Sony tries to patent stylus with friction-based haptic feedback

Sony tries to patent stylus with frictionbased haptic feedback

There’s a certain disconnected feeling that comes with using a touchscreen, and Sony isn’t content with vibration being the sole standard for haptic feedback. The company has filed a bunch of patent applications for a stylus which instead uses artificially generated friction to make it harder or easier to move across the screen. It works using a “rolling contact ball gripping mechanism,” which responds to instructions from the phone or tablet and employs actuators to increase or decrease friction on the roller ball tip. The various filings outline some potential benefits of this stylus-based haptic feedback, including being able to feel yourself “carving and molding” 3D objects in a design application, or understanding your character is “fatigued or damaged” while playing a game. We know that Samsung increased the friction of the Note II’s S-Pen to make it feel more like writing on paper, but Sony’s approach would potentially bring a whole new layer of interaction.

Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Source: USPTO (1), (2), (3), (4)

Microsoft’s Google Glass rival tech tips AR for live events

Microsoft is working on its own Google Glass alternative, a wearable computer which can overlay real-time data onto a user’s view of the world around them. The research, outed in a patent application published today for “Event Augmentation with Real-Time Information” (No. 20120293548), centers on a special set of digital eyewear with one or both lenses capable of injecting computer graphics and text into the user’s line of sight, such as to label players in a sports game, flag up interesting statistics, or even identify objects and offer contextually-relevant information about them.

The digital glasses would track the direction in which the wearer was looking, and adjust its on-screen graphics accordingly; Microsoft also envisages a system whereby eye-tracking is used to select areas of focus within the scene. Information shown could follow a preprogrammed script – Microsoft uses the example of an opera, where background detail about the various scenes and arias could be shown in order – or on an ad-hoc basis, according to contextual cues from the surrounding environment.

Actually opting into that data could be based on social network checkins, Microsoft suggests, or by the headset simply using GPS and other positioning sensors to track the wearer’s location. The hardware itself could be entirely self-contained, within glasses, as per what we’ve seen of Google’s Project Glass, or it could split off the display section from a separate “processing unit” in a pocket or worn on the wrist, with either a wired or wireless connection between the two.

In Microsoft’s cutaway diagram – a top-down perspective of one half of the AR eyewear – there’s an integrated microphone (910) and a front-facing camera for video and stills (913), while video is shown to the wearer via a light guide (912). That (along with a number of lenses) works with standard eyeglass lenses (916 and 918), whether prescription or otherwise, while the opacity filter (914) helps improve light guide contrast by blocking out some of the ambient light. The picture itself is projected from a microdisplay (920) through a collimating lens (922). There are also various sensors and outputs, potentially including speakers (930), inertial sensors (932) and a temperature monitor (938).

Microsoft is keeping its options open when it comes to display types, and as well as generic liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) and LCD there’s the suggestion that the wearable could use Qualcomm’s mirasol or a Microvision PicoP laser projector. An eye-tracker (934) could be used to spot pupil movement, either using IR projection, an internally-facing camera, or another method.

Whereas Google has focused on the idea of Glass as a “wearable smartphone” that saves users from pulling out their phone to check social networks, get navigation directions, and shoot photos and video, Microsoft’s interpretation of augmented reality takes a slightly different approach in building around live events. One possibility we could envisage is that the glasses might be provided by an entertainment venue, such as a sports ground or theater, just as movie theaters loan 3D glasses for the duration of a film.

That would reduce the need for users to actually buy the (likely expensive) glasses themselves, and – since they’d only be required to last the duration of the show or game – the battery demands would be considerably less than a full day. Of course, a patent application alone doesn’t mean Microsoft is intending a commercial release, but given the company’s apparently increasing focus on entertainment (such as the rumored Xbox set-top box) it doesn’t seem too great a stretch.

microsoft_augmented_reality_patent_1
microsoft_augmented_reality_patent_2
microsoft_augmented_reality_patent_3
microsoft_augmented_reality_patent_4
microsoft_augmented_reality_patent_5

[via Unwired View]


Microsoft’s Google Glass rival tech tips AR for live events is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Samsung requests to have iPad mini added to lawsuit

Following Samsung‘s recent victory in having the iPhone 5 added to the present lawsuit between it and Apple, the Korean company has now requested that the recently-launched iPad mini also be added. The Apple device allegedly infringes on two wireless technology patents and several other feature patents that are used for both varieties of the mini iPad. In addition, Samsung has also pursued whether it properly went after the iPod Touch, stating that it will do so if necessary.

Specifically, the company is seeking clarity to verify that it properly used Patent No. 7,672,470 against the iPod Touch. If it is found that the company did not, Samsung will press forward in doing so, adding a couple more blows to its legal battle against Apple. In this case, the patent involve PMP volume control.

Apple, meanwhile, added the Galaxy Note and US-version Galaxy S III to the lawsuit. The companies were granted their requests to add the products after Judge Grewal stated that he was concerned not doing so would prompt a new batch of lawsuits. The lawsuit concerns Apple’s iPad, iPod Touch, and iPhone, as well as nearly two dozen Samsung devices.

Samsung recently requested that the licensing agreement from a settlement between HTC and Apple be provided. The request was granted after Apple offered to provide a censored version, which Samsung argued against in court. The trial is set for 2014, with a no doubt bumpy road of legal matters between now and then.
[via Apple Insider]


Samsung requests to have iPad mini added to lawsuit is written by Brittany Hillen & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


HTC and Apple must provide Samsung with settlement information

On Friday, we reported that Samsung had filed a request in court for access to the license agreement that was formed between Apple and HTC in a settlement. The two companies had been engaged in a lawsuit for two years, with Apple claiming that HTC had violated ten of its patents. Today, Samsung’s request was granted, requiring Apple and HTC to provide the settlement details.

Samsung and Apple have been involved in a variety of lawsuits against each other concerning patents. Recently, a judge ruled that both companies could add products to its existing lawsuit, which is scheduled for trial in 2014. The legal squabble concerns 19 Samsung products and Apple’s mobile devices. Apple is adding the Galaxy Note and US-version Galaxy S III, while Samsung is adding the iPhone 5.

The settlement between Apple and HTC involved a 10-year licensing agreement that covers current and future patents from both companies. Samsung filed the information request to see if any of the patents involved in the settlement are part of the current legal issue between it and Apple, particularly the ’381 and ’915 patents. It also wants to know if Apple included “unique” patents that it does not offer to other companies.

Originally, Apple had offered to give Samsung the information it requested minus the financial terms. Samsung didn’t like this, and argued in court that the financial information was important in order to ascertain the consumer demand for certain patents. The judge expressed skepticism over Samsung’s reasons for requesting the financial info, but ultimately granted the request.

[via The Verge]


HTC and Apple must provide Samsung with settlement information is written by Brittany Hillen & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Buying HTC won’t solve Samsung’s Apple patent problem

Apple‘s licensing deal with HTC has been carefully structured to prevent third-parties such as Samsung from gaining patent protection by strategically acquiring the struggling phone manufacturer, it’s been revealed. The agreement between the two firms was announced earlier this month, though neither Apple nor HTC would confirm much in the way of details; however, according to a heavily redacted version found by FOSSPatents, there’s a special clause present which automatically invalidates the deal should either Apple or HTC be taken over.

“In the event of a Change of Control of a party,” the clause reads, “this Agreement shall automatically terminate unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Parties, effective immediately prior to such Change of Control.” A “Change of Control” is defined as a transaction whereby the participants in the original deal are not left with at least 50-percent of the voting power afterwards, or where one is merged or consolidated with a third party or group of third parties.

The clause can by worked around by securing prior permission by both Apple and HTC, though that seems unlikely to be granted should Samsung attempt to sneak into a favorable patent agreement by throwing some cash at HTC. Given the difference between Samsung’s financial position and that of HTC, such a deal would not be impossible.

Samsung is currently attempting to see an unredacted copy of the full agreement, arguing that the deal – and the value Apple places on the patents in question – has a potentially significant impact on its own ongoing litigation with the Cupertino firm. However, Apple and HTC are apparently willing to share all but the license fees section, FOSS Patents reports, missing 33 words that detail what exactly HTC is paying.

Those figures have prompted some controversy of late, with HTC CEO Peter Chou angrily rebuking suggestions that they amounted to $6-8 per Android device sold as “outrageous” and inaccurate. Apple argues that Samsung “offers no reason … why the consideration amount is relevant” to the injunction motion it has against its Korean rival.


Buying HTC won’t solve Samsung’s Apple patent problem is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Apple patent details iOS journaling system, hints at extrapolated Events functionality

Apple patent details iOS journaling system, hints at extrapolated Events functionality

Apple was today granted a patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, filed as 8,316,046, which lays out the framework for a mobile device to “collect and store journal event data over a time span, the journal event data comprising data associated with a plurality of events, including a location and a timestamp of each event.” Moreover, the first independent claim spells out that the system would utilize geotag data (“locations and timestamps”) in order to parse events.

In layman’s terms, the platform would be able to automatically separate check-ins, pit stops, photos, activities and movements based on when and where things happened. From here, it’s anyone’s guess as to what Apple would do with the information, but you don’t have to gaze beyond the ‘Events’ section in the company’s own iPhoto application to get a few solid ideas. One might even say that Apple’s attempting to provide a Path-like experience within the iOS core, but who knows if it’ll ever actually act on its earlier inclinations. Those who like to let their imaginations run wild can have at it in the source link below.

Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Via: AppleInsider

Source: USPTO

HTC CEO: Apple Android tax estimates are “outrageous”

HTC CEO Peter Chou has blasted “outrageous” estimates at the per-device settlement fee rumored to be required in its cross-licensing patent agreement with Apple, instead describing the deal as “a good ending.” Questioned as to whether a $6-$8 charge per Android phone was indeed the settlement amount during a press event in Tokyo, Chou refused to name a specific number, Reuters reports, but said those figures were both “baseless” and “very, very wrong.”

Neither Apple nor HTC made public the terms of their agreement, though the deal brought to a close several years of lawsuits. At the time, Chou said that the settlement would allow HTC to “focus on innovation instead of litigation,” but its announcement was swiftly followed by speculation as to exactly which concessions each company made.

“I think that these estimates are baseless and very, very wrong. It is a outrageous number, but I’m not going to comment anything on a specific number. I believe we have a very, very happy settlement and a good ending” Peter Chou, CEO, HTC

Despite their best efforts to play things quietly, however, the overspill from the “ending” look unlikely to dissipate any time soon. Samsung has already requested a copy of the settlement, arguing that – depending on which of its patents Apple has included – it could have a significant impact on ongoing court actions between it and its Cupertino rival.

“The issue of Apple’s willingness to license its patents was briefed in Samsung’s opposition to Apple’s motion for permanent injunction” Samsung legal rep Robert Becher said in a statement about the request. ”This license has direct bearing on the question of irreparable harm and whether monetary remedies are adequate.”


HTC CEO: Apple Android tax estimates are “outrageous” is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Samsung Probes Apple-HTC Settlement

Samsung has been eavesdropping after all. Last week, Apple and HTC shocked the entire tech industry when both signed a 10-year licensing agreement for “current and future patents.” Although the details of the deal were not disclosed, a critical question lingers – does the deal include all of Apple’s patents? Moreover, does it include Apple’s so-called “Holy Patents,” patents relating to unique user experiences such as touchscreen functionality and design, patents that cannot be licensed to competitors? (more…)

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Apple loses lawsuit against VirnetX over VPN patent, ordered to pay $368 million in damages, FTC could sue Google and Motorola over abuse of standard-essential patents,

Samsung requests Apple and HTC settlement details

This past weekend, Apple and HTC reached a settlement to end the legal squabble between the two companies. Now Samsung, who has been engaged in a series of lawsuits with Apple across the world, is poking around the deal. Earlier today, the Korean company submitted a formal request in court that, if granted, will require Apple to fork over a copy of the license agreement.

While the Apple – Samsung patent war has been getting the most attention, Apple has been engaged in other legal issues as well, including a two year fight over patents with HTC. Ending the battle was a 10-year licensing agreement between the two companies that encompasses both current and future patents on both sides. The issue started when Apple filed a complaint against HTC, alleging that the company had violated ten of its patents.

Specifically, Samsung is interested in information pertaining to what patents were included as part of the licensing agreement. Two of the patents that were part of the dispute may be part of the current lawsuit between Samsung and Apple, including the ’381 and ’915 patents, according to CNET. The company is also curious about whether Apple tossed in some of its unique patents that it doesn’t offer to other companies.

Samsung’s legal representative Robert Becher offered this statement. “As you know, the issue of Apple’s willingness to license its patents was briefed in Samsung’s opposition to Apple’s motion for permanent injunction. This license has direct bearing on the question of irreparable harm and whether monetary remedies are adequate.”

[via CNET]


Samsung requests Apple and HTC settlement details is written by Brittany Hillen & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Apple granted patent for page-turn animation

If you’ve been a long-time iOS user and also read your fair share of ebooks, then you’ll know that Apple implemented a pretty cool page-turning animation when reading ebooks, meaning that sliding your finger across the screen to go to the next page resulted in the page actually turning, just like it would with a real book. And finally, USPTO has granted Apple the patent for that animation.

The patent’s illustration shows three different images of a virtual page being turned. One with the corner of a page being turned slightly, the next image with the page halfway turned, and the third showing the page almost entirely turned over. A swipe of the finger will activate the page turn, while a vertical finger swipe will flip the page just enough to reveal what’s on the next page.

The patent, which is for “Display screen or portion thereof with animated graphical user interface,” represents only one of 38 different patents that have been granted to Apple this week. The New York Times notes that this isn’t the first “seemingly obvious” patent that Apple has been awarded. The company was granted a patent for the musical note icon for iTunes, as well as the infamous glass staircase design Apple uses in their stores.

iBooks isn’t the only application that Apple uses its page-turning animation in. With iOS 6, Apple uses the animation in several of their own apps, including Maps and the Calendar app for iPad. Another notable patent that Apple won this week was for the iPad Smart Case, which acts much like a Smart Cover but gives the iPad a little added protection all around.

[via AppleInsider]


Apple granted patent for page-turn animation is written by Craig Lloyd & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.