AMD details first ARM-based server chip: up to 16 helpings of Cortex-A57 clocked at 2GHz

AMD plans lowpower server chips based on ARM CortexA57, new Steamroller design

It’s hardly a secret that AMD has stepped out of its x86 comfort zone to develop an ARM-based server chip, but now we know a little more about it. Going by the name of “Seattle” and scheduled for launch in the second half of next year, it’ll be built around ARM’s 64-bit Cortex-A57 in either 8- or 16-core configurations, which will likely be clocked at a minimum of 2GHz. In an apparent acknowledgement of ARM’s superiority at low wattages, we’re told that this design has the potential to deliver 4x the performance of AMD’s current Opteron X processors, with improved compute-per-watt. There’s a clear limit to AMD’s reliance on ARM, however, as it’ll use Seattle to up against Intel’s little Atoms, but will continue to sell its own x86 designs for higher-power applications. Meanwhile, we’re still waiting on something more interesting from this union, which might be an ARM CPU paired with a Radeon HD graphics processor in some sort of mobile-class SoC. Guess we’ll just have to be patient.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

AMD Seattle chips ditch x86 for ARM to undermine Intel’s server market

AMD has revealed its new “Seattle” chips, processors headed to power-dense servers, and using for the first time ARM architecture as commonly found in smartphones and tablets, rather than x86. AMD Seattle, which is expected to show up in systems from the second half of 2014, will initially offer eight ARM Cortex-A57 cores running at

Read The Full Story

Report: AMD Is Making Its First Ever ARM Chip

Report: AMD Is Making Its First Ever ARM Chip

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that AMD is taking a leap into unknown waters, as it readies its first ever ARM chip.

Read more…

    

TARDIS Cast: Broken on the Inside

This Doctor Who cast is great. No, not the cast of the show. The cast you see here. I’m actually surprised we haven’t seen something like this before, since the Doctor runs around so much. You would think he would have broken some body part long ago.


TARDIS Cast
It probably has some kind of magical timey-wimey healing properties that regenerate its wearer’s bones. This cast was made for Laura Keeney while her arm was healing. To help cheer her up, her friend Zak Kinsella painted her cast in the geekiest way possible.

I guess it was either this or make it look like a Cyberman arm, which would have been equally as cool to look at.

[via Fashionably Geek]

ASUS MeMo Pad HD 7 vs Nexus 7: what you gain and what you lose

This week at Computex, ASUS has revealed the MeMo Pad HD 7, a direct competitor for the Google Nexus 7, both of them working with a 7-inch display and both of them made by the same company. Though it may seem strange at first for ASUS to create a tablet that’s so extremely similar to the machine they’ve got in their deal with Google, the different bits and pieces offered with this new machine may make all the difference. And it all starts with color choices.

topper-580x386

With the ASUS MeMo Pad HD 7, users will get the choice of several different color back panels – yellow, pink, gray, and white are included in this initial release. The Nexus 7 comes in black – or white, if you’ve got the limited edition Google I/O 2012 iteration. If you put color aside, this machine looks so similar to the Nexus 7 that it is, at first, difficult to tell the two apart.

ASUS-MeMO-Pad-HD-7_1

Both devices have the same display size and resolution, 7-inches and 1280 x 800 pixels strong, that being 221 PPI. Both machines work with Android, but the MeMo Pad HD 7 works with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich out of the box with ASUS’ own custom user interface on top.

It’s important to note here that the Nexus 7 benefits from being part of Google’s Nexus program, meaning that it works with Google’s most basic non-skinned version of Android and receives regular updates whenever Google brings new versions of Android to the market. The MeMo Pad HD 7, on the other hand, still works with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich and has no such promise of updates on any schedule.

ASUS-MeMO-Pad-HD-7_2-580x491

The new ASUS tablet works with an unnamed ARM Cortex-A7 quadcore processor while the Nexus 7 employs the NVIDIA Tegra 3 quadcore processor we know to have support from its manufacturer. While for most common users the brand of the processor has little effect on their end experience, here we know the Tegra 4 to be reliable in its ability to conserve battery life (with 4-PLUS-1 technology, that is), and it has a whole dedicated gaming environment to boast in the NVIDIA TegraZone, as well.

One thing the ASUS MeMo Pad HD 7 has that the Nexus 7 doesn’t is a back-facing camera. While the Nexus 7 famously had its camera axed because ASUS said it wasn’t necessary, the MeMo Pad HD 7 works with a 5 megapixel camera on its back and a 1.2 megapixel camera on its front. The Nexus 7 works with just the front-facing camera on its front for selfies and video chat.

3T8A9525-580x3861

The original release of the Nexus 7 was bafflingly cheap when it was launched, but here in 2013 it appears that the price point is ready to drop once again. While you’ll pay $199 USD for the smallest version of the Nexus 7 (small in 16GB of internal storage, that is), the MeMo Pad HD 7 starts at $129 for an 8GB model. There’s also a $149 model incoming with 16GB internal storage, though there’s still a question of availability.

ASUS hasn’t been clear quite yet on where the MeMo Pad HD 7 will be available, while the ASUS-made Google Nexus 7 is available, and has been available for some time, in both the USA and in international markets. Because of this, the question of which machine is better for your living room is academic: you’ve only got one choice (for now).


ASUS MeMo Pad HD 7 vs Nexus 7: what you gain and what you lose is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Intel scores in tablet chips but success may come too late

Chalk up a win or two for Intel, with Computex 2013 Day Zero opening to a number of products with Atom chips where usually we’d expect to see ARM silicon. As expected, Intel’s processors found their way into at least one tablet from Samsung, the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch, but the Atom push also got the CPU into a number of ASUS models too. Question is, has Intel managed to squeeze into the Android tablet market too late?

ASUS MeMO Pad FHD10_3

ASUS’ Transformer Book Trio – which is designed to run both Windows 8 and Android on a hybrid slate that can be docked in ultrabook and desktop hubs – paired an Intel mobile chip with a gruntier Core i7, while the MeMo Pad FHD 10 also spurned ARM for Atom.

Chatter of Clover Trail+ spreading had been bubbling for some weeks, but broke in earnest last Friday when multiple sources claimed Samsung was the big-name push behind broadening its chip suppliers. Intel has long been attempt to coerce manufacturers to consider its processors – even going to far as to take the lead on porting Android to x86 – but uncompetitive power consumption, among other things, kept it pretty much out of the game.

GALAXY Tab 3 10.1 (1)

That’s all changing with the new Atom architecture, it seems. “In order to meet the demand from our vendor/carrier partners and provide a consistent high-quality experience for customers,” Samsung told us today, “Samsung has sourced components, including chipsets, from trusted partners.” The company confirmed that one such “trusted partner” and component was the processor at the heart of the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch.

“Neither Samsung nor ASUS has leapt to Atom wholeheartedly”

Still, it’s worth noting that neither Samsung nor ASUS has leapt to Cover Trail+ wholeheartedly. The Intel-powered machines share press release space with ARM-based tablets; Samsung’s spec sheet, in fact, doesn’t even mention the underlying architecture or chip supplier, only the speed and the number of cores.

It’s a sign, quite possibly, that the tablet processor market is catching up to where the PC processor market reached a few years back. Most modern chips are “good enough” and so the branding advantage of calling out whether your slate runs on Qualcomm silicon, or NVIDIA silicon, or Intel silicon, simply isn’t so pressing as it perhaps once was.

Meanwhile, the days of premium Android tablets are seemingly behind us, for the most part at least. Apple’s iPad mini and Google’s Nexus 7 forced even more drastic cost-cutting so that Acer, ASUS, MSI, Samsung, and others could continue to compete; the MeMo Pad HD 7 (which runs an ARM chip, not an Intel one) for instance comes in at just $129 brand new. It’s questionable whether the slate segment is the same high-appeal category for Intel now that its margins have been eroded away.


Intel scores in tablet chips but success may come too late is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

ARM Cortex-A12 brings big.LITTLE to the mass market in 2014

ARM has revealed its latest processor, the ARM Cortex-A12, packing 40-percent more performance than a Cortex-A9 but with the same power consumption and in a 30-percent smaller package. The big.LITTLE compatible A12 is a 28nm chip that can be paired with ARM’s Cortex-A7 cores, driving the new, more powerful chips when processing grunt is needed, and then turning to the frugal A7′s when prolonging battery life is the priority.

arm_processor

ARM expects the Cortex-A12 to be used in a variety of phones and tablets, but particularly with emphasis on the mid-range. That’s predicted to in fact exceed high-end phones and tablets in numbers by 2015, ARM claims.

cortex-a12

Those mid-tier devices won’t necessarily lack in features. The Cortex-A12 supports up to 1TB of addressable memory, along with the virtualization and AMD TrustZone technologies that will be required for bring-your-own-device (BYOD) business use.

So, the Cortex-A12 will eventually replace the A9, and come with a line of new GPU and video engine to match. The Mali-T622 GPU takes care of the graphics, with support for OpenGL ES 3.0, and with a 50-percent cut in power compared to ARM’s first-gen Mali-T600 chips.

Mali-T622 block diagram

ARM isn’t just leaving the new Mali to creating visuals, though. There’s also a greater emphasis on general computer power this time around, turning the GPU to doing parallel processing as a companion chip to the CPU. The Mali-T622 supports both the Renderscript Android, and OpenCL APIs.

Mali-V500

Finally, there’s the new Mali-V500 video solution, which handles high-definition video. In fact, the Mali-V500 can cope with higher-than-HD: a single core can deliver 1080p/60 encode/decode, while eight cores working together can support Ultra HD at up to 120 frames per second. There’s also hardware support for DRM, as ARM attempts to court Hollywood.

The new ARM Cortex-A12 family – complete with the Mali-T622 and Mali-V500 – will begin shipping in 2014.


ARM Cortex-A12 brings big.LITTLE to the mass market in 2014 is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

ARM unveils Cortex-A12 CPU and Mali-T622 GPU in expectation of a mid-range boom

ARM unveils CortexA12 CPU and MaliT622 GPU in expectation of a midrange boom

Few trend-spotters would disagree with the following prediction from ARM, but it’s worth laying it out anyway: Of the 300 million mobile devices sold in 2010, the majority cost over $400. Within the next two years, however, these “crazy money” products (as a spokesperson described them) may represent just 25 percent of the total mobile market — still huge in absolute terms, since almost two billion phones and tablets are forecast to be sold in 2015, but a distinct minority relative to entry-level and mid-range options.

In an effort to convert these expectations into an even taller heap of gold, ARM has just announced a new mid-range core, the Cortex-A12, which is designed to replace the aging Cortex-A9 while offering a 40 percent boost in performance. This gain will likely come with the added advantage of better battery life, since the Cortex-A12 will initially be fabricated at 28nm instead of 40nm, and will be offered to manufacturers alongside a new Mali GPU (the Mali-T622) and video engine (Mali-V500) that promise further power savings of their own. The Cortex-A12 will also support big.LITTLE configurations, allowing it to be installed alongside Cortex-A7 cores that will take over for low-effort tasks in order make further power savings. Big.LITTLE hasn’t really blown us away so far, at least not on the Octa-core Galaxy S 4, but its wrinkles may well have been ironed out by mid 2014, which is when the Cortex-A12 is due to land. Check out the PR for more technical details on each component.

Richard Lai contributed to this report.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Samsung tipped to bring big.LITTLE ARM power to Chromebook

With the Samsung GALAXY S 4 in consumer hands internationally, fully stocked with Exynos OctaCore processors, so too has a new Chromebook been tipped with the same technology. While the big.LITTLE ARM processor architecture suggested for this next-generation machine has been implemented on the GALAXY S 4 (the international edition, that is) for a split between obvious “big” and “little” tasks, its usage in Chrome may be a bit less obvious. This device could very well be introduced at the June event teased by Samsung as well.

Exynos_5_Octa-577x5001

While the technology used in the Samsung GALAXY S 4 sets “big” tasks as high-powered games, video processing, and GPS tracking, Chrome OS doesn’t generally have such high demands. Low-powered “little” tasks appear much more regularly – messaging, music, and background bits and pieces galore. These low-powered tasks are assigned to lower power cores in the SoC, therefor keeping energy demands as minimal as possible.

arm_big-little

It’s likely that this, not so much the high-powered end of things, would be the main reason a Samsung Exynos 5410 (or something similar) would be used in a Chromebook. The tip sent to MobileGeeks this week suggests this device might never actually come to the market, mind you.

IMG_7020

But consider the possibilities: perhaps this means Samsung will be releasing a device not unlike the Chromebook Pixel, complete with super-high-definition display and touchscreen abilities! It was no small deal when the entirety of Google I/O 2013 was given a Pixel to develop with – Samsung may just be following up with their own high-powered web-based machine soon.


Samsung tipped to bring big.LITTLE ARM power to Chromebook is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Galaxy Tab 3 packs Atom not ARM tip sources as Intel ramps mobile push

Samsung‘s upcoming Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 will use an Atom processor rather than an ARM-based chip, multiple sources claim, marking a high-profile win for Intel and a perhaps surprising move for Samsung, which makes its own Exynos ARM silicon. The new 10.1-inch Android tablet will use a Clover Trail+ processor in at least one of its variants, both Reuters and Korea Times report, with insiders at Samsung and Intel supposedly confirming rumors about the architecture switch that had been circulating for the past weeks.

samsung_galaxy_tab_2_10-1

Although Samsung has already scheduled a standalone event in the UK on June 20, at which the company has promised the reveal of new Galaxy and ATIV hardware, the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 apparently won’t wait that long to break cover. In fact, Samsung is tipped to be unveiling it at Computex, which kicks off on June 4.

Other specifications for the tablet are unclear, though it’s likely to use an LCD display rather than Samsung’s AMOLED panels, based on previous models of the same size.

Initially, speculation that Samsung would look to Intel’s chips was met with some degree of skepticism, not least because Samsung has its own chip production facility. The company’s Exynos processors have already been used in numerous Samsung products, leading to questions as to why the brand might dilute its “home supplier” advantage.

According to the Korea Times, however, the deal with Intel is part of Samsung’s strategy to hedge its bets on chip supply. “Samsung wants to secure as many processors as possible at better pricing” an unnamed member of Samsung’s research team told the Korean source. “That’s why Samsung Electronics has recently been diversifying its procurement channel in processor chips as a strategy to stabilize production yields of its in-house Exynos-branded processors.”

samsung_exynos

Intel, for its part, has apparently been more than willing to accommodate Samsung casting a broader net for its processor supplies. The x86 company has supposedly offered highly competitive prices for the Atom CPUs, and has reportedly increased its Atom chip specialists based at Intel Korea eightfold, to more than 50, in the space of a year.

“Most of them are working for Samsung-related projects with a mission to customize circuits for adaptation on Samsung products” an unnamed Intel source suggested.

Intel has had some quiet successes with its Android-on-x86 push, including the Motorola RAZR i launched last year, which impressed with its performance even if sales didn’t quite compete with other high-profile handsets. The company has previously confirmed its goal to take a bigger bite of the mobility pie, aiming to undermine ARM’s success in the smartphone and tablet industry, though difficulties achieving the same degree of power efficiency and performance have undermined Atom chips.

VIA: Engadget; Android Beat


Galaxy Tab 3 packs Atom not ARM tip sources as Intel ramps mobile push is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.