Twitter Receives Own Patent

Twitter Receives Own PatentTwitter co-founders Jack Dorsey and Christopher “Biz” Stone are now proud owners of holding patents, where the USPTO’s database did share more intimate details concerning a messaging system that allows users to follow one another, while showing off messages without having to send it over to a unique recipient. Of course, that is the long of it, and if you were to bring things down to a far more concise explanation, Twitter would be the word that you are looking for.

Now that the Twitter patent has been officially assigned to the social network, it goes to show what a long road it has been, considering how the application itself was filed in July 2008, where both Dorsey and Stone were listed as the intellectual property’s inventors. It is nice to know that Twitter announced their Innovators Patent Agreement that gives a detailed dossier on how the social network and its employees will use any of their work related patents for defensive purposes only, so do not expect them to pay a visit to any court house anytime soon as they go on the offensive.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Sapphire Announces Mac Edition Radeon HD 7950, 600 Students To Receive MacBook Air At Illinois High School,

Twitter receives patent on itself after years of waiting

This is a good day for Twitter, which just received a patent on itself from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The patent describes the Twitter service, covering such things as sent messages that aren’t destined to a recipient. The patent request was filed back in 2007, and lists Biz Stone and Jack Dorsey as its inventors.

twitter logo small

You can check out the patent for yourself over at the USPTO website. The abstract details both a method and a system that provides “device-independent point to multipoint communication” able to receive messages from email, web, texting, and more. It then goes on to detail at length the various functions and features of Twitter that make it the update broadcasting service that it is.

Back in April last year, Twitter unveiled the Innovator’s Patent Agreement via its blog, where it details how the company feels on the use of patents and their potential to impact innovation. In the Agreement, which Twitter refers to as the IPA, the company states that it will only use patents in a defensive manner, seeking employee permission for offensive use. The IPA went into effect late last year.

In other Twitter news, we reported yesterday that Twitter’s Jack Dorsey wishes to become mayor of New York City. That will be quite the career change for Dorsey, who currently serves as CEO of Square and Executive Chairman of Twitter. This news came to light during a 60 Minutes interview, where Dorsey said that he is serious but little else about the ambition.

[via The Verge]


Twitter receives patent on itself after years of waiting is written by Brittany Hillen & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

LG accuses Samsung of infringing on eye-tracking patent on GALAXY S 4

The tango between Samsung and LG is starting back up again. LG is accusing Samsung of infringing on one of its eye-tracking patents. Specifically, the dispute deals with Samsung’s “Smart Pause” on the GALAXY S 4 and “Smart Video” on the Optimus G Pro, both of which automatically pause video when your eyes stray away from the screen.

LG-announces-Smart-Video-eye-recognition-tech-for-Optimus-G-Pro1

LG claims it applied for the patent in 2009, as well as other eye-tracking patents as far back as 2005. There’s nothing that the company can do right now, but once the GALAXY S 4 officially launches late next month, they’ll be able to investigate and see whether or not Samsung infringed on one of LG’s patents.

Samsung denies any infringing on LG’s patent, and the says that it uses its own technology for “Smart Pause.” LG’s Optimus G Pro was unveiled at Mobile World Congress last month and is expected to release sometime next month in the US, and there’s already an update out for the new phone that enables eye scrolling, similar to Samsung’s “Smart Scroll.”

This isn’t the first time that LG has turned up the heat on the battle between the Optimus G Pro and the GALAXY S 4. Before the GALAXY S 4 launch, LG trolled Samsung in New York City by placing a clever and bold ad directly on top of Samsung’s ad for the new phone, officially mocking the company before the phone has even been unveiled. Of course, this is only the start, so we’re bound to see more skirmishes between the two companies in the near future.

[via The Next Web]


LG accuses Samsung of infringing on eye-tracking patent on GALAXY S 4 is written by Craig Lloyd & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

LG suspects Samsung of infringing its eye-tracking patents with the Galaxy S 4

Samsung’s Galaxy S 4 isn’t even available yet, but already it’s being eyed for possible patent infringement. According to a report from Korea’s Yonhap News, LG suspects the S 4 might violate eye-tracking patents used in the Optimus G Pro. At the crux of this squabble is Samsung’s Smart Pause feature, which LG finds similar to its Smart Video technology. Chiefly, LG is focusing on a patent it applied for in 2009, though the company also plans to investigate whether Samsung infringed other eye-tracking patents dating back to 2005. So far, of course, Samsung has denied any wrongdoing, saying its eye-tracking tech is implemented differently and is based on proprietary technology. Given that the phone isn’t even out yet, we’ll leave it to LG to do its due diligence before accusing Samsung in court.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: The Verge

Source: Yonhap News Agency

Nokia Granted Injunction Against HTC In Germany Over Alleged Patent Infringement [Updated]

Nokia Granted Injunction Against HTC In Germany Over Alleged Patent Infringement [Updated]If you were looking to get your hands on a HTC device in Germany, you might want to hurry because according to reports, it seems that Nokia has managed to successfully obtain an injunction against HTC in Germany over an alleged patent infringement. The patent in question is that of battery saving capabilities while using wireless technology, and HTC phones with Qualcomm chipsets in them are said to be the ones that have infringed upon this patent. We’re not sure if all of HTC’s phones will be affected, but for now that seems to be the case. No word on when the injunction will take effect, but we expect that HTC will at the very least appeal the decision, or perhaps even arrive at some sort of licensing agreement with Nokia. After all, if HTC managed to reach a settlement agreement with Apple, why not Nokia, right?

Update – According to a HTC rep who got in contact with us, the devices listed in the injunction cover three handsets that HTC no longer imports to Germany, so we guess HTC will not be hugely affected. HTC’s statement can be read after the break. (more…)

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: BlackBerry Performs ‘At Last’ Terribly To Celebrate BB10 US Launch, T-Mobile Hints At Going Contract-Less On March 26,

Nokia hits HTC with German power saving patent injunction [Update: HTC statement]

Nokia has been granted a patent injunction against HTC in Germany this week that has to do with power saving technology. The injunction was handed down by Judge Dr. Holger Kircher presiding over the Mannheim Regional Court. Kircher and the panel of judges he presides over found that HTC infringes Nokia’s patent number EP0673175. The patent is for “reduction of power consumption in the mobile station.”

The trial was conducted on February 5 and reports indicate that the HTC legal team was unable to deny infringing on the patent with devices from HTC that use a QUALCOMM baseband chip. The ruling would seem to indicate that Nokia would now have the leverage to force HTC to license the patent unless HTC and QUALCOMM can deactivate the power saving technique. The problem with simply deactivating the power saving technique is that users of the affected devices would see less battery life.

The technology covered in the patent at its basic level is able to save battery power by identifying specific packets of data that can be reconstructed using a portion of an encoded message. The patent covers a system that whenever possible provides power to the receiving component only when further portions must be received in order to decode the message and packets of data sent. The technology is able to save battery power when it senses a strong and clear radio signal by not receiving redundant data.

The technology covered in the patent is apparently particularly effective when the phone is in standby mode. The injunction handed down by a German court is permanent and not preliminary. Nokia was also granted a recall of infringing devices from retail locations and a declaration that it is entitled to damages to be determined during subsequent litigation. Nokia is also alleging that HTC is infringing on the same patent within the US and the UK.

Update: HTC has given us the following statement, and highlighted the fact that the injunction affects only devices which are no longer offered in the German market.

Today, the District Court of Mannheim handed down a judgment that HTC had infringed the German part of patent EP 0673175 (the ‘175 patent) entitled “Reduction of Power Consumption in a Mobile Station”. HTC is naturally disappointed with the decision of the court, as it believes that Nokia failed to prove its case adequately. However, as the judgment only covers three handsets that HTC no longer imports into Germany (the Wildfire S, Desire S and Rhyme), this judgment is of little significance. HTC’s German business will not be affected by it.

The power-saving technology described in this patent is trivial and contributes only a negligible reduction in power-consumption, so HTC has removed any allegedly corresponding functionality from all of its current German handsets as a precaution against any attempt by Nokia to extend the scope of the judgment unfairly. HTC will be appealing the present decision but also believes that this patent is invalid and so will be continuing with the invalidity actions pending before the German Federal Patents Court and the English Patents Court.

To date, of the twenty-two infringement actions that Nokia has brought against HTC in Germany, two (EP 1329982 and EP 1474750) have been stayed because of concerns over validity and two (EP 0812120 and EP 1312974) have been dismissed outright. This decision cannot be described as a ‘win’ for Nokia because it only applies to handsets that are no longer imported into Germany, and newer HTC handsets do not use the accused technology. As Nokia clearly went to great lengths to assert its strongest patents first, we are confident that its non-essential patent portfolio poses little threat to HTC.

[via Foss Patents]


Nokia hits HTC with German power saving patent injunction [Update: HTC statement] is written by Shane McGlaun & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Apple Sued By THX For Alleged Patent Infringement

Apple Sued By THX For Alleged Patent InfringementOne of the biggest corporate law suits that we have seen in the year 2012 was definitely the one between Apple and one of South Korea’s most famous exports, Samsung products. The former claimed that the latter infringed upon their patents across a relatively wide spectrum of hardware and software, and right now, the cases are still being worked out in different courts around the world, where both sides have had experienced their fair share of victories and defeats. This time around, Cupertino is on the receiving end of the lawsuit, where THX claims that Apple has misused their patented speaker technology in industry leading hardware such as the iPhone, iPad and iMac.

THX, the sound innovation company which was founded by George Lucas, recently filed suit against Apple in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, touting that the single speaker patent infringed was for a “narrow profile speaker.” THX’s U.S. Patent No. 7,433,483 for “Narrow profile speaker configurations and systems,” was a property that was granted in 2008, where it described methods to effectively enhance sound quality even in a compact speaker arrangement that has been thrown into consumer electronics similar to computers and televisions. THX says that Apple’s violation has resulted in monetary damages and irreparable harm, and they are fishing for royalties and damages in order to make up for lost profit. Do you think that THX has a chance to win this?

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Analyst Predicts Retina iPad Mini To Launch Q3/Q4 2013, WhatsApp For iOS To Switch To Subscription Model Later This Year,

THX sues Apple over speaker patent

THX sues Apple over speaker patent

Audio titan THX has filed a lawsuit against Apple, claiming that Cook and Co. infringed a patent it has for technology regarding narrow profile speakers with enhanced sound output that can be built into electronics. According to the court filing, versions of the iPhone, iPad and iMac are culprits that rely on the tech in question. Apple Insider notes that the new, slender iMacs seem to use a design similar to one described by THX, which includes channeling audio down a slim duct. Though THX is out to stop the infringement or collect damages from Cupertino, both companies could settle their differences before the affair escalates into a full-on courtroom brawl.

Filed under:

Comments

Via: Apple Insider

Source: Bloomberg

Apple sued by THX over patent infringement

Another day, another patent lawsuit. This time it is THX initiating the legal warfare, and Apple is in its sights. According to George Lucas-founded THX, Apple is guilty of infringing upon one of its patents via the iMac, iPad, and iPhone. The complaint was filed on Friday in California, with THX stating that Apple’s actions have caused it harm.

thx

The patent in question was filed in 2008, and involves speaker technology that provides sound output boost and that enables a speaker to be connected to TVs and computers. According to THX, Apple uses this technology in many of its devices and in doing so has caused it to lose money and suffer “irreparable harm.”

In the complaint filed, THX seeks for Apple to either fork over money in compensation for the losses and damage THX says its alleged infringement has cause, or to stop using its patented technology and to agree to a reasonable royalty. Given the products Apple allegedly uses the technology in, it is reasonable to assume that monetary damages could be a substantial sum.

THX originated as a way to make sure that the audio in Lucas’s Star Wars movies could be properly produced outside of the theater. The company did this by establishing standards, as well as a certification for sound systems, reports Bloomberg. Not surprising, Apple declined commenting, while THX said that it doesn’t discuss pending legal issues.

[via Bloomberg]


Apple sued by THX over patent infringement is written by Brittany Hillen & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Apple Patent Suggests Using Smart Cover As A Wireless Charging Pad

Apple Patent Suggests Using Smart Cover As A Wireless Charging PadWouldn’t it be awesome if Apple’s Smart Cover could double up as a wireless charging pad for iPhones? We’re not sure how many of you guys actually thought about that, but it seems that in a recently discovered patent, Apple might have toyed with that idea. According to the patent, it reads, “A method for wireless powering a tablet device, comprising: determining if a protective cover is in a closed configuration with respect to the tablet device; enabling a wireless power receiver circuit in the tablet device when it is determined that the protective cover is in the closed configuration with respect to the tablet device; and wirelessly receiving power from a wireless power transmitter associated with the protective cover.”

It’s a pretty outlandish idea and it has been pointed out that there could be some flaws with this idea, namely that you would have to stick a battery into the Smart Cover. This would make the cover heavier, not to mention a lot more dangerous as it could be exposed to heat and what happens when it overheats? Will it damage the iPad in the process? However on the flipside, having a Smart Cover double as a wireless charging pad has its merits – namely convenience. For example if there aren’t enough sockets and you need to charge both the iPad and iPhone at the same time, this could be accomplished by placing the iPhone on the cover.

Now since this is a patent, it’s hard to say if and when Apple will ever turn it into reality, but in the meantime what do you guys think? Good idea?

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: TabRider Is Essentially Guitar Hero With Real Guitars, The ampjacket Amplifies Your iPhone, iPad Mini And iPod Touch’s Sound Naturally,