Hackerbot Labs Resizes Quarters into Dimes

hackerbotlabs

SAN MATEO, California — It’s true your money doesn’t go as far as it used to. Seattle-based Hackerbots Labs can take a coin and shrink it down such that quarters appear the size of dimes and dimes become little more than little molten balls of metal.  What’s amazing is that through this process, the identity and value of the coin remain almost intact.

Here’s their trick: They take a small candy carton-sized machine that hosts three capacitors, which together discharge 15,000 Joules of energy or 10,000 Volts, into a small coil that is wrapped around the coin. Bombarding the coin with that much energy shrinks it almost perfectly, while retaining the weight and volume.

At the Maker Faire festival for DIYers, as onlookers peered eagerly, Rob Flickenger, a member of Hackerbot Labs, explained how it works. To generate the energy, power from a wall outlet goes into a variac or a variable transformer, from which it is channeled to a volt neon transformer. The resultant huge jolt of energy creates an extremely powerful magnetic field inside a coil in the machine’s chamber. This induces a magnetic field in the coin attached to the coil. The two magnetic fields strongly oppose each other leading to the shrinking of the coin.

The side effect of the process is that the coil expands and explodes violently inside the chamber.  To make the whole experiment safe, says Flickenger, Hackerbot Labs has constructed the chamber out of high density plastic and uses a long rope to engage a trigger that sets of the process. And along the way they just have to make sure everyone around plugs their ears.

And after all that, perfect tiny buttons of coins are spewed out. Just don’t try to pass off one of those shrunken quarters as a dime.

To see more of the process including photos, check out their blog.

Photo: Hackerbot Labs


What to See, Do, Hear and Hack at the Maker Faire

8-bit CPU

Maker Faire, the largest festival for DIYers, crafters and hackers, happens Saturday and Sunday, May 30 and 31, in San Mateo, California. More than  80,000 people are expected to attend this year to check out what the 600 odd makers have to show, including robotics, music, crafts and food.

bug_makerfaireHere are some of the highlights:

  • Steve Chamberlin’s 8-bit homebrewed CPU.  Nearly 1,253 pieces of wire were individually hand wrapped to create the connection and Chamberlin has built a functional computer based on it. The computer and the CPU will be on display in booth 296 at the main Expo Hall.
  • A group of Disney Pixar’s Wall-E movie aficianados will also be showing their handmade Wall-E robots and other characters from the movie. The hobbyists have  created life-size, fully functional replicas from the scratch that are indistinguishable from their namesakes in the movie. The robots will be on display at booth 147 in the Expo Hall.
  • There will also be interesting musical instruments on display such as the Yotam Mann’s multitouch musical pad. The musical pad has optical lasers, a webcam and some custom software rigged together to provide an inexpensive way to make some cool music. The contraption will be on display at booth 211 in the Expo Hallo.
  • The Bay Area Lego Users Group (BayLUG), which has more than 100 members, will show an entire city constructed of Lego bricks. The exhibit, with individual members responsible for building a single city block, will measure about 2,000 square feet.
  • Other cool exhibits include Daniel Fukuba’s DIY Segway. Fukuba, with some help from other Segway enthusiasts, has created a balancing scooter, first with a wooden frame and then an aluminum frame.  “I started with raw, plain PCB boards and soldered on all the components for the speed controller and the logic controller,” says Fukuba. The project took about two months and $4000. And at the Faire, he will be sharing his expertise on how to do it yourself. Fukuba’s DIY balancing scooter will be on display at A1 in the Bike Town pavilion.
  • We are also eager to see the two-person self-propelled Ferris Wheel where riders use their arm muscles to shift their weight and turn the wheel. This Ferris Wheel is about 20 feet tall, made of plywood and will be in the Midway M2 area.
  • Don’t forget to also check out the CandyFab Project that uses low-cost, open-source fabrication to create 3D sugary confections. A completely new CandyFab machine will be on display at booth number 293 in the Expo Hall cranking out some sweet goodies.

Know of some other cool exhibits or events at the Faire? Post them in the comments below.

And follow @gadgetlab on Twitter, where we’ll be tweeting throughout the weekend with tips on the most interesting, fun and wacky things to see. Stay.

For more on the event, check out O’Reilly’s Maker Faire website.

Photo: Wire wrapped 8-bit CPU/Steve Chamberlin


Hobbyists Rebuild Wall-E, One PVC Pipe at a Time

wall-e-gamecube1

Its adorable robot love story makes Disney’s Wall-E movie is as much a geek favorite as Star Wars and Terminator. Some Wall-E fans have banded together to take their passion to a new level, fashioning life-size, fully functional replicas of robots from the movie.

And there are more than just a few of them. A Wall-E builders’ group boasts nearly 3,000 members worldwide.

“It’s a lot of reverse engineering,” says Bruce Shields, who is better known among DIY roboticists by his screen name Jawa Lunk. “It’s a release, a relaxing hobby that is enjoyable. When you are done you can look at it and say ‘this is it, this is the end.’”

Wall-E, the bug-eyed robot star of the movie, is clearly the hot favorite in this DIY community. But other robots from the film, such as Eve, M-O and Autopilot, have also been brought to life. Some of the group’s homemade bots will be on display this weekend at the Maker Faire, a festival of DIY arts, crafts and technology in San Mateo, California.

When the first trailer of Wall-E was released in October 2007, Shields says he found a robot that the world could love. A Michigan-based pastor with a strong interest in robotics, he created the Wall-E builders’ group.  In its first few weeks, the group collected about 400 members.  And they tried to find every little nugget, image or slice of video that could offer a hint to how the robot functioned.

Without blueprints or schematics, creating a life-size or even a scaled-down version of the Wall-E robot isn’t easy. The head was the most difficult part, says Shields. He hand-formed the sheet aluminum around two LED flashlights, and connected PVC elbows to the back. He formed faux solar panels on the head and put it all together in his workshop. For the arms, Shields took a PVC pipe from a sink drain and sized a smaller pipe to fit inside it, which allowed the arms to move in and out. He documented the process in this blog. The faux rust and weathering came from a paint job.

Every part of the process has been documented in the online forums where members of the community make suggestions and improvements. For instance, another member suggested that yellow #120 from Walmart’s ColorPlace brand made for an excellent external paint on the robot.

“We don’t have anything that is off the shelf,” says Shields. “We don’t really have anything where we say, ‘Let’s go down to the store, let’s buy an arm and hook it up.’”

It’s not just the Wall-E robot that gets attention. Matt Ebisu, a member of the group, first built M-O, a cleaner robot. “My focus is on the secondary robots, M-O, Eve and Auto,” he says. “And M-O is just very comedic, funny, cute and interesting in the way he has been designed.”

A tiny robot with a box-like frame, a red light at top of his head and a brush permanently stuck between its hands, M-O plays a charming yet small part in the movie.

To recreate M-O, Ebisu started with an existing Clean N Go M-O figure toy. He gutted the insides and devised a way to fit existing electronics inside it. Ebisu took a trackball from a mouse and refashioned it to create a way for the robot to move around. He used toothbrush bristles to recreate the cleaner brush and put an LED inside a clear Lego brick for the light.

Building the robot took about three months. Ebisu says he’s obsessed with Wall-E: He’s seen the movie at least 96 times.

“We are doing robots that are really detailed and take quite some time to build,” says Shields. “It’s not a light weekend project.”

Maker Faire features more than 600 exhibitors and is expected to draw 80,000 attendees, organizers say.

Check out more pictures of the robots below.

M-O robot comes to life.

mo1

A fully functional Wall-E from Uruguay-based Elso Lopez.

elso-wall-e

Bruce Shields aka Jawa Lunk’s Gamecube Wall-E being built.

gamecube-walle

A close-up of the Wall-E robots’s tracks.

walle-tracks

For more see, the Flickr photostream of the Wall-E Builders group.

Top Photo: Wall-E/Bruce Shields. Other photos: Wall-E Builders group.



Homebrewed CPU Is a Beautiful Mess of Wires

bmow1

Intel’s fabrication plants can churn out hundreds of thousands of processor chips a day. But what does it take to handcraft a single 8-bit CPU and a computer? Give or take 18 months, about $1,000 and 1,253 pieces of wire.

Steve Chamberlin, a Belmont, California, videogame developer by day, set out on a quest to custom design and build his own 8-bit computer. The homebrew CPU would be called Big Mess of Wires or BMOW. Despite its name, it is a painstakingly created work of art.

“Computers can seem like complete black boxes. We understand what they do, but not how they do it, really,” says Chamberlin. “When I was finally able to mentally connect the dots all the way from the physics of a transistor up to a functioning computer, it was an incredible thrill.”

The 8-bit CPU and computer will be on display doing an interactive chess demo at the fourth annual Maker Faire in San Mateo, California, this weekend, May 30-31. It will be one of 600 exhibits of do-it-yourself technology, hacks, mods and just plain strange hobby projects at the faire, which is expected to draw 80,000 attendees.

The BMOW is closest in design to the MOS Technology 6502 processor used in the Apple II, Commodore 64 and early Atari videogame consoles. Chamberlin designed his CPU to have three 8-bit data registers, a 24-bit address size and 12 addressing modes. It took him about a year and a half from design to finish. Almost all the components come from the 1970s- and 1980s-era technology.

“Old ’80s vintage parts may not be very powerful, but they’re easy to work with and simple to understand,” he says. “They’re like the Volkswagen Beetles of computer hardware. Nobody argues they’re the best but we love them for their simplicity.”

To connect the parts, Chamberlin used wire wrapping instead of soldering. The technique involves taking a hollow, screwdriver-shaped tool and looping the wire through it to create a tight, secure connection. Wire wraps are seen as less prone to failures than soldered junctions but can take much longer to accomplish. Still, they offer one big advantage, says Chamberlin.

“Wire wrapping is changeable,” he says. “I can unwrap and start over if I make a mistake. It is is much harder to recover from a mistake if you solder.”

Chamberlin started with a a 12×7-inch Augat wire-wrap board with 2,832 gold wire-wrap posts that he purchased from eBay for $50. Eventually he used 1,253 pieces of wire to create 2,506 individually-wrapped connections, wrapping at the rate of almost 25 wires in an hour. “It’s like a form of meditation,” he wrote on his blog. “Despite how long it takes to wrap, the wire-wrapping hasn’t really impacted my overall rate of progress. Design, debugging, and general procrastination consume the most time.”

The BMOW isn’t just a CPU. Chamberlin added a keyboard input, an LCD output that shows a strip of text, a USB connection, three-voice audio, and VGA video output to turn it into a functioning computer. The video circuitry, a UMC 70C171 color palette chip, was hard to come by, he says. When Chamberlin couldn’t find a source for it online, he went to a local electronics surplus warehouse and dug through a box of 20-year-old video cards. Two cards in there had the chip he needed, so he took one and repurposed it for his project.

The use of retro technology and parts is essential for a home hobbyist, says Chamberlin. Working with newer electronics technology can be difficult because a lot of modern parts are surface-mount chips instead of having through-hole pins. That requires a wave soldering oven, putting them out of reach of non-professionals.

After months of the CPU sitting naked on his desk, Chamberlin fashioned a case using a gutted X Terminal, a workstation popular in the early 1990s.

“Why did I do all this?” he says. “I don’t know. But it has been a lot of fun.”

Check out Steve Chamberlin’s log of how BMOW was built.

Photo:  Wire wrapped 8-bit CPU/Steve Chamberlin


Amp Cranks Cardboard Boxes Up to 11

boxamp-4-700

The Box Amp is a $30 kit from Critter and Guitari which will turn any old cardboard box into a guitar amplifier. You’ll need some basic soldering skills but once the hot-work is done, you’ll need nothing but a craft-knife to fashion an almost infinite array of enclosures.

The Box Amp consists of electronics, jack socket, nine-volt power supply and a speaker. The box acts as both a holder and to shape the sound, and the kit can be modded to run off a nine-volt battery for busking. We like the low-fi nature, and we also like that you can stick this bundle inside all kinds of cases to change the sound, from trash cans to mahogany boxes. Plus, if you’re going to go all Pete Townshend or Jimi Hendrix and start smashing up your gear, this is a lot cheaper to replace.

Product page [Critter and Guitari. Thanks, Eliot!]


Mac Cloner Psystar Files for Bankruptcy

openproMac cloner Psystar has filed for bankruptcy, effectively stalling Apple’s legal case against the Florida-based startup.

Filed with the federal courts in Florida, the voluntary petition for bankruptcy protection temporarily puts Apple’s lawsuit on hold while the bankruptcy court begins proceedings.

Apple in July 2008 filed suit against Psystar alleging copyright, trademark and shrink-wrap license infringement. Psystar opened its Mac clone business in April, selling a PC hacked to run OS X Leopard.

Apple strictly forbids its operating system to be installed on anything but Apple products. The corporation alleges Psystar is violating the Mac OS X end-user agreement, which states, “You agree not to install, use or run the Apple Software on any non-Apple-labeled computer, or to enable others to do so.” The corporation also alleges Psystar is committing copyright infringement by installing OS X on non-Apple hardware.

Psystar did not immediately respond to requests for comment. However, the bankruptcy petition suggests Psystar’s investors may have withdrawn from financially backing the company. The bankruptcy filing also implies that Psystar likely cannot afford a legal team to win its battle against Apple.

Winning the lawsuit would be a large victory for Apple, as it would set a legal precedent enabling the corporation to easily squash other existing Mac cloners.

The Florida court on June 5 will hold a hearing revealing Psystar’s equity creditors, meaning if there any large entities backing the Mac cloner (e.g., Microsoft), we’ll know who they are very soon.

Suggestion of Bankruptcy [PDF via MacObserver]

See Also:

Image courtesy of Psystar


Ball-Bungees: The Handiest Thing You Never Heard Of

ball-bungee-1

There are a few items that everyone should have in their toolkit, things so useful that there really is no excuse not to own them. Gaffer tape, or its residue-laying, brittle-ageing US counterpart, duct-tape, is one. Velcro is another. Now this diumvirate of utility is joined by a third object, a widget so simple that you could make your own in seconds, yet so versatile you couldn’t count its uses in a lifetime (well, maybe not in a dragonfly’s lifetime, at least).

It is the ball-bungee, and you can see it above. It consists of a hollow plastic ball and a length of elastic cord. With it you can hold almost any two items together. I came across them by way of the Strobist blog, and they are particularly suited to photography as there are no scratchy parts on them. You can secure flashes to poles, or even small comapct cameras to, well, anything. I wanted to make a couple to hold my umbrella to my light-stand, which is one of the “traditional” uses.

Yes, I said make. I figured that the ball bungee would make a great how-to post for the Gadget Lab, being simple, cheap, quick and useful. Like always, I visited my local hardware emporium, only to find no plastic baubles and, shockingly, no elastic cord. There were, however, packs of ball-bungees in the garden section. The price? Just over €2 for a pack of four, or about US 70¢ apiece. At this price, it’s clearly useless to make your own. And as a generic product, there’s no manufacturers page to link to. You’ll just have to go visit your local hardware store.

ball-bungee-3

ball-bungee-2


Hack: Nintendo DS Controls Open Source Robot

Surveyor makes open source robot controllers that have quite a fan following among do-it-yourself drone enthusiasts. The company’s core product is the SRV-1, a  programmable mobile robot controller that is open source,wireless and video enabled.

Peter Dove, UK-based developer, has created a nifty way to control the Surveyor SRV-1 module’s camera and the base using a Nintendo DS game console. Dove used the SRV-1 console’s built-in WiFi link to remotely control the motorized robot base and view pictures and video transmitted by the robot. And as the video shows the buttons on the DS’s console work perfectly for the purpose.

The attempt is similar to how some enthusiasts had used the Google Android G1 phone to control a robotic blimp.

For detailed binaries and source code on how Dove brings together the DS and the Surveyor moduel, check out his blog.


High-Speed Cameras Reveal the World Inside Time

<< previous image | next image >>

















A hummingbird’s neck is structured like a bucket that acts as a holding tank for liquids. If it hadn’t evolved this way, the bird would choke to death whenever it tried to take a sip of water.

This accidental discovery was observed not by human eyes, but through the lens of a super high-speed camera. It’s just one example of interesting phenomena revealed when video is played back in extreme slow motion. The hummingbird clip appeared in an episode of Time Warp, a show whose premise is to make the ordinary extraordinary with one trick: slowing it down.

“We’ve evolved for 5 billion years just to do what we needed to do to be alive … and we can see 30 to 50 things a second,” said Jeff Lieberman, co-host of Time Warp. “With high-speed cameras we can see a million things a second, and we’re looking at everyday things and seeing an entire world that exists underneath.”

Typically costing upward of $100,000, high-speed cameras are capable of shooting at amazingly high frame rates, stretching a single second into minutes of super slow-motion playback. In order to achieve this feat, each of these cameras draws its powers from a unique, highly advanced complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) — or, in simpler terms, an extremely beefed-up pixel sensor. The cameras were designed for military testing, scientific research and other industry applications.

Though earlier high-speed cameras used film, digital devices have since become the standard due to their more precise ability to capture serendipitous and unexpected phenomena, utilizing a special data-writing method. With hundreds of thousands of frames captured per second, the data needs somewhere it can travel speedily. The high-speed cameras process images using the fastest DRAM available, and writing is performed using a data structure called the circular buffer. The circular buffer keeps recently written data while overwriting older data when the buffer is full, thereby preventing overloading.

In Time Warp, Lieberman leaves the camera recording for as long as he wishes, and when he spots a segment he wants to keep, he hits a trigger. Then, the camera stores only those few seconds that he wishes to keep, erasing earlier, unwanted data.

“It’s not really feasible to record 20 minutes when all you want is 100 milliseconds,” said Andrew Bridges, sales and marketing manager of Photron, which manufactures some of the cameras used in Time Warp. “Digitally you have these various options…. And it’s a lot better than the old film way where the event had to occur in the brief amount of seconds the camera was actually recording onto film.”


Eight Months with a Hackintosh Netbook. Conclusion: Fantastic

wind-1

A few weeks ago, Gadget Lab’s own Brian X Chen moaned about his dreadful experience using a hackintosh netbook for six months. The poor poppet whined on about the case falling apart, the Wi-Fi simply dying on him on a trip abroad and a whole range of other petty niggles.

As Chen mentioned, I agree on one point: The trackpad on the gen.1 Wind is truly atrocious, a tiny square of plastic with almost unusable buttons that you, inexplicably, need two hands to press. But on almost everything else, I disagree. Sure, the Wind isn’t perfect, as either a Windows or a Mac machine (although the Ubuntu Netbook Remix would be almost perfect if the Wi-Fi would work). But it has some great advantages, and a few tweaks down the road I have a tiny, portable machine that has proven very useful.

First, the obvious. The thing is tiny, and it’s a Mac. I don’t want to get into the whole Mac vs. PC thing. I just prefer to use a Mac, I’m used to it and everything is second nature. Now that the problems with certain drivers have been ironed out, it behaves exactly like my bigger Macs, even to the extent of switching automatically to line-output when plugging in headphones. The Mac OS has been rock solid on this machine since the very beginning. Maybe that’s because I didn’t steal my version off the internet.

Then there’s the battery. I replaced the truly awful three-cell that shipped with the machine with a huge, wrong colored nine-cell. It’s not pretty, but I get a true seven hours of use from the computer, and I still have the old one for an extra hour or so if I need it. This alone is reason to own a netbook, Mac or Windows, as it means you are no longer tied to a power source.

I took the Wind (actually, a Wind clone from Medion) on a weekend trip to Rome. I threw it in hand-luggage along with an external hard drive and turned the whole thing into a portable photo backup device. That there was neighbor-fi in the apartment helped, too, for checking out tourist spots, but for the main task — to clear my CF cards every day and do some basic editing (yes, it runs Lightroom, even with just a gig of RAM) — the netbook was perfect.

There’s more. At the kind of parties I host, there is always a need for the internet and, of course, music. The Wind acts as a great wireless front-end to iTunes sharing and Airtunes streaming, and you can pass it around the drunken guests without worrying. Sure, $400 is too much to lose to a spilled gin and tonic, but it’s better than $1600 for a replacement MacBook.

If you are aware from the beginning that a netbook is a cheap, low-spec, low-rent kind of computer, with the cheapest, most plasticky parts, then you won’t be disappointed. And if you hack it to run OS X, and you have similarly low expectations, you’ll actually be pleasantly surprised. I love my hackintosh netbook. It’s not perfect, but is sure is damn useful.

Six Months With a Hackintosh Netbook: It Ain’t Pretty [Gadget Lab]
It Lives! Gadget Lab’s Netbook Running OS X Leopard [Gadget Lab]

Photo: Charlie Sorrel