Apple and Samsung can add products to lawsuit, judge rules

On November 6, we reported that Apple and Samsung, in their seemingly never-ending patent war, sought to have additional items added to the existing lawsuit between the two companies. Judge Grewal was reported to have expressed concern that not allowing the companies to add products would trigger a new series of lawsuits. Now, ten days later, he has ruled in favor of the requests.

For its part in this, Apple will be adding the Samsung Galaxy Note, the Jelly Bean operating system, and the U.S.-version Galaxy S III smartphone to the lawsuit. Samsung, in exchange, will be adding the iPhone 5 in its complaint against Apple. In this case, the addition of Android Jelly Bean is only in relation to the Galaxy Nexus device.

Both companies have been caught up in a long battle over patents, with each accusing the other of infringement. Both sides have experienced victories and losses in various courts. The present lawsuit is set for trial in 2014, and concerns 19 Samsung devices, as well as Apple’s iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch. Recently, a jury ruled that Samsung had infringed on six out of seven of Apple’s patents.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal had this to say. “Apple should think twice before opposing similar amendments reflecting other newly released products, e.g. the iPad 4 and the iPad mini, that Samsung may propose in the future.” For those of you up for some legal reading, this is the lawsuit Apple v. Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) Ltd., 12-cv-00630, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).

[via Bloomberg]


Apple and Samsung can add products to lawsuit, judge rules is written by Brittany Hillen & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Apple applies for patent that scales content to match face distance, save us from squinting

Apple tries for patent that scales content to match face distance, save us from squinting

Most software has to be designed around a presumed viewing distance, whether it’s up close for a smartphone or the 10-foot interface of a home theater hub. Apple has been imagining a day when the exact distance could be irrelevant: it’s applying for a patent that would automatically resize any content based on viewing distance. By using a camera, infrared or other sensors to detect face proximity through facial recognition or pure range, the technique could dynamically resize a map or website to keep it legible at varying ranges. Although the trick could work with most any device, the company sees that flexibility as most relevant for a tablet, and it’s easy to understand why — iPad owners could read on the couch without needing to manually zoom in as they settle into a more relaxed position. There’s no knowing the likelihood that Apple will implement an automatic scaling feature in iOS or OS X, let alone make it the default setting. If the Cupertino team ever goes that far, though, we’ll only have our own eyesight to blame if we can’t read what’s on screen.

Filed under: , , , ,

Apple applies for patent that scales content to match face distance, save us from squinting originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceUSPTO  | Email this | Comments

Apple patent describes search for a pinch-to-zoom alternative

The pinch-to-zoom feature was a pretty amazing feature when first introduced. Now when interacting with touch-based devices, it has almost become second nature to pinch-to-zoom when trying to enlarge or zoom out of a webpage or image. That being said, is it possible that there could be a more efficient way of enlarging or zooming out of objects? While it remains to be seen if Apple’s method could prove to be a more efficient solution, the Cupertino company has recently filed a patent for a new method of zooming in to objects that could one day replace pinch-to-zoom. (more…)

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Apple looking into ways to suppress the noise emitted from phone vibrations, Apple granted patent for page curling animation used in iBooks,

Apple looking into ways to suppress the noise emitted from phone vibrations

The point behind the silent mode on phones is to prevent it from ringing in situations where keeping silent is necessary. This could be during meetings, during the movies, while attending a lecture, on a date and etc. Unfortunately due to the vibration built into our phones and depending on the surface on which you place your phone, sometimes having the phone vibrate against the table loudly is as good as your phone not being on silent, and this is apparently an issue that Apple could be looking into. In a recently discovered patent, it seems that Apple is investigating a means to suppress the noise created by the iPhone when it vibrates.

By utilizing visual, movement and audio sensors, the iPhone will be able to monitor its environment when it starts vibrating. This allows the iPhone to detect when its vibrations cause movement (i.e. vibrating so violently that it moves across the table), or if its vibration is actually louder than its ambient noise (i.e. during a seminar when suddenly you can hear the buzzing of a phone going off in the back row). Once those thresholds have been met, a mitigation mechanism will kick in which will either adjust the vibration to a lesser degree, or halt the alert altogether. It sounds like an interesting idea – what do you guys think?

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Apple patent describes search for a pinch-to-zoom alternative, Apple granted patent for page curling animation used in iBooks,

Samsung Not Interested In HTC-Style Settlement With Apple, Exec Says

Image (2) apple-samsung-620x253.jpg for post 206796

Samsung has “no intention” to follow the example of HTC and work out a settlement with legal and consumer tech rival Apple, according to Samsung Electronics Head of Mobile J.K. Shin. He said so to reporters today, the AFP reports, when asked if Samsung might pursue a settlement similar to the 10-year cross-licensing agreement announced by Apple and HTC this past weekend.

Of course, Samsung has little to gain by proclaiming an interest in giving ground in its ongoing patent dispute with Apple, which spans 10 countries, multiple lawsuits and involves both hardware design and software patents. Certainly, Samsung could still be working behind the scenes to come up with such an arrangement, but it’s likely, given the circumstances, that Shin’s statements can be taken at face value in this case.

Consider that Apple and Samsung have made apparently little progress in trying to come together to settle this issue outside of court in the past. Apple reportedly offered Samsung a licensing deal for iPhone and iPad-related patents at around $30 to $40 per phone and tablet, back in 2010, a deal Samsung rejected. And top executives at the two companies have met repeatedly to try to find an arrangement that satisfies both parties, including twice this past year that we know of. Court orders have also been issued to try to force a resolution by getting the companies negotiating, and still, the two are at each other’s legal throats.

Shin also told reporters today that he expects Samsung’s Q4 results to be in line with Q3 with respect to smartphone sales, which basically means the company isn’t sweating its success. Last quarter, the Galaxy S3 became the world’s best-selling smartphone, dethroning Apple’s iPhone 4S as the single best-selling device. The strength of its consumer sales is why I argued Samsung has no strong motivation to arrange a deal like the one agreed to by HTC, and likewise, Apple doesn’t really have a good reason to settle unless it finds terms very agreeable to its position and goals with these lawsuits.


Apple granted patent for page curling animation used in iBooks

Whether you love or hate the skeumorphic design employed in the iBooks app on Apple’s iOS devices, you have to admit that the somewhat realistic effect of the turning pages is quite a pretty one. Well it seems that if you were hoping to see what effect employed on other non-iOS devices in the future, you might not be able to as Apple has been granted a patent for the curling pages turning animation. Of course Apple could always license that patent out, but given that it is somewhat unique, we doubt that they will. For those wondering, the curling effect can also be found in iOS 6 with other apps as well, such as Maps in which the curl will reveal more options, and Calendar. In any case what do you guys think of the page curling animation anyway? Would you rather your pages flip instantly or did you like that touch of realism?

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Microsoft Files For Virtual Page Curling Feature, Google wins patent for directions using cell coverage,

Samsung has “no intention” of Apple settlement says mobile chief

Samsung has “no intention” of chasing a settlement with Apple, its mobile chief has insisted, refusing to follow HTC in ending ongoing patent battles outside of the courtroom. Asked whether an HTC-style agreement was in the pipeline, Samsung Mobile head J.K. Shin told press that “we have no such intention” the AFP reports, going on to predict Q4 2012 sales at least as strong as those in Q3.

HTC and Apple announced the two firms had come to an agreement and settled their patent differences earlier this week, ending several ongoing suits. Financial terms of the settlement have not been confirmed, but according to analyst reports, it amounts to HTC paying Apple in the region of $6-8 per Android device sold.

Such a compromise doesn’t appear to tickle Samsung’s fancy, however, and with sales topping the global smartphone market share charts, we can see why sliding a slice of each over the table to Apple doesn’t exactly hold much allure.

Apple has argued that Samsung is a “copyist” that has borrowed design, functionality, and other technologies from the iPhone and iPad ranges so as to shorten development time for its own Android-based phones and tablets. In retort, Samsung has accused Apple of infringing on various technological patents, including those around 3G connectivity in several devices.

The high-profile trials have seen some significant fall-out. Apple was awarded a huge amount in damages – in excess of $1bn – in a US jury trial earlier this year, though Samsung is appealing the decision and the behavior of key members of the jury is also under investigation. Meanwhile, courts in other countries have found in Samsung’s favor, with Apple recently being slapped by a UK appeals judge for how it handled a court-mandated public statement acknowledging its iPad designs had not been copied.


Samsung has “no intention” of Apple settlement says mobile chief is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Google wins patent for directions using cell coverage

The smartphone has more or less become the indispensable tool for most folks these days, especially when you consider the fact that our smartphone more or less does everything we need – from handling calls and text messages to keeping us entertained with games, videos and music while we are on the go, not to mention ensuring we do not get lost in unfamiliar territory, leaving the home without a smartphone, or one that has no battery left, is definitely a no-no.

Well, Google intends to improve on the directions department after winning a patent that allows your smartphone to access wireless coverage data, using such information in order to deliver a more accurate directions segment. Perhaps it could be part of a user input option, who knows? I guess the proverb of more than one way to Rome holds true for the information technology age as well, as there is more than one way to access navigational data for the clueless.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Project Glass nose bridge patent, FTC could sue Google and Motorola over abuse of standard-essential patents,

Google bags patent for directions based on cell coverage

Google snags patent for directions based on cell coverage

Want to get somewhere, but don’t want to miss an email, or risk a break in the directions on the way? A patent granted to Google suggests it’s been thinking about the very same thing. Read through the details, and it all sounds fairly familiar — receiving origin and destination, planning a route etc. But, this time, there’s the added hop of accessing wireless coverage data, and stirring that info into the returned directions mix. The flow charts in the literature suggest that this could be a user input option. So, along with the choice of fastest and most economical, maybe some day we’ll be seeing one for “fastest data” too. Someone resurrect the term “information superhighway,” and quick.

Filed under: , , ,

Google bags patent for directions based on cell coverage originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:45:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceUSPTO  | Email this | Comments

HTC signs up for the Apple tax: $6-8 per Android phone

It would appear that HTC is now set up to pay two giant companies for the rights to use their patents rather than face their legal wrath: their newest being Apple for $6-8 USD a phone. The other company HTC is into for cash-per-device is Microsoft, revealed all the way back in 2010 as an industry changing agreement for $5 USD a phone. The difference between that fee and this are small for HTC and for Apple and Microsoft in the end, but for this one fact: it does still appear that Microsoft makes more from Android-carrying device patent license fees than it does from its own Windows Phone platform – though that may change in the oncoming Windows Phone 8 season.

This information on how much HTC is likely paying Apple comes from Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu, a man with vested interests in getting analysis right around these companies getting his own information from “conversations with industry sources.” As it stands, should HTC continue to sell 30-35 million Android smartphones annually, they’ll be paying $180-$280 million annually to Apple. HTC’s total per phone payed to Microsoft and Apple will soon be between $11-$13 USD per phone – tiny or giant, however you choose to see it.

HTC’s license fees here have more of an impact on the way Apple does business than it does on how it does business simply because Apple hasn’t recently been entering into agreements like this – quite the opposite. Instead, Apple has been entering into litigation with groups such as Samsung – grabbing millions from them after arduous legal processes. Prolonged as those fights inevitably are, it may be that Apple has found a better way to do business with settlements such as these.

Have a peek at the timeline below to see other recent Apple legal matters – and see if you can tell why Apple may just want to be out of the courtroom as much as possible into the future. HTC too may be finding itself in either a really terrible place at the moment (not likely) or a great place – with both Microsoft and Apple having enough confidence in their future to make long-lasting agreements, be they negative or not.

[via Business Insider]


HTC signs up for the Apple tax: $6-8 per Android phone is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.