The Four DSLR Cameras for Every Budget

We’re in kind of a golden age of DSLR cameras. They’re cheaper than ever, so they’re affordable, and they do more stuff than ever, so the time’s right to jump in. Here’s our DSLR picks for every (non-pro) budget.

Baby’s First DSLR: Nikon D3000

The D3000 is cheap. We’re talking a full kit (i.e., it comes with a lens) for just $460, making it the cheapest DSLR kit around. But what really makes it stand out for beginners is a built-in tutorial system that explains how to get certain kinds of shots—like shallow depth of field—in plain English.

Amateur Hour: Canon T1i

The next step up is Canon’s T1i. What we like is that it packs a bigger boy’s image sensor—it’s got the same 15-megapixel sensor as the pricier mid-range 50D—and 1080p video into a camera that’s $720 with kit lens. Also, for the money, it edges out Nikon’s D5000 on a few points, namely superior video handling and Live View.

Bigger Britches: Nikon D90

Nikon’s D90 was the first ever DSLR to shoot 720p video with manual controls, but that’s only part of the reason we like it. It’s got the awesome image sensor from the semi-pro D300, in a package that’s just over $1000. And at that price, it’s $100 cheaper than Canon’s competing 50D, which has the same image sensor as the cheaper T1i above, but none of the video benefits of either camera.

The Budding Auteur: Canon 7D

The only camera on this list that’s more expensive than its competition—the D300s—the 7D overwhelms with DSLR video that’s superior to every camera but Canon’s very pro 1D Mark IV (which costs $5000). It shoots in 1080p, with full manual controls, and it’s amazing what it can do in low light. Besides that, Canon’s somehow cheated physics with an 18-megapixel sensor that doesn’t explode with noise at high ISO settings, all while cramming a whole bunch of new features, and an actually good autofocus system. It’s $1900 with a kit lens.

Beyond here, honestly, you should already have a pretty idea of what you’re gonna buy without our help. And if you’ve got your own opinions about what’s best in every price range, let’s hear ’em in the comments.

Amazing Software Turns Cheap Webcam Into Instant 3D Scanner

3d-cam-stages

It’s called ProFORMA, or Probabilistic Feature-based On-line Rapid Model Acquisition, but it is way cooler than it sounds. The software, written by a team headed by Qui Pan, a student at the Department of Engineering at Cambridge University in England, turns a regular, cheap webcam into a 3D scanner.

Normally, scanning in 3D requires purpose-made gear and time. ProFORMA lets you rotate any object in front of the camera and it scans it in real time, building a fully 3D texture mapped model as fast as you can turn an object. Even more impressive is what happens after the scan: The camera continues to track the objsct in space and matches it’s movement instantly with the on-screen model. Here’s a video of it in action:

It works by generating a 3D point cloud from the image coming through the camera and then uses some clever math to both ignore the occasional occlusion of the model by a hand and to work out where the surfaces are. Then things go over my head, involving a process called Delaunay tetrahedralisation to turn the 2D surfaces into a 3D model.

Like I said: clever math. But imagine, for a second, the uses. Forget Nintendo’s Mii avatars, for instance. Instead you could make a 3D version of yourself, or add your favorite household items into a game of Mario Kart. You could quite possibly hook this rig up to a 3D printer and make fast facsimiles of almost anything. And remember, this is all done using a single camera, just like the one that’s probably staring from the top of your laptop screen as you read this. I want to play with this right now.

ProFORMA product page [Cambridge University via Core77 via BoingBoing]


DIY iPhone Macro Lens Carousel

fx1q6dkg1bbc52ymedium

The first two iPhones had terrible cameras, something Apple fixed with the 3GS. Those of us who like to complain can still find fault with the lack of an optical zoom lens. Those who don’t just whine go out and fix this for themselves.

Instructables member T-skware did just that, grabbing the lid of an old pickle jar, some lenses ripped from the eye-sockets of donor cameras, a suction cup and sundry old computer and Walkman parts. With these he made a suck-on carousel of macro lenses which will magnify close-up shots taken with the iPhone. He didn’t stop there: In the center of the spinning lens-disk is an LED lamp powered by a 3V battery. The results obtained by shooting through this lens setup won’t replace you DSLR macro setup, but then, it is also essentially free (apart from the iPhone of course).

