Facebook stumped on 80% fake ad click accusations

Facebook has pleaded ignorance to accusations of widespread fake advert clicks, saying that it is unable to replicate what one company claimed amounted to a 5:1 ratio of bot action to real users. Music platform startup Limited Run came to attention earlier this week after revealing that its own analytics suggested the bulk of advert action was fake. However, Facebook is struggling to find the same evidence.

“We’re trying to work with Limited Run to investigate these claims,” a spokesperson for the social network told Wired, “but we haven’t received any data yet to support these claims.” The two companies have confirmed that they are in talks and cooperating in investigations, though exactly what’s being examined isn’t being discussed; “they are researching the issues we had” Limited Run co-founder Tim Mango said, “this is all I can say.”

Also left in the air are suggestions that Facebook told Limited Run that it could only change its name on the social network if it agreed to a considerable advertising spend each month. According to the company’s original post – since deleted, but available as a Google cache – Facebook representatives told Limited Run that it could only do so if the firm spent $2,000 per month or more on promotions.

Monetization remains one of the big issues for Facebook at present, with the company citing advertising as a primary weak point, particularly in its mobile strategy. Facebook has also come under fire for its attitude toward developers, with Google+ chief Vic Gundotra citing the site as an example of what Google doesn’t want to do in its developer relations.

[via Mike Elgan]


Facebook stumped on 80% fake ad click accusations is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Facebook faces loose Likes at crucial ad crux

As Facebook’s public persona ramps up another new month, less than a year after it’s first put itself on the public market with an IPO of some great disaster, the social network faces several allegations of advertising network faux pas. The most recent bit comes in as a release in their very own company filings, a note on how more than 8.7% of its 955 million active accounts are “rule breakers” or completely fake accounts altogether. The second and third negative news bits come from 3rd party groups saying Facebook’s advertising network relies too heavily on “likes” that may not even be real, so to speak.

The Facebook company filings shown this week by Facebook say that the Zuckerberg-owned company is made up of 4.8% duplicate member accounts. That’s a fairly massive number when you consider that it’s more than half of what the company suggests are simply rule breakers. An amount of 2.4% of the total number of members on Facebook then are user-misclassified, that being personal profiles for pets, businesses, or objects. Finally there’s the eerily titled “Undesirable” category which makes up 1.5% of the members on Facebook.

The “Undesirable” category is made up of what Facebook says are profile “intended to be used for purposes that violate our terms of service, such as spamming.” This is not good news for the company that also notes in its most recent filing that, “the loss of advertisers, or reduction in spending by advertisers with Facebook, could seriously harm our business.”

Earlier this week the digital distribution firm known as Limited Press let it be known that they were quite suspicious of Facebook’s ways and means of charging them for advertisements and clicks on the social network. They noted that based on their own 3rd party analytics software, they found 80% of clicks on their advertisements to have been made by bots – aka not real users in the least.

Limited Press now notes that after substantial attention from the press, Facebook is now looking in to the matter.

Meanwhile the BBC’s technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones had a hankering last month to investigate Facebook’s recent round of fake “likes” allegations. He created a fake company by the name of VirtualBagel and found that a large majority of the interactions the company had were from non-English-speaking regions in the Middle East and Asia. Cellan-Jones also observed that many of the accounts – if not a majority of them – were entirely fake and/or created for spam.

Have a peek at the timeline below to find our more about Facebook’s recent past and see if you can track their movements with several pointed news bits.


Facebook faces loose Likes at crucial ad crux is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Facebook Stories curates the best of sharing

Facebook has launched a new site to collate themed stories, magazine-style, allowing members to chronicle their timeline content and then see infographics of the most commonly shared memories. Facebook Stories kicks off today with a “Remembering” theme and timelines submitted by the social network’s own staff, but from now on individual users will also be able to create their own.

Not all individual creations will be put on display prominently, however. Facebook will be selecting the best of those submitted to feature on the site’s homepage, and then at the end of the month the site will create an infographic related to that month’s theme.

