Microsoft Word allowed to stay on sale… for now

Just as we predicted, Microsoft’s request to have that ban on sales of Word put on hold pending appeal of i4i’s XML patent victory has been granted. That means IT managers and excitable first-year college students can continue to happily throw down cash for the world’s most popular word processor, while the rest of us twiddle our thumbs waiting for either proceedings to resume on September 23 or Stevey Ballms to write the big check and make this whole case disappear forever.

Filed under:

Microsoft Word allowed to stay on sale… for now originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:17:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Amazon formally protests Google Books settlement


Well, we knew this was coming: Amazon’s trying to convince a federal judge to block the $125m settlement that’ll let Google Books make out-of-print works available online. According to Amazon’s newly-filed brief, allowing the settlement will essentially force copyright holders into allowing Google to scan in and sell their works whether they want to or not — a thorny area of the law Amazon’s gotten pretty familiar with as it builds out the Kindle library. Of course, since the actual settlement is between Google and those very same authors and publishers, it certainly seems like Amazon is crying crocodile tears here — according to our old friend Paul Aiken of the Authors Guild, “Amazon apparently fears Google could upend its plans” to make the Kindle the dominant ebook platform. Heady stuff — and with more briefs against the settlement due in the next few days from heavy hitters like Sony, Yahoo and Microsoft, things seem like they’re building to fever pitch. We’ll keep you updated.

Read – USA Today
Read – CNET
Read – Amazon’s brief [Warning: PDF]

Filed under:

Amazon formally protests Google Books settlement originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:12:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

TiVo projects larger than expected losses, still taking the patent fight to AT&T and Verizon

We’ll let the analysts make sense of TiVo’s new projection that it will lose $8 to $10 million in the third quarter, larger than Wall Street expectations while projected revenues are lower — we’re too busy adding Verizon and AT&T to the patent battlemap. Today it filed complaints against both for violating three of its DVR-related patents — Nos. 6,233,389 B1 (“Multimedia Time Warping System”), 7,529,465 B2 (“System for Time Shifting Multimedia Content Streams”), and 7,493,015 B1 (“Automatic Playback Overshoot Correction System”) if you must know — seeking damages for past infringement and a permanent injunction. We’d assumed it would wait until settling things with DISH to push forward against other companies, but it looks like we’re not the only ones getting impatient. Beyond the legal slapfight there’s a few nuggets for the bleep bloop faithful, with the Comcast TiVo on-line scheduler beginning to roll out in Boston plus further expansions on the way and the due-in-2010 DirecTV HD TiVo still on track — we’ll need a few seasons of Law & Order queued up before this mess ever gets resolved.

Read – TiVo Swings to Loss, Files Infringement Suits
Read – TiVo Reports Results for the Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2010 Ended July 31, 2009
Read – TiVo Files Complaints for Patent Infringement Against AT&T and Verizon Communications in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas; Seeking Damages and Injunction

Filed under:

TiVo projects larger than expected losses, still taking the patent fight to AT&T and Verizon originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Tesla founder quietly dismisses lawsuit against the company, Musk

Remember that time, way back in June, when we told you that former Tesla Motors exec Martin Eberhard was suing the company and its chief (a certain Mr. Elon Musk) for sundry offenses, including forcing him out of the company, wrecking his car, and besmirching his good name? According to the San Jose Business Journal, the suit was quietly and unceremoniously dropped on August 7 at the request of Eberhard. Of course, the most likely explanation for this turn of events (besides Eberhard’s suddenly finding his Zen and deciding to drop out of the material world for a life of quiet contemplation) is a settlement of some sort. Maybe he’s getting that coveted roadster after all? According to The Register, a Tesla spokesperson refused to “speculate on why Eberhard dropped his suit.” When pressed for a follow-up, the same site received an automated reply: “I am on vacation”.

[Via The Register]

Filed under:

Tesla founder quietly dismisses lawsuit against the company, Musk originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:55:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Amazon, Microsoft and Yahoo unite against Google Books

Microsoft, its new pet dog Yahoo, and Amazon have decided to join together in the soon to be formed Open Book Alliance. You might expect this to be a revolutionary new collaborative effort at delivering the written word in a way that makes Google Books pale into insignificance, but you would, of course, be wrong. Far from trying to compete with Google, The OBA is set to act as the collective mouthpiece for all those opposed to Google’s recent $125 million settlement deal with book publishers and authors. With the US Department of Justice already investigating antitrust concerns relating to the case, the other big dogs just couldn’t restrain themselves from pitching in together for a united whinge. Should the settlement be cleared, it will permit Google non-exclusive rights to orphan works (those without an established writer) and will give it a 30 per cent cut of books sold via Google Books, both things that authors have agreed to. So what’s there to moan about, fellas — we all trust Google to do the right thing, right?

