Nexus One Desktop Dock now available for $45

The rumored desktop dock for the Nexus One has been made official today — conveniently (and accurately) bearing the official name of Nexus One Desktop Dock — running $45 sold separately or bundled with your phone purchase. As expected, dropping the phone into the dock triggers the Clock application to fire up to give you access to alarms, music, and weather (not unlike the Droid), but the special sauce lies out back where you’ll find a 3.5mm jack that connects to your stereo system using an included 3.5mm-to-RCA cable. A charger’s included to keep the phone topped off while it’s resting in the cradle, too, and considering the presence of Bluetooth here, we’re guessing audio is ferried via A2DP rather than a hardwired connection. Technology! The dock’s available right now for purchase directly from Google.

Nexus One Desktop Dock now available for $45 originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:37:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceNexus One News and Updates  | Email this | Comments

With iPad, Apple Still Has a Fatal Attraction for ATT

When Steve Jobs said Apple’s new iPad tablet would have 3G data service from AT&T during Wednesday’s press conference, sighs of disgust could be heard from the audience, presumably from disgruntled iPhone customers.

Prior to the unveiling of the 9.7-inch device Wednesday, a few vague rumors suggested Verizon would carry the tablet. Instead, Jobs announced two versions of the iPad: a Wi-Fi only model and an unlocked, Wi-Fi + 3G model for use on GSM networks. The Verizon network operates on the CDMA standard, meaning Verizon won’t be able to support the iPad.

Why not Verizon? Apple must be keenly aware of the incessant AT&T bashing from iPhone owners. And yet AT&T will be the primary U.S. carrier for the tablet, just as it is for the iPhone.

However, the tablet’s situation is different from the iPhone’s, analysts told Wired.com. First of all, this isn’t a phone. The iPad is a data-driven, media-rich device that you’ll primarily be using in your living room. Second, the tablet does not require committing to a contract for 3G. You can prepay a month ($15 for 250 MB or $30 for unlimited) for when you’re traveling, for example, and then cancel the 3G and just use the Wi-Fi.

But why not Verizon? Surely, Apple must have at least thought twice about sticking with AT&T as its official U.S. partner for the iPad. Dissatisfaction with AT&T did, after all, incite a consumer protest attempting to bring down its network with digital sabotage.

“What is this fatal attraction between Apple and AT&T?” wondered MKM Partners analyst Tero Kuittinen. “Pretty much everybody I talked to really expected Verizon.”

Kuittinen said Apple may have stuck with AT&T to retain a cordial relationship, because telecom analysts expect the iPhone’s exclusivity contract with AT&T to end in the next year, which could invite a Verizon iPhone.

“If they’re planning an iPhone Verizon launch maybe they’ll want to throw a bone at AT&T,” he said.

Ross Rubin, an NPD analyst, said it’s unlikely Apple purposely left Verizon out. The tablet is compatible with new GSM micro SIMs, which supports international carriers, so Apple likely made this decision to simplify its offerings.

AT&T said it plans to continue improving its network to help support Apple’s new device. AT&T iPad customers will have free access to 20,000 hot spots nationwide, an AT&T spokesman said.

“We have a great relationship with Apple,” an AT&T spokesman said. “Today we offer the nation’s fastest network and will continue to increase network speeds throughout 2010 and 11 in advance of 4G networks and devices being widely available which further sets us apart from the competition of the mobile broadband leader.”

Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com


iPad will be to MacBook as Netbook is to PC

There’s work ahead for the iPad engineers, but make no mistake: This product is a direct attack on the Netbook category. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://news.cnet.com/8301-19882_3-10443079-250.html” class=”origPostedBlog”Rafe’s Radar/a/p

The Mystery (?) of the Apple iPad Camera Connector, and SD Cards

iPad connector kit.jpgOne of the notable omissions of the new Apple iPad has been the lack of external storage, something that has been a staple of most computing devices. The iPad lacks it too – or does it?

At the very bottom of the iPad’s specifications page is the iPad Camera Connection Kit, a peripheral add-on whose purpose is to give you “two ways to import photos and videos
from a digital camera,” according to the attached description. “The Camera Connector lets you import your photos
and videos to iPad using the camera’s USB cable. Or you can use the SD
Card Reader to import photos and videos directly from the camera’s SD
card.”

Here’s my question: although the iPad lacks an internal SD card reader, the SD card reader that’s part of the camera kit could serve as a dongle, allowing some form of storage expansion. It appears that the top part of the SD card reader matches that 30-pin connector. The question boils down to: does the connector prohibit everything but image files? If so, it seems like a royal pain. Otherwise, though, it’s a functional but awkward method of going beyond the iPad’s small storage capacity.

Wendy Sheehan Donnell, our consumer-electronics editor, doubts that the Camera Connection Kit is actually a stealth expansion slot. But without Apple’s input, I guess we won’t know for certain. We have an email out to them, and I’ll update this post if I hear back.

iPad: Did it live up to the hype?

Apple’s iPad was probably one of the most talked about unannounced devices in recent history, but did it live up to all of the rumors and speculation? Analyst think so. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10443011-37.html” class=”origPostedBlog”News – Apple/a/p

What, no iPhone news?

