Apple Pays Out $946 in ‘Locationgate’ Settlement

An unencrypted file stored in iOS 4 recorded location data, which an open source application could then plot.

Apple has begun shelling out dough for its location-tracking debacle lovingly referred to as “Locationgate.”

Apple was ordered to pay out 1 million South Korean won ($946) in compensation for collecting user geolocation data without permission in May, Reuters reported Thursday. The payment was made to a lawyer named Kim Hyung-suk.

This is the first payout Apple has made in response to the issue. And although $946 isn’t even a drop in the hat to the $323 billion company, it may just be the start.

In April, it was discovered that Apple was collecting user location data and storing it in an unencrypted file (“consolidated.db”) within iOS 4. An open source program called “iPhone Tracker” could then be used to turn the file’s contents into an interactive map like the one above. The file could not be accessed with Safari or any apps on the device itself. The location tracking and storing function could not be turned off in that version of iOS, but Apple’s iOS 4.3.3 update eliminated the bug, which was “a mistake [caused] by making the location database file too large.” iOS 4.3.3 reduced the size of that file.

Storing such data on a mobile device itself was problematic because it’s completely unnecessary and could lead to a breach in privacy, especially by law enforcement officials.

Though Apple fixed the glitch, the incident served as a cautionary tale for eroding privacy in the always-connected digital age, through smartphones that are constantly collecting and storing our personal information.

Mirae Law, Kim’s law firm, is now in the process of preparing a class action lawsuit. Two American factions of iPhone and iPad users are also suing the Cupertino-based company. French, German, and Italian regulators also began investigating the incident after it was unearthed.

As our society moves to an ever more mobile computing model, the need for security and clear privacy policies is becoming increasingly important. People aren’t just using their phones or tablets to write friendly emails or play games; they are conducting business, there’s sensitive information involved.

Apple’s locationgate scandal felt to many like a gross violation of privacy.

“This thing remembers more about where I’ve been and what I’ve said than I do, and I’m damn sure I don’t want it falling into anyone’s hands,” The Atlantic’s Alexis Madrigal said.


Why Netflix Wants You to ‘Just Say No’ to DVDs

Netflix's instant-streaming option is more appealing than ever, in light of a price increase for its DVD rentals. Photo courtesy of Netflix.

Netflix wants you to kick your DVD habit.

The company would much rather you launch the Netflix app on your Roku, Xbox or iPad and watch movies there instead.

That’s the simple explanation behind Netflix’s recent price hike for its DVD rental plan, analysts say. Ideally, the move will encourage customers to sign up for digital streaming plans, which would lower operating costs and increase profits for the company.

“The incentive for Netflix is to push their customers into digital distribution,” said NPD Group analyst Ross Rubin in an interview. “With a DVD customer, in terms of mailing DVDs, Netflix has to deal with damaged discs and inventory,” said Rubin. “There’s many expenses with that part of the business.”

Netflix’s DVD price hike comes off as an aggressive tactic to transition into streaming media, in a time when some brick-and-mortar shops are failing in the wake of digitally distributed media hitting the mainstream. In the past year, both Blockbuster and Borders have filed for bankruptcy and closed hundreds of shops, and many agree that the two companies failed because they were too slow to execute digital solutions to compete against tech-savvy giants Netflix and Amazon.

To its credit, Netflix has ruthlessly executed its digital regime for years. It started out as an online DVD rental service, and later expanded into an unlimited streaming video service accessible through multiple devices, such as the Roku, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and Apple TV.

Now Netflix’s goal is to push digital even harder by enticing customers to opt for the streaming plan. Instead of Netflix’s former plan — 10 bucks per month for all-you-can-stream online movies and endless DVDs by mail — the services have been split into two separate plans, ultimately making the streaming service more attractive to customers. For unlimited movie streaming service, you’ll pay eight bucks a month. For unlimited DVDs, you’ll pay eight bucks a month. So if you still want both, it’ll cost you $16 a month total.

Therefore, the incentive for customers who want more bang for their buck — i.e. more movies per month — rests in the streaming plan. If you go the DVD route, you’re only allowed one DVD out at a time. That means waiting for days before you get another flick.

And that’s exactly what Netflix wants.

“They’re driving people away from the model that’s no longer cost-effective for them,” Forrester analyst James McQuivey told Wired.com.

