freja, “a former search and rescue operative turned bounty hunter” with an explosive crossbow who will be playable in a free trial weekend during Season 15 before joining the game in Season 16, and a hero currently being called “Aqua” who will land in Season 18 and can control water.

Season 15 launches on February 18, while features like hero bans and map voting are coming later this year, in that order, according to Blizzard.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/overwatch-2s-next-update-overhauls-the-game-with-perks-and-loot-boxes-212409206.html?src=rss

MyFitnessPal, a popular, free food logging app, is getting into AI, specifically letting AI plan your meals for you. Following an acquisition of a startup called Intent, MyFitnessPal is adding an AI-generated meal planning feature for subscribers.

The meal plans the updated MyFitnessPal app will be able to create take into account subscribers’ “goals, preferences, dietary habits, and routines,” according to MyFitnessPal, via information the app already has on you, and what looks like a survey. The feature will also be part of an end-to-end experience. Any plan the app creates can be automatically translated into a grocery list for the next time you’re at the store, or an order to a grocery delivery service if you’d prefer to do as little as possible.

MyFitnessPal

Given the sheer number of recipe and diet videos you can stumble upon across social media, trying to simplify the process of planning what you’re going to eat makes sense. Using AI to do it does seem like it could have some unintended consequences, though. Knowing AI’s ability to hallucinate, even if MyFitnessPal isn’t generating recipes from scratch, it still feels like you could end up with some oddball meal combinations or incorrect grocery lists.

The only way to know for sure is to try the AI meal planner for yourself, and if you’re interested, you can already sign-up for a waitlist so you’re able to try it out as soon as its available. MyFitnessPal says meal planning will officially launch in the spring in the US, UK, Ireland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and require joining a new $99.99 annual subscription tier called “Premium+” to use.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/apps/myfitnesspal-is-going-to-let-ai-play-your-nutrionist-191239496.html?src=rss

We’re in the tail end of winter here, but it’s snowing as I write this. Not a lot, but just enough to be a potential frustration to the move I have planned for later this week. Basically, winter weather sucks, and one of the worst things about it is how unpredictable it can be. The Weather Company, owners and developers of the Weather Channel app (but not the TV station) know this, and have just released a feature to try and make planning for storms a little easier.

It’s called probabilistic snowfall, and it aims to give you greater insight into just how severe or impactful a storm might be. You’ll still see the standard “50 percent chance of snowfall” in your forecasts, but in the 72 hours leading up to snow, you’ll also see the percent change for specific snowfall amounts. For example, you’ll see that there’s an 80 percent chance of snow overall, but you’ll also see bars detailing how likely more specific snowfall amounts are. In this screenshot from the app, you can see that five to eight inches is the most likely outcome, followed by eight to 12 inches — enough snow that you might want to change your plans to deal with it.

According to Rachel Chukura, head of product at The Weather Company, that was precisely the vision behind the feature. “The idea is that users can see the different probabilities and know there could be variations, she said. “That’s important because of all the decisions we make in terms of what weather we think is coming. What time do you need to leave for your commute, will there be a school delay, and so on.” And while the company is starting with snowfall forecasts, they also hope to bring it to more forecasting tools over time.

I’ve been using the feature for about a week, just in time to see it pop up for the small storm we had in Philadelphia last night. I obviously can’t say how accurate it is, as I’m not out there measuring snowfall with a ruler. But the few inches we got overnight were in line with the probabilistic forecast, and it was helpful leading up to the storm to know I likely didn’t have to worry about the weather truly being an inconvenience.

The feature is part of the Weather Channel app’s premium subscription, which costs $30 per year. Besides probabilistic snowfall, that also removes ads, shows longer-term forecasts on the radar, adds a 30-mile lightning strike map and provides more detailed 15-minute weather breakdowns. While most people out there will stick with the default weather app on their phones, or just use the free version of the Weather Channel or other similar apps, there’s definitely something to be said for greater insight into how likely you are to get crushed by a snowstorm.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/apps/the-weather-channel-app-can-show-how-likely-you-are-to-get-specific-snowfall-amounts-165900316.html?src=rss

How do you follow up a product that has reigned as the king of mirrorless cameras for the last four years? For Sony, the answer with the A1 was simple: just improve everything. The result is the $6,500 A1 II, a powerful pro-level hybrid mirrorless camera that’s Sony’s best to date.