If you want to make your own, head over to the step by step instructions. You don’t even need an iPhone: With a few tweaks this should work with any cellphone cam.

iPhone Magnifying Camera Mod [Instructables]

See Also:


Cisco: New Wi-Fi Flip Camera Early Next Year

If you thought “huh?” when network supremo Cisco bought out Pure Digital – the maker of the Flip camera – earlier this year, then we at last have some reason for the purchase. A spokesman from Cisco has confirmed that a new Flip will go on sale early in 2010, and that it will have Wi-Fi built in.

This is such a perfect fit it seems obvious. The Flip’s main rival as we see it is the iPhone 3GS, which can shoot video and upload it, all without a computer. Adding Wi-Fi transfer claws back one bullet point on the spec sheet.

The same source, speaking to the Pocket Lint blog, says that the screen will not feature touch, but will move, sliding back to “reveal the record and menu buttons underneath.” This will, presumably, mean a bigger screen than the current 2-inch LCD on the top-end Flip Ultra HD, which happily co-exists with the buttons by its side. We’d also guess that there will be some editing abilities, like the iPhone, so that you can trim and tuck your clips before sending them off to YouTube.

This is what competition does, folks. Fear of death breeds innovation, and we, the customers, are the winners. Good old market Darwinism.

Next-gen Flip camcorder to boast Wi-Fi [Pocket Lint]

Photo credit: Jon Snyder for Wired.com


Ruggedized Casio Camera Is As Tough As it Looks

casio_exg11

Casio has realized that a ruggedized camera should look tough. Normally these kinds of shock-resistant, waterproof, dustproof machines come in big, bubble-shaped, brightly colored cases. The Exilim EX-G1, though, looks like a stealth fighter with knobs on.

So how tough is it? You can shoot for an hour at ten feet below the water, use it in cold weather down to -10ºC (14ºF), bounce it from seven feet (in tests it survived drops from 26 different angles) and generally treat it like Joe Pesci treats everyone in Casino, only it won’t die.

The camera is split into inner and outer sections, like a Casio G-Shock watch. The sealed inner part contains the electronics, and the outer part has extra sealing. The lens, for example, has a reinforced glass cover and a resin ring to absorb shocks. This all houses a 12 megapixel sensor, a 2.5-inch screen, a 38-114mm (35 mm equivalent) zoom lens and an 848×480 movie-mode. It’s enough to drive a man to violence.

Available December in black or red, for $300.

Casio EX-G1 press release [Photography Bay]


Hands-On With The Orbis Ring Flash Adapter

orbis

In our recent ring flash roundup, Wired.com photographer Jon Snyder took a combination of self-powered units and adapters through their paces. Soon after, the folks at Orbis got in touch, wondering why we had left their flash-adapter out. I told them to send one over.

The best part about a ring-flash adapter, like the Orbis or the Ray Flash that Jon reviewed, is that you just pop in your existing strobe and its light is reflected around a series of tubes to emerge in the trademark circle of flat light. This keeps down both cost and weight, and means that you can use your fancy, expensive speedlight on full auto, making great pictures easy to get.

It also means that the adapters are huge. Baseball-mitt huge. The Orbis isn’t going to fit in any normal sized camera bag. The reason is that the hollow tubes need to be a lot wider than an actual light-tube, otherwise they would just suck up the light and offer no more sparkle than a candle behind a dirty window. The Orbis, though, takes advantage of this bulk by keeping the neck – where the flash slides in – big too. My tests were all performed with a Nikon SB900, a (literal) giant amongst strobes, and while the fit was snug, it was certainly viable. For smaller units, there are some stick-on rubber pads in the box.

I slid in the flash, switched it on and… Damn, I didn’t have a cable. Because of the design, the flash unit can’t be mounted on the camera’s hot-shoe, so you’ll need a cable to fire it. This can be a very expensive cable that also sends all the automatic functions between the devices, or a cheap PC cord. I wanted auto, but I didn’t want to spend $60 on a wire. Surely I could use the built-in wireless functions of my flash and camera?

It turns out that I was in luck. The Nikon D700 talks to the SB900 through a series of quick, coded pre-flashes from its built-in speedlight. Even with the gun held up and to the side of the camera body, the flash fired fine, every single time.

The Orbis itself does suck out some light, but as ring flashes are used on-axis and pointed straight at the subject without using diffusors or reflectors, there was plenty of light left to do the job. I have used it on a few product shots over the last few weeks (the Surly bike wrench and the Brooks saddle, for instance) and I love it. Combined with the camera’s automatic mode it’s easy to dial the effect up and down, and once you get going, you learn to hold the unit and let it take the weight of the camera. It’s still bulky, and there is an optional bracket to clamp it to your camera, but you can get used to it.

And that’s really it. If you want to experiment with ring-flash, and you already have a strobe, this is a fairly cheap way to do it — $200 might not sound so cheap, but when you start pricing up the alternatives, you’ll see what we mean.

Will I buy one? I love the effect, and the Orbis is easy to use. But now I have the taste for it, I’d actually consider some of those more expensive dedicated units. They might not work on full-auto, but they will fit in my camera bag.

Orbis product page [Orbis]

Roundup: Ring Flashes [Gadget Lab]

See Also:


Ultimate Pocket Camcorder Comparison

Pocket camcorders are a hot holiday gift, but due to their nearly identical feature sets, it can be tough to tell which is best—so I tested seven of these humble unitaskers to make your decision easier. You’re welcome.

Pocket camcorders (AKA mini cams or budget cams, or sometimes Flip cams after the pioneer of the category) are simple gadgets. They’ve got one job to do: Shoot watchable video, often for uploading to streaming video sites. They’re also very close to the end of their lifespan, with perhaps only a year or so left before smartphones make them obsolete, but right now they’re the easiest and cheapest way to take quick and dirty video. I tested seven of these diminutive camcorders, or more accurately six camcorders and one capable PMP, in five categories: Outdoor, indoor, low light, macro, and sound.

The criteria for judging fell mostly to smoothness of video during motion, image sharpness, noise, and color reproduction. Specs like storage capacity, screen size and battery life are mostly the same across the board, although overall, compared to last year, this crop of mini cams are faster and stronger, with beefed up memory and HD sensors. All save the iPod Nano take 720p video (or better) and add HDMI ports and more memory to accommodate the higher-quality footage. Yet I wasn’t really all that thrilled with any of the camcorders—the bar for these cams is so low you could trip over it, and several of them actually did. Battery life was disappointing across the board, as none could break two hours of filming. Anyway, on to the results!

Results

Choosing between the Kodak Zi8, Flip Mino HD and Flip Ultra HD is tricky. The Zi8 is unreliable, but when it’s good it’s unbelievably good; the Mino HD is diminutive, solid and stylish, but overpriced and with lousy touch controls; and the Ultra HD is a reliably good shooter with a low price and the best controls of all, but physically unappealing (read: fat as hell). In my opinion, you should never judge a book by its obese cover, so the champion is…the Flip Ultra HD!

Flip Ultra HD: First Place


Flip’s Ultra HD is the best overall choice. It’s one of the cheapest cams around (at $150, it’s $70 less than it’s younger brother, the Mino HD), but it tied for the highest score in our lineup, and it features nice tactile controls that I much prefer to the sleeker Mino HD’s touch-sensitive exercise in frustration. Unfortunately, the Dom DeLuise HD is upsettingly fat—about twice as thick as the Mino HD, but even that doesn’t really get across how truly large it feels in the hand. It’s not particularly heavy, but it is by a long shot the thickest pocket cam here. On the plus side, that girth hides a useful battery—Flip includes a rechargeable pack, but the John Candy HD can also use two AA batteries, which is great since pocket cams have generally abysmal battery life (usually about an hour, though of course they’re often rated for double or triple that). Replaceable, cheap batteries are really nice, but some will have to decide whether the William Howard Taft HD’s girth is worth that feature. Given its price, I think it is.

Video quality is just fine, above average if not particularly impressive on every test, and it, like the Mino HD, is extremely user-friendly. Although that simplicity yields less flexibility and a barebones feature set compared to the Kodak Zi8, it’s a good distillation of the aims of pocket camcorders, and its 100% tactile controls are a welcome change from the Mino HD. If you’re not superficial, it’s a very smart buy.

Flip Mino HD: Second Place


Flip’s Mino HD is the best-looking and best-feeling camcorder I tried. Its aluminum body feels solid and expensive, which might be because it is—at $230, it’s the priciest camcorder I tested. But I wouldn’t be surprised if it sells the best, even though it’s not the greatest deal, because it looks (and is) simple, cute, and functional. I won’t rehash my review, except to say that I hate those goddamn touch buttons more and more every time I use the Mino HD. They’re incredibly sensitive and I guarantee that you will accidentally trigger the playback function more times than you can count.

Besides that, it’s totally serviceable: It did well on all of my tests, it’s thoughtfully designed and stupid-easy to use. But it’s definitely overpriced, and I have a hard time recommending it over its physically awkward yet substantially cheaper older brother, the Ultra HD, just for its looks.

Kodak Zi8: Third Place


Wider and taller than the Flip Ultra HD, though not nearly as fat, the Zi8 packs a 1080p sensor and the largest and best screen of the bunch. The controls are easy and tactile and aside from flimsy-feeling plastic covers over the ports (one of mine already fell off), the hardware is high-quality. The Zi8 snagged the bronze medal, because while its highs were higher than either of the Flips, its lows were lower—and given how focused and simple this type of gadget is, reliability is worth more than flashing moments of greatness.

The Zi8 absolutely rocked in two of my tests, outdoor and macro, with perfect color reproduction and excellent clarity, and it even takes pretty decent still photos (think point-and-shoot circa 2006 quality). But the conditions need to be just right to get the most out of this guy—I first tried it in 1080p mode (neither of the Flips can break 720p) and while picture quality was amazing, scenes with lots of motion were pretty jerky to the point of being distracting. But even in 720p, it was still head-and-shoulders above the competition—but only in outdoor and macro testing. In the indoor test it proved to have difficulty focusing on objects closer than 10 feet but farther than 2 feet away, and low light shooting was distinctly tinted red and a bit dark. It wasn’t unusable in any test (unlike the similarly uneven Creative Vado HD) and at $180 it’s fairly priced, so I’d still recommend it—but you and I are likely to be more forgiving of the Zi8’s flaws than, say, your mom, who just wants a camera that works pretty well all the time. For her, go for a Flip.

The Rest

The Creative Vado HD scored pretty high, only a point lower than the bronze medalist Kodak Zi8, but while its design is fairly middle-of-the-road (albeit nice and teeny), its abilities were all over the place. It was one of the worst in standard daytime shooting (it has a hard time with sunlight, a serious problem for a pocket cam) and macro, but was the best at indoor, and while its low light video was a little dark, it was the clearest and smoothest of the lot. It also, likely due to Creative’s background in stellar-sounding PMPs and sound cards, boasts excellent sound quality. At $150, it’s very fairly priced, but I can’t recommend a camcorder that mangles sunlight the way the Vado does.

Apple’s iPod Nano is the only “camcorder” in this roundup to peak at VGA resolution, and aside from a surprisingly strong macro performance, it shows. It turned vibrant colors dull and lifeless, washed out detail and made everything seem darker than it was. It can’t compete with the Zi8s and Flips of the world, but it’s still usable and incredibly priced at $150/$180 for 8GB/16GB—if you’ve got a Nano already, you probably won’t need a dedicated cam. Convergence killed the video star, I guess.

The JVC Picsio GC-FM1 sucked. It’s spectacularly ugly (think Ed Hardy-inspired) and cheap-feeling, with a confusing button layout (unforgivable in a pocket cam) and a high price ($200, or $178 at Amazon). Besides all that, it scored poorly in every one of our tests. Avoid.

And finally, the worst—Aiptek’s PenCam HD. I wanted to like it, I really did—it’s got a tongue-depressor-like design and came with a sweet tripod that attaches to a bicycle’s handlebars—but it bombed in almost every one of my tests. The 1.1-inch screen is nearly unusable and battery life barely topped 40 minutes, so it’s definitely the loser here.

Here’s a giant gallery of all 28 videos I took.

Don Nguyen assisted with this Battlemodo.