And get this: There’s opportunity for the price changes to sign up even more subscribers. Those who choose a streaming-only service are effectively getting a $2 price decrease on their subscription. For potential customers who don’t care about physical DVDs, a $2 drop may break the threshold that kept them from signing up before. That’s an influx of new cash and new customers for Netflix.

“They’ve probably done the math, and they say, ‘Hey, if we lose 10 percent of our DVD-only customers, but gain 30 percent in streaming customers, in the end, we can invest less in DVDs, have fewer warehouses and have less shipping costs,’” McQuivey added.

Those that still want DVDs but don’t want to lose their streaming service end up being cream to skim from the top for Netflix — an extra $6 per customer who wants to keep both plans.

Which feeds into the second half of the company’s strategy — further fleshing out its streaming services. Right now, Netflix’s big problem lies in access to streaming content. In order to secure more rights to films you can watch online, Netflix has to pony up cash to reluctant studios, all of which are nervous to give up potential DVD sales. If a number of current or future subscribers decide to fork over the extra six bucks for both services, Netflix can turn that cash around and put it to securing more digital content. That means a more robust digital platform, and ultimately, more customers.

Of course, running streaming services to multiple continents isn’t a cheap ordeal. But it’s much less difficult than, say, shipping physical media to different countries over the world. Not to mention their streaming services offer “more variable costs that scale with the business.” In other words, the bigger Netflix’s customer base gets, the easier the server and streaming costs will be to keep down.

And Netflix plans to scale the business for sure. Earlier this month, Netflix expanded its streaming services to 43 countries throughout Latin America for the first time, and the company plans to broaden its service in the future.

“Ultimately this will be a global brand, and everywhere will be streaming,” Netflix vice president of communications Steve Swasey told Wired.com. “We want to emphasize that we’ll be a global streaming service.”

As for the current flurry of consumer backlash, Netflix will weather the storm. Twitter is completely aflutter with customer complaints, and the comments section on Netflix’s blog post announcing the price changes is spinning rapidly out of control. But Swasey said the company “expected the reaction” it’s currently receiving from angry customers, and all of the changes came after months of extensive testing and internal deliberation.

And really, it’s not like everyone is going to up and quit the service immediately.

“The value they offer is too concrete, too good,” said Forrester’s McQuivey. “People aren’t going to walk away from it, because it’s not like you have a lot of alternatives. Netflix is in the driver’s seat, and they can do pretty much what they want.”

What do you think of the price increases? Let us know in the poll below.


Facebook Announces New Design, In-Browser Video Chat With Skype

Mark Zuckerberg introduces three new features to Facebook: video calling, group chat and a new chat design. Photo:Jon Snyder/Wired.com

PALO ALTO, California — Facebook unveiled three new products at its headquarters here Wednesday: video calling, group chat and a new design for its chat system.

In a major partnership with Skype, Facebook now offers free video calling between connected users of the site. Beginning Wednesday, users will find a Call button in the top right-hand corner of their Facebook pages. After clicking on the button, the video chat window launches on your Facebook page, inside of your browser window.

“Think of this simply as a mini-Skype client,” said Skype CEO Tony Bates during the announcement. “One that’s obviously embedded in a very attractive way.”

The group chat announcement comes as an add-on to Facebook’s already existing chat function. When you’re chatting with a friend on your Facebook page, a button allows you to add other friends to the chat.

Finally, the company redesigned the chat window, so your Friends list can now vary in size relative to your browser window. A list of friends who are online will appear, as well as those who are offline that you message with the most.

The new Facebook chat integrates Skype for video conferencing. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

The video-chat announcement — obviously the star of the show — comes as a competitive jab at Silicon Valley media giants Google and Apple. Apple introduced its FaceTime video-chatting protocol in 2010, available for Macs, iPhones and iPads. And Google last week launched its brand-new social networking site Google+. Facebook, Apple and Google’s intentions are clear: to lure customers into their media ecosystems with the hippest social networking tools.

Facebook’s partnership with Skype is, in essence, a partnership with Microsoft, who acquired the chatting platform for $8.5 billion. The move should benefit Microsoft, too, by expanding Skype’s presence into the social networking realm.

Google’s social network launched with Hangouts, a group video-chat tool, which can host up to 10 users in a video conference. By contrast, Facebook’s offering with Skype does not offer a group-chat version.

“Today we’re doing one-on-one,” said Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, when asked about a possible group chat addition. “The companies [Skype and Facebook] have been working together for a while.”

Skype CEO Tony Bates (left) and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg introduce Skype video chatting for Facebook. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

Google and Facebook have been in especially fierce competition with each other over the past year, competing for engineering talent. In May, the Daily Beast revealed a Facebook-led smear campaign against Google in unflattering detail.

But Facebook isn’t talking much about Google today. When asked what he thought about the competing company’s social service, Zuckerberg was tight-lipped: “I’m not gonna say a lot about Google.” Though he did implicitly refer to Google when he mentioned “a lot of companies entering the social space.” In other words, Facebook did social first, and Google and company are now hopping on the bandwagon as it takes off.

Speculation on today’s announcement ran high on the mobile arena. The New York Times reported that the first official Facebook iPad app was in the works.

But mobile news was scant at the conference today, and there was no Facebook iPad app among the announcements. “Video calling isn’t live for mobile yet,” Zuckerberg said, though he hinted at more to come. “It’s the beginning of launch season, 2011.”

Google+ launched with an accompanying Android mobile application for handheld devices; the iOS app is reportedly waiting for Apple’s App Store approval. Nearly two years ago to the day, Facebook launched its iPhone app. The app is also available for the iPod Touch and Android phones. Yet still no tablet-optimized versions created by Facebook itself have been previously released (both RIM and HP developed their own versions for the BlackBerry PlayBook and TouchPad, respectively).

As of today, Facebook hosts 750 million active users, according to Zuckerberg.


New Two-Wheeled Professional Tool Slices Through Air

<< Previous
|
Next >>


cervelo_01


Just days before the start of the 2011 Tour de France, bike manufacturer Cervélo has announced its newest model, the S5. Though aggressively aerodynamic, the carbon-fiber S5 is not a triathlon bike. It’s made for road racing, and it will be under the riders of team Garmin-Cervelo when they line up on July 2 at Passage du Gois for the start of the three-week, 2,132-mile race.

Wired was the first media outlet of any kind to get a look at the S5, let alone ride it, which we did this spring. Our access included behind-the-scenes time with Cervélo engineers in the wind tunnel at the University of Washington and our exclusive test ride in Marin County, California, just north of San Francisco.

Following are our photos from the wind tunnel sessions, along with shots and impressions from our test ride.

Above: A prototype of Cervelo’s new aero-road bike frame, the S5, at the Kirsten Wind Tunnel on the campus of the University of Washington in Seattle. Engineers at the wind tunnel compared the S5 with older Cervelo designs and with competitor’s bicycles.

Photo: Mike Kane/Wired.com

<< Previous
|
Next >>


Exclusive Peek: Cervélo’s New Bike for the Tour de France

Cervélo, which for the past decade has made some of the most coveted race bikes in cycling, is launching a new model for the Tour de France. And we have the exclusive, including the first test ride of any media outlet on the planet. Check back tomorrow for all the details and cool behind-the-scenes photos.

It’s only 15 years old, but Cervélo has become one of the top brands in cycling. It got there through innovative designs and engineering that brought a win at the Tour de France, an Ironman World Championship, Olympic medals and several of cycling’s top one-day races, including multiple wins at the brutal Paris-Roubaix (Google it).

One of the company’s primary innovations has been aero-road designs, which combine the geometry of normal road bikes with the streamlined, wind-cheating tube shapes of triathlon bikes. The Cervélo S3 is the current standard in aero-road bikes, and the company’s wind tunnel and lab tests suggest this new bike will be a massive improvement over the S3 in both aerodynamics and stiffness.

Current world champion Thor Hushovd will be among those riding the new bike at the Tour, which starts Saturday, but he agreed to do so only if he could race it at the Norwegian national championships last weekend. That’s why some spy photos of the aggressively aero design have leaked out, in case you’d like a preview. Either way, check back tomorrow for photos of the bike in the University of Washington wind tunnel and more photos from our exclusive test rides.

Photo: Mike Kane/Wired.com


Flexible ‘Roll Me’ Computer Not for Swatting Flies

<< Previous
|
Next >>


roll_me2


<< Previous
|
Next >>

Move aside slate tablets and sleek MacBook Air style ultraportables. The Roll Me could be the future of mobile computing.

