Microsoft and Verizon May Offer ‘Pink’ Phone

Microsoft could be working on creating a new smartphone of its own

Microsoft could be working on creating a new smartphone of its own

Apple has its iPhone. And Microsoft may have ‘Pink,’ a new Windows Mobile-based cellphone that it is reportedly developing in partnership with Verizon.

A phone born out of the ‘Pink’ project could be available early next year,  according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.

The latest round of speculation around ‘Pink’ is reminiscent of similar buzz from last year. And it follows fast on the heels of rumors that Apple is also in talks with Verizon about potential iPhone-like devices. But so far Microsoft has denied that it is working on a device of its own.

In December, Brian Seitz, group manager of Zune spoke with Gizmodo in response to rumors of a Zune phone offering some basic details about ‘Pink.’  Seitzer indicated that the Microsoft Pink project is more “a platform of services that could allow Zune like services to run on platforms like Windows Mobile.”

That may still be Microsoft’s plan but the company could have decided to take the plunge towards creating its own device in a bid to restore Windows Mobile’s position in the market.

Over the last two years Microsoft has seen rival operating systems gain ground.  Last year Google launched Android, an open source mobile OS that has so far been included in three phones–HTC G1, HTC Magic and Samsung I7500.  Meanwhile, Palm, which has been a long time Windows Mobile user, has launched web OS.  web OS will make its debut with the much-anticipated Palm Pre and if the device is a hit, it is likely Palm could move away from Windows Mobile.

Betting on its own device to showcase Windows Mobile’s capabilities could spur other partners to action. But it could also backfire. Microsoft’s move could put it in compeition against handset makers such as LG that use Windows Mobile OS extensively. In February, Microsoft said it has signed a deal with LG to integrate Windows Mobile into at least 50 LG smarpthones.

Microsoft’s track record in terms of consumer hardware devices also doesn’t inspire much confidence.  After all,  how many users would want a Zune-like phone?

See also:
Zune Manager Slams Zune Phone Rumors

Photo: (mtlin/Flickr)


Moto Labs screens interactive display concept

Moto Labs touch screen(Credit: Moto Labs)

A new touch-screen tabletop computer display brings together the unlikely combination of technologies popularized by Apple and Microsoft.

It’s called the Scalable Multitouch display, and its touch technology is similar to the iPhone, but it would scale up from handheld device size to dimensions more like those of Microsoft’s Surface. The prototype measures just 19 inches right now, but it aspires to cover an entire 50-inch tabletop one day.

The Scalable Multitouch has been in development at Moto Labs in San Francisco for the past two years, and on Tuesday the company released an updated video (below) as a peek of what it’s working on.

Like Microsoft’s Surface, the Scalable Multitouch display is intended to be used as a group workspace where information on the screen can be manipulated by hand. But Moto Labs CEO Daniell Hebert says what his company is doing is different than Microsoft and others because it does not use cameras or projectors underneath the surface of the display to project images. And by nixing the inner camera/projector, it allows the display to be thin–perhaps some day as thin as the LCD screen you’re likely reading this on.

The display instead uses multitouch technology–which means you can use more than one finger as an input device. Moto Labs likes to say that you can use as many fingers to control the device as you want, and that you’re only limited by the number of fingers you have on each hand.

The device also employs capacitive touch–same as the iPhone–in which a finger touching a sensor grid (just below the screen) causes a change in signal. That relays exactly where on the screen the finger is. But while the iPhone uses a solid solution known as ITO (indium tin oxide), Moto Labs employs a grid of super-thin wires that pick up on the signals from each finger.

The thin-wire grid is used right now in single-touch displays, but has yet to be used on multitouch, and that’s where Moto Labs’ work on the inner electronics and the software to take advantage of multitouch comes in.

Moxi HD Review: Beats Cable, But It Ain’t TiVo

When I hooked Digeo’s Moxi HD DVR up, I told my wife it’s like TiVo, and she said, “Then why don’t we just use TiVo?” After several weeks testing it, I have no good answer.

If you’ve never heard of Moxi or Digeo, you are forgiven. Although the company has been making set-top boxes for almost a decade in one form or another, this is the first time Digeo is selling a Moxi box to consumers directly. There are rollouts of similar-looking Moxi cable boxes in smaller markets across the US—the chance is slim that you have one, but if you do, you’re damn lucky, because they are a hell of a lot nicer than any of the crap Motorola or Scientific Atlanta DVRs that cable companies usually foist on their highest-paying customers.

But the question here is unfortunately not, “Is Moxi better than a cable box?” even though the answer to that question is, “You know it.” The question is, why should I buy one of these instead of a TiVo? And the answer is, at the moment, you probably shouldn’t.

Price Breakdown
When the news came out, some people bitched about the price, but the truth is, Moxi HD does sit somewhere between the two comparable CableCard-compatible high-def TiVo models. It’s got a 500GB hard drive, bigger than the 160GB on the $300 baseline TiVo and smaller than the 1TB found in the $600 TiVo HD XL. Once you factor in service, it’s pretty much exactly on par:

• Moxi HD is $800 up front, or four $200 payments, or 20 monthly payments of $40.
• TiVo HD is $300 plus $300 for three years of service up front (more if you pay a la carte)
• TiVo HD XL costs $600 plus the same service pricing, so if you pay for three years of service up front, it costs $100 more than Moxi

In the rear, they are very much the same. Both Moxi and TiVo deliver HD video over HDMI, take a CableCard tuner from any cable company, and can have expanded storage by way of a drive attached to the eSATA port. The difference lies in the interface, and in the internet-based services that each box offers at the moment, always subject to change.

Note: I realize that I have left out CableCard-compatible Windows Media Center PCs. As a fan of the Media Center platform, I didn’t do this by accident. It’s just that we have yet to see a cool-running quiet set-top PC marketed widely to average users for a reasonable price that can compete with TiVo or Moxi. When that product comes along, you better believe it will be in the running.

Interface
The company that builds the Moxi has been talking about their interface since the beginning of time, and even brags about an Emmy it won for it. I can see why. It’s a fun interface, a refreshing change from candy-colored ca-plop ca-plop ca-plop TiVo menu that you might well be sick of by now.

The interface operates a bit like Sony’s Xross Media Bar PlayStation interface, with icons running along a horizontal bar. Whenever you pause on an icon, Recorded TV, for example, you instantly see a vertically aligned list of choices, in this case, all the programs you’ve recorded, grouped by show and listed in alphabetical order. Point to a particular show grouping, and suddenly each episode appears to your right, and you can move over to them and select the one you want. In most cases, it’s a fluid experience.

My beef on the interface is that there are things you must learn that aren’t readily obvious, and are not helped by the design of the remote. The Zoom button turns out to be the most important button on the whole thing, but you wouldn’t know it from being so tiny. Zoom brings you in and out of the overlaid Moxi interface, unlike the centrally positioned Moxi button, which does, well, something.

Button confusion is combined with redundant motions or inconsistent behaviors. For instance, sometimes the back button will get you out of things, but sometimes it will not, and you are required to hit OK. You can move forward (right) or back (left) along the main icon menu, but if you pause, you can no longer move right, because that takes you into a new menu, so you have to left-arrow your way out if you want to keep looking at the icons. Hitting OK when you land on an icon is a no-no as well, since that takes you to secondary options: The thing to do when you get to the icon you want is to freeze. Usually. If you’re confused by all this, welcome to my first week with Moxi.

You can get over a lot of the confusion by learning the behavior, but I don’t remember ever having to learn TiVo behavior, or even having to look at the TiVo remote, which I have to do a lot with Moxi. My final frustration with the interface is one that may be remedied soon. There isn’t great customization. I don’t know how to sort recorded shows by date, and there are too many icons in the main menu for things I couldn’t give a fig about, and there’s no way, at the moment, to hide them.


Note: I shot that one-handed while a cat was pounding into my arm, begging for lunch, so pardon the helter-skelter framing.

Services
The big deal with set-top boxes these days—not just cable boxes but Blu-ray players too—is connected services. Everybody wants Netflix, Amazon On Demand, Rhapsody, Hulu, YouTube, your mom’s private video stream (just making sure you’re paying attention). Officially, Moxi only has Rhapsody and Flickr at the moment, but unofficially, by way of a special Windows background-server app, it has all of the above and more.

PlayOn (normally $40 but Moxi gives you a “free” product key when you buy one) lives on your Windows PC, using it to access Netflix and Amazon as well as Hulu, CBS, YouTube, ESPN and CNN, to grab video from the services and pop it up on the Moxi screen. Now, as you might imagine, some of it looks like ass, and because of the double bottleneck—internet-to-PC then PC-to-Moxi—quality suffers and there are lots of hiccups. But in theory, with the ideal all-ethernet setup, you can immediately make your Moxi do more than a TiVo can now.

PlayOn The Moxi also yanks vids and stuff from your PC or other servers on your network. Like anything else, though, there’s limited file compatibility, and I’m not a fan of the interface. I could get it to see H.264 video on a network drive, but it couldn’t play them. And although the manual says you can stream H.264 video from a computer that can decode them first, I couldn’t find any of the media files I had on the PlayOn test PC for some reason, probably because it didn’t have Windows Media Connect or other server software running. (Side Note: Don’t be like me—don’t rip your DVDs in H.264.)

I think even if the PlayOn service worked half as well as it had inside my head, I’d be happy, but the Moxi service in general still felt buggy, like it was still in beta, even though I am assured that it is not. In addition to the expected occasional trouble with CableCard (some as a result of my moving houses), I have experienced more mysterious problems. Even now, the system occasionally restarts spontaneously, and I can’t go two days without noticing chunks of time missing from my favorite shows, like they’d been hand recorded by Richard Nixon.

Other connected perks do work nicely. Like TiVo, you can program it over the web, and that worked instantly, so much so that it was my preferred way to add shows, because I could just type in their names, and pick recording preferences afterward. I will give a special shoutout to the Ticker, which, once you figure it out, lets you browse news reports and other text feeds while watching shows. It’s great, but I’m still not comfortable turning it on and off. (Apparently, more practice is needed.)

So I end as I began, with a strong interest in Moxi and the need for new TiVo competitors, but with the gnawing feeling that however much Moxi can advance, TiVo has a head start it will be able to exploit for years to come. I love that there are more entrants to this field—Moxi’s “enemy” as it were is not TiVo but the total crap cableco DVRs that both are striving to replace. That said, though, you can only have one, and I think I’m going back to TiVo, old-school menus, silly sound effects and all. [Product Page]

In Summary

Interface look is refreshing change from TiVo, with lots to do while watching TV PIP

PlayOn capability technically means it has the most web video options available; Ticker great for news, sports and weather

Price up front is daunting, even though it’s on par with TiVo pricing when you factor in service

PlayOn server software not the easiest to work with, only runs on Windows, and internet connection can be very sluggy.

Remote button layout is confusing; important buttons are not clearly identified

Epson launches next-gen Ensemble HD Home Cinema System

Considering that Epson’s highest-end HTIB is nearly two years old now, we’d say an update was definitely in order. Today, the outfit has just taken the wraps off of its next-generation Ensemble HD Home Cinema, which gets updated by way of including the PowerLite Home Cinema 6100 or Home Cinema 6500 UB. As with the prior kit, these two also include a motorized 100-inch screen, integrated surround sound, AV controller with built-in DVD player, universal remote and all virtually components needed for installation. The only thing that’s glaringly absent is a Blu-ray player, which — at this point — is completely and utterly inexcusable. At any rate, those content with treating themselves to upscaled DVD can fork out $4,999 for the Ensemble HD Home Cinema 720p, $6,499 for the Ensemble HD Home Cinema 6100 and $7,999 for the Ensemble HD Home Cinema 6500 UB.

Filed under: ,

Epson launches next-gen Ensemble HD Home Cinema System originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Touchscreen Kit May Spur More Multi-Touch Apps

N-Trig Touchscreen

Touchscreens are already a big hit with cellphone users. But PC users largely remain chained to their keyboards and mouse.  N-Trig, which provides touchscreens for HP and Dell machines, hopes to change that by putting the technology into the hands of independent software developers — the same people whose apps helped propel the iPhone to massive success.

N-Trig has introduced a touchscreen kit for software developers that can be connected to any development PC. The kit, which costs $900, allows developers to display and test programs designed for touchscreens without having to buy computers that already have one.

“The advantage of having a dev kit  is that it allows you to use the CPU on a high end workstation for compile times but lets you test the multi-touch features in a box next to it,” says Frank DeSimone, senior director of research and development at SpaceClaim, a company that makes a 3D CAD-like product.  “Or you have to compile on a consumer laptop with a touchscreen and that isn’t as fast.”

Apple’s iPhone has made touch a much-desired feature on cellphones. But in PCs, touchscreens have yet to take off. Multi-touch (which involves use of more than two fingers on a touchscreen) is expected to get a boost once Microsoft releases the Windows 7 operating system, its successor to Vista.  Windows 7 supports gesture such as pinching and fingertip scrolling. Other Windows programs, such as Paint, will also include new brushes designed for multi-touch and features such as panning across a page in Internet Explorer. Earlier this year, Microsoft led a $24 million investment round in N-Trig.

But so far developers have had to buy touchscreen computers that feature the N-Trig display. Only three PCs — the HP TX2 and two Dell PCs — currently have it.  The N-Trig dev kit allows developers to turn any of their computers into a touchscreen enabled machine.

“The N-Trig kit can connect to a very powerful desktop computer,” says Harry van der Veen, CEO of Natural Interface, a Swedish company that offers multi-touch software products for applications such as digital signage and education. “You can easily move it around and it is attractively priced. The fact that it is mobile adds a lot of value to the product.”

And as more developers take to creating multi-touch based apps, N-Trig is betting demand for its touchscreens will increase driving the company’s fortunes.

N-Trig's digitizer box aims to kick start multi-touch app development

N-Trig's digitizer box aims to kick start multi-touch apps.

“We are a hardware company but the only way that multi-touch on PCs will become mainstream is if independant software developers create applications such as games and productivity tools,” says Lenny Engelhardt, vice-president of business development for N-Trig.

The N-Trig dev kit box, also known as the digitizer, looks like a tablet computer with few controls. The touchscreen on the digitizer supports both stylus and finger touch and connects to the computer using a standard USB cable. The digitizer box can be moved to any Windows-based computer, though it does not work with a Mac.

“This way the developer community can have a touchscreen without buying a touchscreen computer,” says Engelhardt.

$900 for a touchscreen box may seem expensive, but N-Trig says developer shops can use a single box across many machines. And if there is significant demand for the kits, the company can bring down the costs.

Though Windows 7 won’t be available to consumers till 2010, developers interested in multi-touch will have to start working on creating and testing applications now, says DeSimone. “To be successful to get it right you have to start now,” he says.  “If you wait till Windows 7 is out it could be too late to design around the hurdles and have a quality product.”

Photos: N-Trig


Video: MOTO Lab’s multitouch display scalable up to 50-inches

When the heads over at the MOTO Development Group aren’t busy outfitting E-Ink devices with Android, they can often be found looking for bigger, better, and cheaper ways to build multitouch surfaces — and they seem to be on to something. The video below shows full multitouch on a 19-inch display, although the company promises it is scalable up to at least 50-inches — and it does this without the bulky projector. The capacitive touch screen forgoes the ITO (indium tin oxide) used in devices like the iPhone, relying instead on “extremely fine” wires to conduct the signals (which are lit up here for effect — the company assures us that this will not be the case in production units). You know what this means: we may be getting that touch screen coffee table sooner than we thought! And we won’t have to buy that yacht, either. But don’t take out word for it — peep for yourself after the break.

Continue reading Video: MOTO Lab’s multitouch display scalable up to 50-inches

Filed under:

Video: MOTO Lab’s multitouch display scalable up to 50-inches originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:48:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Well actually, 21 and a half will do just fine

The Lenovo L215p laughs at your 22-incher’s resolution.

(Credit: CNET)

Right now, many of you are reading this on a 22-inch monitor at a 1,680×1,050-pixel native resolution and you’re probably thinking, “Man, this is it. I mean sure, it’s not as big as some of …

Amazon cashes in on Obamania merchandising craze

Doesn't look very waterproof to me.

(Credit: Amazon)

Presidential commemorative merchandise is always a hot seller, but the First Face is usually reserved for porcelain dishes, stamps, or squeezy cheesy T-shirts. Being that our 44th president is a twittering BarackBerry user, it’s fitting for Amazon to finally offer an Obama USB Flash Drive. I just wish it weren’t so unbearably ugly.

The 2GB drives are manufactured by Active Media Products and sold on Amazon for $9, plus shipping. The design looks unfinished, though, bearing Obama’s painted profile across the front of the drive. Also, isn’t it a little sad and ironic that the most patriotic part of the drive is its packaging? They couldn’t have put those red, white, and blue stripes on the drive itself?

Also, the store claims the drive is waterproof, but that smells fishy to me without material specification. For all its faults, the drive does have one neat feature: it comes loaded with almost an hour full of Obama’s speeches in MP3 format, including his famous inaugural address.

Buy the 2GB Obama Drive for $8.95 here.

More pics after the jump.

Sugar Labs debuts “Sugar on a Stick” beta, for LiveUSB-derived diabetes

After offering Sugar for the past while as an interface to run on top of your Linux distro of choice, Sugar Labs is prepping “Sugar on a Stick,” a Fedora 11-based LiveUSB distro that boots most any PC from a 1GB+ USB stick and lets a user carry their Sugar environment, files and settings wherever they roam. While the beta is currently up for download, there seem to be plenty of kinks to work out, but as the team expands and refines hardware support, we could see this potentially being more of a boon for education than the XO-1 itself; turning any PC into a Sugar PC, not just the dramatically green ones. It’s also nice to see how speedy Sugar can be free from the bonds of AMD Geode — even Atom provides quite a bit of relative pep. Check out a quick (and slightly hyperactive) hands-on video from OLPC News after the break.

Continue reading Sugar Labs debuts “Sugar on a Stick” beta, for LiveUSB-derived diabetes

Filed under: ,

Sugar Labs debuts “Sugar on a Stick” beta, for LiveUSB-derived diabetes originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Raser Technologies develops 100MPG Hummer H3 just to spite Al Gore

That’s right: last week at SAE World Congress, Raser Technologies unveiled a prototype Hummer H3 that gets 100 miles to the gallon. Insane, right? We agree. Raser partnered up with FEV to turn the famously non-environmentally sound gas guzzler around. The prototype boasts an E-REV power train engine, and three lithium ion battery packs under the rear of the vehicle. The batteries provide enough juice for about 40 miles, when the range extender starts up, providing an additional 400 miles — averaging about 100 MPG — before it needs to be plugged in again. The company is looking to start up low volume production by 2011, though there is no word on possible pricing at this time. Hey — who says electric cars have to be small, tasteful affairs? Fierce! One more shot after the break.

[Via Inhabitat, Autoblog Green]

Continue reading Raser Technologies develops 100MPG Hummer H3 just to spite Al Gore

Filed under:

Raser Technologies develops 100MPG Hummer H3 just to spite Al Gore originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments