Bloomberg is reporting that the recent NSA Prism scandal is just a tiny scratch on the privacy surface. Citing "four people familiar with the process", the agency claims that in fact thousands of technology, finance and manufacturing companies work with US national security agencies.
     |
Providing another wrinkle to the recently exploding privacy debate, a Wall Street Journal report indicates which wireless companies are providing call information to the government. According to the infamous people familiar with the matter, foreign ownership of Verizon and T-Mobile presents several obstacles including them in the program. Chief among them is that the requests are top secret and might prohibit some of the owners from being aware.
Meanwhile, Sprint and AT&T are said to have “long cooperated with the government,” although it may not really matter which provider you’re using when it comes to popping up in NSA-requested files. Last week’s leaked court order requested call logs and metadata from Verizon Business Network Services, which, along with AT&T provides the backbone most calls go through. No matter which carrier you’re on, if your call is routed along that backbone, the information about it is recorded and could be passed along.
Filed under: Wireless, Mobile, Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile
Source: Wall Street Journal
The highly-classified, confidential documents that revealed the NSA’s massive data-mining operation, PRISM
| |
Are you worried about Barack Obama reading all your emails and listening to all your phone calls? Beefing up your privacy settings is one thing, but fighting in the greater war to protect your Constitutional rights is another. You should do the latter, y’know, to be a good American. Here’s how to get started.
| |
If you’re already overwhelmed by the sheer amount of activity surrounding the ongoing NSA fallout, we’re guessing that now would be an excellent time to go on vacation. Predictably, lawsuits are already being filed against the National Security Agency, the second of which is coming from the American Civil Liberties Union. Essentially, it’s challenging the constitutionality of the surveillance program in a New York federal court, deeming the initiative “one of the largest surveillance efforts ever launched by a democratic government.”
The suit claims that the program infringes upon (at least) the First Amendment and the Fourth Amendment of the United States constitution. As The Verge points out, the ACLU’s prior NSA lawsuit (in 2008) was dismissed in a 5-4 outcome “on the grounds that it did not have legal standing to sue, since there was no way to prove it had been targeted.” Given the leaked documents involved now, however, the outcome could be much different this go ’round. Of course, one has to wonder: if all of this leads to the public shutdown of the program, are we capable of trusting the same government that started it to not actually operate it in secret?
Filed under: Cellphones, Internet
Via: Wired
Source: ACLU [PDF]
Google CEO Larry Page and Chief Legal Officer David Drummond made a general call for more transparency in their response to the PRISM revelations last week, and Drummond has gotten quite a bit more specific with that request today. In a post on the company’s Public Policy blog, he says that he’s sent a letter to offices of the Attorney General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation asking that Google be allowed to publish aggregate numbers of the national security requests for data it receives, including FISA disclosures, “in terms of both the number we receive and their scope.” Those numbers, he says, “would clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made,” adding, “Google has nothing to hide.” You can find the full letter at the source link below.
Update: Reuters is reporting that Microsoft also wants Uncle Sam to loosen up and let it be more transparent with the “volume and scope” of national security requests and FISA orders. “Our recent report went as far as we legally could and the government should take action to allow companies to provide additional transparency,” Ballmer and Co. added.
Update 2: Hot off the heels of Redmond’s call to the US government, Facebook is voicing similar sentiments regarding increased transparency. “We urge the United States government to help make that possible by allowing companies to include information about the size and scope of national security requests we receive,” read a statement released by the social network.
Filed under: Internet, Microsoft, Google
Source: Google Public Policy Blog, Reuters (1), (2)
Google CEO Larry Page and Chief Legal Officer David Drummond made a general call for more transparency in their response to the PRISM revelations last week, and Drummond has gotten quite a bit more specific with that request today. In a post on the company’s Public Policy blog, he says that he’s sent a letter to offices of the Attorney General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation asking that Google be allowed to publish aggregate numbers of the national security requests for data it receives, including FISA disclosures, “in terms of both the number we receive and their scope.” Those numbers, he says, “would clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made,” adding, “Google has nothing to hide.” You can find the full letter at the source link below.
Source: Google Public Policy Blog
You might say the week is never really done in consumer technology news. Your workweek, however, hopefully draws to a close at some point. This is the Weekly Roundup on Engadget, a quick peek back at the top headlines for the past seven days — all handpicked by the editors here at the site. Click on through the break, and enjoy.
This is site is run by Sascha Endlicher, M.A., during ungodly late night hours. Wanna know more about him? Connect via Social Media by jumping to about.me/sascha.endlicher.
