Dell demos multitouch on the Studio One 19

Dell’s new all-in-one Studio One 19 is due to start shipping soon, and it’s packing some interesting new multitouch capabilities which Dell has been kind enough to demo briefly on video. There’s a new touchable launch bar, which give access to Dell’s own touch-friendly apps (see the second video after the break), though Dell’s Josh Duncan (video one) made sure to reiterate that gestures should carry over to non touch specific apps — which pretty much means Internet Explorer, from what we can tell. Our own experience with Windows 7 multitouch was none too impressive, and Vista’s built-in single touch stuff is even worse, so hopefully Dell’s not just paying lip service to making multitouch a real OS-wide phenomenon. The touch-specific apps like a photo browser and paint app are cute and gimmicky, but at least seem to match HP’s TouchSmart for the most part — plus some multitouch enhancements. What is perhaps the Studio One’s biggest boon to touchability doesn’t even have a thing to do with the screen or software: it tilts back on the stand, giving you a better angle to work with. Check out both videos after the break.

[Via Pocket-lint]

Continue reading Dell demos multitouch on the Studio One 19

Filed under: ,

Dell demos multitouch on the Studio One 19 originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:37:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Inflatable Movie Screens Now at Target

MovieScreens.jpg

Enjoy movies under the stars with Open Air Cinema. If you’ve got a McMansion with a giant yard, use it to create your own drive-in, with no cars required. These inflatable movie screens aren’t new, but Target has just begun carrying them–meaning more people than ever will have access to professional-quality outdoor screens.

Target is carrying three sizes of outdoor screens: 9 foot, 12 foot, and 16 foot. Put one on the edge of the pool for the ultimate summer party. The screens are made of wrinkle-resistant nylon, have black backs to prevent light from leaking through, and come with quiet air blowers. Prices range from $499 to $1,149.99.

Note that this price is for the screen only. You’ll need to get a projector capable of creating that large an image on your own.

The 404 316: Where Kenley does her best Wilson

Enough with the lame updates

(Credit: Switched.com)

With Wilson at the auto expo in town, our good friend Kenley Bradstreet from “Heavy & Flow” joins us today on the show. We chat about Gore Verbinski’s decision to make BioShock over another pirates movie and how that’ll either be the best or worst thing he’s ever done.

Justin then enlightens us about the logistical issues with sending feces through the United States Postal Service and how it isn’t exactly a crime. First thing you’ll want to do with the new OnStar system in the event of a car accident is Twitter about it as the service has found its way to the on-board vehicle communication system.

Next Kenley tells us about The Transcendent Man, Ray Kurzweil, and how he used to come visit the Bradstreet home on major holidays. Finally, we touch on some tech no-nos, a few tech-inspired faux pas (can you even pluralize that?) that we’re all guilty of.

Make sure you keep sending in those stories of survival for a chance to win Tom Avery’s incredible book, “To the End of the Earth”. Leave us an email (the404 [at] cnet [dot] com or call in @ 866-404-CNET).



EPISODE 316





Download today’s podcast Subscribe in iTunes Subscribe in RSS



Originally posted at the 404

Cosmic Hand Surprises Astronomers

NASA_Chandra_Nebula_Hand.jpg

In a new image from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory, high-energy X-rays emanating from the nebula
around a known pulsar, when colored blue, unveil a structure that resembles a “hand reaching for some eternal red cosmic light,” according to Space.com.

Sometime in the distant past, pulsar PSR B1509-58 was a star that ran out of energy and collapsed into a sphere just 12 miles in diameter. Today, the star now spins at the high rate of seven times per second. In the process, it spits out energy into space that sometimes falls into a pattern, such as the one shown above.

The report said that the pulsar in question is about 150 light years across and 17,000 light years away. That means we’re now seeing it as it actually looked 17,000 years ago, because that’s how long it took the light to reach us Earthlings.

