Synchronicity Makes File/Folder Backups Simple

This article was written on August 24, 2010 by CyberNet.

synchronicity.png

We’ve covered all kinds of backup utilities on the site, but the one covered in this article is hands-down one of my favorites. Synchronicity is free, open source, and available in a portable format. After you fire it up the first time you’ll probably be shocked that something laid out this nicely only uses 215KB on your hard drive… I know I was.

Setting up your first profile consists of filling out the information in the screenshot above, and after that you can go on to schedule the task if it’s something you want to run on a regular basis. Here are all the different things Synchronicity is capable of:

  • Fully customizable synchronization and backup, including:
    • Limited synchronization: synchronize some folders only, or synchronize folders contents without synchronizing subfolders.
    • Full regexp support for files inclusion/exclusion
    • 3 synchronization methods:
      • Mirror
      • One-way incremental
      • Two-ways incremental
    • File hashing
  • Full scheduling support (daily, weekly, monthly, at a particular time, etc.)
  • Support for multiple profiles
  • Fully portable: settings are stored in a single config file
  • By-volume-label paths: Create Synchronicity can backup directly to “My Usb”\Documents for example, by automagically locating the “My Usb” drive.
  • Advanced features:
    • File hashing, various comparison options
    • Time offsets, to compensate for wrong DST settings
    • Loose timing: allow file time to differ by a few seconds
    • Multiple file systems support (all the ones supported by Windows)
    • Native support for UCN (network) and relative paths
    • Proxy support for updates check.
    • For command line addicts: support for command-line arguments, allowing you to queue profiles, run silently, with optional preview display.

If you haven’t tried out Synchronicity then I highly recommend that you do. It’s not as full-featured as something like SyncBack (e.g. this doesn’t include FTP support), but it includes a lot of the features most people will need… plus some.

Synchronicity Homepage (Freeware/Portable; Windows only)

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

Another Samsung flip-phone leaks out: the Hennessy, with dual 480 x 320 displays

Samsung Hennessy leaks out with dualscreen

In the realm of Samsung flip-phone rumors, color us confused. Earlier, we saw a manual on Samsung’s site for a Galaxy Folder (SHF-E400K), with dual 800 x 480 displays, a dual-core Snapdragon 400 CPU, 2GB of RAM, gold trim and LTE support. Now, we’re seeing a so-called Samsung Hennessy (SCH-W789), another dual-screen clamshell model with 320 x 480 resolution on both of its 3.27-inch screens, a quad-core 1.2GHz CPU, 5-megapixel camera, dual-sim support and, yes, a “Luxury Gold” color trim option. The latter model has leaked multiple times from Asian rumor sites, while the presence of a manual and photos for the Folder seem to all but confirm that model. We remain skeptical, though, as the sources may have mixed up the similar-looking models, and in any case they may never arrive in the US. If they’re real, though, we’ve obviously underestimated the size of the cognac-and-cigar throwback market.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: SamMobile

Source: Sammy Hub

Leaked Samsung ‘Galaxy Folder’ suggests return of the dual-display flip phone

Leaked Samsung 'Galaxy Folder' suggests return of the dualdisplay flip phone

It feels like yesterday we were discussing the alleged death of form factor diversity in the smartphone world, and now Samsung comes up with this: a mid-range clamshell called the Galaxy Folder (SHV-E400K) with displays on both sides of the lid. According to Japanese site RBMen, which discovered a Korean-language user manual for the device on Samsung’s website, at least one of the displays is a 3.7-inch AMOLED panel with 800 x 480 resolution. Other specs include a Snapdragon 400 dual-core chip, 2GB of RAM and LTE support. The basic design is nothing new to Samsung, which came out with the similar SCH-W2013 in China last year, and the SCH-W999 a year before that, but it’s good to see evidence of its survival in 2013 — and especially if it’s destined for Samsung’s home market. If it was up to us though, we’d put some e-ink in that second display.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: AndroidBeat, RBMen

Source: Samsung (PDF download)

Metal Folder Puts Your Filing Cabinet on Your Wall, Sorta.

Home decor that doubles as actual functional stuff is totally in demand these days, mostly because people are living in homes with such limited space. Another one of these items is the aptly-called “Metal Folder” by Debra Folz.

Metal Folder

Instead of flimsy cardboard, these standard size folders are constructed from aluminum. You can’t exactly open or close them, and you won’t be able to staple into it with in case you want to fasten your papers. However, you can mount it to your wall and slip documents into it as you walk past, so you can come back and get them later.

metal folder silver

They’re available in silver and ivory and are priced at $48(USD) on Debra’s website.

[via BLTD]

Twitter’s cooking up a way for you to archive your old tweets, relive your Bieber fever again and again

Twitter's cooking up a way for you to archive your old tweets, relive your Bieber fever again and again

Frustrated by a lack of access to your thoughts and feelings about world events and sandwiches circa 2008? Twitter’s working on a way to let users export and download old tweets into a file, according to CEO Dick Costolo. As far a service for search all users, the exec doesn’t see such a solution coming any time soon, telling reporters, “It’s a different way of architecting search, going through all tweets of all time. You can’t just put three engineers on it.”

Filed under:

Twitter’s cooking up a way for you to archive your old tweets, relive your Bieber fever again and again originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:01:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceNew York Times  | Email this | Comments