Samsung trademarks Ativ Tab and Ativ S names, may give a peek into its Windows (Phone) 8 world

Samsung trademarks Ativ Tab and Ativ S names, may give a peek into its Windows Phone 8 worldEveryone knows that Samsung is making a big Windows 8 push at IFA, but there’s new signs emerging that it might shake up its naming scheme in the process. We now know through SamMobile that Samsung has quietly snapped up a pair of trademarks with the Ativ badge that would let its branding venture beyond the Galaxy. Ativ Tab is the most conspicuous: unless Samsung is planning a shakeup of its Android slates, there’s a distinct chance we’re looking at the future name for one or more Windows 8 tablets. Ativ S is slightly more nebulous, although that very familiar oversized S raises the possibility of a high-end Windows Phone 8 smartphone like the Odyssey. Whether or not Samsung wields these trademarks later this week, or at all in the near future, is still up in the air — it may be holding on to names as a precaution rather than previewing a course of action. If the Ativ label makes its way into stores, though, it may give Samsung a much catchier (if not entirely intuitive) name for its Windows devices than Series 5 Hybrid PC.

Filed under: ,

Samsung trademarks Ativ Tab and Ativ S names, may give a peek into its Windows (Phone) 8 world originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:07:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink SamMobile (Twitter)  |  sourceJustia, Trademarkia  | Email this | Comments

Microsoft bans use of Metro name in Windows Store apps (Update: May not be banned after all)

Microsoft bans use of Metro name in Windows Store apps (Update: May not be banned after all)

If Microsoft can’t use the Metro name, no one else can. Not in its company-owned Windows Store, at least. An update to the Windows 8 app criteria guide explicitly tells developers that any submitted Windows Store app with Metro in the title will “fail certification” — effectively, it’s banned. There’s a certain irony to the aggressive stance on naming when Microsoft itself still mentions Metro prominently across many of its pages, but the restriction isn’t a laughing matter for developers already trying to support an OS that doesn’t ship for another two months. One of the most popular apps in the pre-release Windows Store, MetroTwit, likely faces imminent exile without a name change; there’s also worries that mass transit apps might get the boot for entirely innocuous uses of the word. We’ve reached out to Microsoft for comment on its legal rights in the area. In the meantime, it’s safe to say that “metro” is only to be spoken in hushed tones anywhere near Microsoft’s official content portals.

Update: Word from WPCentral is that the language restricting developers from using the Metro name wasn’t a new addition to the Windows 8 app criteria guide. Turns out, it was an older error that has since been removed. Rejoice, developers! It appears that the word is not off limits. We’ve reached out to Microsoft for confirmation and will update when we hear back.

Filed under:

Microsoft bans use of Metro name in Windows Store apps (Update: May not be banned after all) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:09:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink MarkedUp, Ars Technica  |  sourceWindows Dev Center, WPCentral (Update)  | Email this | Comments

Microsoft officially leaving Windows 8 Metro brand in the dust

Microsoft confirmed today that it will indeed be ditching the Metro branding for Windows 8, and said it plans to introduce a new brand sometime later this week. We had a feeling that something like this was going to happen, thanks to this week’s leak of internal Microsoft memos which signaled such a change. Apparently, Microsoft’s decision to dump the branding comes from talks with “an important European partner” that left the company without much choice in the matter. To put it simply, Microsoft probably picked the term “Metro” without realizing that one its partners already held the trademark.


So, now Windows 8 will get a bit of new branding. Metro was the term Microsoft used to describe the design and feel of Windows 8 and Windows RT, and don’t expect the phrase to disappear overnight. Microsoft hit the ground running with this branding, mentioning the name Metro at every chance. Now that the term Metro has been used so much, it’s going to be incredibly hard for Microsoft to flush it from the minds of those who have been following the development of Windows 8.

ComputerWorld points out that the “important European partner” may be Germany-based Metro AG. The company is the fifth-largest retailer in the world, so it isn’t hard to imagine why it might be upset with Microsoft’s choice of branding in this instance. Neither company will confirm nor deny this speculation, and Microsoft says that this change was not brought on by litigation. If the two companies were at odds over the Metro brand, Microsoft seems to have diffused the situation before it ended up in a court room.

We won’t be waiting long for this new brand to arrive, as Microsoft’s announcement that it will be coming “this week” means that the company will be revealing it either later today or tomorrow. Once this new brand arrives, expect Microsoft to begin using it as much as humanly possible. We’ll have details on this new brand for you once Microsoft makes its announcement, so keep it tuned right here to SlashGear.


Microsoft officially leaving Windows 8 Metro brand in the dust is written by Eric Abent & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Microsoft downplays Metro design name, might face a lawsuit over all that street lingo

Microsoft Surface for Windows RT hands-on

If you’ve seen most of Microsoft’s design language for nearly three years, there’s only one word that sums it up: Metro. In spite of that urban look being the underpinning of Windows Phone, Windows 8 and even the Zune HD, Microsoft now claims to ZDNet and others that it’s no longer fond of the Metro badge. Instead, it’s supposedly phasing out the name as part of a “transition from industry dialog to a broad consumer dialog” while it starts shipping related products — a funny statement for a company that’s been shipping some of those products for quite awhile. Digging a little deeper, there’s murmurs that the shift might not be voluntary. Both Ars Technica and The Verge hear from unverified sources that German retailer Metro AG might waving its legal guns and forcing Microsoft to quiet down over a potential (if questionable) trademark dispute. Metro AG itself won’t comment other than to say that these are “market rumors,” which doesn’t exactly calm any frayed nerves over in Redmond. Should there be any truth to the story, we hope Microsoft chooses an equally catchy name for those tiles later on; Windows Street Sign Interface Windows 8-style UI just wouldn’t have the same ring to it.

Filed under: ,

Microsoft downplays Metro design name, might face a lawsuit over all that street lingo originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:53:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceArs Technica, The Verge, ZDNet  | Email this | Comments

Sony registers “Reality Racer” trademark, upcoming game for the PS Vita?

If Reality Fighter for the PS Vita was a game you enjoyed, or thought had a huge amount of potential, then you might be interested to learn that Sony has registered a trademark for a game called “Reality Racer” in Japan. Assuming they’re keeping to the “Reality” series of gaming, we could be looking at another augmented reality racing game for the PlayStation Vita. We have no idea what to expect at this point in time, but if you’ve ever played Reality Fighter, then you should probably have an inkling of what to expect. No word from Sony yet regarding the game, but we expect that more details should be made available later into the future, so if this sounds like a game you wouldn’t mind checking out, be sure to stay tuned and check back with us regularly for more updates!

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: LittleBigPlanet Vita: new trailer surfaces, Kart beta reopen for Plus subscribers, Upcoming PlayStation Vita firmware update brings PSOne support,

Proview sued by its iPad court case law firm, owes at least 2.4 million dollars in legal fees

Proview sued by its iPad court case law firm, owes 24 million dollars in legal fees

Guess who hasn’t yet gotten its share of Proview’s recently acquired $60 million? Ironically, it’s the lawyers that helped it win the iPad trademark dispute in China. According to Sina Tech, Grandall Law Firm confirmed that its shady client refused to pay up the promised 4 percent of Apple’s settlement fee, which equates to $2.4 million. While acknowledging their contractual arrangement (wherein the law firm covers the legal fees in advance, and then expect the client to pay up after winning the case), Proview founder Yang Rongshan told Sina Tech that Grandall’s behavior is “nonsense,” and that his company isn’t obliged to pay back immediately as it isn’t under normal operation right now. However, Yang promises Proview won’t “pass the buck.” We shall see about that — maybe he could spend some yuans on buying Grandall a few new iPads, at least.

Filed under:

Proview sued by its iPad court case law firm, owes at least 2.4 million dollars in legal fees originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:36:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceSina Tech (translated)  | Email this | Comments

Apple sued in China over Snow Leopard trademark

Apple finally settled the iPad trademark case in mainland China, paying Proview $60 million to put the issue to rest. Now it looks like Cupertino will be coming under fire from another target: a Chinese chemical company is suing Apple over a Snow Leopard trademark. Jiangsu Xuebao claims to have filed the electrical equipment trademark protection back in 2000.

Jiangsu Xuebao creates household cleaning products and trademarked the word “Xuebao”, which translates to Snow Leopard. As a result, the company believes that Apple is violating its trademark with OS X Snow Leopard sales in China. A court in Shanghai has accepted the case, and an initial hearing will take place on July 10th.

While Proview was originally seeking a $1.6 billion settlement, Jiangsu Xuebao’s claims aren’t quite so bold. The company is seeking CNY 500,000 (~$78,700) in damages as well as an official apology from Apple. On top of that, Jiangsu Xuebao has sued four companies that sell OS X Snow Leopard, but one Chinese lawyer believes the company won’t win the case because Apple isn’t using the Chinese word to sell its product.

[via MICGadget]


Apple sued in China over Snow Leopard trademark is written by Ben Kersey & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Apple pays Proview $60m for iPad trademark

Apple has settled its iPad trademark suit with Proview, agreeing to a $60m pay-out in order to use the iPad name for its tablet in China. “The iPad dispute resolution is ended,” the Guangdong High People’s Court confirmed in a statement. “Apple Inc. has transferred $60m to the account of the Guangdong High Court as requested in the mediation letter.” Proview had argued that Apple’s apparent purchase of the iPad trademark back in 2009 was not legally valid.

Apple had believed it was securing the naming rights when it dealt with a Taiwanese affiliate of Proview for around $55,000. However, Proview subsequently argued that the affiliate had no legal right to sell the name, and that its 2001 registration of the use of “iPad” in China still stood.

Skepticism around Proview’s motivations was quick to surface, especially amid rumors that the company was facing bankruptcy and under significant pressure from its Chinese bank backers, among others, to extract as much money from Apple as possible. Proview’s lawyer says that while “this is a result that is acceptable to both sides,” the company had hoped for as much as $400m, and that it still faces the possibility of bankruptcy.

Apple is yet to comment publicly on the settlement, which according to Chinese statements was actually agreed on June 25. “As we all know that Apple has made iPad such a big name, I don’t think that brand could do Proview a lot of good even if Proview won it” Proview’s attorney said.”

If you’ll miss the constant, confusing axe hovering over Apple’s branding, feel free to relive each step of the beautiful journey to $60m silence in the story timeline below.

[via Morning Whistle; via NYTimes; via WSJ]


Apple pays Proview $60m for iPad trademark is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


Apple pays $60 million in iPad trademark dispute, makes peace with Proview

Apple pays $60 million in iPad trademark dispute, makes peace with Proview

Earlier this year, iPads were flying off the shelves in China — but not for the expected reasons. The slates were being removed from stores following an injunction granted to Shenzhen Proview Technology, a local firm that had laid claim to the iPad trademark. The injunction would later be rebuffed by a Shanghai court, resuming tablet sales while the dispute raged on. Today, Apple and Proview have come to a resolution, putting $60 million in Proview’s coffers and the matter to rest.

Feeling lost? Let us catch you up. Way back at the turn of the century, Proview’s Taiwan branch registered the “iPad” trademark for its Internet Personal Access Device — an all-in-one PC that wasn’t unlike Apple’s own iMac. Later on, Apple would purchase the worldwide rights to the name from the Taiwan branch, which presumably included Shenzhen Proview Technology’s claim — though the Chinese vice minister for the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) would later declare Proview the trademark’s rightful owner. Fast forward to today, and the two firms are finally settling.

According to The New York Times, Proview had originally sought as much as $400 million, but has agreed to settle for a lesser amount to help it pay its debts. Either way, Apple seems to have already transferred the sum, according to the Guangdong High People’s Court, apparently eager to put the dispute behind them.

Apple pays $60 million in iPad trademark dispute, makes peace with Proview originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:05:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceNew York Times  | Email this | Comments