For the launch, the infographic is titles “Biggest Life Moments from Timelines,” and looks at which stories are shared the most. Strangely – given most people have complained about excessive baby photos at least once – Facebook walls filled with gurning offspring isn’t the most common type of sharing; in fact, it’s travel, followed by people mentioning they have moved.

Facebook will also be introducing other elements of Stories, again tied to the monthly theme. The Bookshelf will have a list of related books for suggested reading, while The Playlist will use Spotify integration to sample different genres of curated music. The Reading List, finally, will be put together from famous sources of writing, such as The New Yorker.

[via ABC]


Facebook Stories curates the best of sharing is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Facebook fakes make up 83m members Zuckerberg reveals

More than 83m of Facebook‘s registered users are in fact fakes, the social network has calculated, almost 9-percent of the total membership of the site and taking some of the shine off the near-1bn milestone. Facebook made the estimate in its latest 10-Q filing, totaling up the number of duplicates and false users along with “undesirable” accounts that could potentially be used for spamming legitimate members, though the figure is significantly higher than the previous estimate made only a few months ago.

In March 2012, Facebook estimated around 5- or 6-percent fake members, which given the company’s books at the time amounted to as many as 50.7m. These new numbers, however, mark a huge step up, with Facebook now saying that around 4.8-percent of accounts are duplicates, user-misclassified accounts make up 2.4-percent – that is, Personal Profile accounts which have been incorrectly created as individual users, when really they should have been Pages – and finally 1.5-percent being undesirable accounts.

“The numbers of our MAUs and DAUs and ARPU are calculated using internal company data based on the activity of user accounts. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates of our user base for the applicable period of measurement, there are inherent challenges in measuring usage of our products across large online and mobile populations around the world. For example, there may be individuals who maintain one or more Facebook accounts in violation of our terms of service, despite our efforts to detect and suppress such behavior” Facebook

Facebook does not give its exact workings to identify those false accounts, but a tightening of the net rather than a sudden surge in fake registrations over the past quarter is expected to account for the disparity in numbers. Nonetheless, with the site eagerly approaching its one-billionth member, it’s worth bearing in mind that the raw database doesn’t necessarily map to a billion individuals.

It’s not the first time that fake membership has impacted Facebook’s reputation this week. One startup gained attention with the news it was deleting its account on the social site after realizing that a fair proportion of advertising clicks were coming from bots not real users.

“Bots were loading pages and driving up our advertising costs. So we tried contacting Facebook about this. Unfortunately, they wouldn’t reply” music platform Limited Run wrote. “Do we know who the bots belong too? No. Are we accusing Facebook of using bots to drive up advertising revenue. No. Is it strange? Yes. But let’s move on, because who the bots belong to isn’t provable.”

In fact only 20-percent of the clicks actually came through to Limited Run’s site, the company claimed. Although hardly scientific it further highlights the ongoing issues Facebook has in monetizing its membership; mobile has already been identified as a key weak spot where heavy use has not been translated into cash.

[via CNET]


Facebook fakes make up 83m members Zuckerberg reveals is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Facebook releases its 2011 energy usage report, details your carbon footprint

Facebook releases its 2011 energy usage report, details your carbon footprint

More Facebook news, but this time we’re back to the numbers instead of reporting on a new feature, improvement or integration. As part of its mission to swap the familiar blue for something of a greener tinge, Facebook released today its carbon footprint and overall energy usage figures for 2011. Turning bio-babble into easy visualizations, the company points out that for the whole year, an active user occupied roughly the same carbon footprint as one medium latte. Or, if you’re a fan of the tipple, a couple of glasses of wine. Impressively, 23 percent of the social giant’s energy usage came from clean and renewable sources, which puts it well on the way to its 2015 target of 25 percent or more. If you’d like more info and a complete breakdown of the stats, the full report is available at the source link below.

Filed under:

Facebook releases its 2011 energy usage report, details your carbon footprint originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:58:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceFacebook  | Email this | Comments

Facebook App Center unleashed to the whole world

Starting today users across the entire world can access and utilize the brand new Facebook App Center however they please. You can access your own personalized and localized App Center from the same address no matter where you are across this Earth of ours, right over at facebook.com/appcenter. From there you’ll be treated to a collection of forward-thinking social network-based apps for all manner of functions and fun-loving activities.

As Facebook Public Relations superstar Malorie Gator will tell you, it’s time to get started if you’ve not already jumped in on Facebook’s App Center. You can also see on Facebook App Center’s timeline that today is essentially their birthday as never before has the App Center been available the whole world over.

This app center has both a mobile and a web version with classic Facebook apps like Farmville running hard right next to new apps like Bubble Witch and Sim City Social. And it’s not just all about games – Facebook App Center also has official Olympics apps and news apps as well. Timeline apps also sit pretty up in the main section of the portal with Mobile Apps just making their first big break-out here so that Facebook can push on in to the future in mobile style!

We recommend you check out a collection of apps from many different categories so that you get a healthy dose of what’s possible in the social network overall. You can grab Travel and Local apps, Sports apps, Utilities, Music, and Lifestyle apps as well. Also don’t forget to check our own timeline below to keep up to date on how far the Facebook App Center has come in a short time!


Facebook App Center unleashed to the whole world is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Facebook working on ‘save-for-later’ feature, lets you like things privately

Facebook working on 'save-for-later' feature, lets you like things privately

Ever wanted to flag a Facebook post for the future — one you wouldn’t want to be seen “liking” in the present? Well, the heads at Palo Alto are testing a way to make that happen: a save-for-later feature that’ll allow you to add posts to a private feed. Saving is conducted on the sly, so you can create a slimmed-down stalking experience without alerting the posters. If you’re prone to using the desktop version of the site, the option should appear alongside the familiar “Like”, “Comment” and “Share” soon. A similar change should be available on the mobile site, with a press-and-hold mechanic doing the job in the apps for iDevices. There’s no word on other platforms at the moment, but we’d be surprised if the update is confined to browser and iOS users. We know you’re keen to start hoarding those embarrassing drunken status updates, so hopefully the update will be rolling out shortly.

Filed under:

Facebook working on ‘save-for-later’ feature, lets you like things privately originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:55:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink The Verge  |  sourceiMore  | Email this | Comments

Twitter responds to suspended reporter controversy, explains Trust & Safety policies

Twitter responds to suspended reporter controversy, explains Trust & Safety policies

Well, you might not have heard about it from us, but by now you’re likely familiar with the tale of British journalist Guy Adams and the controversy surrounding his suspended Twitter account. The Independent correspondent posted a number critical missives regarding NBC’s Olympic coverage, one including the corporate email address of an executive at the network. Shortly there after his page went down. Adams has since had his account reinstated, but Twitter felt it necessary to clear the air about the circumstances regarding the temporary blockage. When the company’s Trust & Safety receives a complaint that personal information is being distributed, its policy is to temporarily suspend the offending account. NBC Olympics president Gary Zenkel filed such a complaint, and the social network now admits it was at the behest of members of its team working closely with NBC on its Olympic coverage. That, it acknowledges, was a mistake. Twitter says it does not actively monitor anyone’s account and that the Trust & Safety team was unaware that Zenkel acted on the suggestion from the company’s employees. Adams has since had his account reinstated and in a blog post Twitter has stated that it “should not and cannot be in the business of proactively monitoring and flagging content, no matter who the user is.”

Filed under:

Twitter responds to suspended reporter controversy, explains Trust & Safety policies originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:27:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceTwitter  | Email this | Comments

Twitter backtracks on Olympic NBC tweeter: Account reactivated [Update: Twitter reponds]

This week Twitter made more than just a tiny mistake in banning one of their more famous members in an effort to keep him quiet on speaking out against NBC’s coverage of the London Olympics. This fellow was (and is) Guy Adams, a journalist who writes for the BBC, and his supposed crime was pointing out the email of NBC’s Olympics president, saying that he was responsible for the Olympics being broadcast with a time delay so that they might reach prime-time audiences across the USA. Adams alleges that NBC didn’t see this tweet until Twitter informed NBC of it, and once NBC complained, Twitter banned him – Twitter disagrees.

Twitter thus far has released a statement on the situation saying, “it was company policy not to comment on individual users” for privacy reasons. However, it had said it did “not actively monitor users’ accounts”. This may satisfy those wondering whether the company will be admitting to monitoring Adams, though it does not speak to the fact that they may simply have been watching the most popular topics. As Adams’ tweet was re-tweeted many thousands and thousands of times, Twitter very well may have caught wind of it and blocked his account without NBC being involved at all.

UPDATE: Twitter General Counsel, Alex Macgillivray, has made a rather long apology and explanation for the events that went on over the past few days. Have a peek at a bit of it here:

“That said, we want to apologize for the part of this story that we did mess up. The team working closely with NBC around our Olympics partnership did proactively identify a Tweet that was in violation of the Twitter Rules and encouraged them to file a support ticket with our Trust and Safety team to report the violation, as has now been reported publicly. Our Trust and Safety team did not know that part of the story and acted on the report as they would any other.

As I stated earlier, we do not proactively report or remove content on behalf of other users no matter who they are. This behavior is not acceptable and undermines the trust our users have in us. We should not and cannot be in the business of proactively monitoring and flagging content, no matter who the user is — whether a business partner, celebrity or friend. As of earlier today, the account has been unsuspended, and we will actively work to ensure this does not happen again.” – Macgillivray

But as Adams now says, Twitter has emailed him saying, “we have just received an update from the complainant retracting their original request…” This seems to shed a bit more light on the situation – that Twitter officials don’t want the company to seem at fault for pushing Adams out. NBC Sports also released a statement right after Adams had been initially blocked, saying:

“We filed a complaint with Twitter because a user tweeted the personal information of one of our executives. According to Twitter, this is a violation of their privacy policy. Twitter alone levies discipline.” – NBC Sports

Of course those well in the know on how to use a search engine would have been able to find this “personal email” as NBC Sports alleges was not public. Adams spoke up between here and there saying that the email was indeed available on the NBC Sports webpage and could be found by “anyone in possession of 30 seconds of free time and access to Google”.

And now it’s all right, yes? We shall see as Adams account has indeed been re-activated and the talk of what he might do from here continues. What do you think – do you think Twitter was in the wrong for banning Adams, or are they in the wrong for allowing him to come back? And perhaps better yet, was it reasonable for NBC Sports to make a request for Adams to have been banned, or did they make the wrong move?

Special note: NBC and Twitter are kind of, sort of, partnered for coverage of the Olympics this year – this could possibly factor into the situation.

[via BBC]


Twitter backtracks on Olympic NBC tweeter: Account reactivated [Update: Twitter reponds] is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Bing search lets you tag Facebook friends, forces them to Google ‘Bing’

Bing search lets you tag Facebook friends, forces them to Google 'Bing'

Microsoft has already made its “decision” engine get all buddy-buddy with Facebook and Twitter, but now it’s taking the integration one step further. You’ll now actually be able to tag your friends in searches. Why, pray tell, would you need to do such a thing? Perhaps you’ve got a buddy who grew up in Paris and need suggestions for where to eat while you’re visiting. Or maybe you’ve spotted an awesome hiking trail and want others to tag along. Just enter the question in the Bing side bar then tag the appropriate people. The search will show up on your timeline and others can pitch in. Of course, you could always just ask these same people via Facebook message, text or (gasp!) in person. But why would you want to simplify matters? Check out the source for more info and the video after the break.

Continue reading Bing search lets you tag Facebook friends, forces them to Google ‘Bing’

Filed under:

Bing search lets you tag Facebook friends, forces them to Google ‘Bing’ originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:34:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceBing  | Email this | Comments