The A1 II is equipped with a 50-megapixel stacked sensor, not a global sensor like the A9 III, so it’s not quite as fast. However, its blend of speed and resolution makes it the most versatile camera in Sony’s lineup. It also impresses on the video side with 8K 30 fps 10-bit capture, along with 4K slo-mo at up to 120 fps.

I expect a lot out of a Sony flagship camera, though, and while the A1 II has lots of small improvements, there’s nothing terribly innovative. It’s also up against impressive (and cheaper) competition like the $4,300 Canon EOS R5 II and $4,000 Nikon Z8. Plus, there’s the similarly priced pro-level Canon R1 and Nikon Z9. So despite its strengths, I found Sony’s new flagship to be slightly disappointing.

Body and handling

The A1 II is Sony’s best-handling camera to date. In terms of design and control placement, it’s nearly identical to the company’s high-end A9 III. At 743 grams (1.64 pounds), it’s heavier than the 617-gram (1.36 pound) A1, but still a featherweight compared to other professional models like the three-pound Z9. The new grip has slightly softer materials and more rounded contours, so it’s more comfortable and secure to hold than the hard-edged A1. That’s a big help to working pros with heavy lenses.

If you like manual controls, the A1 II is a dream. It has three primary dials, compared to just two on rival flagships. There’s a mode selector ring to choose photo, video and so-called Slow & Quick modes, along with a dual-control wheel for both shooting and autofocus. Around back, there’s yet another dial, plus a joystick and numerous customizable buttons.

The A1 II’s menu system has been refreshed to match the A9 III. It now offers a “home” setting for your most-used features, and everything is neatly organized into sub-menus. Sony also added an easy-to-use section for customizing buttons, dials, the quick menu and more.

Steve Dent for Engadget

Despite the price difference, it’s natural to compare the A1 II’s design and setup with the Canon R5 II as both are high-performance, high-resolution cameras. The R5 II does feel a bit nicer thanks to the more rounded shape and softer materials. But the A1 II has a larger array of controls, so it’s easier and faster to shoot with it once you get used to them. Sony also has a more intuitive menu system that makes it easier to find key settings.

Then there’s the A1 II’s sublime electronic viewfinder (EVF). Though it has the same resolution as the A1 at 9.44 million dots, it no longer drops in resolution at its default 120 fps frame rate. With that, it’s so sharp and bright that it blows away any argument for an optical viewfinder. Sony even provides two eyepiece cups, including what it calls a “squishy” option that molds around your eye to block out light, giving me a fully immersive experience. With all of that, this is easily the best EVF I’ve ever used.

Vloggers complained about the lack of a fully articulating display on the A1. Sony addressed that by outfitting the A1 II with a bright, 3-inch, 2.1-million-dot screen that not only tilts up and down but also fully swivels — ideal for both photographers and content creators.

As before, the A1 II has a dual card slot system with support for both SD UHS II and (sigh) Sony’s CFexpress Type A cards that no one else uses. Those are faster than SD, but not as fast as the CFexpress Type B slots found on the R5 II, Z8 and others.

Steve Dent for Engadget

The Z-type battery delivers a decent 520 shots on a charge, which is just slightly less than the 530 on the A1. It comes with a nice array of ports, including full-sized HDMI and high-speed USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 that allows rapid 10Gbps file transfers. You also get mic and headphone ports, a 2.5 Gbps ethernet connection and a flash sync port. Even the Wi-Fi was upgraded with 2×2 MIMO support that allows 2.5Gbps transfer speeds instead of 1Gbps as before.

Performance

The A1 II is the fastest high-resolution camera available, letting you hit burst speeds up to 30 fps when shooting RAW with continuous autofocus enabled in electronic mode, or 10 fps with the mechanical shutter. Those speeds match or beat its main rivals, but aren’t an improvement over the four-year-old A1. That’s a bit of a surprise, given that the A1 II has a much faster Bionz XR image processor borrowed from the A9 III.

The autofocus is a big improvement, though. It locks onto subjects quicker than before, so I saw fewer out-of-focus shots when firing off bursts. The A1 II also has Sony’s latest algorithms and AI features from the A9 III that make subject-recognition faster and more user-friendly. It can now recognize human bodies, faces and eyes, along with animals, birds, insects and several types of vehicles. On top of that, the A1 II is Sony’s first camera to automatically identify those subjects so you don’t have to tediously select them yourself. In other words, if you’re photographing birds and happen to see a bear, you won’t waste valuable time switching modes.

Sony is a bit late to the game with this auto subject selection, as Canon and other brands have had it for a while. However, the A1 II has the best implementation I’ve seen to date, as it chooses and locks onto subjects more quickly. Like other cameras, it can get tripped up in situations with multiple subjects, occasionally selecting the wrong one. With human subjects, Canon has an edge thanks to its face-memorization feature on the R1 and R5 that will always try to lock onto a specific person.

Steve Dent for Engadget

While the A1 II has both a mechanical and electronic shutter, the stacked sensor’s fast readout speeds mean you can use the latter almost exclusively. Even in sports like golf with high speed movements, skewing and distortion is rarely an issue when using the electronic shutter, and you can shoot photos silently without disturbing participants.

Pre-capture is a key new feature, letting you keep up to 70 frames when half-pressing the shutter button, before fully pressing it. That reduces the odds of missing a decisive moment in a scene.

When it comes to stabilization, the A1 II also represents a first for the company. It offers 8.5 stops, beating the A9 III by a half-stop and matching the EOS R5 II and R1. Thanks to that, I was able to nail sharp photos even at ridiculously slow shutter speeds, like a full second. That’s ideal when you need to shoot in low light or deliberately blur moving subjects without using a tripod.

While the A1 II is quick, it didn’t bring the generational leap I expected compared to a four-year-old camera. My professional photographer friends (who already own A1s) felt the same way and won’t be upgrading.

Image quality

The A1 II is not just fast, but also delivers high resolution, and that combination is why you pay the big bucks. Images are sharper than just about any full-frame camera, with the exception of Sony’s own A7R V. Dynamic range is excellent and colors are accurate when shooting JPEGs, though I prefer Canon’s warmer images straight out of the camera.

The new model has the same sensor as the A1, but Sony managed to boost dynamic range very slightly at higher ISOs. As a result, you get minimal noise up to around ISO 6,400 and images are very usable at ISO 12,800. This is outstanding for a 50MP camera, and better than Canon’s EOS R5 II. Beyond that, and up to the camera’s maximum ISO 32,000, noise starts to become distracting.

RAW files give photographers ample room to dial down blown out highlights or boost detail in shadow areas. If you need the maximum amount of dynamic range, you’ll want to shoot using the lossless compressed RAW format, as lossy compressed RAW files are noticeably worse in highly detailed images. The downside to the latter is that shooting them limits burst speeds to 20 fps and fills your memory card much faster.

While image quality is outstanding, it’s not much of an improvement over the A1. For studio and landscape photographers who value image quality above all and already own an A1, the A1 II likely isn’t worth the investment.

Video

On paper, the A1 II is a powerhouse for video, offering up to 8K 30 fps recording and 4K 60 fps(up to 4K 120 fps with no sound), with 10-bit log shooting available. It comes with a new feature that lets you load custom LUTs when shooting in log (S-Log3) mode, so you can better judge your exposure. It also has a setting that lets you better match footage with Sony’s professional cinema cameras. That’s on top of the other improvements I already mentioned, like the fully articulating display and upgraded stabilization, that are also beneficial when recording video.

Steve Dent for Engadget

Autofocus is much improved with more reliable tracking of moving subjects, as I found when shooting a fast-moving soccer event. It also supports the same subject tracking modes available when capturing photos (eyes, faces, bodies, birds, animals and vehicles).

Looking closer, though, the video capabilities are slightly disappointing. Unlike the much cheaper Nikon Z8 and Canon EOS R5 II cameras, the A1 II doesn’t offer internal RAW recording, possibly because the CFexpress Type A slots can’t handle the required bandwidth. That can make a big difference with video quality and the ability to adjust colors and levels when editing.

Still, when recording 8K or 4K 10-bit log video at the highest data rates, image quality and dynamic range are solid. The S-Log3 and 10-bit features give content creators a lot of room to tweak footage shot in dim interiors or a bright sunny day.

The in-body stabilization may be the best I’ve seen on any camera to date. The optical mode does a great job removing any hand jitters if you don’t move around too much. And for walking or running, the electronic stabilization (not available in 8K) provides near GoPro-like smoothing, with none of the sudden jolts seen on other models. If you do need to move the camera quickly, rolling shutter is usually a non-issue. I only saw any distortion when shooting 8K video, and even then, it was minimal.

Wrap-up

Steve Dent for Engadget

The A1 II is an awesome camera and near the top of the food chain in terms of speed and power. Nearly every aspect has been improved over the A1, including the stabilization, body design and autofocus.

However, the innovation that Sony is known for is lacking here, and on top of that, the A1 II is very expensive. With that taken into account, I think it falls short. The A1 II is only a mild upgrade over the A1 and when it comes to video, it’s lagging behind the Nikon Z8 and Z9 as well as the Sony R5 II.

If you already have the A1, I don’t think the A1 II offers enough extra to justify a new investment. And anyone who is more serious about video should consider either the Canon R5 II or Nikon Z8, as both offer higher-quality RAW video at up to 8K 60p for less money. However, for pros or serious amateurs going into the A1 lineup for the first time, who focus on photos and have no qualms about the $6,500 price, the Sony A1 II is a great pick.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cameras/sony-a1-ii-review-a-powerhouse-camera-that-falls-short-of-its-own-high-standards-150053430.html?src=rss

$449 is a lot to pay for earbuds. When you consider the quality of the options at $100 and below, it may seem exorbitant. However, Noble Audio hasn’t just crafted another set of high-end wireless earbuds. The company is offering something unique on the FoKus Rex5: five drivers. Most earbuds have one or two, but Noble has put its in-ear monitor (IEM) expertise to work here, packing in a 10mm dynamic driver, a 6mm planar driver and three balanced armature drivers.

The result is absolutely incredible sound quality for a set of wireless earbuds. A wide, immersive soundstage surpasses every other set I’ve tested, and I’ve tested a lot of them. However, audio performance alone doesn’t make a complete product. There’s still battery life, active noise cancellation (ANC), customization and other features for Noble to contend with. And the company needs to check all the boxes to justify that price.

Design of the FoKus Rex5

The FoKus Rex5 earbuds are very green. From the charging case to the aluminum and acrylic housing, the company is dedicated to that hue on this model. Its gold accents won’t be for everyone either. The styling is akin to a set of IEMs, which Noble also makes in spades. If you’re looking for other colors from the company, the pricier FoKus Prestige ($599) will be available in black and blue when they’re back in stock.

Other than the color scheme and marbled acrylic shell, the FoKus Rex5 looks like standard earbuds — at least in terms of its shape. The rounded, triangular frame mimics a set of generic in-ear monitors and it fits well in the ear. Weight is nicely balanced too, with nothing sticking too far out from your head. This all leads to a secure, comfy fit that never becomes a burden, even after hours of constant use. Additionally, Noble includes nine sets of extra ear tips across three shapes in the box. One of those is foam instead of silicone, if you’re into that, and the diversity of the pack should help you find an ideal fit for your ears.

Software and features

All of the settings and features for the FoKus Rex5 reside in the Noble FoKus app. Here you’ll find battery percentages for each earbud, quick access to the personalized EQ, media controls and noise-cancellation toggles up front. On the right side, an expandable menu offers a 10-band EQ, EQ curve, personalized EQ and touch control settings.

Noble opted for Audiodo’s customizable sound software to power its Personal EQ feature. Like some of the competition, this tech takes you through a setup process to calibrate the audio to your hearing. The FoKus Rex5 has a Qualcomm QCC3091 chip inside that stores these custom profiles on the earbuds. This means that the audio tweaks stay with you on any device you pair to without having to download the app multiple times. Noble says Personal EQ works well for people with uneven hearing, offering balanced sound at the appropriate levels.

For me, the test determined that I needed a boost in the high frequency range, which raised the volume for vocals and guitars. I don’t love it. The stock tuning is a better blend of all the instruments and I prefer the balance of that mix. This doesn’t mean the feature won’t help you, it just means that you might want to keep the default settings rather than opt for Personal EQ.

The FoKus Rex5 is equipped with multipoint Bluetooth connectivity, which adds convenience to daily use. The earbuds seamlessly switched between my MacBook Pro and my iPhone whenever I got a call or started playing audio there. What you won’t find on the Rex5 is automatic pausing as the earbuds don’t have a proximity or wear sensor on the back side. Perhaps the company needed every millimeter for all of those drivers, but this is a handy feature that would have been great to have.

FoKus Rex5 sound quality

Billy Steele for Engadget

It’s amazing how much nuance five drivers will allow you to hear when listening to music. Noble says its driver array “effortlessly delivers rich, full bass, detailed mid-tones and crystal-clear highs,” and I found that to be true across a range of genres. Where most earbuds have a frequency range of 20Hz-20kHz, which is in line with the capabilities of the human ear, the FoKus Rex5 extends that a bit to 20Hz-40kHz. Am I confident that I can hear that extra high frequency? No. Does that impact my rating of the sound quality? Not at all.

I’m well aware that artists, producers and recording engineers make the decisions on how to split instruments on the left and right channels. But for the first time, I could clearly hear the separation in the guitars on songs like L.S. Dunes’ “I Can See It Now…” and across the entirety of Jason Isbell and the 400 Unit’s latest live album. There’s a sonic division on these earbuds that’s more segmented, yet everything still blends well for a great immersive sensation. It’s like you’re standing in the middle of the studio. You can hear that the lead guitar is situated to the right while the rhythm player is on the left. A lot of earbuds would smash them together.

There’s also minute detail in guitars, drums, vocals and more with the FoKus Rex5. You can hear the texture in the vocals on Julien Baker & TORRES’ “Sugar in the Tank,” and it sounds like you’re almost inside the acoustic guitar on that track. There are a number of flagship-quality earbuds that deliver fine details well, but I’ve never heard the level of subtlety that the FoKus Rex5 provides song after song. And the earbuds do so with a robust soundstage that, once again, envelops you like you’re standing in the middle of a performance rather than simply streaming tunes.

Noble offers support for aptX Adaptive and Sony’s LDAC codecs on the FoKus Rex5, in addition to SBC and AAC. I tested primarily with Apple Music, including a lot of albums in either lossless or Dolby Atmos. All of the songs from the service sounded incredible with these earbuds, although the crunchy, layered guitars on that L.S. Dunes record sounded particularly stunning (that album is Dolby Atmos, Lossless and Apple Digital Master).

ANC performance

Billy Steele for Engadget

Noble doesn’t go into too much detail about the ANC setup on the FoKus Rex5, other than saying the “sophisticated” tech “effectively minimizes external noise.” Unfortunately, that effectiveness is just average. The earbuds only dampen constant noise sources like fans and noise machines. And while they slightly lower the volume of human voices nearby, they suffer the same inefficacy as much of the competition there. Simply put, you’re not buying the FoKus Rex5 for the ANC performance, it’s the sound quality that’s the primary draw. But I’d argue you should have both if you’re spending $449.

Call quality on the FoKus Rex5

Call quality is another area Noble could improve. The FoKus Rex5 is usable for calls, but the audio performance is average at best. If you’re looking for something to use for virtual meetings, or any situation where you need to sound crystal clear, these earbuds aren’t a great option. What’s more, the ambient mode doesn’t beam your voice back through the buds on calls. I kept feeling like I was shouting just to hear myself during those chats.

Battery life

Noble promises up to five hours of listening time with ANC on, or up to seven hours without. What’s more, the company packed an extra 35-40 hours of use in the wireless charging case, which is longer than most of the competition can muster. There’s a 15-minute quick charge feature that will give you two hours of use as well.

During my tests, the FoKus Rex5 easily met the stated figures, and even went beyond them by about 30 minutes. Five hours of noise-canceling use is standard these days, but it’s nice to see that Noble delivered on this, even with the additional drivers and codec support.

The competition

In terms of sound quality, only Bowers & Wilkins’ Pi8 comes close to the pristine audio performance of the FoKus Rex5. Unfortunately, those earbuds don’t offer a complete package either. And at $399, they’re still a bigger investment compared to the likes of Bose, Sony and Sennheiser. You’ll get excellent sound on the Pi8, though the level of detail and separation isn’t on the level of the five-driver Rex5. ANC performance is slightly better, but still not robust, and there’s a lack of advanced features that are offered by much of the competition on products that cost less.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/audio/headphones/noble-fokus-rex5-review-incredible-sound-if-youre-willing-to-pay-for-it-130043824.html?src=rss