Jury Orders Samsung To Pay An Additional $290 Million To Apple

Jury Orders Samsung To Pay An Additional $290 Million To AppleBack in 2012, Apple won a lawsuit against Samsung which saw damages of $1 billion that could potentially have been awarded to Apple. However it was later ruled that this was a miscalculation of $400 million, which is why Apple and Samsung are back in the courts again where both sides are arguing for more/less money. Well it looks like a middle ground had been reached as the jury has since decided that Samsung owes Apple an extra $290 million for infringing upon their patents.

Apple had expected to get $379 million, while Samsung estimated that they owed maybe an extra $52 million. Safe to say neither side got what they wanted, although in Samsung’s case it seems like this is definitely more than what they had originally hoped to pay. In total, along with the damages awarded from the original trial, it has been reported that Samsung now owes Apple $640 million in damages. We expect Samsung will attempt to appeal this, but as to whether their appeal will be successful or not remains to be seen. Either way it looks like this patent war between Apple and Samsung is far from over, and we can expect it to roll over in 2014 and maybe even further into the future.

  • Follow: Apple, , ,
  • Jury Orders Samsung To Pay An Additional $290 Million To Apple original content from Ubergizmo.

        



    Apple vs Samsung patent trial verdict sees $290 million for the former

    A new verdict has been reached in the Apple vs Samsung case, a verdict which has awarded the former with $290 million in damages vs the latter. This is the latest in the ongoing battle between Apple and Samsung over patent issues surrounding devices such as the iPhone and the Samsung Galaxy S. Earlier last […]

    Nintendo receives death and bomb threats, man arrested in Japan

    The console wars have always been heated, but at least one person appears to have taken them entirely too seriously. Though he hasn’t been publicly named, the Sankei News is reporting that early this year, Nintendo received death threats against two of its executives, something that was later followed with bomb threats against the company’s […]

    Gaming company slapped with fine over secret bitcoin mining

    E-Sports Entertainment Association, otherwise known as the ESEA, was fined a total of $1 million due to secret bitcoin mining software that resulted in gamers’ unknowing harvesting the digital currency. The work was said to be the result of a single employee who went rogue and was later fired, but that didn’t stop legal actions […]

    Obama Administration Tries to Ban Phone Unlocking, Claims to Support It

    Obama Administration Tries to Ban Phone Unlocking, Claims to Support It

    Slate is reporting that, while the Obama administration has long been making noises about trying to support phone unlocking, it’s also been busy readying legislation that would actually ban the practice.

    Read more…


        



    Samsung Could Have Their Products Banned After All

    Samsung Could Have Their Products Banned After AllApple and Samsung are currently fighting it out in the courts (still) over how much Samsung’s damages to the Cupertino company should be, but it seems that Samsung might have more to worry about than just money. According to the Wall Street Journal, they have reported that the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, they state that judge who made the original ruling against the ban of Samsung’s products, Judge Lucy Koh, should reconsider her ruling and recommends that she “spend more time considering evidence offered by the iPhone maker to support arguments that Apple is being irreparably harmed by Samsung’s patent infringement.”

    Back in 2012, Apple appealed to have up to 8 Samsung products banned due to alleged patent infringement. These products included older models, such as the Samsung Galaxy S2 and the Droid Charge being some of them. At this point in time it’s safe to say that even if the courts were to agree to ban these products, it would not hurt Samsung much financially, although it would set a legal precedent that Apple could use in the future against Samsung’s newer phones. Will the ruling be changed and could we see the ban actually enforced? We guess we will just have to wait and see, and just when we thought the patent war between the companies had started to die down as well!

  • Follow: CellPhones, , ,
  • Samsung Could Have Their Products Banned After All original content from Ubergizmo.

        



    Samsung device bans reconsidered in Apple patent case

    A ruling has been passed down today by an appeals court which says U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh must spend more time considering evidence offered by Apple in arguments that certain Samsung devices should be banned from sale. In this ruling, the appeals court currently working on the case agreed unanimously that Koh “made errors” […]

    Google and Microsoft clamp down on child exploitation search

    Google and Microsoft have reworked their search algorithms to make child abuse content harder to find, though some experts still argue that it will make little difference to those who actually hunt out the illegal imagery. Announced at a UK internet safety summit, the new search code has apparently already removed around 100,000 Google results […]

    Phil Schiller Thinks Samsung’s Alleged Copying Tarnished Apple’s Image

    Phil Schiller Thinks Samsungs Alleged Copying Tarnished Apples ImageThe original beef Apple and Samsung had with each other was over the design of the Samsung Galaxy S, the first of Samsung’s Galaxy S series of Android devices in which Apple accused Samsung of stealing the iPhone’s design. While that might be arguable, it seems that Apple’s Phil Schiller believes that the copying was so severe that he believes it actually made customers question Apple’s practices as a whole. Speaking during the Apple versus Samsung damages retrial, when asked by an Apple attorney as to what he thought upon first seeing the Samsung Galaxy S, Schiller was quoted as saying, “I was quite shocked. They went and copied the iPhone.”

    Schiller goes on to state that by copying Apple’s work, it has “weakened” the way everyone in the world views Apple as a company, and has gotten people to question the company’s innovativeness and design skills “in a way that people never used to”. Those are some pretty fanciful words but we expect nothing less coming from Apple’s Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing. What do you guys think? Do you agree with Schiller that Samsung’s products have made Apple fans question the company’s innovativeness and design? Or do you think that he’s kind of blowing things out of proportion?

  • Follow: Apple, , ,
  • Phil Schiller Thinks Samsung’s Alleged Copying Tarnished Apple’s Image original content from Ubergizmo.

        



    Google seeing more government requests than ever before

    Google released their latest Transparency Report today. This marks the eighth such report, with the seventh having come back in late-April. That last report brought mention of a record high number of government requests and this time around the report is arriving with a similar description. Details coming from Google point towards how “requests from […]