Gallery of Gadgets Which Inspired Modern Day Tech

Does Dieter Rams T3 transistor radio from 1958 (left) look familiar?

Over at the Atlantic, ex-Wired.com science nerd Alexis Madrigal brings us a look at the gadgets which inspired the iPad, the touch-screen and that disappearing computer, the iPad. The selection is curated by Microsoft Research scientist Bill Buxton, and contains such gems as the Dieter Rams-designed T3 radio seen above, next to the eerily similar iPod.

While the iPod is clearly aesthetically inspired by Rams’ transistor radio, but other devices have been more subtly mined for their ideas. The Data Rover 840 form 1998, for example, may have a stylus but the row of icons along the bottom of the touch screen and its minimal amount of hardware buttons seem rather familiar.

My favorite, though, has to be the Psion Series 5, a true classic. I used to have one of these clamshell, handheld computers and happily typed whole articles on it. According to Alexis, “Buxton says he dreams about loading modern components onto the Psion chassis so that he could use the keyboard and form factor.” I couldn’t agree more.

The Crazy Old Gadgets That Presaged the iPod, iPhone and a Whole Lot More [The Atlantic]

The Buxton Collection [Microsoft Research]

See Also:


Peg Light Concept Clamps Bulb Between Wooden Jaws

Steffi Min’s Peg is as ingenious as it is simple. It’s a ceiling lamp which looks like a clothespin, only instead of screwing in the bulb you just prize open the jaws and slide the bulb in.

The jaws contact the base and thread of the bulb and allow the current to flow. It couldn’t be any simpler, and it also means an end to that dangerous practice of trying to unscrew the jagged remains of a broken bulb from a stubborn fixing.

Steffi’s design is not yet commercially available, which is a shame as I would love to try one. Not for plain lighting, though. I want to see what happens to a red-hot bulb when it is dropped, almost still glowing, to the floor.

Peg [Vimeo via Oh Gizmo!]

Steffi Min’s internet home website [Steffi Min]

See Also:

Google Rallies Android Troops at I/O Conference

Google’s Android mascot, flanked by phones running the popular platform. Photo by Jon Snyder/Wired.com

Google’s Android mobile platform is a force to be reckoned with. In the three years since the operating system first landed on a phone, Google booted top phone manufacturers RIM, Apple and Nokia from their resting places as market leaders. Two of every five phones sold in 2011 will be Android devices, according to estimates by IDC research.

Among other things, Android’s explosive growth is due to its enthusiastic community of developers. In part, they’re the ones who fuel platform growth by expanding the application ecosystem.

They inject apps like Angry Birds or Fruit Ninja into the Android Market, games which have superseded their place in the tech world and made their way into mainstream pop culture. Developers create the content we want, fueling the sales of new devices and furthering Google’s mobile platform.

And Google wants to take care of its own.

Google’s fourth annual developer conference, Google I/O, kicks off on Tuesday in downtown San Francisco. In its biggest I/O yet, the conference will feature 110 individual developer sessions with more than 250 speakers spanning two days. More than 5,500 developers are expected to attend.

Basically, it’s a coding geek’s Mardi Gras.

It’s also where we often get the first look at Google’s huge new product releases. At the first I/O in 2008, Google engineers demo’d a walk-through of the first smartphone ever powered by Google’s Android platform. Shortly thereafter, the G1 was released on T-Mobile.

According to Google’s blog post published Monday, this year’s keynotes will focus on two big areas of development for the company: the Android mobile platform, and the company’s Chrome browser.

This year’s hotly speculated Android announcement: “Ice Cream Sandwich,” the next generation of the software.

In February at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt dropped hints of what was to come for the platform. Schmidt said that in the next release of the Android software, Google will combine features from the phone-based Gingerbread version and the tablet-optimized Honeycomb version.

Ever since Schmidt dropped the news that Ice Cream Sandwich would bring the two versions together, developers have eagerly awaited news of the latest iteration of the platform.

“I don’t necessarily expect a release of Ice Cream Sandwich,” software developer Chris Soyars told Wired.com, “but probably a time frame of what’s to be expected over the next few months.” Soyars is one of the top team members of CyanogenMod, a highly popular Android-modification software build.

Anticipation of the release has only been amplified by Google’s refusal to release the source code for its Honeycomb software. Google’s decision has been relatively unpopular in the developer community, which espouses “open” principles in regards to software source code.

But some think Google’s decision to hold Honeycomb was a good idea. “If you open up Honeycomb, it gives everyone the freedom to take it and make bad versions of it on phones,” Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney told Wired.com. “They’re doing the right thing by telling people to wait for Ice Cream [Sandwich],” Dulaney said.

Developers like Soyars are hoping that Google sticks to its tentative Android-software release cycle of 6 months between each major version, which would slot an Ice Cream Sandwich debut for sometime in August. Honeycomb, the most recent Android software distribution, first debuted on the Motorola Xoom in February.

Not all of Google’s big announcements have been successful ones. Google Wave was supposed to be the next big thing after its 2009 I/O debut, only to be killed by the company 15 months after its release.

Google TV was the star of last year’s I/O, but has gained only a lackluster following because of a lack of integration with Google apps, as well as problems with television networks blocking Google TV devices from delivering their content.

After its mediocre year on the market, Google may update us on its plans for Google TV at this year’s conference. “If there is an announcement related to Google TV,” said Soyars, “it is likely it would be to announce some type of refresh, including the market,” including possibly integrating the Android Market for phones into the Google TV platform. “I know it’s something they’ve been working on,” Soyars said.

Last year the company introduced a cloud-based music system, which would allow you to access your tracks from your phone, laptop or other web-connected device. If Google were able to launch this, it could put the company in a great position to take on Apple’s iTunes, which still requires you to physically connect your device for music syncing. But it’s been a year since Google demoed the product, and we haven’t heard much in the interim.

Also possible are updates on Google’s social initiatives, though reports suggest that we won’t be hearing much on this front. According to sources speaking to AllThingsDigital, all we may see is a bit of info on Google’s “+1″ button, a feature similar to the Facebook “Like” button. Google has been criticized in the past for being behind in developing social applications, losing out to competitor Facebook.

Tickets to the conference went on sale in early February at $450 a pop. Despite the high entrance fee, the conference sold out in 59 minutes. Aftermarket prices on eBay have reached upward of a grand.

Those who missed out on tickets and don’t want to pay the eBay premium can watch a live stream at Google’s I/O Live web site.

Soyars won’t be in attendance: On the day tickets were released, he got shut out. “I’m hoping to go next year,” Soyers said. “There’s just so many workshops and talks that are great for developers like me.”

Google I/O takes place Tuesday, May 10, and Wednesday, May 11, at Moscone West in San Francisco. Watch for coverage on Webmonkey, here on Gadget Lab and across Wired.com.


Apple Employees Tell the Secrets Behind Steve Jobs’ ‘Magic’

Steve Jobs demonstrates the iPhone 4 at WWDC 2010. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

Revealing how Steve Jobs runs Apple is like exposing the secrets behind a magician’s tricks. And several of the magician’s “assistants” just broke their code of silence.

In a lengthy feature titled “Inside Apple,” Fortune magazine’s editor at large Adam Lashinsky paints a clear picture of what it’s like to work at Apple, based on dozens of interviews with current or former employees at the company. In a nutshell: It’s a lot like working for a giant startup with a low tolerance for imperfection.

Take for example, the launch of Apple’s MobileMe web service in 2008, which was riddled with bugs and an embarrassing e-mail blackout for thousands of customers. This product release was so poor that critics labeled it “MobileMess.”

Jobs didn’t take it very well, according to Fortune.

“Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?” Jobs reportedly asked the MobileMe team after the fumbled launch. When he received an answer, he continued, “So why the fuck doesn’t it do that?”

Jobs didn’t stop there.

“You’ve tarnished Apple’s reputation,” he reportedly told the team. “You should hate each other for having let each other down.”

Jobs immediately named a new executive to run MobileMe, and shortly after the meeting, most of the team was disbanded.

Apple’s mercurial CEO is well-known for running the company like a ruthless dictator, on a level of secrecy comparable to the CIA. Fortune’s article does a thorough job unraveling the company culture at Apple, which recently surpassed Google to become the most valuable corporation in the world.

The last ambitious piece analyzing Apple’s culture came from Wired alum, Leander Kahney, in his 2008 cover story “How Apple Got Everything Right by Doing Everything Wrong.” Kahney interviewed several former employees, including Guy Kawasaki, who described Jobs as a manager who proved that “it’s OK to be an asshole.”

Kahney elaborated on why Apple’s culture of secrecy is good for the company: “… [T]he approach has been critical to its success, allowing the company to attack new product categories and grab market share before competitors wake up. It took Apple nearly three years to develop the iPhone in secret; that was a three-year head start on rivals.”

Adding more details to the Apple picture, Fortune offers a rather interesting nugget on an elite group at the company known as the Top 100. Jobs gathers these exceptional individuals to attend a top-secret, three-day strategy session at an undisclosed location. This event is so secret that members of the Top 100 are told not to mark the meeting on their calendars, and they’re not even allowed to drive to the location.

