Hasta La Gadget!

Motorola takes a global perspective at Mobile World Congress. CNET takes a tour through the company’s stand in Barcelona. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13970_7-10456130-78.html” class=”origPostedBlog”3GSM blog/a/p

The set will be the largest commercially available OLED TV on sale in the U.S. besides the Sony XEL-1, which is being withdrawn from the Japanese market.

According to Steve Jobs, running Flash video on the iPad would cut its battery life from 10 hours to a measly 1.5. At least, that was his pitch to Wall Street Journal execs recently. But could it possibly be true?

Well, yes and no. Jobs is picking and choosing here between hypothetical versions of Flash. If the iPad version of Flash were to have hardware acceleration, which Flash 10.1 offered up for desktops (though not OS X), that wouldn’t be remotely the case. If Flash on the iPad were to support hardware video decoding where available, it wouldn’t require nearly as much CPU. You’d lose battery life, sure, the same way you lose battery life watching any type of video on any system, but nothing near as dramatic as 85%.

Of course, that hardware acceleration isn’t currently possible on Macs, because Adobe doesn’t have access to the appropriate APIs. So Jobs can easily on a imaginary version of Flash that doesn’t have hardware acceleration and come up with an imaginary battery life impact.

Jobs’s bigger fib might be his description of ditching Flash as “trivial.” It’s not. While HTML5 is good, it’s not great—yet. And even when it becomes great, it’ll take major sites years to make the switch—however long it takes for the majority of internet users to stop using outmoded browsers. And that won’t be for a very long time. Certainly longer than the first few generations of the iPad.

So. Would Flash make the iPad’s battery life only 1.5 hours? Maybe, maybe not. But the bigger question is: will we ever get the chance to find out for ourselves? [Gawker]

It’s been a ten year process, but TiVo just won a patent on managing DVR recording schedules and resolving schedule conflicts using a list of shows ordered by priority. US Patent #7,665,111 covers “recording, storing, and deleting of television and/or web page program material” by generating a prioritized list of shows that contains both shows chosen and ranked by users and shows the DVR think you’ll like, matching that list against the program guide and available recording space, and resolving conflicts based on priority. Yeah, that’s what essentially every DVR on the market does now — but before you run off screaming into the woods, remember that this was all basically uncharted territory when TiVo applied for this patent way back in 1999, the same year it launched one of the first DVRs.

Now, TiVo has been anything but shy when it comes to suing over its other hard-fought DVR patents, so we’ll have to see how the company decides to use this new bit of IP leverage; patents that have been pending for this long aren’t exactly secrets to anyone, and we’re sure TiVo’s competitors have been thinking of clever ways to design around it. (One bit that jumps out: the priority list has to contain both “a viewer’s explicit preferred program selections for recording” and “inferred preferred program selections for recording,” so DVRs that don’t auto-record like TiVos could potentially be excluded.) Of course, we’d rather just see TiVo retake the lead in the DVR space with some entirely new ideas — we’ll see what happens next month.

TiVo granted patent on recording Season Pass subscriptions by priority originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:48:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Zatz Not Funny  |  USPTO (PDF)  | Email this | Comments

Sagem Orga was on the floor of MWC this week, a company that really doesn’t typically draw a lot of attention outside wireless industry suits who fly out to Barcelona to broker deals — at least, not until they do something totally insane like stuff a WiFi radio into a SIM card. We talked to the company a little bit about its coin-sized technological tour de force and we were shocked to learn that it doesn’t instantly nuke your phone’s battery — the gentleman running demos said that he was getting about a days’ worth between charges with occasional use. Of course, “occasional use” could mean anything, but he added that the card is currently throwing out a hotspot cloud of anywhere between 5 and 50 meters, and it could easily be reworked to stay within a much smaller radius which improves battery consumption in the process.

Unfortunately, we weren’t allowed to take any pictures of the actual SIMfi; this is just a dummy pictured above, but our demo guy took off the battery cover of his phone and we were shocked to find that the real thing looks no different from any other SIM (no, seriously). We guess that makes sense since it has to fit into a standard SIM slot, but it’s rocket science how they managed to fit all that circuitry into a board that tiny — in fact, we were shown an x-ray view of the card, and the number of chips, resistors, and miscellaneous pieces of technology in there is nothing short of mind-bending. It’s hard to say when (or if) we’ll see these on carriers around the world, but it’s going to be a little while — Sagem Orga tells us the prototypes cost a stout €5,000 (about $6,800) each.

Sagem Orga shows off pricey SIMfi prototype at MWC originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments