Netflix Dives into Online Movie Feature

This article was written on January 16, 2007 by CyberNet.

Netflix is diving into an online movie feature that will be offered to subscribers at no additional charge.  Currently, there will be 1,000 movies and TV shows available to view.  This “Instant Viewing” feature was designed and aimed for the under-30 crowd, the same crowd that has made YouTube popular.  A lot of people are excited about this, but with anything, there are still a few aspects to take into consideration before you go running after Netflix to set up an account.

Netflix Chief Executive Reed Hastings says, “For consumers under 30, they are doing so much with online video this is a natural extension of their usage paradigm on a laptop.” This comes two months after Blockbuster announced their “Total Access” program that allows subscribers to swap movies in-store.  The move by Blockbuster caused a bit of a stir with Netflix customers, some which switched services for the enticing offer.

This new virtual delivery process has been a work in progress for quite some time.  Netflix has a goal of signing up 20 million subscribers by 2012.  That’s a pretty hefty goal, and might take more than a virtual delivery process to meet it.  Subscribers will be required to install software so that they will be able to stream movie from the Internet. One good thing is that it’s designed to adjust the resolution based upon the user’s bandwidth to prevent the movie from freezing.

A few things to consider and think about…. How often do you really like to watch a movie on your PC? If you had the choice, wouldn’t you rather sit down in front of the TV to watch a movie?  I wouldn’t exactly consider this a quality viewing experience.  This service will be available only for XP and Vista operating systems, Mac users will be neglected for now. And finally, there are still people that haven’t taken the plunge and switched from a dial-up service to broadband Internet.  They definitely wouldn’t be able to take advantage of this.

Now that I’ve said it wouldn’t exactly be a quality viewing experience, that alone may be to the advantage of Netflix.  Some people don’t care about quality.  They care that they can get what they want, when they want it, and fast.  And of course, there’s always the option to connect your PC to a TV to get a better experience.

The cost for this was 40 million with some of the money allotted to licensing deals with companies like NBC Universal, Sony Pictures, 20th Century Fox, and the list goes on… Because Netflix isn’t charging anything additional, they are definitely taking a risk with this service and betting on more subscribers to increase revenue. 

It will take several months for the service to be available to everyone. The amount of time allotted to each subscriber to watch streamed content varies upon their plan with Netflix.  Plans range from 6 hours of viewing time to 18 hours of online viewing time per month. And, to make sure that their servers can handle the demand, Netflix will be rolling this new service out slowly over the next six months.

News Source: Yahoo

Thanks for the tip CoryC!

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

Follow CyberNet on Twitter

This article was written on June 02, 2009 by CyberNet.

Photoshop-1.pngWe’ve received a lot of requests over the last few months for us to setup a Twitter account that pushes out all the articles we post. The thing that was holding me back from creating one was that I wanted to do it my way. There are services like TwitterFeed that will take in your RSS feed, and post them to your Twitter account, but I didn’t like that solution for a few reasons:

  1. The articles will only get posted to as often as they check my RSS feed. Twitter is all about being “instant”, and so I wanted something that got pushed immediately to Twitter once an article was published. That way when we do things like giveaways people on Twitter will have an advantage.
  2. I didn’t want to be dependent on a third-party service. If you read through some of the support pages for TwitterFeed you’ll see all kinds of people asking why the stuff they’re posting isn’t showing up on Twitter. I didn’t want it to be out of my control if it suddenly stopped working.

So what did I come up with? I ended up making my own custom solution after realizing that nothing fit my needs quite right. I got some example code from existing WordPress plug-ins since I had never interacted with the Twitter API before, but the whole process wasn’t that hard.

The end result is instantaneous Twitter posting as soon as an article becomes available on our site. You can follow CyberNet here (link also available at the top of our sidebar), and you can follow me here if you want.

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

Google Latitude Update Interval for Android, iPhone, and BlackBerry

This article was written on December 21, 2010 by CyberNet.

google latitude iphone.jpg

I’ve been using Google Latitude with some friends and family ever since it was released last week for the iPhone. I noticed that it used very little battery on my phone, which made me wonder how frequently it actually sends updates. To get this information I went ahead and enabled the history functionality that keeps a log of all the coordinates that your device has sent.

I found that if I was relatively stationary for a period of time, such as being at home, that no updates would be sent to Google. In that respect it is pretty smart. That got me curious as to the logic that Latitude uses on my iPhone to determine when to send updates. After a little searching around I came across this article that explains the update interval for the different platforms. Interestingly enough Latitude takes into account how fast your moving, how much battery life is left, and whether you’re switching between cell towers. Here’s a breakdown of how it works on your device:

Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and Symbian:

The background location update frequency isn’t a fixed amount of time. The update frequency is determined by several factors, such as how much battery life your phone has, if you are moving, or how fast you are moving. Background updating will only use cell ID or WiFi location detection depending on your device. GPS will not be used in the background to preserve battery life.

iOS-only (iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad):

Your location will only update in the background when you’re moving (exceptions: when you switch the app from foreground to background mode, or go from a “moving” to a “stationary” state, the app will continue to update your location for a few minutes).

The background location update frequency isn’t a fixed amount of time. The update frequency is determined by several factors, such as how much battery life your phone has, if you are moving, or how fast you are moving. Background updating will only use cell ID or WiFi location detection depending on your device. GPS will not be used in the background to preserve battery life.

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

Wikipedia Publishes Its Millionth Article…WOW!

This article was written on March 01, 2006 by CyberNet.

Wikipedia Publishes Its Millionth Article...WOW!

Wikipedia is becoming one of the most popular sources for knowledge on the web. The increasing popularity can definitely be seen just because of the millionth article accomplishment.

The lucky article that happened to be lucky number 1,000,000 was on the Jordanhill Railway Station that is located in Scotland. I could only imagine how many people are going to learn about the Jordanhill Railway Station because that article is being reference all around the web!

The other interesting fact is how popular the English Wikipedia is (which is the one that hit the millionth article marker) when compared to some of the other many languages. The English version has almost three times more articles than the next closest language which is Deutsch. Congratulations to Wikipedia for this well deserved accomplishment.

News Source: Wikipedia Press Release

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

BizSpark Provides a 3-Year MSDN Subscription for Small Businesses

This article was written on October 06, 2009 by CyberNet.

msdn bizspark.jpg

A few weeks ago a lot of sites were writing about a web developer program from Microsoft that provided web-related software at no upfront cost. When you end your membership you will, however, have to pay a $100 fee. If you look at the overall value of the software you’ll see that it’s still worthwhile.

There’s another program that Microsoft offers which is an even better deal if you qualify… BizSpark. It’s targeted for small businesses that have been around for less than 3 years, make under $1 million a year, and are privately held. Once you get in you’ll have access to pretty much all the software Microsoft makes including all versions of Office 2007 (Ultimate, Professional, Enterprise, etc…), all versions of Windows 7 (Ultimate, Professional, Home Premium, etc…), all versions of Vista, and so on. You’ll basically get a full retail MSDN subscription.

Here’s a more detailed list of the requirements:

  • An eligible startup must have the following characteristics at the time of joining:
    • Actively engaged in development of a software-based product or service that will form a core piece of its current or intended business
    • Privately held
    • In business for less than 3 years
    • Less than US $1 million in annual revenue
  • To be eligible to use the software for production and deployment of hosted solutions, startups must also be developing a new “software-plus-services” solution (on any platform) to be delivered over the Internet. To meet this requirement your software must:
    • Add significant and primary functionality to the integrated Microsoft software
    • Be owned, not licensed, by you

After you apply it should take about one business day to get accepted (they’ll send a confirmation email to you). Once you’re in you’ll be able to enjoy 3-years of Microsoft software, and similar to the web developer program you’ll have to pay a $100 fee when you exit the program. That’s a heck of a deal for all of the software you get access to.

BizSpark Homepage
Thanks Chris for the details!

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

Google Denies trying to Rewrite New Orleans History

This article was written on April 02, 2007 by CyberNet.

Google New OrleansLast Friday, people started to notice that Google replaced the satellite imagery of New Orleans with those taken before hurricane Katrina had devastated the city. Both blogs and news sites alike were claiming that Google was trying to rewrite the history of what happened in New Orleans. Here is what Google’s response was:

Several months later, in September 2006, the storm imagery was replaced with pre-Katrina aerial photography of much higher resolution as part of a regular series of global data enhancements. We continued to make available the Katrina imagery, and associated overlays such as damage assessments and Red Cross shelters, on a dedicated site (earth.google.com/katrina.html). Our goal throughout has been to produce a global earth database of the best quality — accounting for timeliness, resolution, cloud cover, light conditions, and color balancing.

Given that the changes that affected New Orleans happened many months ago, we were a bit surprised by some of these recent comments. Nevertheless, we recognize the increasingly important role that imagery is coming to play in the public discourse, and so we’re happy to say that we have been able to expedite the processing of recent (2006) aerial photography for the Gulf Coast area (already in process for an upcoming release) that is equal in resolution to the data it is replacing. That new data was published in Google Earth and Google Maps on Sunday evening.

Make no mistake, this wasn’t any effort on our part to rewrite history. But it looks like this April Fool’s joke was on us.

So apparently they reverted to pre-Katrina imagery about 7–months ago with the intent of providing higher resolution satellite maps than what was previously available. I wasn’t as shocked when I heard about this especially compared to some people who were claiming this was a conspiracy between Google and the New Orleans government. I had a good feeling that wasn’t the case, but I guess we never really know.

Source: Google Blog

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

CyberNotes: Create Your Own Visual Map with Wayfaring and Google Maps

This article was written on January 27, 2007 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Weekend Warrior

Recently, I stumbled across Wayfaring, a visual map creation service that uses Google Maps. There are four main things that you can do with with Wayfaring. You’re able to create maps of your own, share those maps with friends and family, explore maps that others have made, and collaborate with others to build new maps. There’s an endless list of reasons you’d use it, such as places you’ve traveled to, favorite restaurants, favorite golf courses, mapping out clients, etc.  I decided to create a map of my own, so I’ll take you through the process.

Pictured above is the map that I created. One of the first things you should know is that you can embed your map into blogs or other websites.  Clicking on the map will take you to Wayfaring where you can get more details about each point.  The first thing that you’ll do when creating a map is to select the general area on the map that you’ll be starting with.  I was starting in Miami, Florida, so I selected that area. Next, you’re going to name your map which you can always change later. I titled mine Honeymoon Cruise’, and then it was time to start adding “waypoints,” or locations on my map.

I went on a cruise for my honeymoon, so I created Waypoints for each of the stops the ship made.  With each waypoint, you’re also able to add notes, and tags to give more details.  Another nice feature is that you’re able to add extra elements like photos and videos to give it a more personalized feel. After you’ve added all of your points, you can create a route and connect each point together to get the total mileage.

Once you’re done, you have the option of sharing the map with friends, or family by email, or of course as mentioned, by embedding it on your website. Maps can be set to private or public, and you can also set it so that others can edit them (this would be the collaboration portion).

The last thing that you might want to do with Wayfaring is to explore and find maps that others have created. They have the “Best of Wayfaring” where you can view some of the best maps that users have created. Another option is to search by specific key words, or view the most recent maps created.

One of the best maps I came across was a road trip that started on the East Coast and went all across the US to California with lots of stops in-between. They included pictures for some of the places that they came across.  If you switch to the satellite option on the Google map, you could get a nice tour of some of the US landmarks.

That’s all that there’s really to it.  Wayfaring a very simple, easy way to create maps for any reason you could think of!

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

Web Hosting: 1998 Vs. Now

This article was written on February 20, 2008 by CyberNet.

Web hosting is a big industry these days with so many people and businesses running sites of their own. Royal, which is Pingdom’s official blog, recently took a look at web hosting now versus 10 years ago. It’s actually amazing to see the changes in storage space offered, and the increases in data transfer between then and now. What’s interesting though is that while so many things have increased, one thing hasn’t, and that’s the price. The cost of web hosting has managed to stay exactly the same, if not lower, than what it was back in 1998. Take a look:

web hosting

First of all, notice that the average price for web hosting back in 1998 was $16.28 per month while 10 years later in 2008, it’s actually lower at $12.95.  You’d think with inflation it would have at least gone up some, but it didn’t.  Of course back in 1998 there weren’t as many web hosting options out there. These days there are so many that they all compete for your business and do so by keeping prices at a minimum.

Next on the chart above is storage space.  Back in 1998, companies on average offered 153 MB of storage to their customers. Today it’s 171,000 MB which is quite the difference. That increase in storage space is due in part because of the advances in the hard drive technology. With the increase in storage space came the increase in data transfer – 4GB back in 1998 compared to 1,770 GB today on average. As Royal points out, obviously network capacity isn’t keeping up with storage space because the increase wasn’t quite as large.

So what can we make out of all of this? Well, obviously people today are getting a bigger bang for their buck. More importantly though, the changes we see in the graph above from 1998 to 2008 seem natural. There’s been a natural progression in technology and of course storage space and data transfer are going to increase drastically over time. After seeing the changes that occurred over the last 10 years, what do you think storage space and data transfer will be like 10 years from now?

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

CNET’s New Addition: CNET TV

This article was written on October 17, 2006 by CyberNet.

CNET TV CNET has added a new element to their network, CNET TV.  It’s purpose is of course to broadcast news and product reviews.  With the way the popularity of internet videos is going, CNET has probably taken a step in the right direction – particularly because CNET’s chairman and chief executive has resigned and their outlook a bit unsure. With all of the hype and popularity over YouTube recently, it’s no wonder they wanted to get themselves involved in web TV.

I tried it out for a minutes at www.cnettv.com, and the streaming was great. I tuned in for Summer’s Top 5 Worst Technology which was actually worth watching. At number 5 was iTunes 7. I’m sure you could think of a few others that deserve to be on the list! Along with this announcement, they have also announced a partnership with Verizon.  CNET’s video’s will be distrubuted by Verizon with on-demand TV.It also has the capability for users to subscribe to particular channels through iTunes.

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com

A Look at Microsoft’s WorldWide Telescope

This article was written on May 13, 2008 by CyberNet.

A lot of hype has surrounded Microsoft’s WorldWide Telescope right from the start, especially after we learned that it made Robert Scoble cry. Back in February he took a trip to Microsoft and saw it in action. He was under embargo and couldn’t explain what it was that he saw, but he did say that it was life changing and it was something that had an emotional impact on him. A couple of weeks later when we learned that the WorldWide Telescope was in fact what Scoble was referring to, the pressure was on for Microsoft to deliver. Late last night they did deliver and the WorldWide Telescope has been released into it’s “Spring Beta” and is available for download here.

My very first impression when I started it after installing it was that in some ways, the interface reminds me of Windows Media Player with the drop-down menus at the top. The next thing I noticed was just how complex it is, in a good way. There is so much information available, it’s unbelievable and there are many, many features.

worldwide telescope.png

The best way to get a hang of everything is to just start exploring. Click on the different drop-down menus to see what kinds of things you can click on and just have fun. I haven’t spent more than 20 minutes playing around with everything, but in that time I saw a lot of really amazing images. You can choose which telescopes you’d like to look through, and you can even switch between different light wavelengths. There are also guided tours available, complete with narration.

In the official press release from Microsoft, they quote Bill Gates saying:

“The WorldWide Telescope is a powerful tool for science and education that makes it possible for everyone to explore the universe.

By combining terabytes of incredible imagery and data with easy-to-use software for viewing and moving through all that information, the WorldWide Telescope opens the door to new ways to see and experience the wonders of space. Our hope is that it will inspire young people to explore astronomy and science, and help researchers in their quest to better understand the universe.”

I don’t know about you, but I would have loved to have tools like the WorldWide Telescope and Google Sky available while I was in school to learn about the universe. For both kids and adults alike, these tools provide us with a great opportunity to see what’s out there.

Check out Microsoft’s WorldWide Telescope… (just note that the download is Windows only)

Thanks for the tip Change and Silviu!

Copyright © 2013 CyberNetNews.com