During the Top 100 meeting, Jobs and his top leaders “inform a supremely influential group about where Apple is headed,” Lashinsky writes. Here, some members of the Top 100 get on stage to present strategies or products that signal the company’s future. According to one employee, Jobs first showed the iPod to employees during a Top 100 meeting.

Outside of the theatrical Top 100 events, Jobs meets with executives every Monday to discuss important projects, and on Wednesdays he holds a marketing and communications meeting, Fortune claims.

There’s no excuse for employees to have any confusion after a meeting. An effective Apple meeting will include an “action list,” and next to each action item is a “DRI” — a directly responsible individual who must ensure the task is accomplished.

As for senior employees such as vice presidents, Jobs reportedly gives the same speech to all of them. Basically, when you’re a high-level employee, you have no excuses for screwing up:

“When you’re the janitor,” Jobs has repeatedly told incoming VPs, “reasons matter.” He continues: “Somewhere between the janitor and the CEO, reasons stop mattering.”

And perhaps the most fascinating tidbit from the article is about a program called Apple University.

Before his second medical leave three years ago, Jobs hired Joel Podolny, dean of the Yale School of Management, to lead Apple University. Podolny has hired a team of business professors to write a series of internal case studies about Apple’s most significant decisions in recent history.

The purpose? To ensure that Apple will remain Apple, in the event that Jobs were to depart. Investors and technology observers have debated for years whether Apple can continue to be so successful without the visionary leader that has shaped the company from day one.

That remains an open question, but Apple University’s sole purpose seems to be preparing for the day that the show must go on without the magician.


Aged to Perfection: Years-Old Gadgets Worn Smooth

Remy Labesque’s old gadgets have aged like antique leather. Photos Remy Labesque

What happens if you actually keep and use your gadgets for more than a year, something that seems increasingly gauche in these days of incessant updates and upgrades? You end up with something worn to a beautiful and unique finish.

This first-gen iPhone is three years old, and the Canon Sureshot camera has seven years on the clock. Both belonged to Remy Labesque, and have finally been recycled after long and faithful service. They’re beautiful.

Well, the iPhone is beautiful. As Remy says, “the Canon camera’s shell looks like garbage while the iPhone’s is starting to resemble something more like an heirloom pocket watch.”

The aluminum has certainly worn better than the plastic, the edges buffed and worn shiny by use, but the camera has its charms, too. In fact, the Sureshot was still going strong. It was only euthanized because it used film.

The irony here is our devices are ditched not because they are broken — today’s hardware seems to be made to last — it’s that the software or capabilities quickly become obsolete. Did I need to swap my iPad for an iPad 2? Of course not. Was I hypnotized by the shiny baubles that are the Smart Cover, a crappy camera and a new, thin, light case? I’m ashamed to admit I was.

Aged to Perfection [Design Mind via TUAW]

See Also:


Got Gadget Questions? We’ll Answer Them on Facebook

The pensive and gadget-savvy Mike Calore. Photo: Jim Merithew/Wired.com

Join Wired.com’s product reviews editor Michael Calore on Facebook Thursday starting at 1 p.m. Eastern time (10 a.m. Pacific) as he answers your tech questions and gives a behind-the-scenes look at Wired.

When we passed the 200,000 fans mark on Wired’s Facebook Page last month, we asked our readers what they’d like to see more of. You gave us more than 600 comments, and one of the top responses was learning more about the Wired staff, including what goes on behind the scenes and what gadgets we use.

You asked and we deliver, as Michael will be revealing his list of favorite gadgets, posting photos, and answering questions. He might even reach into the way-back machine to find the last five Webmonkey hats from the swag closet (since his last position here, before moving to the gadget side, was Webmonkey editor-in-chief).


Futuristic Pod Carriage Would Make a Royal Wedding Worth Checking Out

<< Previous
|
Next >>


Royal Wedding Carriage Concept


<< Previous
|
Next >>

There was a royal wedding today? You don’t say!

I’m not too much for pomp, circumstance, or royalty, but if the princely couple came out in this carriage, I think I might actually care (a little).

Reza Esmaeeli, a London-based designer and architect, sought to throw out the traditional, old-fashioned carriage the royal couple rode in and imagined something significantly more awesome: an avante-garde pod of glass marbled with white glass-reinforced plastic.

From the overhead view, it looks a bit like a tadpole with wings. The designer describes the carriage as “like a shining bird, a super-fictional transparent globe with a ceremonial tail.”

As far as transportation goes, Esmaeeli envisions it with a light engine onboard. I envision it with a pair of twin turbo jet packs.

It doesn’t look like the royal family will adopt a design like this any time in the foreseeable future, but it’s fun to pretend anyway.

Royal Wedding Carriage [Reza Esmaeeli via Arch Daily]

Images Courtesy of Reza Esmaeeli


The Hardware That Rocks Your World


There are really no words to describe the this photo, except to point out the obvious: It has a robot. And a bike. And a lady in white tights with really big hair.

In other words, this photo sums up all that is awesome and good and wonderful and yes, a bit juvenile about what we write about here on this blog. If there was ever an official photo of Gadget Lab, this would be it.

Via VintageMongoose.com

(Thanks, Erik, Caitlin and Pete)


12 Lust-Worthy Toys From Bike Fest

<< Previous
|
Next >>


Shimano


With something like 50 bike races — road and mountain — spread over four days, the Sea Otter Classic has become the unofficial kickoff to the U.S. cycling season. It has also, between the racing and the beer tents, become an important quasi-trade show for the bike industry, with demos, meetings and major product launches. For bike
geeks, no event can match Sea Otter’s mix of racing action and pure gear porn.

Of course, we’re not racing (have we mentioned the beer tents?). We’re prowling the festival grounds in search of product highlights. Here are some of the standouts from our first afternoon at the show, from the likes of Shimano, Santa Cruz, SRAM and Ibis. Check back for more.

Above:

Shimano’s XT Makeover

Shimano’s workhorse XT group gets a top-to-bottom makeover for 2011 that borrows heavily from the top-end XTR group the Japanese company launched last summer, including dual pedal options for race or trail applications, redesigned hydraulic brakes with cooling fins to dissipate heat, and a 10-speed rear cassette.

“XTR is the group for bike fanatics,” said Shimano PR manager Devin Walton. “XT is for bike enthusiasts, people who ride a lot but also have maybe a surfboard, a snowboard. People who have a lot of fun and need dependable gear.”

<< Previous
|
Next >>


Behind the Largest Counterfeit-Audio Sting in History

Chinese police inspect a warehouse full of counterfeit goods. Photo courtesy Gizmodo.com.

by Bryan Gardiner, Gizmodo.com

Think you got a good deal on those Beats by Dre? Might’ve. Or maybe you paid too much for a knockoff. Thanks to easily accessed suckers like you, business in the world of phony high-end audio has never been better.

Early on the morning of October 28, 2010, a massive strike force assembled outside the Meipai Electronic Audio Factory and three other storage facilities in and around Southern China’s Enping City. What had started out as a tip from a handful of major audio-equipment makers led to a months-long investigation by Guangdong Public Security Department and Jiangmen City police. By day’s end, four people were in jail, and 1,200 counterfeit audio items were in police hands. The so-called “New Dynamics Audio Equipment Factory” was effectively shut down.

It was the first salvo in a new war against fake wares, lead by an unlikely coalition of audio companies who, though fierce competitors in stores, are closely allied against a common enemy.

This February, the same international initiative helped tip authorities off to another den of fakes, this time in the United Kingdom. Together, the two stings have netted counterfeit audio gear worth more than $500,000. Sounds like a lot, but that’s just a teensy drop in a giant bucket: a multibillion-dollar industry that’s proving nearly impossible to quash.

The two recent busts came after months of investigation — including test purchases, surveillance stakeouts, and a series of coordinated raids on warehouses and private residences. All told, authorities have managed to confiscate everything from fake mics and headphones to loudspeakers, amps and mixers.

The British raid in particular represents the largest seizure of bogus audio equipment (mostly headphones) in the country’s history, according to Sennheiser and Monster. And the two counterfeiters now under investigation are reportedly linked to Britain’s third-largest online retailer.

While the size and scope of these separate raids may be noteworthy, counterfeiting and copycat designs are of course nothing new to the headphone and AV industry.

Over the years, a thriving gray market for ersatz goods has sprung up all over the world, nourished by cheap Chinese production costs, increasingly sophisticated manufacturing facilities, e-commerce, and often non-existent IP and trademark laws. In other words, those knock-off Ferrari Limited Edition Monster Beats you mistakenly bought are not only getting easier to make, but they’re also quite lucrative for the guys selling them.

According to a recent study put out by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, counterfeit goods could account for as much as 10 percent of China’s gross domestic product — third economy, holla! Worldwide, it’s regarded as $600 billion dollar industry, fully half of it in the United States.

“Right now, the counterfeit problem is at an all time high for a few reasons,” explains David Tognotti, vice president of operations and general counsel for
 Monster Cable. “You have a China economy that needs to keep people employed and create millions of jobs every year; you have lax laws and enforcement in that country, you have rising consumer demand for luxury branded goods, and you also have people with a lot less money in their wallets.”