Hasta La Gadget!

Remember all the fuss a couple years ago about Apple storing your location data from iPhone 4 handsets and the subsequent privacy lawsuits that resulted? Well, that’s all amounted to nothing for four of the plaintiffs, as their claims have just been dismissed in court by none other than Judge Lucy Koh. She said that those folks failed to show they had relied on any alleged Apple misrepresentations, and suffered no harm in any case. Shortly after the allegations were made in 2011, Apple countered that it was just using the data to improve connection times, and the only thing it did wrong was keep it for too long. As a result, it ended up patching the problem so that the offending file only stored your information for a week, instead of a year. Despite Koh’s ruling, Apple has paid out similar suits elsewhere, and still has up to 19 more to contend with stateside. Anyway, after what we’ve seen since then, the whole thing now seems downright quaint.

Filed under: Cellphones, Mobile, Apple

Comments

Source: Reuters

Cast your memory back to 2011 and you may remember a Texas judge ruling that the seizure of cellphone records without a search warrant violated the Fourth Amendment. Fast-forward to today, and the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals has just overturned that very decision, arguing that law enforcement’s collection of such data does not violate the Fourth Amendment, and doesn’t need to pass the probable cause test. Instead, as the info is considered a service provider’s business records, authorities can get ahold of it so long as they have “reasonable grounds” and obtain a court order. The data in question can include numbers dialed, the date and time of communications and info allowing officials to suss out the phone’s location at the time of a call.

Despite the gavel’s recent action, the issue is far from settled. As the Associated Press notes, a New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled search warrants must be used when officers request access to location information from phones details, while Maine and Montana passed legislation earlier this year requiring the same. To dive into the nitty gritty details of the case for yourself, give the bordering source link a click.

Filed under: Cellphones

Comments

Via: Wall Street Journal, Associated Press

Source: 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals