Hasta La Gadget!

Google CEO Larry Page and Chief Legal Officer David Drummond made a general call for more transparency in their response to the PRISM revelations last week, and Drummond has gotten quite a bit more specific with that request today. In a post on the company’s Public Policy blog, he says that he’s sent a letter to offices of the Attorney General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation asking that Google be allowed to publish aggregate numbers of the national security requests for data it receives, including FISA disclosures, “in terms of both the number we receive and their scope.” Those numbers, he says, “would clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made,” adding, “Google has nothing to hide.” You can find the full letter at the source link below.

Update: Reuters is reporting that Microsoft also wants Uncle Sam to loosen up and let it be more transparent with the “volume and scope” of national security requests and FISA orders. “Our recent report went as far as we legally could and the government should take action to allow companies to provide additional transparency,” Ballmer and Co. added.

Update 2: Hot off the heels of Redmond’s call to the US government, Facebook is voicing similar sentiments regarding increased transparency. “We urge the United States government to help make that possible by allowing companies to include information about the size and scope of national security requests we receive,” read a statement released by the social network.

Filed under: Internet, Microsoft, Google

Comments

Source: Google Public Policy Blog, Reuters (1), (2)

The Obama administration and NSA have been under extreme public fire lately after a report by The Washington Post revealed a project called PRISM, which snowballed into a variety of other leaks and such that revealed what we already knew: the government is spying on Internet users. In retaliation, an Internet trolling operation has been

Read The Full Story

Sure, there are already plenty of cool options when it comes to encrypted flash drives, but what about one that uses NFC on your Android or even Windows 8 device to unlock it? PQI showed us one such implementation at Computex. Essentially, this NFC flash drive requires an NFC-enabled device to toggle its access mode: full access, read-only, one-time access (and remains hidden afterwards) or hidden. All you have to do is choose the desired mode in the app, type in your preset password, and then tap the flash drive (even when unplugged) with your device to change the former’s setting — provided that the password matches, of course.

Since the encryption is done on the storage controller level, the computer’s drive utility wouldn’t be able to see the dongle at all if it’s hidden, so you wouldn’t even be able to format it unless you unlock it or, well, physically destroy it. And that could be anywhere from 8GB all the way up to 64GB of storage space, when the drive launches in Q4 this year.

Filed under: Storage

Comments

Leaks, denials and declassifications aside, one thing has been clear recently: the National Security Agency takes in a lot of data — allegedly collecting call logs, internet records and even Facebook photos from folks all over the world. So, how does the outfit handle all this data? With custom software, of course. According to documents obtained by The Guardian, the NSA sorts through its treasure-trove of intelligence with a tool called Boundless Informant, data mining software that helps the NSA sort out how closely they’re monitoring a given part of the world.

According to the documents, Boundless Informant reportedly “allows users to select a country on a map and view the metadata volume and select details about the collections against that country.” A screenshot found by The Guardian shows this in action, highlighting over two billion reports in the United States alone. According to the outlet, the screenshot also outs the program’s heaviest hitters: in March of 2013, Boundless Informant boasted 14 billion reports from Iran, 13.5 billion from Pakistan and 12.7 billion from Jordan. We’ve got to hand it to the NSA — we may not like what it’s up to, but at least it’s organized.

Filed under: Internet

Comments

Source: The Guardian

After details of a government program called PRISM with alleged hooks into the servers of major internet companies became public this week, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper decided it was necessary to reveal even more information. According to his statement, clearing up the “significant misimpressions” and “inaccuracies” requires the release of further classified info, included in a fact sheet listed after the break. So what is PRISM, according to the “Facts on Collection of Information Pursuant to Section 702”?

It is an internal government computer system used to facilitate the government’s statutorily authorized collection of foreign intelligence information from electronic communication service providers under court supervision…This authority was created by the Congress and has been widely known and publicly discussed since its inception in 2008.

In short, Section 702 facilitates the targeted acquisition of foreign intelligence information concerning foreign targets located outside the United States under court oversight. Service providers supply information to the Government when they are lawfully required to do so.

The document claims PRISM is not an “undisclosed collection or data mining program.” The above passages seemingly align with statements (including one today from Yahoo) from the companies listed claiming that they only respond to inquiries when required to by law. It goes on to offer some details on the process used to identify foreign targets (“Section 702 cannot be used to intentionally target any U.S. citizen, or any other U.S. person, or to intentionally target any person known to be in the United States”) and the oversight involved. Specifically mentioned is the involvement of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of the federal government. Additionally, another report from The Guardian exposes more internal documents that contradict the theory that PRISM involves access to “cable intercepts,” although that can occur under a different process.

Filed under: Apple, Microsoft, Google, Verizon

Comments

Source: Director of National Intelligence, PRISM Fact Sheet (PDF)