Judge orders Apple to stop making special pacts with e-book publishers

Judge orders Apple to stop making special pacts with ebook publishers

After plenty of tussling over the DoJ’s proposed injunction against Apple, preventing it from striking untoward pricing deals with e-book publishers, a judge at the Southern District Court of New York has today laid down the law. The final injunction prevents Apple from setting prices with any of its partners for terms of between two and four years, with the exact term depending on which publisher it’s working with and how long they originally took to settle with the DoJ — which means Apple’s relationship with Macmillan faces the harshest restriction.

Crucially, Apple also won’t be able to make “most favored nation” pacts, in which e-book prices and discounts are set across a range of publishers or retailers. This particular bit of the injunction will last for five years — a lengthy period of time in this industry, and one that can be extended by the court if it sees fit, but hardly the ten-year term that Apple’s lawyers initially feared. Finally, another key clause prevents Apple from doing business with publishers behind closed doors. For the next two years, Cupertino will have to bring in an independent third party to serve as an “Antitrust compliance officer” in all deals. Sounds humiliating, perhaps, but again, given the relatively short duration, it could have been a lot worse.

Filed under:

Comments

Source: NYSD Court

DOJ offers to cut injunction time in Apple e-book case, stays firm on key points

The US Justice Department was insistent that its proposed injunction against Apple for alleged e-book price fixing was the proper remedy earlier this month, but it’s now willing to budge on that somewhat. As Reuters reports, the DOJ has offered to cut the length of the injunction from ten to five years, and ease the restrictions on Apple striking new deals with book publishers — it now suggests Apple hold staggered negotiations with publishers starting in two years. The DOJ continues to insist on the need for an external monitor to keep an eye on the company, however, which remains a non-starter for Apple.

The company also drew some particularly harsh criticism from the DOJ, which stated in a filing that “Apple wants to continue business as usual, regardless of the antitrust laws,” and that “this court should have no confidence that Apple on its own effectively can ensure that its illegal conduct will not be repeated.” For its part, Apple isn’t commenting on the DOJ’s latest proposal.

Filed under:

Comments

Source: Reuters

Judge denies Apple’s request to suspend e-book antitrust ruling

Judge denies Apple's request to suspend e-book antitrust ruling

Apple, in its ongoing battle over an e-book price fixing scandal, has been dealt yet another setback. Last month, Judge Denise Cote ruled that Apple had violated antitrust laws in conspiring with publishers to raise e-book prices. Cupertino asked for a temporary suspension of her ruling while it sought to appeal the penalties leveled against it, but today Judge Cote refused that request. The company maintains its innocence, and its co-defendants have jumped to its defense in the wake of a strong restrictions handed down by the Justice Department. But, increasingly, it appears that Apple is fighting a losing battle. We’re sure that there are still tricks in its legal arsenal, but there is little indication that Cupertino will be able to avoid terminating its existing agreements with publishers and will be barred from engaging in agency pricing before the end of the DoJ’s five-year ban.

Filed under:

Comments

Source: Associated Press

DOJ defends Apple e-book price fixing injunction, says publishers had it easy

E-book on an iPad

The US Department of Justice isn’t buying publishers’ arguments that proposed injunctions against Apple for alleged e-book price fixing are excessive and contradictory. DOJ attorney Lawrence Buterman claims in a response letter that the penalties against Apple are necessarily harsher, since it didn’t settle the accusations like its reported co-conspirators. The group objection even justifies Apple’s punishment, Buterman claims; it suggests that publishers are just waiting until the end of a two-year ban on agency pricing to raise prices once again. The five-year restriction imposed on Apple could keep prices down for longer, the lawyer says.

Apple, meanwhile, isn’t done with its objections. In addition to an earlier request for a stay on proceedings pending an appeal, it now contends that the court excluded or ignored testimony while giving Amazon and Google witnesses too much credibility. The company will present more of its opinion at a conference today with both the DOJ and the presiding judge, but we’re not expecting a quick resolution — neither side is budging at this stage.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: CNET, GigaOM

Source: Letters to the court (1), (2), (3), (4)

EU regulator accepts Penguin offer to end dodgy e-book deals with Apple

EU regulator accepts Penguin offer to end dodgy ebook deals with Apple

After the European Commission accepted offers from Apple and four publishers to free up e-book pricing restrictions in December 2012, it’s now accepted Penguin’s commitment to do the same. Much like Penguin’s vow to the US DOJ, it will end its agency agreements with Apple and other retailers, and “most-favored nation” clauses will be absent from any new deals struck over the next five years. Most importantly, e-book retailers will now be able to control prices and discounts of Penguin’s catalog for two years. This legally binding pledge essentially brings an end to EC’s “competitive concerns,” as all involved in the original price-fixing investigation have now settled up.