The iPad announcement brought no iPhone news, but Apple’s new device could show us how the iPhone will change.

Apple’s Tablet E-Book App Rips off Indie Dev’s Creation

gallery-software-ibooks-20100127

We love the iPhone book-reading app Classics, and apparently Apple does, too. The iPad tablet includes an app called iBooks, and its similarities to Classics are beyond the realm of coincidence.

The UI is the same idea: a shelf of books that you can tap to choose a title. The pages emulate the look of a printed book page. The 3D page-flipping effect looks almost exactly the same. The only major difference is iBooks has a tool to change font point and type. That and, of course, access to e-books in the iBooks store, which will feature titles from Penguin, Harper Collins, Simon & Schuster, Macmillan and Hachette book group. (Classics’ book content is an aggregation of public-domain materials from Project Gutenberg.)

But for the most part, it’s still the classic story of big-corporation-rips-off-independent-business. (And Apple wasn’t the first to borrow Classics’ idea, either.) And this has happened a few times in the mobile app space. A few months ago, Wired.com reported on two developers who were stomped when they inadvertently competed with Apple, as well as one developer whose project was squashed when Google came out with the same idea and offered it for free.

Ryu also acknowledges that Classics’ bookshelf view was heavily inspired by Delicious Library, but he asked Delicious Library creator Wil Shipley for approval before Classics’ release.

Of course, that doesn’t put Classics out of business. It’s unclear whether iBooks will be ported over to the iPhone, or whether it will be an exclusive app on the tablet.

Phillip Ryu, who helped create Classics, said he felt a little hurt, but as a loyal fan of Apple, he isn’t planning on picking a fight.

“It stung a bit as a huge fan of Apple, but in the end it’s a page flip,” Ryu told Wired.com. “We’ll come up with something cooler and let them take this digital reading experience to the next level with iBooks.”

Ryu has made Classics free for a limited time, adding “We figured it’s a good idea to get Classics into as many hands as possible, before people start calling it an iBooks ripoff.”

Classics Download Link [iTunes]

classics2classics

See Also:


iPhone SDK calls out nonexistent iPad cam, confirms split views and popovers are iPad-specific

iPhone owners holding out hope that OS 3.2 would bring some of these fancy new iPad spoils to their devices might be in for a disappointment, because two of the big ones — split view and popovers — are both referred to in Apple’s updated human interface guidelines as “iPad-only.” Realistically, this shouldn’t come as a surprise; both of these UI elements were built to shine on larger displays, and it’s hard to say how you could make either one of them work on HVGA — but it’s important for devs to note that heavily investing in these are definitely going to make it difficult to make their apps compatible across all iPhone OS-powered devices. Considering that iPhones will almost certainly continue to dominate iPads for sales volume, we know how we’d be developing.

In other news, running the updated iPhone simulator in iPad mode gives you the option to take photos, which doesn’t make a heck of a lot of sense considering that it doesn’t have a camera. There are plenty of plausible explanations for the muck-up, but our guess is that Apple’s left the vestigial capability on-board since the framework’s already in place for the iPhone and there could very well be iPads down the road that have a cam (or two). Follow the break for a shot of the iPad’s Address Book imploring you to take a photo — and savor it, since it’s probably the closest you’ll actually get to snapping a shot on the device any time soon.

[Thanks, iPhone Dev and Eric]

Continue reading iPhone SDK calls out nonexistent iPad cam, confirms split views and popovers are iPad-specific

iPhone SDK calls out nonexistent iPad cam, confirms split views and popovers are iPad-specific originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:54:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceApple  | Email this | Comments

Amazon Responds to the Apple iPad

ipad forward thinking 1.jpgThe iPad: it’s a video player! A productivity tool! An e-reader! On the last attribute, at least, there’s plenty of competition for Apple’s new tablet.

Amazon, of course, has established itself with not only the world’s largest marketplace for books, but a substantial number of e-books as well. And the company’s Kindle dominates the e-reader space, although the company does not disclose the exact number of e-readers sold.

So, naturally, we asked Amazon was asked to comment on its latest competitor.

“Thanks for your inquiry,” Andrew Herdener responded. “Customers can read and sync their Kindle books on
iPhones, iPod touches, PCs, and soon Blackberrys, Macs, and iPads.  Kindle is
purpose-built for reading.  Weighing in at less than 0.64 pounds, Kindle fits
comfortably in one hand for hours, has an e-ink display that is easy on the eyes
even in bright daylight, two weeks of battery life, and 3G wireless with no
monthly fees–all at a $259 price.  Kindle editions of New York Times Bestsellers
and most New Releases are only $9.99.”

Our followup question has not been responded to, so we’ll have to read these tea leaves for you: basically, it seems that Amazon views the iPad as a platform, like the iPhone (with its own Kindle app) and views the Kindle as the one true e-reader. Which it may turn out to be.

Dialed In Podcast 112: iPad, schmiPad

Apparently, there was something called the Apple iPad announced today. We’re not really sure what all the hubbub is about, but we share a few thoughts on the device and take a couple of jabs at its unfortunate name. Also, though there was no mention of iPhone 4.0, …

Originally posted at Dialed In