Google’s new concession offer gets EU antitrust chief’s stamp of approval

Google and the European Commission have been doing their seemingly interminable antitrust dance for three years now, but today’s development might signal a shift in the tides. In July, the EU’s Competition Commissioner, Joaquin Almunia, had deemed Google’s previous concession offer unworthy and informed Eric Schmidt that the company had to “present better proposals.” According to The New York Times, Google has evidently heeded his words and ponied up a new offer that’s evidently enough to please the antitrust chief, although specific terms have yet to be disclosed.

At the heart of the problem is Google’s tendency to squeeze its rivals (including, but not limited to, Microsoft, Foundem and Hotmaps) out of search results, making it difficult for users to find them. The new offer allegedly addresses those concerns, and while it’s unlikely that a decision will be made earlier than next spring, the EU’s tentative approval of Google’s efforts could mean that case is inching its way to a settlement. Almunia has said that he intends to present the proposal to the complainants in the case, who seem less than enthused. David Wood, the legal counsel for the Microsoft-backed Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace (ICOMP) told the Times, “It is far from clear from Commissioner Almunia’s description of the revised package of proposed commitments that they go nearly far enough.”

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: The New York Times, Reuters

European Commission proposal would end some roaming fees, enshrine net neutrality

European Commission VP Neelie Kroes

The rumors were on the mark — as part of a larger telecom plan, the European Commission’s Neelie Kroes has proposed regulation that would largely scrap roaming fees. The measure would ban all charges for incoming calls within the EU after July 1st next year, and give carriers incentives to drop many other roaming fees altogether. Companies would either have to let customers use “roam like at home” plans in EU countries or offer a choice of roaming providers with cheap rates. Outbound, mobile-to-mobile calls within member states would cost no more than €0.19 per minute.

The strategy also includes rules for enforcing net neutrality across the EU. The proposal bans internet providers from blocking and throttling content. Firms could offer priority services like IPTV only as long as these features don’t slow down other subscribers, who could walk away from contracts if they don’t get their advertised speeds. There’s no guarantee that the European Parliament will vote in favor of the new measures, but it’s already clear that the Commission is far from happy with the telecom status quo.

[Image credit: The Council of the European Union]

Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Via: Dominic Laurie (Twitter)

Source: European Union

Rumored EU law would scrap cellular roaming fees, let travelers choose providers

Leaked EU law reportedly scrubs roaming fees, lets travelers pick foreign providers

It’s no secret that European Commission regulators dislike roaming charges. However, The Guardian now hears from sources that the Commission may propose legislation next week that eliminates those charges altogether. Carriers would reportedly have to charge the same service rates in every European Union country, forming alliances in nations where they don’t operate. Networks that don’t scrap roaming fees by July 2014 would also have to give customers a choice of foreign providers. Subscribers wouldn’t even have to swap SIM cards or phone numbers, according to The Guardian. A spokesman for the Commission’s Neelie Kroes declined comment on the rumor, but noted that the agency wants roaming “out of the market” — clearly, the cellular status quo won’t last for long.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: The Guardian

European Commission proposes framework for unified patent court

European Commission proposes framework for unified patent court

Getting a patent in Europe is hard. Making sure it’s protected in every European Union member state is even harder. That’s why the European Commission announced today that it plans on simplifying this notoriously convoluted process by proposing the legal framework for a unified patent court. Currently, patents must be validated in each member state to gain EU-wide protection, but as you know, patent litigation is everyone’s favorite past time. Companies can incur prohibitively high costs simultaneously defending their claims in multiple countries. By cutting the number of patent courts down from 28 to one, a unified system would streamline the process of handling infringement cases, and perhaps even promote growth and innovation. While the measure must be approved by the European Parliament and individual EU states in order to become law, the proposal appears to be a step forward in the right direction.

Filed under:

Comments

Via: EurActiv

UK government issues ultimatum on Google’s troublesome privacy policy

A year and a half after Google introduced its new, “simpler” privacy policy, UK regulators have come to a verdict: Mountain View must now change that policy by September 20th or face the possibility of “formal enforcement action.” In a statement, the Information Commissioner’s Office said:

“We believe that the updated policy does not provide sufficient information to enable UK users of Google’s services to understand how their data will be used across all the company’s products.”

German and Italian governments have reached much the same conclusion, while France and Spain also wrote strongly-worded letters to Google last month. For its part, Google has the following response:

“Our privacy policy respects European law and allows us to create simpler, more effective services. We have engaged fully with the authorities involved throughout this process, and we’ll continue to do so going forward.”

As The Guardian points out however, Google’s statement doesn’t really explain how its privacy policy can “respect” EU law and yet be considered objectionable by five major EU governments.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: The Inquirer (1), The Guardian

EU toughens penalties for internet-based crimes

EU toughens sentencing for internetbased crimes

Virtual crime can lead to very real damage, and the European Parliament knows this well enough to have just issued a draft directive toughening up the EU’s penalties for internet-based violations. Get caught running a botnet and you’ll face a minimum of three years in prison; dare to attack critical infrastructure and you may spend five years behind bars. Don’t think of hiring someone for corporate espionage, either — the directive makes whole companies liable for online offenses committed in their name. EU nations will have two years to adopt the directive as law, although an existing, unofficial agreement suggests that at least some countries won’t wait that long to enforce the new rules.

Filed under:

Comments

Via: Reuters

Source: European Parliament

European Parliament votes to investigate US surveillance of EU residents

European Parliament votes to investigate US surveillance, may suspend data agreements

Not surprisingly, the European Parliament isn’t happy to hear that the NSA and other US agencies are allegedly snooping on communications in Europe and elsewhere. It isn’t just complaining loudly, however — the Parliament just voted 483-98 in favor of a resolution that will investigate US surveillance activities in Europe and report on their impact before the end of the year. The measure also asks EU officials to consider limiting the data they voluntarily provide to American authorities, such as shutting down programs that forward air passenger and bank records. There’s nothing in the resolution that would immediately affect the EU-to-US communication pipeline, but that could change in half a year — US intelligence outlets may not get their European information served on a silver platter for much longer.

[Image credit: JLogan, Wikipedia]

Filed under:

Comments

Via: ZDNet

Source: European Parliament

EU Commissioner teases net neutrality rules: no throttling, easy switching

European Commission teases net neutrality rules no throttling, lots of transparency

The European Union has only taken baby steps toward proper net neutrality legislation so far. Today, however, the European Commission’s Neelie Kroes just gave the first glimpse of what those continent-wide rules could look like. Her proposals would let companies prioritize traffic, but not block or throttle it. The measures would also prevent gotchas once customers have signed on the dotted line: internet providers would not only have to offer clear terms of service, but make it easier to jump ship for something better. There are concerns that the proposals would let providers favor their own services, but Kroes also makes no arbitrary distinctions (and thus exemptions) between wired and wireless networks, like we’ve seen in the US — can we get these rules elsewhere, please?

[Image credit: The Council of the European Union]

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: GigaOM

Source: European Union

EU reportedly accepts Google’s antitrust concessions for online search

Google antitrust saga

Google has no doubt been on pins and needles wondering whether or not the European Commission will accept the search engine changes it’s proposing to avoid an antitrust showdown. If what we’re hearing is right, Larry Page and crew might just get to relax in the near future: sources for the New York Times claim that the EU agency has accepted Google’s proposal. Reportedly, the terms of the deal are close to what had been mentioned last week. Google would have to explicitly label search results that come from its own services while sometimes showing those results from others. It would also have to test the results in the field to get feedback from both the Commission and competitors. While neither Google nor European officials have confirmed the apparent leak so far, any truth to the story could mean the long-running saga might draw to a close before it gets ugly.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: New York Times

Google delivers EU antitrust concessions, now subject to feedback from rivals

Google provides formal concessions to EU antitrust concerns, now subject to feedback from rivals

There’s no question that most of the talk between Google and EU regulators over the firm’s search ranking practices have taken place behind closed doors, but now the antitrust inquiry is one step closer to a binding resolution. Following a preliminary assessment in which the European Commission laid out its concerns, Google has offered up a formal list of commitments in attempt to assuage the regulator — and in the process, avoid a nasty fine that could top $5 billion. Reuters sources suggest that one concession may involve labels within search results that distinguish Google’s services from those of its rivals, but whatever the final resolution entails, EU Commissioner Joaquin Almunia asserts that it’ll be a legally binding agreement. As for the next step, Google’s proposal will be subject to input from its peers, which includes complainants such as Microsoft. If there were ever an opportunity to kick up some dust, we reckon this’d be it. Then again, it could be that Redmond is more preoccupied with Android nowadays.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: Reuters