

The new Rolls-Royce Ghost not only is the most luxurious car you’ll ever drive, it’s also one of the quickest at 4.8 seconds to 60 mph, and – this may be a surprise – its technology offerings are virtually unsurpassed, particularly the vision systems. It debuts in the U.S. this spring as a smaller and sportier $245,000 counterpoint to the $380,000 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
The redesigned 2010 Hyundai Tucson represents a big step up for this small crossover utility vehicle (CUV). It looks better, the cockpit feels nicer, road noise is reduced, and a USB music adapter and satellite radio come standard. But Hyundai took a step backward with other technology options. You need to spend $3,700 to get navigation on the entry model GLS. Bluetooth is standard only on the higher-end Limited. The ride is stiff. Hyundai’s advantages over the competition aren’t quite as clear-cut with the Tucson compared to other Hyundai models.
Toyota is a Japanese car and it’s a German word that comes to mind, schadenfreude: taking glee in the misfortunes of others. In this case, take glee if you want, but also take advantage of their misfortunes if you’re in the market for a car. Toyota’s reputation is horrible this month. Whatever ails the cars is relatively minor (I believe) but prices will depressed and dealers will be cutting prices to build showroom traffic. If you’re thinking of buying, now’s the time. Some tips after the jump, plus how to deal with a sticking throttle.
The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro lives in two eras. It’s a 1970s muscle car at heart – big, loud, visible – yet it’s also more polished thanks to the dozens of microprocessors that keep the rear end from breaking loose under acceleration, maintain fuel economy in the mid-twenties, and provide connections for your iPod and cell phone. If you’re a pony car fan, the choice of Camaro vs. Ford Mustang comes down to whether you’re a Chevy guy or Ford guy. Ford offers more cockpit technology even if the Camaro has just about enough on its best-equipped V6 and V8 models.
NASA and GM Create Humanoid Robot
Posted in: NASA, robot, Robots Robotics, Space Tech, Today's ChiliThe impending robot takeover gets closer: NASA and GM have developed and built Robonaut 2, a second generation humanoid robot that is faster, more dexterous, and more technologically advanced than before. Both companies said that the new robot can use its hands to do work, and even work safely alongside people. OR SO THEY SAY.
“This cutting-edge robotics technology holds great promise, not only for NASA, but also for the nation,” said Doug Cooke, associate administrator for the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington, in a statement. “I’m very excited about the new opportunities for human and robotic exploration these versatile robots provide across a wide range of applications.”
NASA and GM hope their robotics partnership–through a Space Act Agreement at the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston–will lead to advanced safety systems for future vehicles, improved safety and efficiency in manufacturing plants, and in space, the ability to aid astronauts during hazardous missions. I’m not scared at all.
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, is caught up in Toyota’s unintended acceleration problems. Wozniak’s 2010 Toyota Prius unintentionally accelerates to as much as 97 mph when using automatic cruise control, he says. Wozniak told Bloomberg News that Toyota and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration haven’t responded to his complaints submitted over the past two months. (Maybe his iPhone wasn’t in a 3G coverage area?)
Insurance industry researchers say they’re not sure that the use of cell phones leads to more car accidents. While conventional wisdom has been that holding a cellphone and talking while driving is hazardous, crash data doesn’t clearly show it. What’s more amazing, the conclusion comes from the Highway Loss Data Institute, an arm of the insurance industry that generally finds most every aspect of driving to be dangerous to motorists and by coincidence to insurance industry loss reserves.
Snow tires and technology aren’t an obvious pairing since there are no microprocessors embedded in the tire. (In the wheel, yes, to monitor tire pressure.) The technology goes into R&D computer simulations of how rubber compounds and tread patterns work in deep snow, in a dusting of snow, and on dry pavement. A recent weekend trip in a powerful sports car with rear drive and not much weight in back proved uneventful in an eight-inch snowstorm because the car was fitted with snow tires all around. The combination of snow tires, traction control, and stability control allowed me to go confidently with rear-drive where others were slipping in all-wheel-drive vehicles with summer tires.