Hasta La Gadget!

Starting Thursday, Comcast will add TV shows from ABC and Fox to its video on-demand library, making it the only provider that offers shows from all four broadcast networks (including NBC and CBS) as soon as the day after they air. There’s a list of all the TV shows Comcast will be offering in the press release after the break — no Modern Family or House? weak — so the next time you forget to DVR Cops, you’re covered. Also, now that DirecTV has broken the seal on premium VOD early release movies, Comcast also mentioned it is still in negotiations to provide similar access to flicks. With no specifics to announce it’s possible the pricing or windows could differ from what we’ve seen so far, so we’ll just advise Senior Vice President and General Manager of Comcast Video Services Marcien Jenkes to take a long look at our poll results before signing anything.

Continue reading Comcast is first with VOD from all four major networks, still negotiating for early release movies

Comcast is first with VOD from all four major networks, still negotiating for early release movies originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:02:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  Comcast Voices  | Email this | Comments

Just a couple of weeks after removing several channels from its live TV streaming iPad app Time Warner Cable has added most of them back again. The notable exception here are networks owned by Viacom, which it took to court last week. So far, other than announcing Discovery and Fox channels are back on the TWCable TV iPad app, we weren’t able to get anything other than a no comment out of anyone at the companies involved. That means we don’t know if the channel providers have spontaneously come around to Time Warner’s way of thinking (this seems unlikely) or if it has simply decided to press the issue. We’ll see who is suing who next week, until then you can enjoy watching whatever happens to be on Fox News Channel, FX or National Geographic (if you actually do enjoy that, we don’t like to live by programmers broadcast schedules – DVR4LIFE) on your iPad as much as you like.

Time Warner Cable brings back Discovery, Fox channels to its iPad app originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:37:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  TW Cable Untangled  | Email this | Comments

Time Warner Cable was the first party to blink in the battle with programmers over its new live TV streaming TWCable TV iPad app, removing channels from Viacom, Fox and Discovery. The company’s official statement indicates its merely choosing to focus on the “enlightened programmers” who support its cause and that it will provide replacement channels (maybe BBC America, since it’s in all the screenshots) ASAP, possibly as soon as tomorrow. Expect the legal fight to continue to heat up between Time Warner, which believes it has obtained all the rights necessary to provide these channels on any screen in a customer’s home, and the programmers, that think it hasn’t.

Throwing more gasoline on the fire is word from Cablevision that its new iPad app with TV and video on-demand access was supposed to be out already and is merely awaiting Apple’s approval before it launches. According to the Wall Street Journal it will go forward launching the Optimum Link — formerly PC to TV Media Relay — product that brings video from their PC to the TV tomorrow. Check out the list of pulled channels after the break or on Time Warner’s blog, we’ll let you know when or if anything changes.

Continue reading Time Warner removes channels from iPad app while Cablevision prepares one of its own

Time Warner removes channels from iPad app while Cablevision prepares one of its own originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:49:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  TWCable Untangled  | Email this | Comments

We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: Time Warner Cable is made up of some insanely shady folks. And frankly, it’s not just TWC to blame here — CenturyLink, Embarq and a smattering of other big telecom companies are banding together in order to push the ironically-named H129 “Level Playing Field” bill straight into law. Unfortunately, said bill sailed through the clearly oblivious (or “persuaded”) North Carolina House this week, with just 37 sane individuals voting against 81 delusional proponents. For those outside of the loop, the bill effectively suggests that commercial entities — municipal ISPs like Wilson’s own Greenlight that provide greater levels of service with lower costs — are unfairly competing against for-profit monoliths. In short, that’s an absolute joke. Rep. Bill Faison nailed it with this quote:

“This bill will make it practically impossible for cities to provide a fundamental service. Where’s the bill to govern Time Warner? Let’s be clear about whose bill this is. This is Time Warner’s bill. You need to know who you’re doing this for.”

Yours truly just so happens to reside in the wonderful state of North Carolina, and knows first-hand what it’s like to live in a major metropolitan area with a single high-speed broadband carrier. TWC has only recently announced impending DOCSIS 3.0 coverage, but early installations in the heart of Raleigh have been fraught with latency issues and router difficulties. Oh, and it’s charging $99 per month for a service with 5Mbps up; for comparison’s sake, Greenlight gives customers 10Mbps internet (in both directions), home phone and expanded basic cable for the exact same fare. So, NC lawmakers — how exactly do your constituents gain access to that “level playing field?”

[Image courtesy of IndyWeek]

Big cable-backed broadband bill soars through NC House, one step closer to stifling ISP competition originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:24:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink ArsTechnica  |  WRAL  | Email this | Comments

Those premium channels really add up, huh? Ohio resident Daniel DeVirgilio’s bank rejected his cable payment request–apparently his account couldn’t handle the $16.4 million bill, which was up a bit from the usual $80 a month.