Filed under:

Comments

Via: Reuters

Source: European Commission

Apple tells price fixing courtroom it owns 20 percent of the e-book market

Apple tells courtroom it owns 20 percent of the ebook market in pricefixing case

Apple director Keith Moerer said in court on Tuesday that the company holds about 20 percent of the US e-book market, double the size commonly assumed. The revelation came after the Department of Justice tried to bolster its price fixing case against the company by asserting that “Apple forgot to focus on customers, that’s why the iBookstore is a failure.” Moerer responded that the online store has consistently held a 20 percent share since just after launching, adding that “sales grew 100 percent last year at the iBookstore and it had over 100 million customers.” The government will continue trying to prove that Apple colluded with publishers like Macmillan and Harper Collins — who settled out of court — with testimony later today from Senior VP Eddy Cue.

Filed under:

Comments

Via: paidContent

Source: Publishers Weekly

Macmillan settles up with DoJ, Apple now stands alone in e-book price fixing case

It took awhile to read the writing on the wall, but Macmillan has finally settled the antitrust lawsuit brought by the US Justice Department for the publisher’s alleged e-book price fixing. In doing so, Macmillan joins Hachette, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster and Penguin in choosing not to go to trial against the DoJ’s lawyers. It’s an about-face from Macmillan’s initial stance in settlement negotiations, when it claimed that the DoJ’s terms were far too onerous.

Why settle now? Company CEO John Sargent told the Wall Street Journal that the company changed its tune not because it was guilty, but “because the potential penalties became too high to risk even the possibility of an unfavorable outcome.” Should the settlement terms be approved by the court, retailers will be able to discount Macmillan titles, regardless of existing contracts, for 23 months starting from December 18, 2012. With Macmillan bowing out, Apple remains as Uncle Sam’s lone legal opponent at the trial scheduled in June. Given Apple’s staunch denial of wrongdoing and general willingness to litigate, it seems we may be in for some more legal fireworks this summer.

Comments

Via: Electronista

Source: Wall Street Journal

China fines LG Display, Samsung and others over alleged price fixing

Samsung 2012 Smart TV

Companies embroiled in display price fixing scandals aren’t out of the woods just yet. China’s National Development and Reform Commission has just fined six manufacturers ¥353 million ($56.7 million) for allegedly colluding on LCD prices, including Korean heavyweights LG Display and Samsung as well as Taiwan-based AU Optronics, Chungwa Picture Tubes, HannStar and Innolux. The accusations behind the latest penalty aren’t quite the same as in other countries, but they share a familiar story: China believes the firms agreed to keep costs artificially high between 2001 and 2006, making ¥208 million yuan ($33.4 million) in undeserved profit. While the immediate fiscal damage will be light when it’s spread across several companies, it adds to punishment that has already ranged into the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: Bloomberg

Samsung, Philips, LG and others reportedly set to face EU regulatory fines for CRT price fixing

Samsung, Philips, LG and others reportedly set to face EU regulatory fines for CRT price fixing

Samsung SDI, Philips, LG, Technicolor, Panasonic and Toshiba are said to be facing heavy fines from the European Commission due to alleged involvement in a TV cathode-ray tube price fixing ring. According to Reuters, the fines will be announced on November 28th and can reach up to ten percent of the turnover during the period which the cartel was said to have ran. Based on 2011 revenues, LG could be fined up to $5 billion, while Dutch-based Philips would top out at around $2.9 billion. While the fines aren’t expected to reach such heights, it will definitely take more than a few Black Friday blowout sales to recover this type of coin.

Filed under: , ,

Samsung, Philips, LG and others reportedly set to face EU regulatory fines for CRT price fixing originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:58:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceReuters  | Email this | Comments

EU regulators to accept Apple and book publishers’ offer of cheaper e-books

According to Reuters, EU regulators look likely to accept an offer from Apple and a handful of publishers, including Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins, Hachette Livre and Macmillan. The assembled publishers propose that they will allow retailers (including Amazon) to sell e-books cheaper than Apple currently does. The move will attempt to end the EU’s anti-trust investigation that looked into the publishers’ e-book pricing model that unfairly affected retailers’ ability to compete with Apple’s own electronic book collection.

Filed under:

EU regulators to accept Apple and book publishers’ offer of cheaper e-books originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:47:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceReuters  | Email this | Comments