Verizon in talks to charge for TV channels based on real viewing time

Verizon in talks to charge for TV channels based on real viewing time

Few of us like paying for TV we don’t use, and there’s been attempts to fix a broken model that makes TV providers pay for channels in blocks, no matter the viewer interest. Verizon’s lead programming negotiator, Terry Denson, has told the Wall Street Journal that a more logical usage-based approach may come to FiOS TV. The telecom firm is in talks with mid-size and smaller content companies to pay for channels only based on how long we watch: Verizon would pay whenever a subscriber tunes in for at least five minutes. In theory, it’s a win-win strategy that lowers Verizon’s overhead (and hopefully ours) while rewarding the more successful smaller channels. Of course, there’s no guarantee that a deal will go through — and while Verizon will ask about a similar model when renewing major contracts, Cablevision’s battle shows how much media giants will resist disruption of a steady revenue stream.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: Gizmodo

Source: Wall Street Journal

Verizon seeking Spotify model for TV: Pay-Per-Viewer

This week the folks at Verizon have had a bit of a revelation: instead of paying media companies a flat fee for their television channels, make the payment based on real viewership. In this way, companies that deliver a channel that has no popularity at all will not have to be payed as much while the top-tier companies will get payed monster amounts of cash. This model is rather similar to how Spotify works, having you the user pay a flat fee and listen to whatever you like on their service, the artists whose tracks you listen to getting cash per listen accordingly from the company.

verizona

It was Verizon chief programming negotiator Terry Denson who spoke up this week with the Wall Street Journal. There he noted that at this very moment, Verizon was in talks with “midtier and smaller” media companies to see if a payment based on audience size model would work for them. Speaking on the model in play today, Denson said: “we are paying for a customer who never goes to the channel.”

The model in play today has Verizon (and other cable and satellite television operators) paying media companies an amount based on the number of homes their service goes to. If the channel is available through their service, Verizon will have to pay based on the amount of homes they push their service to – regardless of how many people actually watch the channel. With new person-tracking technologies in play, Verizon is thinking about using the number of people actually tuning in to create a whole new model.

As Denson notes, the current talk puts viewing time at five minutes minimum to register as having actually visited a television channel. This unique viewing setup would have odd channels that’d otherwise not get a massive amount of cash in a lump-sum deal to really ramp up their earning potential with ad campaigns and must-see-tv pushes across the web.

The same as Spotify artists tell their fans to head to Spotify and give them a listen, so too will media companies tell users to head to Verizon to watch their shows. It won’t be quite so simple as all that until installing a television system is as easy as installing an app – but we can dream!

Meanwhile we’ll keep an eye out for this new television payment model and will let you know if the costs and benefits will ever be passed on to you, the consumer. At the moment it appears that they’ll be keeping your bills the same – the future could very well be knocking some real bills off the top rack.


Verizon seeking Spotify model for TV: Pay-Per-Viewer is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Verizon Wants to Give You More Channels, But Only Pay For What You Watch

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Verizon has plans to shake up the TV industry. It simultaneously wants to offer more channels on its FiOS TV service—and only pay for the shows its viewers are actually watching. More »

Panasonic to Cut TV Production, Maybe Abandon Plasma

Reuters is reporting that Panasonic is planning to cut its TV production—and perhaps pull of out of the plasma TV market altogether. More »

Sharp may not need Foxconn after all

Sharp has been in a financial rut for quite a while now, and if things don’t go its way, it could wind up filing for bankruptcy. Many companies have rallied to save Sharp’s financial back by making generous investments. Samsung invested about $111.5 million in Sharp to gain a 3% stake in the LCD panel manufacturer, and Qualcomm invested $120 million in order for Sharp to develop MEMS display technology for Qualcomm’s subsidy, Pixtronix.

Sharp may not need Foxconn after all

Foxconn wants to be one of Sharp’s investors as well, and the two parties have been in talks for quite a while. However, Sharp had stated at a press conference held on March 14th that talks with Foxconn are falling through. Foxconn responded by saying that its trying everything it can to secure a deal with Sharp. The two have been very satisfied with their joint LCD fabrication plant located in Sakai, Japan.

Many have speculated that Sharp is hesitant in sealing any deal with Foxconn because it’s currently looking to obtain loans from banks. With Samsung’s and Qualcomm’s investments behind it, Sharp believes it has a much higher chance to convince banks that giving it a loan is a great idea. With the bank loans, Sharp doesn’t necessarily need another investor on its back telling it what to do.

Sharp’s business is very important to many manufacturers. It provides displays for a variety of technology, including laptops, tablets, and mobile phones. Apple had spent $2.3 billion more on Sharp’s displays than it had expected in Q4 2012. Horace Dediu, an analyst whose primary focus is Apple and mobile phones, stated that if Sharp did file for bankruptcy, Apple’s production capacity may be jeopardized. He believes that “Apple’s late and unprecedented expenditure was to secure this asset.” Sharp’s investors have helped the company stay up-and-running, despite the huge losses it had suffered last November.

[via Tom’s Hardware]


Sharp may not need Foxconn after all is written by Brian Sin & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Google Fiber app reaches all Android 4.2 devices

Google Fiber app reaches all Android 42 devices

If you’re one of the precious few to have access to Google Fiber, you may have been disappointed by the need to use its companion app on a Nexus 7 — a fine tablet, but certainly not the only device in Google’s universe. Thankfully, a new update significantly broadens that pool. The app should now offer remote control and content browsing on phones and tablets that run Android 4.2 or later, whether it’s a Nexus 4 or the upcoming Galaxy S 4. Viewers should also see a simpler interface, no matter what hardware they’re using. Those fortunate enough to have the fiber TV service just need to swing past Google Play to expand their control of the living room.

Filed under: , , , , ,

Comments

Via: Google Fiber (Google+)

Source: Google Play

Samsung shuffles: TV and mobile chiefs made co-CEOs

How many CEOs does one company need? If you’re Samsung, then the answer is three; the Korean firm just elevated two of its top execs to the role of co-CEO, with President Boo-keun Yoon and President J.K. Shin joining Vice Chairman Oh-Hyun Kwon. The new roles are being billed as recognition of the particular inputs the divisions of the two presidents make to Samsung’s business overall.

samsung_co-ceos

On the one hand, there’s Boo-keun Yoon, who heads Samsung’s TV division. “Under President Yoon, Samsung’s TV business maintained and solidified its global leadership position after becoming global No. 1 in 2006″ Samsung said in a statement.

Meanwhile, J.K. Shin has helped guide Samsung’s phone division to its current position of strength, notably with the launch of the GALAXY S 4 revealed yesterday. “Under President Shin, Samsung’s mobile business posted significant growth” Samsung said, “and attained global No.1 position in smartphones in 2011 and in overall mobile phones in 2012.”

Both presidents will remain in charge of their respective divisions, while Oh-Hyun Kwon keeps his position at the head of Samsung Electronics’ component division. He also continues as Chairman of the Board of Directors.


Samsung shuffles: TV and mobile chiefs made co-CEOs is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Philips DesignLine TV is a seamless square pane of glass (video)

Philips DesignLine TV is a seamless square pane of glass (video)

Folks with an eye for unusual design likely had their interest piqued by Samsung’s “Timeless Gallery” TV stand, but now a new Philips television is stepping into the living room limelight. Dubbed the Philips DesignLine, the rig hides an LCD display behind a seamless glass pane with a black to transparent gradient that supports itself by leaning against a wall. The TV operates at 1,400 Hz and packs a dual-core processor, WiFi and support for 3D (in 1080p, naturally) and MiraCast. In addition, the DesignLine boasts the firm’s Ambilight tech on three sides, which beams out lights matching the color of what’s displayed on screen. It’ll be available in in 46- and 55-inch flavors in Europe and Russia by way of TP Vision during Q2, but there’s no word on price or when it might travel overseas. Hit the jump to catch a video of it in action and watch its creators talk shop.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: TP Vision

Jack Dorsey Explains How the Idea of Twitter Was Born

Twitter is just a part of everyday life for a lot of us, but back in the days before, someone actually had to think it up. In an upcoming interview on this week’s 60 Minutes, Twitter co-founder and Square CEO Jack Dorsey sits down to explain exactly how the idea for Twitter came to be. More »

CBS Prime Time and Ad Revenue Coming to iOS

CBS Prime Time and Ad Revenue Coming to iOS

CBS wants you watching its shows — and, of course, the ads appear with those shows — anywhere, which is why it’s putting its programming on the iPhone. It’s like a network exclusive version of Hulu for your iPhone and …