Leica M7 Hermes, a $14,000 Film Camera

leica-m7_hermes

Leica’s latest price-pumped promo comes in the form of the M7 Hermes Very Special Limited Edition, a calfskin-clad version of its M-series 35mm film camera. It will cost you £8550, or almost $14,400.

Just 200 will be made, in two colors. One, “etoupe”, is just brown and soft. The the other is orange. Make no mistake — these are collector’s cameras, and should never be removed from the box. As such they are labeled with a serial number between one and two hundred.

If you do dare to run a film through the camera, you can shoot with the supplied Leica Summilux-M 35 mm ƒ1.4 ASPH and ratchet the film through the gate at a teeth rattling pace with the Leicavit M rapid winder, a mechanism which clamps onto the bottom and lets you wind-on with a lever, and is also included in the kit.

A few other tweaks have been added, lest you think you’re not getting your money’s worth: the red logo is now black, to avoid unsightly color clashes, and the red “auto” on the control dial now matches the leather cladding. Finally, Leica has thrown in a matching leather strap and a lens hood to sweeten the deal.

Available in the UK from December. And yes, it is on my Christmas list.

Leica M7 Edition “Hermes” announced [Pocket Lint]


BigShot Kit Camera, Like Crack for Kids

mr-bigshot1

What do these phrases mean to you? “Circuit board”, “gearbox”, “dynamo and battery”? If your answer is “digital camera” then you are either cheating or you already know about the BigShot, a kit camera designed to let kids learn about digicams by building one.

The BigShot, still in testing, is a super-simple digicam from the Computer Vision Lab at Columbia University. It comes in parts, ready to be assembled (by kids, but I can’t wait to get my hands on one), and teaches you along the way how these things work. It’s not quite the transparent view you get from making an old analog camera, where you can see how everything works, but it’s as close as you can get from a machine that uses circuit boards.

The feature set itself is interesting enough. The BigShot is powered by a single AA battery, or by spinning a crank (4-6 rotations will provide enough power for one shot). The flash is made up of LEDs, and there is no removable memory card — instead you just hook up the camera to a computer via USB.

The lens arrangement is the best part, though. An array of options is laid out on a dial, which is rotated into position, much like the elements on a microscope. Matched pairs sit opposite each other on the circle, so you look through one (there is nor screen on the back) and take a picture through it’s partner. Lens choices are “normal” (a 43º field of view), “panoramic”, which appears to act likE an anamorphic lens, squishing the scene horizontally to be stretched back out in the accompanying BigShot software, and “Stereo Prism”, which splits an image into stereo pairs, again for processing later.

One oddity, caused by the lack of a screen, is that you can only delete the last photo you took: this is done by turning the control dial to the trashcan icon and pressing the shutter. We actually like this setup: along with the limited (and unspecified) amount of on-board memory and the lack of an image review function is that you will shoot like you did with film — every frame is precious and everything comes as a surprise when you finally get to see the photos.

As a non mass market educational aid, it’s sure to be too expensive. But perhaps, if sold as a toy, or advertised as a low-tech camera, kind of a digital Lomo, it could take off. I’m all over this, and if it comes in at under $100 I’ll be grabbing one for myself and my nephew, who doesn’t have enough geek influences in his life.

Project page [BigShot via Make]


Eye-Fi Geeks Out with Direct FTP Transfers

homepg-wifi-eyefi

Eye-Fi has added a small, nerdy, but significant new feature to its Wi-Fi-enabled SD memory cards: FTP transfers. While beaming your photos straight to a sharing site such as Flickr is a very sweet trick, not everyone wants to send pictures direct to the web without editing them first. Adding FTP uploads gives the benefits of instant (ish), off-site backup, but keeps things private.

Imagine that you are taking photos in a sensitive area: a civil protest, or perhaps in a country at war. Now you could have your photos sent off-site as you take them (if there’s no Wi-Fi, you can use a Mi-Fi) and kept safe, even if somebody confiscates your camera and card.

The new FTP feature can be turned on by using your Eye-Fi Manager application, and works with any of the wireless cards: the Share Video, Explore Video and Pro. You can upload via FTP and FTPS, and right now just JPEG and video files are supported (no RAW). It’s free for current users, so what’s not to like?

How to upload photos and videos to an FTP server [Eye-Fi]

See Also: