Apple Patents A Smart To-Do List That Uses Contextual Information From Your iPhone To Fill The Gaps

Image (6) features_reminders_location.jpg for post 47262

An Apple patent filing published by the USPTO and spotted by AppleInsider on Thursday describes a task manager that goes well beyond the standard Reminders app that is now built in to iOS and Mac devices. The patent describes a smart to-do list that combines natural language processing for easy text entry, with contextual information sourced from your device to fill in all the little details that you might omit in making a casual task entry. It’s a little bit like Google Now in the way it actively seeks information from the device, but with the specific aim of turning a lightweight reminders app into a much more powerful and intelligent getting-things-done tool, without any additional complexity required on the user’s part.

The use case is simple: A user quickly enters a task into their phone such as “send him an email,” because they think at the time it’ll be enough to trigger a memory about all the other important details. But as we all know, what we think we remember one moment doesn’t turn out to be what we actually do remember later. Apple’s patent application addresses this by having the phone look for supporting information, including recently read and opened emails, recent voice messages or calls, text messages and more to determine who the user is talking about, and potentially even when might be a better time to call, depending on calendar information. It could fill in details in this way for all kinds of different tasks, including “attend meeting later,” “catch flight at 8 PM,” and many more.

Apple accounts for both spoken and text entry of tasks, and actually it’s surprising how much this resembles Fantastical’s vision of how calendar management should be handled on iPhone, with the added benefit that an Apple system-level process would have access to everything stored on the phone, potentially making its powers of deduction much stronger in terms of making educated guesses.

The system would also be able to group and trigger task and notifications based on cues, so that an item like “pick up eggs” would automatically be set to be triggered when near a grocery store, and would live in a sub-category of tasks that acts as a grocery list. Notifications could also be triggered by more than just location and time – one example provided is “Remind me to call my mom the next time I am on the phone,” or “Remind me before sunset this evening.”

Some of these types of features are already being used and improved upon by Google in its rival Android mobile OS via Google Now, but Apple’s patent is also a natural extension of what it has already been trying to do with Siri, Passbook and Reminders in terms of making the iPhone more into a comprehensive personal digital assistant.

Apple and Samsung back in court to tussle over $1bn fine

Apple and Samsung head back into the courtroom today, with the Korean company eager to scythe away at the $1.05bn patent infringement judgement it was ordered to pay back in August. Meanwhile, Apple hopes to inflate the penalty by a further $535m, arguing that since the jury decided Samsung’s infringement was willful, the company should be subject to an even greater punishment. US District Court Judge Lucy Koh of the San Jose, California court will hear arguments from both, as well as deciding which of Samsung’s products should be banned from sale.

In total, there are 26 devices which Apple hopes to have yanked from shelves, of varying ages and including both phones and tablets. The injunction would not automatically cover the very latest Galaxy S III, however, though Apple confirmed back in November that it was aiming to have the flagship – in addition to the Galaxy Note II, Galaxy Tab 8.9 WiFi, Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, Rugby Pro, and the Galaxy S III Mini – added to the list.

Samsung, meanwhile, argues that the penalties calculated by the jury were incorrectly added up, and is demanding a rethink. Shortly after the ruling was first announced, the damages were reduced slightly after Samsung’s legal team spotted the jury had awarded a sum to Apple for devices they had in fact deemed not to infringe in the first place.

The foreman of the jury himself could also give Apple some headaches, with claims that he guided the jury as a whole to decide punitively, rather than make decisions based solely on the value of each infringed patent. A retired software engineer, the foreman also failed to disclose that he was once sued by Seagate Technology, a fact which Samsung argues that – since it is a partner with Seagate – could have prejudiced him.

Even if Judge Koh doesn’t see things Samsung’s way, it’s unlikely to be the end of the legal saga. An appeal is likely, which would delay the payment of any damages, as well as further mitigate any value to a permanent injunction against the currently cited devices.

[via WSJ]


Apple and Samsung back in court to tussle over $1bn fine is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

This Is the Document Outlining Apple’s Settlement With HTC

Or at least, what you can read of it, because vast swathes have been redacted. Still, there are bits you can actually read, so let’s take a look. More »

LG patents smart kiosk for wine cellars, creates a sommelier’s best friend

LG patents intelligent wine reading kiosk, creates a sommelier's best friend

That LG would make a wine refrigerator should come as no shock. This is, after all, the same company that made a smartphone-controlled oven. But, as a recently surfaced patent can attest, it appears the Korean electronics giant may have more than cooling soured grapes on its mind. The USPTO filing, which dates back to December of 2009, describes a “mobile terminal” (think: portable kiosk) outfitted with a camera that’s capable of scanning wine labels, matching them to a database and then delivering any relevant data. Sounds like a handy tool for those one-percenters with an ever-expanding cellar or, more practically, to help professional boozehounds sommeliers at highfalutin restaurants keep their inventory in order. Whatever the case, we’re pretty sure Jack Donaghy approves. Hit up the source below to sift through the legalese for yourself.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: USPTO

Apple files patent application for wireless charging

I think I can see the clouds of another patent infringement lawsuit forming now. Apple has filed a patent application on wireless charging technology using magnetic resonance. The problem as many might know is that wireless charging using magnetic resonance has been around for a long time.

Apple has a patent application, number 20120303980, that outlines its magnetic resonance charging technology. It appears that there is at least one significant difference between most wireless charging technologies on the market today and what Apple’s application outlines. While typical wireless charging solutions require physical contact between the device being charged and a charging mat, Apple’s patent doesn’t.

The system that the Apple patent application outlines allows for wireless charging a distance of up to 1 m from the charging device. Even though Apple’s patent application outlines a wireless technology that doesn’t require contact, it’s certainly not the only company that has been working on wireless charging technology from a distance.

The Apple patent application was filed in November of 2010. Notably, a company called WiPower file the patent in 2008 on the concept of wireless charging as a whole. That company was later acquired by QUALCOMM with the patents becoming the foundation for The Alliance For Wireless Power along with some intellectual property provided by alliance member Samsung.

[via The Register]


Apple files patent application for wireless charging is written by Shane McGlaun & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Judge rules that the patents in the Apple/HTC agreement can be released to the public

Ever wondered what exactly it was that Apple and HTC agreed upon that led to both companies ending the dispute against each other? It wasn’t too long ago that a judge ordered Apple to hand over to Samsung the details of the agreement, a move which we’re sure Apple wasn’t too pleased about as it could have an effect on future negotiations with Samsung (assuming Samsung is willing to play ball). Well if you’re curious as to what sort of patents both Apple and HTC had agreed upon in their agreement, that may soon come to light as Judge Lucy Koh was ruled that while details such as pricing and royalty rates should be kept from the eyes of public as it could put either Apple or HTC at a disadvantage in future negotiations with another company, this apparently does not hold true with the rest of the agreement. Basically what this means is that the patents that Apple and HTC have agreed upon and licensed with one another can be revealed to the public because according to Koh, “there is nothing in the remainder of the agreement that presents a sufficient risk of competitive harm to justify keeping it from the public.”

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: GMail 2.0 for iOS launched, Fox Steals iPhone And Sends SMS Messages With It,

The Secret HTC-Apple Settlement Might Not Be Quite So Secret

Last month HTC and Apple decided to play nice when they reached a settlement over a patent license. While Apple was forced to tell Samsung how much that deal was worth, it thought the rest of the case was secret—but it turns out that might not quite be the case. More »

Patent troll Arendi sues Apple over alleged patent infringement

Patent trolls are nothing new and they often make the headlines by going after high profile companies over a vague patent that said company may or may not have infringed upon. Now it looks like Apple is being targeted by one of them, Arendi S.A.R.L., a company based in Luxembourg. According to Arendi, they believe that Apple has violated three of their patents, but have declined to point out which products in particular have infringed upon them and will argue claim by claim.  According to the patent they’re suing Apple over, it has been described as a “Method, system and computer readable medium for addressing handling from a computer program.” If you’re wondering why this might sound familiar, back in 2009, Arendi went after both Microsoft and Dell over the same patent, and in Markman hearings, it seems that instead of taking it further, both Dell and Microsoft settled with Arendi over an undisclosed amount. With the settlements with Microsoft and Dell acting as precedents, perhaps there is a good chance that Arendi could be successful in their lawsuit against Apple as well.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Naming your kid after Apple’s products/services has apparently risen in popularity, Apple said to have turned to Intel for manufacturing of their mobile chipsets [Rumor],

Judge rules Motorola can’t seek injunctions against the Xbox 360 in patent row

Motorola’s case against Microsoft has been handed a significant blow with a federal judge in Seattle ruling that Motorola can’t use certain patents to seek an injunction against the Microsoft Xbox 360 game console. Microsoft and Motorola are currently fighting a patent infringement battle in a Seattle court. Microsoft originally brought the case against Motorola alleging that Motorola was infringing on its patents with Android smartphones.

Motorola attempted to file a counter suit claiming that Microsoft’s Xbox infringes some patents it owns. However, the federal judge ruled that because the Motorola patents were tied to widely used technological standards it could not be used to seek injunctions against the Xbox 360. That doesn’t mean Microsoft won’t have to pay Motorola licensing fees; it simply means Motorola won’t be able to block sales of the Xbox 360.

It’s also worth noting that since the patents Motorola was trying to use to seek the injunction against Microsoft are for widely used technological standards, it may not be able to squeeze as much money in licensing for Microsoft either. Motorola had argued that FRAND rules should be set aside because Microsoft had sued it, but the judge in the case disagreed.

The judge overseeing the case has made it clear that he believes money in the form of monetary damages against Microsoft is enough in this case. To be able to get an injunction against the product the company has two proof harm was done that money can’t remedy. The patents Motorola hope to use against Microsoft have to do with H.264 standard essential patents.

[via ArsTechnica]


Judge rules Motorola can’t seek injunctions against the Xbox 360 in patent row is written by Shane McGlaun & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Sony patent application details hybrid DualShock / PlayStation Move controller

Sony patent application details hybrid DualShock / PlayStation Move controller

If you think Sony’s DualShock and Move controllers are two halves of a well-rounded gaming experience, you might be pleased to know that the firm has dreamt up a hybrid. A patent application filed last year by Kaz and Co. for a “Hybrid Separable Motion Controller” has just surfaced, and it describes a controller that can function as two independent parts or locked together as one. The application also suggests that the location of the controller’s halves could be independently tracked when separated and that video games played with the Franken-hardware could switch to configuration-appropriate control schemes. A similar concept has popped up before, but that’s no guarantee the contraption will ever see the light of day. In any case, you can hit the bordering source link to dig into the filing and fantasize what such a piece of kit could mean for gaming.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Via: Joystiq

Source: USPTO