Er, maybe.

Roll Me is comprised of a flexible, bendable e-paper-based display that can wrap around an oblong keyboard unit. The keyboard features a hollow center that acts as cooling system when the device is in use, and stores its flexible solar panel charger when not in use. Similarly to the display, the charger rolls up when it’s not juicing up the conceptual computer.

The cylindrical shape of the Roll Me looks like it’d be great for stuffing it in bags, backpacks or briefcases, rather than needing to be padded and protected in rectangular sleeves like many of today’s favorite portables.

But the flexible screen is probably best suited for reading on flat surfaces, since you’d need to hold the top edge of the display upright like you’re reading from a scroll. Not exactly the way I look to look when I’m reading on a mobile device.

Roll Me [Yanko Design]


What Will iOS 5 Bring for Photographers?

iOS 5 will bring a lot of new features for photograpahers

IOS 5 adds plenty of new features to the iPhone, but one group of users who will be particularly happy with the new operating system will be photographers. The most obvious feature is the update to the camera app itself, but there are lots of other tweaks which will make things a lot easier.

First, the camera application. The headline feature is that you can now use the volume switch to fire the shutter. This is a lot easier than tapping an on-screen button. Ironically, a third-party app which enabled this — Camera + — was booted out of the App Store in August last year.

You also get auto-focus and auto-exposure lock. A long press on the screen will set both and then lock them to that subject. This lets you recompose and shoot without those values changing. And pinching will now let you zoom in and out. It’s a digital zoom, but still — most of our photos end up on Instagram anyway.

IOS 5 is designed to let you use an iPhone or iPad without a parent computer. This carries over to the Camera app, which now offers basic image processing. Users can remove redeye, crop and enhance photos. It’s no Photogene, but it’s certainly a handy quick fix for casual snapshooters.

This independence carries over to the Photos app, too. Now you can arrange images into a folder on the device itself. Previously this was done within iPhoto on the Mac, which was frankly a pain.

Another feature, which may cause lost sales to developers of alternative camera apps is shooting direct from the lock screen. When the phone is locked, double-tap the home button and a camera icon will appear. This will take you to a restricted version of the Camera app, allowing you to snap pictures but denying access to photos already taken (including the ones you just took).

This is a nice way to allow quick access to the camera without compromising security. Just don’t leave you phone lying around at parties or you’ll be sure to end up with photos of somebody’s junk.

The thing I’m most excited about, though, is Photo Stream. this uses Apple’s new push/sync iCloud service to send photos automatically between devices. Snap a pic on your iPhone and it appears magically on your iPad and your computer. The last 1,000 images are kept on iOS devices, and of course everything is stored on the Mac or PC. This might convince me to finally buy an iPhone.

I wonder if Apple will open this up to third parties. Imagine if the wireless Eye-Fi SD cards could use Photo Stream. You’d be able to take pictures on your regular camera and they’d immediately be backed up and sent to all your devices.

Finally, a kind of related point: The LED flash on the iPhone 4 is now open for developers to abuse. Apple itself now lets you set the lamp to flash as an alert for messages or calls. Who knows what other annoying uses it can be put to?

Who knows what changes will come between now and the public release o iOS 5 this fall. One thing’s for sure, though — taking photos on the iPhone is about to get a whole lot more fun.

iOS 5 product page [Apple]


Book Excerpt: Always On: How Smartphones Change Policing

Adapted from Always On: How the iPhone Unlocked the Anything-Anytime-Anywhere Future — and Locked Us In, © Brian X. Chen, to be published by Da Capo Press, A Member of the Perseus Books Group, on June 7.

For more discussion of the book, visit the Always On book page on Facebook.

One Saturday afternoon in January 2009, Rose Maltais picked up her granddaughter Natalie in Athol, Massachusetts for a short weekend visit. Just before she drove off, Maltais reportedly told Natalie’s adoptive parents that they would never see the nine-year-old again. But just one night later, police officers found Maltais at a Budget Inn in Virginia and arrested her. They didn’t use the traditional process of tracking down a suspect — interviewing witnesses and following clues — to find Maltais and her grandchild. Instead, they tracked Natalie’s smartphone and used a bit of clever technological sleuthing to follow their trail.

Unbeknownst to Maltais, the Federal Communications Commission has required cellphone carriers since 2005 to provide a way for police to track most phones within a few hundred meters, and the GPS technology embedded in all smartphones has been a crucial tracking tool. To narrow down Maltais’s location, officer Todd Neale of the Athol police department called the child’s cell phone provider, AT&T, which provided approximate GPS coordinates every time Natalie’s smartphone connected with a celltower to get a signal. Then Neale contacted Athol deputy fire chief Thomas Lozier, who had experience using GPS for guiding firefighters through forest fires and finding lost hikers. Lozier plugged the coordinates into Google Maps and used satellite imagery to home in on where Maltais might be hiding. Jiggering around in Google Street View, Lozier saw a road sign for the Budget Inn in Natural Bridge, Virginia. Neale contacted Virginia state police, who arrived at the motel and found Natalie and her grandmother.

This GPS-assisted arrest offers a peek into the future of policing in an “always-on” society, where we are all constantly connected to the internet via incredibly-capable handheld gadgets with access to data everywhere. Smartphones already include a stunning amount of computing power, and an array of advanced sensors, such as gyroscopes, accelerometers, magnetometers, not to mention GPS, cellular, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi radios. The constant connection these devices offer, and the amount of information they are constantly collecting and transmitting is set to change much of our lives. In law enforcement, that data-driven revolution is already underway.

The information collected and stored on an iPhone can be more revealing than a fingerprint and a face scan, and police officers are already taking advantage of this. Security researcher Jonathan Zdziarski regularly teaches forensics courses focused on the iPhone. Police officers learn how to recover sensitive data from the device to help them build cases against suspects. That includes information that a suspect has attempted to destroy — deleted text messages, voicemails, contacts can be recovered with some clever hacks; officers can also learn how to crack pass codes of an iPhone and bypass encryption. Zdziarski admits that from a user’s perspective, it’s unsettling how insecure the iPhone is, but says he’s somewhat “divided on it,” because “at the same time, it’s been useful for investigating criminals.” iPhone forensics techniques have helped officers successfully gather evidence against criminals later convicted of rape, murder, or drug deals, according to Zdziarski.

Of course, it’s possible that some day, someone might clear themselves of a crime using their phone (See, I posted to Twitter from miles away when the crime was committed!). For now, however, these devices are more of a help to cops than suspects.

‘I think there’s an extreme lack of knowledge about the tracking on your iPhone or your iPad.’

But what’s good for law enforcement might not be good for our privacy. Just how much information are our smartphones broadcasting about us? To find out, German politician and privacy advocate Malte Spitz sued his phone company, Deutsche Telekom, to get information that the company had about Spitz’s movements. It turns out that between August 2009 and February 2010, the carrier tracked and stored his location 35,000 times. That was enough data for German newspaper Die Zeit to compile a detailed interactive map that showed Spitz’s every move over six months.

Never before had a mobile phone company been shown to have such a detailed log on a single customer. Already, Spitz’s story has created ripples reaching the United States, where congressmen Edward Markey and Joe Bartain have sent letters to AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile demanding disclosure on their data collection and storage practices. “Location, location, location may be the favored currency of the real estate industry but it is sensitive information for mobile phone users that must be safeguarded,” said Rep. Markey. “Collecting, storing and disclosing a consumer’s exact whereabouts for commercial purposes without their express permission is unacceptable and violates current law.”

Incidentally, federal prosecutors in New Jersey in April 2011 issued subpoenas to makers of multiple iPhone and Android apps, accusing them of transmitting personal customer data such as location, age and other identifiable information to third-party advertisers. The federal investigation stems from an ongoing study by The Wall Street Journal, which tested 101 iPhone apps and found that 56 of them transmitted unique device identifiers (UDID) — a 40-character string of letters and numbers tagged to each iPhone — to third-parties, including advertisers, without the user’s awareness or consent. While an iPhone does not transmit a user’s real name, a company could combine a UDID with other personal information collected from the device, such as location, age and gender data to determine a customer’s real identity.

One target of the subpoena is popular music-streaming service Pandora, which the WSJ found to be sharing UDID, age and gender without user permission. Also, independent programmer Anthony Campiti received a subpoena regarding his app Pumpkin Maker, a kiddy app for carving virtual Jack-O-Lanterns, which the Wall Street Journal found was sharing UDID and location data with advertisers. Notably, neither of these apps ask customers for permission to share this data, and neither of them provides services related to location. “These unique identifiers are permanent social security numbers in your phone in that they’re freely submitted and they can’t change,” says Justin Brookman, director of the Center for Democracy and Technology’s Project on Consumer Privacy. “You can’t go in there and change your UDID like you could go out and change a cookie [on a PC web browser]. It presents a lot more of a problem.”

“I’m glad this is coming to light, because we’ve seen for a while that with smartphone apps there’s a significant lack of transparency,” says Sharon Nissim, consumer privacy counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. “I think consumers are waking up to the tracking that’s going on with a computer, but I think there’s an extreme lack of knowledge about the tracking on your iPhone or your iPad.”


Reporter Survives 24 Hours in Japan Using Only Vending Machines

This Swedish vending machine lets you pay via SMS. Photo Charlie Sorrel

Vending machines. Who doesn’t love them? And the undisputed world champion of the vending machine is Japan, where you can buy pretty much anything with the drop of a coin or the swipe of a cellphone. But whilst you can buy anything from iPods to marijuana to umbrellas, can you actually survive on the mean streets of Tokyo without once buying sustenance from another human being?

That’s what reporter Tom Edwards wanted to find out, so he set out with two friends to spend 24 hours buying anything they needed from vending machines.

What won’t surprise you is that the challenge wasnt’ really a challenge. If you want something in Japan, you can get it from a vending machine. What is interesting is the breadth of choice, and some of the gimmicks. Sure, you can buy cheesecake, ice-cream, miso soup and the horrifying-sounding cheese curry, but you can also buy gold (real gold) and even a hotel room for the night.

My favorite machine, though, is one of the first that Tom and his team encountered. It sells beverages, but it uses a camera to take a picture of you, combines this with temperature, your perceived age and even the time of day to suggest a drink for you. Tom and his friends decide to mess with it by wearing a hockey mask and a false beard.

Perhaps the best part of this entire escapade is a little bit of trivia Tom learned from Takashi Kurosaki, the boss of the Japan Vending Machine Manufacturers Association. He explains that vending machines in Japan took of in 1967. This was when expensive silver ¥100 coins were replaced with copper ¥100 coins. This meant there were a lot more ¥100 coins around, and vending machines switched to allowing ¥100 coins instead of requiring multiple ¥10 coins. This made them a lot more convenient.

Lastly, there was one essential thing Tom and team couldn’t find in a machine. Beer. This final point surely marks the whole endeavor as a failure.

How to Live off of Japanese Vending Machines [Maximum Tech. Thanks, Jon!]

See Also:


Apple Stores Unlikely to Launch New Product This Weekend

A customer carries a new iPad from one of Apple's 300-plus retail locations. Photo: Bryan Derballa/Wired.com

Multiple publications report that Apple retail outlets are preparing “something big” this weekend in celebration of the 10th anniversary since the opening of the first Apple store, and that might involve a product launch. But it’s more likely nothing.

Apple stores are holding all-hands meetings with retail employees this weekend, according to independent reports from MacStories, Boy Genius Report and Cult of Mac. The 10th anniversary of Apple’s first retail store opening is this Thursday, a few days before the scheduled meeting.

Speculation is running wild that the stores are preparing to install near-field communications technology so that future iPhones can make store transactions wirelessly.

Before you get your hopes up, Wired.com’s best guess is that there will be a whole lot of nothing this weekend in terms of products. Historically, Apple retail employees have been kept in the dark about new products before their public debut, and we don’t see why that strategy would suddenly change for any new product.

Why would anyone trust thousands of retail employees to keep a lid on the release of a new product or service such as NFC?

In the past, Apple stores have launched new versions of Mac OS X, but only after Steve Jobs or another Apple executive has publicly announced a release date. Also, the Worldwide Developers Conference, where Apple traditionally makes these announcements, is set for June 7. Therefore, the chances of Mac OS X Lion being released this weekend are rather slim.

This sounds to us like a mandatory meeting for some internal reorganizations that we probably won’t even notice.

We don’t get excited about any other company’s all-hands meetings, so let’s shut down the hype machine on this one, shall we?

See Also: