LG E980 Stops By The FCC, Could Be The Optimus G Pro For AT&T

LG E980 Stops By The FCC, Could Be The Optimus G Pro For AT&TIf phablets are your kind of device, then devices like the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 and LG’s Optimus G Pro could be of interest to you .While the Galaxy Note 2 has been launched, the Optimus G Pro is expected to make its way into North American markets come Q2 2013, and thanks to an FCC filing, it looks like LG could be right on schedule. An FCC filing for a certain LG E980 was spotted recently and with the LG Optimus G being the E970, it can be safely assumed that the E980 would be referring to the Optimus G Pro. The FCC filing has also revealed radio bands that would suggest that AT&T would be the carrier that the Optimus G Pro will be launching on. Either way we don’t have any official confirmation yet, but hopefully this FCC filing means that a launch is nearing, so check back with us at a later date for the details! In the meantime if you’re trying to decide if the LG Optimus G Pro is the phone for you, check out our review of the device here.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: HTC Myst Passes Through FCC With AT&T-compatible LTE, HTC One Releasing In The U.S. ‘Before The End Of April’,

LG E980 arrives in the FCC’s database with LTE: is this the Optimus G Pro for AT&T?

LG E980 arrives in the FCC's database with LTE is this the Optimus G Pro for AT&T

It’s reported that the E980 is LG’s codename for the Optimus G Pro (considering that the E970 is the Optimus G), and while we’ve already reviewed the global variant, it sure looks as if AT&T is setting itself up to carry the handset here in the US of A. Arriving in the FCC’s database today is the item you see above, replete with LTE bands that match AT&T’s profile. Assuming it’s the G Pro, AT&T loyalists can get ready for a 5.5-inch, 1080p display, one of the fastest mobile processors on the planet, 2GB of RAM and a Jelly Bean-infused edition of Android. The only remaining questions? When, where, how much, and in what color.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: FCC