Digging A Hole Straight Through Earth?

This article was written on November 23, 2006 by CyberNet.

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!

Whole Through Earth

So what would happen if you dug a hole straight through earth from where you live? Don’t worry…you’ll wonder no more because someone has put together this set of synchronized Google Maps that will let you drag the map around to adjust the location and the other one will move at the same time.

It looks like if I dug a hole through Iowa in the United States that I would end up in the middle of the Indian Ocean. I was always told it was China but North America is way too far north for that to happen. If you live over in Europe you’ll probably come out in the Pacific Ocean and the same goes for Africa. Looks like South America is lucky though because they should hit land somewhere in Asia. Hope you’re a good swimmer because nearly everyone is going to hit some sort of water. :D

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


This Could Be The Smallest Website That Can Be Navigated

This article was written on February 09, 2006 by CyberNet.

This Could Be The Smallest Website That Can Be Navigated

If you are looking for news, pictures or just something fun to do then visit the smallest site in the web world to get it all! If you did happen to notice the picture above then you have seen the entire size of the website. Believe it or not, the site actually has a navigation system to it with options such as news, icons, pictures and such. It was actually quite amazing to see something so small yet functional (despite it being hard to get the mouse over the buttons).

Visit The Smallest Website

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Indeed… a Job Search

This article was written on January 08, 2008 by CyberNet.

If you’ve told yourself that it was time for a new job, but you just haven’t taken the time to go through the process, listen up.  A service called Indeed will help you immensely in your search for a new job, no matter what type of job that you’re looking for.  The reason that it’s so helpful compared to other career services like Monster or Hot Jobs is that it includes listings from job boards, newspapers, and company employment sites.  This means all of the jobs are in one location which saves you time and the hassle of jumping from one source to another.

When you search, you can either enter in a job title, keywords, or a specific company that you’re interested in working for.  You also enter in the city, state, or zip code of the general area you’ll be looking.  You can refine that distance by searching with in 5 miles, 10 miles, etc. There’s also an advanced job search which allows you to include all kinds of information to narrow the job search down further. 

Once you perform a search and it pulls up the search results, you can further refine them by the job type, and the employer or recruiter.  As you can see below, I search for “Computer Engineer” in the Chicago, IL area.  It showed me that Google had four positions open, so I refined the search further by selecting to view only the jobs from Google.  What’s even nicer is that you can save a particular search as an email job alert or receive updates via an RSS feed. Job searching has never been so easy, really!

indeed

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Facebook Gets a Makeover after Community Feedback

This article was written on April 11, 2007 by CyberNet.

The last time a major change was made to popular social network Facebook, it didn’t go over so well with the community. Users were outraged by the “feed” system that provides an overall summary of what’s going on with friends. As a result, people protested in major numbers saying that this was the “ultimate stalkers dream.”

Facebook apologized for that mess and said that they didn’t do a very good job of explaining the new features, and giving users control of them. They also made a serious effort to provide users will better privacy controls. Thankfully this turned into a learning experience for them and they learned that community feedback is important.

Fast-forward to mid-March when Facebook started their “Sneak Preview” group. It was created and open to any users who wanted to get a glimpse of what ideas Facebook had, and then provide them feedback. User feedback is always important in a social situation, and this is no exception.  Users joined the group by the thousands and offered all kinds of ideas and suggestions regarding the new design Facebook was planning.

That brings us up to now. Facebook had a New Year’s resolution of making Facebook simpler, more flexible, and make the network structure more relevant to users.  To meet this resolution, they’ve given the design of Facebook a makeover which launched today.

One of the first things you’ll notice is that the navigation is different. Prior to this change in design, just about all navigation was on the left.  Now they’ve split the navigation up, moving the “core aspects” to drop-down menus on the top, and “applications” like photos, notes, etc., on the left. The images below show the old design, versus the new design.

Facebook-new

Facebook-old

While it will probably take users some time to get used to it, there hasn’t been a huge outrage like there was when Facebook introduced the feed system, or even their last major change to the user interface. The design makes sense, it’s easy to use, and the drop-down menus are a great addition. They learned that they need to involve the community that keeps them afloat, or else face the wrath of millions of users. Kinda like what MySpace is probably going through over the whole Photobucket ordeal

Thanks for the tip Curtiss!

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


CyberNotes: Use Fotolog for Social Networking via Photos

This article was written on June 23, 2007 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Weekend Website

FotologEverybody seems to have gotten in on digital photography these days.  Even more than taking the photos, people seem to have gotten into sharing those photos with others via social networks and photo sharing sites.

Websites like Picasa and Photobucket have become popular places to upload pictures for online storage, and other sites like Flickr have become popular as social networks.Another site called Fotolog aims to be a social network for photo sharing, kinda like Flickr, but different. They claim to be the world’s largest social networking site (largely in part to their loyal users in Brazil) where members can communicate and connect via photos. 

What is Fotolog?

Fotolog was launched in May of 2002, so they’ve been around for a while. They recently celebrated their 5th anniversary, and currently receive around 13 million unique visitors, and 3 billion page views per month.

What people do at Fotolog?

Fotolog is meant to help people get social via photos. It’s as simple as that. Members can publish an online photo diary or photo blog, and share it with others.  You can use it to stay in touch with family and friends, but you can also use it to meet new people, hence the social networking.  At the time of their launch the focus was on catering to the new business of digital photography. It’s become huge since then, and Fotolog has grown right along with the digital camera industry.

Fotolog2

Interface

One of the things that I like most about Fotolog is that it’s simple.  There aren’t THAT many features which makes it easy to use, and people can comment on photos that have been posted, much like Flickr. Some might also consider their lack of features as a downside. It just depends on what your preference is.

Which is more popular?

Flickr is well-known as a social networking sight for photography, so I was curious which was more popular. Before I get to the answer, here’s some background information.  In 2005 Fotolog had just hit their million member mark, and now they’re adding about one million new members every month. They also sign up new users in 70 different countries, with many coming from South America and Europe.

So the answer? According to Alexa (take it for what it’s worth) – Fotolog is more popular than Flickr.  Yesterday Fotolog ranked 20th while Flickr was ranked 35th.  Perhaps they’re more popular because they’ve been around longer?

I hadn’t really heard much about Fotolog in the past, and I can say with certainty that I hear a lot more about Flickr than I do about Fotolog, but clearly they have done well for themselves.

How it works

The difference between Fotolog and many other sites is that it’s not a place to store a bunch of pictures. In fact, with a free account you’re limited to one photo per day. 

Each day that you go to Fotolog, you may upload one photo and it must be less than 2 megabytes.  From there you’re given 5,000 characters to provide an explanation, or a caption. After that, you date the picture and call it a day.  Because you’re only given one photo, you have to choose wisely which usually means that everybody is sharing their best photos.

Another great feature is that they offer an RSS feed that you can subscribe to so that it’s easy to keep up with photos that your friends have posted.

Once your photos are posted, you can wait for your friends and family to come leave a message on your Guestbook. With the free account, you’re limited to 20 Guestbook postings per photo, and 200 if you’re a paid Gold Camera member.

As I just mentioned, there’s a paid Gold Camera Membership which costs around $60 for a year.  That means that you are able to upload six photos per day, and you won’t have to deal with any advertisements.

Downside

I get that these sites have to be supported by ads, that’s how they’re able to stay around. However, the ads on Fotolog are sometimes a bit too much, requiring me to click so that I can continue to the page I requested.  It gets in the way of the experience when it’s that intrusive, but I guess that’s just another incentive to get the Gold Camera Membership/

Another downside is that they don’t use tags. I’ve gotten used to using tags, and I tend to find them pretty useful. Granted, tags weren’t popular back in the day when Fotolog launched, but it’s surely something that they could have added.