Rumor: T-Mobile to get HTC Snap, Touch Pro2, and more

HTC Snap

HTC Snap

(Credit: Bonnie Cha/CNET)

The HTC Snap made its debut at CTIA 2009 where we learned that the U.S. will get its own unlocked version of the QWERTY smartphone, called the HTC S522, this summer. However, some blogs are reporting that T-Mobile may just get a model …

HP Pavilion dv6, HDX 16 and more see updates, rumors

In the market for an HP laptop? Then it looks like your buying decision just got a tad tougher, with another round of official and not quite official announcements affecting four more models among the company’s many offerings. Those include the dv6 (pictured above), which is now available with lower-cost Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4200 or Core 2 Duo T6400 processors and ATI Mobility Radeon HD4530 or HD4650 graphics, and the considerably higher-end HDX 16, which gets a boost in the graphics department courtesy of NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 130M GPU with 1GB of on-board RAM. What’s more, while HP isn’t saying anything about it just yet, Notebook Italia seems pretty sure that the 18.4-inch HDX 18 will also be getting a similar graphics upgrade in the coming days. Lastly, it seems that the 17-inch Pavilion dv7 laptop has also seen a mild update in the form of the dv7-2000, which now packs ATI’s latest Mobility Radeon HD4000 series graphics, and a Core 2 Quad Q9000 processor on the top-end configuration.

Read – Notebook Italia, HP Pavilion dv6, HDX 16, HDX 18
Read – Notebook Italia, HP Pavilion dv7

Filed under:

HP Pavilion dv6, HDX 16 and more see updates, rumors originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:16:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Giz Explains: What a RAID Hard Drive Array Is (and Why You Want One)

RAID: It’s not just for Warcraft nerds anymore. If you’ve got a ton of music, photos and video and you don’t know about RAID hard-drive arrays yet, read this—or wave your precious media files buh-bye.

RAID sounds like vaguely scary, like something you to do a French village if you’re a Viking or what you do on a Saturday night if you’re a lonely, sad person, but really it just stands for redundant array of independent disks. Which really just means a bundle of hard drives acting like one superharddrive. There are a few of different kinds of RAID configurations and they do different things—one kind gives you crazyfast performance, another makes your storage safer than a single hard drive acting alone via redundancy.

The most likely place you’re going to run into RAID—if you’re not familiar with it already—is when you jump into the world of network attached storage, aka NAS, providing a huge bank of hard-drive goodness for storage, backup and media streaming across all of your home or office computers and devices.

But okay, let’s jump into the basic kinds of RAID setups, known annoyingly as levels, even though they are mostly different. If you wanna skim, the ones you should know are RAID 0, RAID 1, and RAID 5.

RAID 0 is all about performance, employing what’s called striping, where data is broken up into fragments and written across multiple drives, sort of treating them as one giant drive. Let’s assume we’ve got a setup with four hard disks. The performance edge comes from the fact you’re getting massive throughput—it’s like going from one lane to four, since you’re writing and accessing all four drives in parallel. It’s for pros and crazies handling massive files, like HD video editing. The downside is that if even one of the hard drives fails, you lose everything. Every file is now incomplete. It’s not technically RAID since there’s no redundancy going on—possibly hence the zero. You need at least two disks for this.

RAID 1 is the main configuration most novices should learn about. It writes, or mirrors, data to multiple disks, so you’ve got multiple hard drives that are exactly the same. Obviously, this is good for data reliability, since if one fails, you’ve got another. If you don’t have an independent disk controller or host adapter for disk, however, performance can be kind of crummy trying to write to the disks simultaneously, and performance isn’t going to be as good as a striped RAID configuration, obviously. On top of that, you have to buy two 500GB disks just to get 500GB of storage, so it gets a little costly, too. Safety first! You need at least two disks here.

RAID 2 stripes data like RAID 0, but at even smaller level (bits instead of blocks) and uses additional hard drives and what’s called Hamming code for error protection and parity which allows it to recover corrupt data. Guess what? No one uses it anymore, because it requires a ridiculous number of disks.

RAID 3 stripes data across multiple drives as well, but at the byte level, and it has a single disk dedicated to data parity and error correction. Because of the byte level split, all the drives work together simultaneously as one unit, which means it can only do one one read or write operation at a time. Pretty rare to see, and nothing you, Joe Q. Consumer have to worry about. It’s good for high transfer rates (again, HD video editing comes to mind) with a measure of security that you don’t get with RAID 0, since you can lose a disk and still be okay. You need at least three disks for this party.

RAID 4 is a striping+parity disk setup too, but at the larger block level, so disks can be more independent, and you can have multiple read operations in different places going on. Since you’re only using a single disk for parity, which has to be written to every time you write data, you can still only have one write operation going on at a time. Three’s the magic number of disks here too.

RAID 5 is where much of the NAS in a box action is today if you’re not rolling with RAID 1, and tries to offer the best of all RAID worlds—performance and redundancy—by combining the various configurations. It stripes data across multiple hard drives, but instead of just dumping parity data onto a single drive, it spreads it across all of the hard drives too, meaning there’s no bottleneck from writing parity data. (Though writing parity data is still kind of a drag.) In this configuration, you can lose one hard drive and be okay, since that drive’s parity data is on a different disk. Sadly, there’s some concern about its probability for failure over the next year as hard drives increase in size and the system expands. Three disks gets you in the door.

RAID 6 is like RAID 5, but it uses two disks for parity and correction which are setup so that if one of the drives bombs out during data recovery, the system keeps on chugging. Obviously, you need one more disk than RAID 5, making the minimum four.

• Beyond the standard RAID levels, you’ve also got the multiples: RAID 1+0 and 0+1. In RAID 0+1, you take a set of drives that striped in RAID 0 configuration (so they’re acting like one hard drive) and then you mirror them in a RAID 1 setup, so you get some redundancy. So if you’ve got a pair of RAID 0 drives, you’d be mirroring them, for a total of four drives. RAID 1+0 is the reverse: It stripes across a set of mirrored drives. With hard drives getting cheap, the army of hard drives you need to make this happen is easier to get going, so you might see more of it.

Just to be clear: RAID’s not a total substitute for backup. For average internet geek people, the best way to think about RAID is as a way to more reliably store a large bank of data (which we all have now with photos, videos, music and more) with extra protection against physical hard drive failure. You can still totally lose an entire RAID array via virus or accidentally overwriting it.

If you buy networked storage in a box, like from Western Digital, you’ll typically have options for RAID 1 or RAID 5—which one you pick decides on what’s more important to you. Total redundancy for more reliability or a combination of performance and reliability. Lifehacker has a step-by-step guide to building your own RAID array in your computer for some more hands on how to advice, and if you need some help picking your network storage solution, we’ve got you covered there too.

Still something you still wanna know? Send any questions about raids, WoW or hard things to tips@gizmodo.com, with “Giz Explains” in the subject line.

Smartphone War Heats Up, Google Phones Still MIA

Htc_vodafone

Google’s mobile phone operating system, Android, made a big splash last year with the promise of many nifty phones from a slew of handset makers. But six months later, only one Android phone is on the market: the HTC G1. Other than that, Google phones are scarcer than cabinet nominees who pay their taxes.

Several major handset makers have claimed they have Android devices in the works, but phones running the OS were largely missing at last week’s CTIA wireless trade show in Vegas and at the Mobile World Congress conference in Barcelona last month. Apart from a handful a new models this year, it appears the majority of models won’t be out until 2010.

"There is some loss of momentum in terms of perceived value, especially from a media and public perception point of view," says Charles Golvin, an analyst with Forrester Research.

So what’s holding the Google phones back? Time to
development, the lack of support from major U.S. carriers Verizon and AT&T, and some fears about how
reliable Android is, say analysts.

Android is Google’s attempt to enter the packed — but presumably lucrative — market for smartphone operating systems. Currently, that market is dominated by Apple’s iPhone, Nokia’s Symbian Series 60, Research in Motion’s BlackBerry and Microsoft’s Windows Mobile. Despite the economic slowdown, smartphones sales are expected to outpace the overall mobile industry growth and post double-digit annual revenue growth by 2011.

Getting a chunk of this market is important for Google because it allows the company to play in a market that will potentially be even bigger than the PC-centric web. With Android, Google is betting on an ambitious open source strategy that will put software written by it at the center of this business and help drive mobile access to its own apps.

This year, three or four new
Android-based phones are likely to be on the market, including the HTC-manufactured Vodafone Magic. The touchscreen Magic will be similar to the G1 in looks, prompting some to dub it the "G2," though it lacks the G1’s full keyboard.

Samsung will be the other major company to offer Android phones in 2009, launching an Android phone outside the United States in June and another one in the works for later this year. The company did not share any specific details about the devices. Struggling cellphone maker Motorola has also promised an Android phone toward the end of the year.

"I think the bulk of Android devices will come next year," says Chetan Sharma, a telecom analyst who has his own consulting firm.

The biggest promise of Android has been that it is a free and open
platform that device manufacturers could take and customize to suit
their own needs. Since its launch, a number of major handset
manufacturers, including LG, Samsung, Motorola and Garmin, have said
they are working on Android devices, hoping to slap the inexpensive OS
onto their devices. The move could bring down their costs in the long
run and offer smaller companies a chance to fight larger rivals such as
Nokia and Research In Motion.

"Android is all about the long term payoff in terms of
simplification of the platform and operating system for manufacturers,"
says Golvin. "But it you look at the G1, it is a very good device for a
first effort. But it has some rough edges, which is a reflection of the
software."

Compare that to Apple’s iPhone OS, a closed and proprietary system
that is about to go into its third version. The iPhone 3.0 OS is
expected to be available this summer
along with a new version of the device. The new iPhone will offer
several interesting new features for users and developers, including
global search and the ability to sell additional content through third
party applications. The iPhone OS is also the de facto
standard — because of its place in popular perception — for other
manufacturers to better.

The longer it takes for Android devices to come to market, the more
likely it is that developers and users will shift to competitors such
as Apple, Research In Motion or even Palm. That’s where Android faces
the real threat.

One reason for the delay in new Android phones could be that it
takes time for companies to customize a new platform to their needs.

"It’s a completely new platform and it takes time to customize it to
the hardware," says Michael Gartenberg, vice president of strategy for
Los Angeles-based analytics firm Interpret.

To get the first Android phone out, Google appears to have focused
on working with one handset maker, HTC, says Tim Bass, senior manager
of strategy for Samsung Telecom America. "That created a bit of a gap
for other companies," says Bass. "Now we are seeing equal support from
Google for all devices."

LG, meanwhile, says it is looking at the Android platform, but the
company says it has its hands full with new hardware that showcases its
proprietary S-class 3-D user interface. "We are exploring Android but
nothing’s locked down yet," says Tim O’Brien senior director of
marketing for LG Electronics Mobile U.S.

For other handset makers, such as Garmin and Asus, finding telecom carriers to pick up their Android devices won’t be easy.

Major U.S. carriers — Verizon and AT&T in particular — aren’t
exactly clamoring for Android phones. The duo are not a part of the Open Handset Alliance,
the group that advocates Android. And AT&T already has a runaway
smartphone hit with the iPhone, while Verizon’s BlackBerry Storm is a
respectable success, too.

"The big carriers are worried that if they launch something that is
not fully baked, they will have to risk an expensive recall of the
devices," says Sharma. "It takes time to work out the kinks with any
new operating systems, so it would be fair to say the major carriers are
adopting a wait-and-watch attitude."

The next Android devices in the United States will be on T-Mobile and Sprint,
the only two carriers that are part of the Open Handset Alliance. And
Sprint’s hands are pretty full for now with the upcoming Palm Pre
phone. The Pre is expected to launch exclusively on the Sprint network
by the end of June.

"Right now Sprint is very focused on Palm as a partner and has put
most of its marketing dollars around it," says Golvin. "Even if there
were an Android device waiting to be activated on the Sprint network,
Sprint would probably say, ‘let’s hold off so we can get full bang for
the buck from the Pre.’"

Still, all this is no reason to write off the Android, say analysts.
"In the grand scheme of things, small delays are not going to take away
from Android’s attractiveness as a platform for handset makers," says
Golvin.

Photo: HTC Magic/G. Photo Credit: Priya Ganapati/Wired.com.

Dai Nippon Printing’s Joe Walsh approved OLED poster

We have to admit that we got excited when we saw this poster, but that’s only ‘cos we thought it was for the dinosaur rock band from the 1970s — an appropriate object of some good-natured ribbing, if ever there was one — instead of some baseball team from Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Manufactured by the Dai Nippon Printing Co., this “light emitting poster” is currently on display at the exhibition space of the aforementioned sluggers. Combining an LED backlight for graphics and OLED panels for scrolling text, energy use is sixty percent that of fluorescent light, and the OLEDs have lifetime of 20,000 hours. Expect commercial availability sometime in April 2010, by which time the Eagles should be ready for their next “farewell” tour.

[Via OLED Info]

Filed under:

Dai Nippon Printing’s Joe Walsh approved OLED poster originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:53:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Flexible poster combines OLED, LED

OLED poster(Credit: Tech-On)

While we’re still waiting for OLED TVs to get more realistic prices, a Japanese company is moving on to making OLED-based posters for advertising.

The prototype, pictured above as a poster for Japan’s Rakuten Eagles professional baseball team, uses both organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) and inorganic …