Filed under:

Amazon, Microsoft and Yahoo unite against Google Books originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:23:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Nokia / InterDigital patent drama continues with ITC ruling in Espoo’s favor

Corporate legal teams are so large, so powerful, and often so evenly-matched that when you combine them with the glacial wheels of justice, patent disputes can take years to resolve — in fact, we’d say it’s the rule rather than the exception — and inevitably, they end in anticlimactic fashion with the alleged offender agreeing to shell out some fraction of the plaintiff’s original request in exchange for sweeping the whole matter under the rug. Nokia’s had its fair share of such spats, and one that’s been dogging the company for a good long while now is with InterDigital, which has been systematically targeting firms in the industry for years with claims that it holds patents inherently required for UMTS — in other words, if you make UMTS gear, you automatically owe InterDigital money. Of course, Nokia has been politely disagreeing with that claim all along, and the US International Trade Commission has just issued an initial determination in its favor, saying that it doesn’t violate the four patents InterDigital’s all worked up over. For the record, the US ITC has been investigating this issue for a solid two years now, so yeah, if someone’s ripping off your IP, don’t expect a speedy resolution. The commission’s initial determination will be followed by a final, binding determination this December; in the meantime; Espoo “will continue to present its case.” Now that we think about it, we’re pretty sure we saw this episode of Law & Order already.

Filed under: ,

Nokia / InterDigital patent drama continues with ITC ruling in Espoo’s favor originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:54:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Best Buy Kiosks Display In-Store Prices Disclosure

This article was written on September 26, 2007 by CyberNet.

If you’ve been into a Best Buy store over the last several months, you may have noticed a disclosure displayed across their Kiosks warning that what’s displayed are in-store prices which could be different from Internet prices. The addition of this banner across the screen was likely a direct result of a lawsuit that was filed back in May accusing Best Buy of deceiving their customers with a bait-and-switch scheme using their in-store Intranet. They adamantly denied the accusation, but at that point, many people didn’t trust them anymore.

Below you’ll see what the banner looks like. It simply states “This kiosk displays in-store prices- which may differ from national Internet prices. Promotions can differ between stores and Internet.  See your sales associate if you have questions.” What it doesn’t say though, is if they’ll honor the prices in-store that are advertised online, or if this disclosure now prevents them from price matching?

best buy disclosure

As a side note, while I was visiting the Best Buy website, I noticed in big print that there was an error in their most recent weekly ad for a Panasonic TV. On the front cover, they showed that the 50″ Panasonic Plasma TV was on sale for $1799 before $90 savings when they really meant to advertise the smaller 42″ Panasonic TV at that price. Considering that the 50″ Panasonic TV that they advertised is regularly priced at $2,799, that would have been quite the deal! To make up for their mistake, they’re offering a $100 instant rebate on all of their plasma TV’s this week.

Source: The Consumerist

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Kaleidescape gets in line behind RealDVD for rough treatment

DVD lawsuitWhen it rains it pours — right on the heels of the punishing blow dealt to RealDVD, the money-laden Kaleidescape crowd suffered its own setback at the hands of the law. You just know that the DVD CCA (Copy Control Association) appealed the 2007 ruling that allowed Kaleidescape owners to rip DVDs to their media servers, and yesterday a California Appeals Court overturned that ruling. Next stop — the Santa Clara Superior Court, which could place an injunction on Kaleidescape if the appeal is upheld. It’s not over yet, but we’re prepping the soundboard with ominous music, boos and noisy hand-wringing. Whatever (and whenever) the outcome, we can only hope that Blu-ray’s Managed Copy comes to the scene sooner rather than later and settles this issue for our beloved HD content

Filed under:

Kaleidescape gets in line behind RealDVD for rough treatment originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Microsoft forbidden from selling Word, will probably keep selling Word

Hey, remember that seemingly random patent case from May in which a federal jury awarded a company called i4i Ltd $200 million in patent damages against Microsoft? Things just got worse for Redmond: the judge in the case today issued a permanent injunction against sales of Word 2003, Word 2007, and any future versions of Word that can open .xml, .docx, or .docm files containing “custom XML.” Yeah, no kidding — that’s pretty much all of ’em. At issue is i4i’s patent on a method for reading XML, and obviously Microsoft’s vowed to appeal, so expect this injunction to be stayed pending that appeal in short order — and also expect Microsoft to eventually either find a way to win or simply pay up, since there’s no way it’ll let anyone kill Word. We’ll see what happens. Word.

Update: CNET has a quick interview with i4i Chairman Loudon Owen, who says that he himself uses Word and that i4i isn’t trying to “stop Microsoft’s business” or “interfere with all the users of Word out there.” It’s an interesting read, go check it out.

Update: Not that it should come as a surprise to anyone at all, but Microsoft has confirmed that it’ll be appealing the decision.

Filed under:

Microsoft forbidden from selling Word, will probably keep selling Word originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:42:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory

Something tells us Kaleidescape has a man (or woman, to be fair) on the inside, else United States District Court Judge Marilyn Patel is just downright trifilin’. In every visible way, RealNetworks’ proposed RealDVD player was exactly what Kaleidescape was, but for people with annual salaries far less than $9,854,392,220. Regardless of our opinion, a preliminary injunction has just been passed down from The Almighty in the robe, which blocks the sale of the RealDVD software here in the US. The six major movie studies filed the suit last September, alleging that it “illegally violated their right to restrict the use of their movies in digital form.” Evidently those that matter agree. A RealNetworks spokesperson took the time to vent their feelings on the whole ordeal, and since we know you’re curious, we’ve pasted it below for your convenience.

We are disappointed that a preliminary injunction has been placed on the sale of RealDVD. We have just received the Judge’s detailed ruling and are reviewing it. After we have done so fully, we’ll determine our course of action and will have more to say at that time.

[Via Electronista]

Filed under:

Court injunction puts sales of RealDVD on ice, hopes and dreams in purgatory originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments