Grasshopper Rocket Successfully Takes Off And Lands Vertically


There are some things in the world of science fiction that has proven to be difficult, nay, impossible to reconcile with real world physics. Ever wondered how space being a vacuum, is still capable of transporting sound such as screams and laser blasts when we watch epic space battles in the movies? How about all of those weirdly shaped ships that would be physically impossible to take off, let alone land, and yet they do so with relative ease? Well, the Grasshopper rocket that you see in action in the video above is definitely something else, as the 10-story high test rocket successfully completed its first test flight as part of the Space X project, taking off from a test field in Texas, maneuvering itself sideways and staying in place in the air 250 meters from ground level, before making a safe return to the launch platform by touching down vertically, too – thanks to its quartet of hydraulic-controlled steel and aluminum landing legs.

While the Grasshopper rocket’s sideslip was just 100m, the successful vertical takeoff and landing test showed the world of its capability to balance and conduct precise movements. Would this be the start of a new class of rockets that do not need to burn-up in the atmosphere upon re-entry?

  • Follow: Gadgets, rocket, ,
  • Grasshopper Rocket Successfully Takes Off And Lands Vertically original content from Ubergizmo.

        



    NASA halts efforts to repair Kepler space telescope

    Kepler calls it quits: NASA halts efforts to repair damaged space telescope

    It’s had a good run, but it seems like NASA’s Kepler telescope is down for the count — the space agency says it has stopped repair efforts. The 0.95 meter diameter space telescope launched four years ago, tasked with seeking out Earth-sized planets suitable for habitation. All was going well until the rig’s gyroscopic reaction wheels began to fail, robbing it of the precision aim needed to continue its task. After months of testing, NASA has concluded that it won’t be able to restore the telescope to full working order.

    That doesn’t mean the mission is at an end, however — NASA still has to sort troves of previously collected data, thumbing through over 3,500 exoplanet candidates to add to the 135 celestial bodies Kepler has already identified. The hardware may one day see a second life too, as engineers attempt to assess what can be done with the remaining two reaction wheels and the telescope’s attitude control thrusters. Without significant (and now abandoned) repair efforts, Kepler will never be precise enough to continue its primary mission, but NASA is hopeful it will eventually find a new purpose.

    Filed under:

    Comments

    Watch a Star Explode, Live, Right Here Right Now

    Seems like whenever a star is discovered, it’s just a countdown until the inevitable crash and burn. It happened to Lindsay Lohan and Macaulay Culkin, and tonight it’s happening to the just-spotted star Nova Del 2013. Located yesterday by an amateur astronomer, the erupting white dwarf is getting brighter and hotter as it heads for a violent nova explosion, and Slooh Space Camera is livestreaming the whole stellar meltdown.

    Read more…


        



    The Mysterious Magnetar WIth an Insanely Strong Magnetic Field

    The Mysterious Magnetar WIth an Insanely Strong Magnetic Field

    A team of scientists using the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton space telescope have discovered a weird dead star , which hides one of the strongest magnetic fields in the Universe.

    Read more…


        



    How the Speed of Light was First Measured

    How the Speed of Light was First Measured

    The speed of light in a vacuum stands at “exactly 299,792,458 metres per second“. The reason today we can put an exact figure on it is because the speed of light in a vacuum is a universal constant that has been measured with lasers; and when an experiment involves lasers, it’s hard to argue with the results. As to why it comes out somewhat conspicuously as a whole number, this is no coincidence- the length of metre is defined using this constant: “the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second.”

    Read more…


        



    Made In Space, Makers Of The Only 3D Printer In Orbit, Answer Some Pressing Questions About Manufacturing And Yoda

    made-in-space-zero-gravity

    This week we learned that NASA was sending its own 3D printer into space to support the astronauts on the International Space Station. But NASA didn’t build the printer. Instead they farmed it out to a company called Made In Space, a startup focused on making a solid, space-ready 3D printer that can survive the vast darkness of the cosmos.

    That company has a great sense of humor and wanted to talk a little bit more about their product and the printer. In fact, they explained that they are currently working on a closed loop system that would allow the astronauts to reuse plastic over and over again in the printer. I spoke with the founders of Made In Space, Aaron Kemmer, Jason Dunn, and Mike Chen, about their new product and what it feels like to be the first additive manufacturing company to send their product into orbit.

    TC: Let’s start with this question… How can you be sure the printer won’t become sentient and lock the pod bay doors?

    Made In Space: I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t answer that.

    TC: Tell us about the printer. Why is it special?

    MIS: Our printer will be the first device to ever manufacture anything off of the Earth.

    This milestone is significant because up until now, everything that is needed in space must be made on Earth and then launched to space, which is an incredibly expensive and time-consuming process. This is a tremendous impediment to progress in the space industry, and is also one of the primary factors that makes space missions so risky. You really need to plan for every contingency ahead of time.

    In 2014, When our 3D printer starts manufacturing parts on-demand in space, NASA and other space entities will have the capability to repair their space missions on the fly if something goes wrong.

    Astronauts will be able to create new parts as-needed on the station in a matter of minutes or hours, instead of waiting months to years for the needed parts to arrive on station. This will speed up development time, accelerate the innovation cycle, and increase the safety of space missions.

    TC: Why didn’t you just buy a Makerbot and fly it into space?

    MIS: When we started to bring additive manufacturing to space, we originally looked at adapting commercial off-the-shelf 3D printers. In 2011, we conducted in-depth testing of off-the-shelf 3D printers in microgravity. The results of our testing clearly indicated that no 3D printers designed for terrestrial use were fit for the space environment.

    There are quite a number of significant differences between a 3D printer designed for use on Earth and one that is fit for use in space. We have had the good fortune of working with and employing quite a few highly experienced aerospace engineers with extensive experience creating space-ready hardware.

    Not only does the printer need to work in extended microgravity, but it needs to be capable of surviving the extreme forces imposed on it during launch, and meet a very long list of NASA imposed requirements to fly hardware to the International Space Station. These are just some of the developments we’ve needed to make. It’s taken us thousands of pages of internal documentation just to describe the engineering work we’ve done to get our printer ready for space.

    TC: How are you associated with NASA? NASA spins of companies now? Like Tang?

    MIS: NASA is one of our customers. It is common for NASA to contract private companies to provide products and services for space exploration. A good example is Boeing. One of the most featured in the media these days is SpaceX, who is now delivering goods for NASA to the Space Station on their rockets.

    The “new space” industry is getting more exciting with every passing year, where startups in Silicon Valley like Made in Space are working with NASA and other groups to push the envelope of what is possible with space missions.

    TC: How did you test this for space travel?

    MIS: The process starts with an extensive suite of modeling and simulation tools that we use to run analyses on every detail of our design.

    The primary way that we test our hardware for space travel, though, is by repeatedly testing our systems in an actual microgravity environment, on parabolic aircraft flights through the NASA Flight Opportunities Program. To date we’ve accumulated over 500 parabolas of zero-gravity manufacturing time.

    We also put our printer through rigorous environmental testing with NASA at Marshall Space Flight Center, where we test everything from electromagnetic interference and radiated emissions, the ability to survive launch vibrations, crew safety, and just about everything in-between.

    We now have over a dozen full-time employees and a team of 20+ people.

     

    TC: So this is very important: will they ever print a Yoda in space?

    MIS: We asked our team, and they told us that they would try. We told them “do or do not, there is no try.”

    SpaceX Grasshopper aces side-tracking reusable rocket test

    SpaceX‘s Grasshopper test rig for the Falcon 9 reusable launch vehicle has stepped up its game, with Elon Musk’s private space company demonstrating that the rocket can now not only take off and land in a straight line, but track sideways as part of the maneuver. A vital talent if Grasshopper is to land safely […]

    Watch the SpaceX Grasshopper Hop Into the Air and Fly Sideways

    You’ve seen the SpaceX Grasshopper blast off, hover and land vertically. You’ve seen it fly higher than the Chrysler building and land vertically. Now you can see this innovative little rocket zoom 250 meters into the air and fly 100 meters sideways. You know what it does next? It lands vertically.

    Read more…


        



    Researchers find 12 easily captured near-Earth asteroids

    NASA asteroid capture concept

    Both NASA and Planetary Resources dream of capturing asteroids, but they need viable targets — many space rocks aren’t easily moved. The University of Strathclyde just gave those organizations some help by identifying 12 near-Earth asteroids that are relatively easy to catch. All of them would require velocity changes of less than 1,640 feet per second to fall into orbit around Earth’s Lagrangian points, where the gravity balance would let miners and researchers get to work. Don’t expect intercept missions anytime soon, though. One of the more accessible targets, 2006 RH120, would have to be nudged in February 2021 to reach orbit in 2026; it will be a long while before any of us sees an asteroid up close.

    Filed under: , ,

    Comments

    Via: Huffington Post

    Source: MIT Technology Review

    The U.S. Once Tried to Wrap a Ring of Copper Wire Around the Earth

    The U.S. Once Tried to Wrap a Ring of Copper Wire Around the Earth

    The Cold War was a crazy time. With the space race happening on one front and an arms race happening on another, the United States was constantly looking for ways to gain an advantage over the Soviets and were limited only by our creativity. And boy did we get creative.

    Read more…