Reviled by Reviewers, BlackBerry’s Storm Rages On

Storm0128

Two months ago Research In Motion released Storm, its first touchscreen phone, to some of the harshest reviews that a phone has seen in recent times. Yet sales of the device tell a different story.

The BlackBerry Storm is doing pretty well, to the tune of 1 million sold since its launch on the Verizon’s network.

That may not be success on the scale of the iPhone, which sold 1 million units in just a weekend, but it is a respectable showing. Storm’s success is comparable to the much-anticipated first phone based on Google’s Android operating system, the HTC G1 from T-Mobile. It’s also far more than you might expect from a device that was labeled "dark, sodden and unpredictable," by prominent gadget reviewer David Pogue.

"It shows that there are two worlds that exist out there," says
Michael Gartenberg, a technology analyst. "The digerati, and the mainstream consumers who are just looking
for a reasonable experience with the carrier they want."

So what’s behind the Storm’s surprising success?

Two words: BlackBerry and Verizon.

"If you want true push e-mail and have been a longtime BlackBerry user, there’s really just one touchscreen phone out there for you," says Peter VanRysdam, a Storm user who is vice president of marketing of 352 Media Group, a web design company.

Other factors have helped, too, such as the availability of the device on Verizon Wireless, the biggest cellphone service provider in the U.S., strong promotion of the phone, and the loyal BlackBerry fan base.

"This underscores the symbiotic relationship between carriers and handset vendors," says Gartenberg. "For a lot of users, Verizon is the network of choice and a BlackBerry is the device of choice."

RIM launched the BlackBerry Storm on Nov. 21 in the U.S. as its first touchscreen device. Despite innovative features — most notably, a touchscreen with tactile feedback that gives users a feel similar to physical buttons — the phone drew some harsh criticism.

Wired.com gave it six out of 10 while New York Times reviewer David Pogue, in one of his harshest reviews ever for a device, said the Storm "even muffs simple navigation tasks."

Still, sales have been strong. Since its release, RIM has said it is pleased with how consumers have been taking to the Storm. The company also offered updates for the phone to fix problems such as the accelerometer lag and the unexpected lock up of the phone.

Reports of the Storm’s problems may have been greatly exaggerated, says Simona Jankowski, an analyst with Goldman Sachs, in a research note.

"Our retail checks suggest that the Storm is Verizon’s best-selling smartphone, and the rate of returns is relatively low, contrary to recent market concerns and internet blogs."

Some Storm users say their initial negative reaction to the phone turned into a more positive experience after using the device for a few weeks.

The bad reviews for the Storm did make longtime BlackBerry user Evan Bartlett nervous initially, he says. Bartlett, who is a senior account executive for Angelsoft, a company that makes a deal flow management platform for venture capitalists and angel networks, says he was a T-Mobile subscriber using the BlackBerry Curve before switching to the Storm on Verizon.

Now there’s no looking back for him."The true push e-mail, the ability to search through your e-mail, copy and paste were all features that I use very heavily," says Bartlett, "which is also the reason why the iPhone doesn’t work for me."

The Storm’s web browser has also attracted fans. "The two things I do most are e-mail and browsing," says VanRysdam. "And the browsing experience on the Storm is unlike any other BlackBerry device and as good as the iPhone."

Ultimately the Storm’s success can be attributed to the power of Verizon and BlackBerry’s marketing efforts.

"The Storm has been the subject of a tremendous ad campaign by Verizon," says Avi Greengart, an analyst with research firm Current Analysis. "So if you are a user at Verizon it is one of the most exciting devices to have."

Could the BlackBerry brand also been enough to draw in users? "Absolutely," says Greengart.

Meanwhile, even die-hard Storm users agree that the device is still fairly buggy. The shutter delay on the camera can be frustrating as is the lack of Wi-Fi and the third party applications for the phone.

They are, however, willing to be patient for more updates from RIM to fix those problems. Their Storm, they say, is worth the wait.

See also:
Showdown:  BlackBerry Storm vs. iPhone 3G
Hands On With The BlackBerry Storm

Photo: (RealtorKimWood/Flickr)

SilverStone Raven’s unique case design highlights cooling, not to mention “ugly”

Those crazy kids over at bit-tech got their hands on SilverStone‘s new Raven RV01 PC case and have been kind enough to give us their impressions. The big news here is that the motherboard’s been rotated 90 degrees clockwise, so that your expansion cards are slotted in vertically (they face up, not out the back). This is intended to facilitate cooling — cool air is taken in at the bottom and exhausted through the top of the machine — but as the reviewer points out, although this “seems the most logical orientation for a high-end PC,” the actual case design is poor enough to rate as fairly frustrating. “For every welcome piece of design,” he writes, “there’s another to annoy.” Cable management is described as nigh on impossible, especially with drive trays and mobo in such close proximity that there isn’t any wiggle room. Judging by all this — and by an appearance that betrays not one wit of “innovation” — you might want to hold off on this bad boy. Someone is sure to take another stab soon, hopefully with a package that is nowhere near as goofy looking. Available now in the UK for £171.35 MSRP and Stateside for $249.99.

Filed under:

SilverStone Raven’s unique case design highlights cooling, not to mention “ugly” originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:03:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Ask an Analyst: Whatever Happened to 700-MHz Open Access

This question came in from reader Dick:

I seem to remember an article somewhere that said some part of the spectrum being vacated due to the digital TV switchover was to be made available to a new communications service, which would allow people to buy a phone from anyone and use the new spectrum like a wireless internet service open to anyone with the right phone. I seem to recall the Google name was associated with the idea. I haven’t anything more about it. Is something like this coming?

See Sascha Segan’s answer after the jump.

Recession roundup: volume eleventeen zillion

We’re getting rather tired of having to “roundup” the misery, loss of profits, and layoffs in this modern era of plenty and luxury, but there’s seemingly no end in sight, so here we go. Texas Instruments announced plans to cut 12 percent of its workforce (apparently as a safety measure as its profits last quarter actually topped analysts’ estimates). Meanwhile, Panasonic’s announced some modest cuts of roughly 600 workers, in addition to closing some of its plants in Asia as it posted a net loss for the first time in six years. Moving on, Hewlett-Packard’s laying off nearly 25,000 people in a “restructuring” scheme, while those IBM losses we’ve been hearing about (and which have been rumored to number nearly 16,000) are now quietly happening in several locales across the U.S. Finally, big boxer Best Buy’s just confirmed impending cuts at their headquarters in Minneapolis, but won’t release any hard numbers until February. Seriously, world: the future is disgusted with us.

Read – Texas Instruments cutting jobs
Read – Panasonic to cut 560 jobs, close plants
Read – IBM, HP quietly cut thousands of jobs
Read – Best Buy plans layoffs at headquarters

Filed under:

Recession roundup: volume eleventeen zillion originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:33:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

British Airways to allow in-flight texting

Go ahead, send that all-important text.

(Credit: Airbus)

British Airways announced this week that it would initiate limited cell phone use on an upcoming route between London and New York City. Voice calls will not be permitted, but passengers will be allowed to send and receive text messages and e-mails.

OLPC 2.0 dual touchscreen mockup surfaces in the wild

What we’re staring at here is apparently the first “in the wild” shot of the promised dual touchscreen OLPC 2.0. As far as we can tell (thanks, Mr. Blurrycam), we’d wager this is a purely non-working mockup, since that “touchscreen” looks a bit too much like “glued-on paper” to us, but we’re really short on info otherwise. What is encouraging here is that apparently someone is taking this dual screen idea seriously, and it’s hard to deny that such an improbable form factor could really end up being the shot-in-the-arm this project needs.

Filed under: ,

OLPC 2.0 dual touchscreen mockup surfaces in the wild originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Boost Mobile to phase out CDMA offerings

Boost Mobile

Following its recent news of unlimited monthly plans, Boost Mobile confirmed Wednesday that it is aiming to push all of its subscribers to iDEN over time.

According to this PhoneScoop report, a Boost Mobile spokesperson said that the Sprint Nextel subsidiary will still support its CDMA products but will no …

House Fails to Pass DTV Delay Bill

dtv delay

The House on Wednesday failed to approve a measure that would move the digital television transition from February 17 to June 12.

Members voted 258 to 168 to pass the bill, dubbed the DTV Delay Act, but it failed to receive a two-thirds majority, as required by bills placed on the suspension calendar.

Placing items on the suspension calendar is a procedural tactic usually reserved for non-controversial bills that Congress wants to pass quickly. Debate is restricted to 40 minutes, members cannot add amendments, and the bill must receive a two-thirds majority.

The bill is not dead, however. The House can still bring the bill up for a vote the “regular” way, which allows for lengthier debate, the addition of amendments, and a majority rules vote, but that has not yet been scheduled.

Digital TV transition delay bill fails to pass in House

In an absolutely shocking move, the United States House of Representatives has failed to pass the digital TV transition delay bill that was all but certain to fly through just days ago. The bill needed two-thirds of the votes of the House under “special rules adopted for the vote,” and reportedly, the vote was just 258 to 168 in favor of changing the date. As it stands, an estimated 6.5 million Americans are not yet prepared for the switch — which is now back on track for February 17th — and the money well for government-issued vouchers has ran dry. Honestly, we’re elated to hear the news. The February date has been blasted from the rooftops for years now, and changing it this late in the game would wreak all kinds of havoc in the industry, not to mention instill even more confusion. Soon-to-be-vacated airwaves, we’re ready for you.

[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]

Filed under: ,

Digital TV transition delay bill fails to pass in House originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:36:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Apple vs. Palm: the in-depth analysis


Apple and Palm kicked a lot of dirt at each other last week — acting Apple CEO Tim Cook flatly told analysts that “We will not stand for people ripping off our IP” when asked specifically about competition like the Palm Pre, and Palm responded with a similarly-explicit “We have the tools necessary to defend ourselves.” At issue, of course, is that the Pre employs a multitouch screen and gestures almost exactly like those made famous on the iPhone — and if you’ll recall, Steve Jobs introduced multitouch on the iPhone with a slide reading “Patented!” To top it all off, the past few days have seen a number of media outlets proclaim that Apple’s been awarded a “multitouch patent” without so much as a shred of analysis, instead hyping up a supposed future conflict. That’s just not how we play it, so we enlisted Mathew Gavronski, a patent attorney in the Chicago office of Michael Best & Friedrich, to help us clear up some of the confusion and misinformation that’s out there — read on for more.

Continue reading Apple vs. Palm: the in-depth analysis

Filed under: , ,

Apple vs. Palm: the in-depth analysis originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:28:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments