Science buffs?
(Credit: EuroNews/YouTube Screenshot by Chris Matyszczyk/CNET)
Prejudice, like beauty, comes in many forms.
The assumption is that if you hold a particular opinion, it follows that you must hold a particular other opinion. If you don’t, goes the argument, then you must be stupid.
It’s a little like those who believe that a smartphone is its specs, therefore you can’t possibly want to buy an iPhone.
Such logical thought-extension can sometimes pollute science. There are fears that researchers try to find evidence that satisfies their own assumptions.
Some might find it marginally heartening, then, that one researcher, Dan Kahan, admitted to his prejudices being slapped on the behind by actual results.
Writing on the Yale Cultural Cognition Project blog, Kahan described his analysis of research into possible correlations between religious or political beliefs and grasp of science.
When it came to strongly stated religious adherence, his conclusion was that there was a small negative correlation between it and science literacy.
He concluded: “I frankly don’t think that that’s a very big deal. There are plenty of highly religious folks who have a high science comprehension score, a… [Read more]
Related Links:
Bing is better than Google? Bunkum, says Freakonomics
Ex-pro athlete uses tweets to track down house-trashing teens
Popular Science silences its comments section
Obama’s BRAIN project gathers dust in government shutdown
Conan upgrades to iOS 7; disaster strikes