Other than that, I really don’t have many complaints. 

How to use it?

If you’re having a hard time coming up with one photo per day to upload, you could always just take a photo of yourself everyday for the next several years (you know, to keep track of aging), much like what someone did in the following YouTube video:

Wrapping it up

If you’re looking for a service to manage all of your photos, this isn’t for you.  Fotolog is about sharing the best of your photos with friends as a means of social networking. The process is simple, and I’d say it’s the perfect way to keep an online photo journal for free that includes only your best pics.

Visit Fotolog here.

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Opera Product Page Hacked?

This article was written on May 17, 2006 by CyberNet.

Opera Product Page Hacked?

It appears that the Opera Product Page may have been hacked. The first paragraph of the page states:

The most full-featured Internet power tool on the market, Opera includes pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing, integrated searches, and advanced functions like Opera’s groundbreaking E-mail program, RSS Newsfeeds and IRC chat. And because Wii know that our users have different needs, you can customize the look and content of your Opera browser with a few clicks of the mouse.

The “Wii” links to a GeoCities site that is someone’s personal site. There is no way that Opera would have done that, even by accident. I guess only time will tell!

Opera Product Page
News Source: Digg

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Google Adds Geotagging to Picasa Web Albums

This article was written on June 27, 2007 by CyberNet.

Picasa Album

Geotagging photos is something that I never got into doing until recently. I have a Flickr account and I went through my 5,000+ photos adding locations of where they were taken. Surprisingly it didn’t take me all that long, but I also didn’t go that in-depth with geotagging. For the most part, I would just get the general location of where they were taken at, instead of the exact position at which I took a specific photo.

Flickr does a good job of making geotagging an almost effortless process, but to be honest, I really don’t like Yahoo! Maps. Well, it’s not that I don’t like it all together, I just don’t like Flickr’s implementation of it. If I wanted to find something such as Epcot Center in Disney World (a point of interest that’s on every map) you would think that I could just enter that into the search. Nope, it mostly returns results for cities/towns or returns nothing at all. I’m sure if it recognized more points of interest, I could have geotagged my 5,000 photos in 5 hours instead of the 10 hours that it took. Of course doing a search for “Epcot Center” on Yahoo! Maps actually works perfect, so it is how Flickr does things that is the problem.

Google learned from Flickr’s mistakes when they launched their new geotagging capabilities in Picasa Web Albums by making it a 5-second process. You can geotag individual photos or complete albums, and the AJAX search lookup is top-notch. In the screenshot above, as soon as I finished typing “ames,iowa” it automatically pulled up the location that I was referring to…and I didn’t have to push a single button. Honestly, the whole tagging process in Picasa Web Albums is almost disgustingly simple. Google obviously thought it out and did it right.

When viewing albums on a map, it shows thumbnails of the images so that they are easy to navigate. Here is an example album that Google setup to demonstrate how geotagged images look on a map, and you’ll even notice that there is a link to view the album in Google Earth. Below are two screenshots I took when viewing the map in Picasa Web Albums (on the left) and Google Earth (on the right):

Picasa Albums Picasa Albums

Overall Google is really starting to impress me with the features they have been adding to Picasa Web Albums, although Flickr is a lot more reasonable when it comes to cost and private photo sharing. For an annual fee of $25 I can get 7GB of storage at Google (which wouldn’t hold all of my photos), or for the same price at Flickr I get unlimited everything. So I would need Google’s $100 plan which offers 26GB of storage, but I would still need to worry about how I can share my private photos with my family. With Flickr I can give out guest passes so that people can see only the albums I specify, and I can retract those passes at anytime. I’m not going to be giving up on Flickr quite yet, but Google is headed in the right direction.

Kudos to CoryC for the tip

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Download Videos From YouTube And Google

This article was written on July 27, 2006 by CyberNet.

Download Videos From YouTube And Google

Another way to download those YouTube and Google videos has emerged. Flash Video Resources is similar to KeepVid (our initial report can be found here) where all you have to do is enter in the URL of the video. Once you enter it in you just press the “Get Video” button and you can save the file wherever you please.

Personally I am still love KeepVid too much to switch. They recently made it even easier to save files by simply adding a bookmarklet in your browser:

Keep It!

Now all of the videos are just a few clicks away from being saved to my desktop and I didn’t even have to install an extension or use an external program!

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Google Calendar IS Available Tomorrow

This article was written on April 25, 2007 by CyberNet.

Begging ComputerI have seen several sites reporting that the Google Calendar is going to be down nearly all day tomorrow. This is actually a misconception that came from an email Google sent out to Google Apps subscribers:

We wanted to inform you that we are planning to conduct routine maintenance to Google Calendar between 8AM and 9PM on Thursday, April 26th, 2007 .  During this time, this service may be unavailable to some of your users.  Please inform your users about this planned maintenance appropriately.  We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience as we work to improve Google Calendar.

If you have any questions, you can contact the Google Apps Support team through the Google Apps Help center (http://www.google.com/support/a/).

Sincerely,
The Google Apps Team

Please do not reply directly to this message. Please contact us through the Google Apps Help Center (http://www.google.com/support/a/) if you have any questions.

When I received the email I began wondering what they meant by maintenance? I tried contacting Google, and then before I could get a response back they sent a follow up email that included the following clarifications:

Why are we doing an upgrade?
We are updating some of our servers as we continue to improve Google Calendar. This is a normal maintenance update, and as with all updates we look to minimize the impact to our end users.

How will this impact my end users?
The impact to your users should be minimal. Only a subset of your users should be affected by the upgrade. These users may have trouble accessing their Google Calendars for a short period of time, generally less than 5-10 minutes each.

Will Google Calendar be down from 8AM to 9PM PDT?
No. This is the window of time that the maintenance upgrade will take place. During this time some users will experience issues accessing their calendar, but only for a short period of time each.

So if you’re a Google Calendar user you don’t have to worry about not being able to access your calendar for the 13–hour period that some people are reporting. What I don’t like is that Google only sent this message out to Google Apps subscribers, and typical Google Calendar users aren’t receiving the notification. The least they could do is put some kind of warning on the Google Calendar site itself so that everyone can be aware of what’s going on.

 

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Nested Labels in Gmail (Sub-Labels or Folders)

This article was written on July 20, 2007 by CyberNet.

Nested GmailOne feature that I’ve always wanted in Gmail was the ability to organize my labels in a folder-like structure. By that I mean that I want to nest the labels one inside of another so that my list isn’t quite so long. This kind of structure is probably referred to the most as sub-labels.

The other day Lifehacker posted an awesome Greasemonkey script that does just that. It’s called Folders4Gmail and has instructions on installing it for Firefox, Opera, and Internet Explorer. Just make sure you follow the steps because I was a little confused since I didn’t realize that I needed to create a parent label. Here’s what I had to do to get my "ISU" structure in the screenshot to the right:

  1. Create a parent label:
    Create a label named ISU
  2. Rename your labels:
    Com S to ISU\Com S
    General to ISU\General
    Senior Design to ISU\Senior Design
  3. Now there are four labels:
    ISU
    ISU\Com S
    ISU\General
    ISU\Senior Design

The script automatically treats the slash ("\") as a folder divider, and you must have a parent label created otherwise it doesn’t work. One of the other cool things is that you can actually deeply nest multiple labels, which means you can have "folders" inside of "folders"! Ahh…I’m really lovin’ this script!

Folders4Gmail is also part of the Lifehacker Firefox extension called Better Gmail. That extension offers a great list of Gmail-related scripts that can make your email experience so much better. Be sure to check it out if you haven’t already!

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts: