Google denied dismissal of wiretapping claims in Street View data snooping suit

Google denied dismissal of wiretapping claims in Street View data snooping suit

Google’s already vowed to pony up $7 million and destroy passwords, emails and other data collected from unsecured WiFi networks through its Street View cars, but the damage won’t stop there. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has denied the company’s attempt to dismiss wiretapping claims in a class action suit over the debacle. Page and Co. argued their actions could pass under a wiretap exemption since data transmitted over WiFi is an electronic communication that’s easily accessible to the public. However, the panel of judges didn’t buy the search giant’s argument. “Wi-Fi transmissions are not ‘readily accessible’ to the ‘general public’ because most of the general public lacks the expertise to intercept and decode payload data transmitted over a Wi-Fi network,” Judge Jay Bybee explained. Secondly, the court ruled that the data transmitted over WiFi can’t be classified as mostly audio, so it falls “outside of the definition of a ‘radio communication.'”

“We are disappointed in the Ninth Circuit’s decision and are considering our next steps,” a Google spokesperson told Bloomberg. Now that Mountain View isn’t getting off this hook, expect it to dish out more compensation soon.

Filed under:

Comments

Via: AllThingsD

Source: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (PDF)

DOJ defends Apple e-book price fixing injunction, says publishers had it easy

E-book on an iPad

The US Department of Justice isn’t buying publishers’ arguments that proposed injunctions against Apple for alleged e-book price fixing are excessive and contradictory. DOJ attorney Lawrence Buterman claims in a response letter that the penalties against Apple are necessarily harsher, since it didn’t settle the accusations like its reported co-conspirators. The group objection even justifies Apple’s punishment, Buterman claims; it suggests that publishers are just waiting until the end of a two-year ban on agency pricing to raise prices once again. The five-year restriction imposed on Apple could keep prices down for longer, the lawyer says.

Apple, meanwhile, isn’t done with its objections. In addition to an earlier request for a stay on proceedings pending an appeal, it now contends that the court excluded or ignored testimony while giving Amazon and Google witnesses too much credibility. The company will present more of its opinion at a conference today with both the DOJ and the presiding judge, but we’re not expecting a quick resolution — neither side is budging at this stage.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: CNET, GigaOM

Source: Letters to the court (1), (2), (3), (4)

Appeals court upholds Nintendo victory over IA Labs in patent lawsuit

Nintendo Wii Balance Board

Companies that prevail in patent lawsuits can’t relax until the inevitable appeal is over — just ask Motorola. Nintendo, however, can take a momentary break. A US Court of Appeals just upheld the company’s win over IA Labs, declaring that the Wii Balance Board doesn’t infringe on an IA Labs patent. While the ruling isn’t all that vital when the accessory is now a rarity at best, it puts IA Labs on the hook for Nintendo’s $236,000 attorney bill. It also sends a warning to other companies plotting similar legal assaults, although we’d still expect lawsuits when other patent holders are hitting paydirt.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: Nintendo

Appeals court denies ReDigi appeal, says music downloads can’t be resold

Appeals court denies ReDigi appeal, says downloaded music can't be resold online

ReDigi took a gamble that it could resell legally purchased song downloads, much as you would that one-hit wonder CD you bought in high school. Unfortunately for ReDigi, the odds weren’t ultimately in its favor: a Southern District of New York court has shot down ReDigi’s appeal against a Capitol Records lawsuit accusing it of copyright infringement. The court didn’t accept ReDigi’s view that first sale principles apply to strictly digital music, at least as its service implements the technology. While the startup tries to keep traders honest by making them delete originals after a resale, the process by its digital nature still involves making a copy of the track without Capitol’s permission, according to the court. We’ll have to wait to know what penalties ReDigi might pay, but there’s enough legal precedent in the case that it’s doubtful others will follow in the service’s experimental footsteps.

Filed under:

Comments

Via: The Verge

Source: Santa Clara Law (PDF)

YouTube scales back automatic Content ID takedowns, improves appeals process

YouTube scales back automatic Content ID takedowns, improves appeals process

In the last several years Google has become quick to respond to complaints of copyright infringement. Unfortunately, its record in dealing with unfounded claims (specifically on YouTube) is a bit mixed. In particular the process for appealing a Content ID takedown has left many users frustrated and with little recourse in the event of a rejected dispute. And its the content owners themselves who make that decision. Starting today, even if a dispute is rejected, users can file an appeal that leaves a content owner with one of two choices — recind the complaint or file a proper DMCA takedown notice. To minimize the amount of appeals and disputes Google is also launching an improved Content ID algorithm that identifies potentially invalid claims and places them in a queue to be reviewed manually before takedowns are issued. For more, check out the source.

Filed under: ,

YouTube scales back automatic Content ID takedowns, improves appeals process originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceYouTube Creator Blog  | Email this | Comments

US Appeals court rules Motorola can’t enforce injunction against Microsoft in Germany… again

US court rules Motorola can't enforce German injunction against Microsoft, keeps the Xbox 360s flowing

In another face of the ever turning world of patent battles, Reuters reports Microsoft has snagged a victory over Motorola as the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in its favor today. Motorola had obtained an injunction in Germany against Microsoft products — including the Xbox 360 and Windows 7 — based on its h.264 patents back in May, but today the court upheld a previous decision putting enforcement on hold because of Microsoft’s existing lawsuit against Moto for breach of contract. Microsoft’s push to leverage its patents into licensing payouts from manufacturers of Android devices have seen the two at each other’s throats since at least 2010, when the folks from Redmond lodged an ITC complaint over nine patents and followed up with another suit accusing Motorola of charging unfair license fees for its patents. Motorola fired back with its own pair of lawsuits — all of this a year before we heard it would be acquired by Google — and the battle was on. Whether or not this moves us any closer to any resolution remains to be seen, but at least Bavarian gaming consoles are safe, for now.

Filed under: , , ,

US Appeals court rules Motorola can’t enforce injunction against Microsoft in Germany… again originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:22:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceDan Levine (Twitter), Reuters  | Email this | Comments

Apple denied Galaxy Nexus and Tab ban in Germany

Apple denied Galaxy Nexus and Tab ban in Germany

Samsung is having slightly better luck in Munich than it is here the US in its ongoing legal battle with Apple. The high court upheld a previous ruling that Cupertino’s patent relating to “list scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display” was invalid. The end result is that the Galaxy Tab 10.1N and Galaxy Nexus will stay on shelves in Germany, while Apple undoubtedly looks for a new avenue of attack against its primary competitor (one we presume will also be of the legal variety). The decision to deny an injunction against the 10.1N comes only two days after the same device passed a similar challenge in Dusseldorf, where the cosmetic design was the focus. Samsung was obviously pleased with the result, saying that it confirmed the company’s position that its Android products did not infringe on Apple’s IP. Cupertino, on the other hand, remained predictably silent. Of course, this war is far from over, and it’s only a matter of time before a new ruling hands one of the two manufacturers another small victory.

Filed under: ,

Apple denied Galaxy Nexus and Tab ban in Germany originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:40:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceMacWorld  | Email this | Comments

Apple wins stay on having to post ‘Samsung did not copy’ notice

Apple wins stay on having to post 'Samsung did not copy' notice

Apple’s pride can stay intact for at least a little while longer: the company successfully won a stay on a UK ruling that would have it post notices clearing Samsung’s name in the wake of the two tech giants’ patent dispute in the country. Apple now won’t have to face any kind of public flogging unless it loses an appeal on the non-infringement verdict, which is due to be heard in October. Not surprisingly, the iPad creator doesn’t want its own site to become a billboard promoting someone else’s work. The decision makes Samsung’s victory that much more bittersweet — along with losing that instant satisfaction from a humbled Apple, it still has to accept a verdict that claims the Galaxy Tab supposedly isn’t cool enough to have been an imitation.

Filed under:

Apple wins stay on having to post ‘Samsung did not copy’ notice originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:59:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceBloomberg  | Email this | Comments

Court upholds EU antitrust decision against Microsoft, reduces fine slightly to $1.07 billion

Court upholds EU antitrust decision against Microsoft, reduces fine slightly to $107 billion

Europe’s second-highest court has finally denied Microsoft’s 2008 appeal of its 899 million euro ($1.35 billion) EU antitrust fine, while reducing the award to 860 million euros ($1.07 billion). If you can’t remember that far back, Redmond was hit with the penalty for delaying information about its operating system to rival companies, impeding their progress in competing with the software giant. It’s not known if a further appeal is possible, but we suspect that the company won’t give up if it’s got any options — it’s not exactly pocket change we’re talking about.

Court upholds EU antitrust decision against Microsoft, reduces fine slightly to $1.07 billion originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 27 Jun 2012 05:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceReuters  | Email this | Comments