ARAIG gaming feeback suit hits Kickstarter in search of good funding vibrations

ARAIG gaming feeback suit hits Kickstarter in search of good funding vibrations

In spite of the company’s claims that feedback has always been localized on gaming controllers, this certainly isn’t the first time we’ve seen the phenomenon incorporated into a wearable. That said, the ARAIG (that’s As Real As It Gets, for the record) does wrap a lot of features into a nice looking package — well, about as nice as one can expect from a vibrating shirt that you wear while gaming. The ARAIG (sounds a bit like “ear ache”) features 16 points of feedback on the front, 16 on the back and eight on each side, a number of which are located in areas so as to offer the most muscle stimulation as they respond to what’s happening in the game.

You’ll also find a six speakers around the collar, offering a sort of surround sound to the wearer, as well as an admittedly somewhat clunky subwoofer on the back. Of course, ARAIG is still in its early stages, a few days into its Kickstarter campaign, so there may well be some changes to the suit in the months to come. In the meantime, the company’s hoping for a lofty $900,000 in crowdfunding. You can check out a video plea below or click the source link to contribute.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: Kickstarter

What’s inside Motorola’s digital tattoo?

Motorola dropped some jaws this week, when Advanced Technology and Projects Group chief Regina Dugan revealed the company’s tinkering on digital tattoos, week-long implanted electronics that could free you from the tyranny of remembering passwords. Dugan – a former DARPA head – described the tattoo as perfect for a wearables market targeting users that don’t actually bother wearing watches any more, instead turning the body into a walking authentication token. She also namechecked mc10, a company not unfamiliar to SlashGear, as the brains behind the flexible tattoo-tech, but just what’s inside?

mc10_digital_tattoo_1

Cambridge, MA, based mc10 calls the tattoo “epidermal electronics”, and has in fact been working on the concept for some years now. The idea is relatively straightforward: rather than rely on the user carrying a device, or remembering to strap one on each morning, the technology is temporarily bonded to their skin.

That bond has another advantage, since the responses of the wearer’s skin can also be used to collect health data. The tattoo is made up of various sensors and gages, such as for tracking strain in multiple directions (how the user is flexing), EEG and EMG (electrical impulses in the skeletal structure or nerves), ECG (heart activity), and temperature, as well as light and other factors. In total, it’s a mini-lab for your arm, the side of your head, or anywhere else on the body.

epidermal_electronics_annotated

Like NFC chips, the mc10 epidermal electronics get powered up from an external electricity source, using the embedded wireless power coil. It’s a similar system to the wireless phone charging Nokia and others have implemented in recent handsets, and it powers the tattoo’s transmitter. That’s all layered onto a sheet of water-soluble plastic that gets laminated to the skin; in fact, it can even be disguised with a regular temporary tattoo pattern, opening the door to potential branding and such.

Once they’re in place, they’re incredibly resilient. The tightly coiled structure of the electronics means that, even if the tattoo is stretched or twisted, the connections won’t break. It’s also waterproof, which means that even if you’re swimming or in the shower, the tattoo won’t be affected.

mc10_digital_tattoo_2

However, epidermal electronics don’t just have to stop at being biometric keys for your laptop and your Netflix account. Studies using the technology have found that they can also track muscle movements around speech, when applied to the throat, potentially turning the tattoos into half of a wireless hands-free kit. Since you don’t actually have to speak out loud, it could pick up sub-vocal commands, too. Alternatively, they can even track brain signals with enough accuracy to control a computer, which might mean simply thinking about making a call and having your nearby smartphone place it. Similar sensors have been used to fly remote-control planes and drones, something mc10 is working on replicating with its more compact tattoos.

They were some of the possibilities mc10 co-founder Ben Schlatka spoke to us about last year, when we talked to him about the advantages of persistent sensing. The company is also working with the US army on embedded electronics in battlefield clothing, which could collect energy and convert it into electricity to power the gadgets soldiers carry.

“Imagine a kids’ fake tattoo that can sense how our bodies work: data from the heart, the brain, muscles, body temperature – even hydration levels,” Schlatka told us. “When a sensing technology conforms to the consumer and not the other way around, it can capture more insights for longer periods of time without discomfort or distraction.”

Motorola isn’t the only company intrigued. Back in April, mc10 announced it had closed a new $8m financing round, taking the company’s total Series C funding to $18m. Exactly which investors have come on-board is yet to be confirmed, though mc10 did say that it now has backers across its consumer, digital health, and medical devices divisions.

mc10_digital_tattoo_3

Whether Motorola will actually release a wearable using mc10 technology remains to be seen; the Google-owned company still needs to prove it has a solid foot in the smartphone market, though the new Moto X could address that. Still, it’s clear that the digital tattoo is capable of further breaking down the boundary between users and their devices. If Motorola can leverage that, alongside Google’s own ongoing research into wearables like Glass, it could be the differentiator the company needs from the increasingly crowded Android market, not to mention finally silencing the critics who doubted the wisdom of the smartphone company’s acquisition in the first place.

IMAGES: Dr Todd Coleman; mc10


What’s inside Motorola’s digital tattoo? is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Motorola developing digital tattoos and “smart pills” for next-gen wearables

Motorola‘s big vision for mobile isn’t just the Moto X smartphone: the company also has wearable, tattoo-embedded, and even swallowable gadgets in the pipeline. Motorola’s Advanced Technology and Projects Group chief Regina Dugan – former DARPA chief – showed up at D11 sporting an electronic tattoo that could be worn on the skin for a week at a time, and used to cut through the numerous authentication processes we go through every day.

motorola_electronic_tattoo

The tattoos rely on a new, stretchable electronics system that can keep working even as it flexes on the wearer’s arm. As Dugan says, while criticisms of wearables like smartwatches include suggestions that young people won’t want to wear them – something Tim Cook commented on – it’s much more likely that the demographic would want to use a digital tattoo.

It’s not the only high-tech security system Motorola’s group is looking at. “I take a vitamin every morning: what if I could take an authentication vitamin?” Dugan asked, before whipping out a Proteus smart-pill.

motorola_smart_pill

That pill contains a “switch” and an “inside-out potato battery”, Dugan explained, which creates electricity from the chemical processes in the body when swallowed. The result is the switch toggling on and off, and creating an 18-bit ECG-like signal.

“Essentially your entire body becomes an authentication token,” Dugan concluded, before laughing off suggestions by AllThingsD’s Walt Mossberg that Google – which owns Motorola – might insist on employees swallowing one of the pills every day. The technology itself still needs work, she admitted, but the pills are safe for human consumption: you could take multiple each day for the rest of your life, she argued.

Unsurprisingly, none of the projects Dugan and her team are working on will necessarily arrive any time soon. First up, in fact, is the new Motorola “Moto X” smartphone, which the company chief Dennis Woodside said is due to hit the market in 2013, and will include various sensors that will trigger automatic responses depending on how the user is treating their phone.

The full Motorola appearance at D11 – including Dugan’s discussion on wearable and implantable tech – is available in the video below.


Motorola developing digital tattoos and “smart pills” for next-gen wearables is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Internet Trends report shows a surge in sharing, mobile overtaking PCs

Image

Mary Meeker’s Internet Report is often considered a technology bellwether, and it’s certainly living up to that reputation in the 2013 study. This year, the dominating trend is sharing: Meeker has noticed that many more of us are willing to publish our media and location data. People worldwide now share over 500 million photos a day through services like Facebook and Snapchat, while Dropcam, Soundcloud, YouTube and Waze are also growing quickly. Americans aren’t leading the trend, however. An estimated 15 percent of US internet users frequently share content online, while the world average is 24 percent.

Other findings? If it wasn’t evident before that mobile devices are taking over, it’s quite clear now. The Internet Report shows tablet shipments overtaking PCs at the end of 2012; meanwhile, mobile internet traffic is quickly surpassing the desktop in countries like China and South Korea. Many companies are leaning heavily on mobile for their income, too. The full Internet Trends report is available after the break for additional insights, although it’s currently bombarded by traffic — have some patience if it doesn’t load right away.

Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Via: AllThingsD

Source: KPCB

Tim Cook suggests Google Glass “broad appeal is hard to see”

This week in an interview with Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher at the D11 conference, Apple CEO Tim Cook had a bit to say about Google’s wearable product: Glass. Having been asked what his take was on wearables by Swisher, Cook responded: “I think wearables [are] incredibly interesting. It could be a profound area.” His reply on Google Glass specifically wasn’t quite so optimistic.

google_glass_live_sg_2-580x3261

According to Cook, “there are some positives in the product.” Responding to a query on Google Glass, Cook continued,”It’s probably likely to appeal to certain vertical markets, [but] the likelihood that it has broad appeal is hard to see.” Mossberg continued the line of questioning by asking “is wearables a thing? Is part of the post-PC era wearables that go beyond fitness devices?”

“There are lots of gadgets in the space. I would say that the ones that are doing more than one thing, there’s nothing great out there that I’ve seen. Nothing that’s going to convince a kid that’s never worn glasses or a band or a watch or whatever to wear one. At least I haven’t seen it. So there’s lots of things to solve in this space.” – Tim Cook

Cook added that this area was “ripe for exploration,” and “ripe for us to get excited about,” noting that “lots of companies” will be joining in. Pushed by Swisher to say whether or not Apple bill be one of them, Cook made it clear, “I don’t want to answer that one.”

On the subject of wearables, Cook continued by noting how his glasses – non-smart though they were – were not something he’d wear if he didn’t have to. “I think from a mainstream point of view, glasses are risky.” It was clear that Cook’s interest in wearables wasn’t about to be tied directly to Apple products that hadn’t been announced yet, but that the company wouldn’t be left out of the movement.

VIA: The Verge
SOURCE: AllThingsD


Tim Cook suggests Google Glass “broad appeal is hard to see” is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Tim Cook thinks Google Glass lacks broad appeal, but wearables are ‘incredibly interesting’

Tim Cook thinks Google Glass lacks broad appeal, but wearables are 'incredibly interesting'

Today on stage at the D11 conference, Tim Cook indicated that Apple’s interested in wearable tech, including Google Glass, even though he thinks it’s “tough to see it [Glass] having a broad-range appeal.” When asked about the current state of wearables, he mentioned that fitness devices like the Nike FuelBand (he owns one) perform well, but things that attempt to do more than one thing haven’t impressed him thus far.

Generally, he sees wearables as “an area that’s ripe for exploration” and that “there will be tons of companies involved” in making such devices. He also mentioned that biometric sensors, in particular, are an area of growth that Apple will be watching with interest, and Cook sees the potential of the wearables space to accelerate the industry further into a Post-PC era as smartphones and tablets did. When asked about Apple’s plans to make a wearable, Cook wouldn’t comment on the existence (or non existence) of an iWatch. So, while this is far from a confirmation of a forthcoming Apple wearable, it seems certain that the crew in Cupertino is considering them carefully.

Update: Check out the video of Cook’s comments embedded after the break.

Follow along with our D11 liveblog right here.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Google Glass color choices: will yours be custom coded?

As Google’s introduction of Glass as the premiere wearable face-based computer starts the world thinking about what they’ll be placing on their head in the near future, so too do the creators of these machines begin to consider what forms they’ll come in. When you create a device that rests on the temples of the user, you’ve got to consider more than just the components inside – color, comfort, and everyday usability are real concerns. Lead Industrial Designer for Google Glass Isabelle Olsson spoke up this month on the development of the final (and first) form of Google Glass, specifically on its first five colors.

google_glass_isabelle_ollson_colors

Isabelle Olsson: We developed five different colors to kind of satisfy different personalities – and also what you look good in. It’s kind of counter-intuitive, a lot of people think “oh Charcoal, that’s going to go with everything, that’s my favorite color.” And me, myself, because I wear a lot of black.

google_glass_isabelle_ollson

But after wearing it around for almost a year – different colors – we started to see how important color was, and how non-intuitive it was, and how people develop, like, an attachment to the specific colors. So every time we’d do a new prototype, and all the colors were not available, people would come and like, scream at me: “I want my tangerine back!”

We chose five – we didn’t want to overwhelm people, and there is a range. So we have a couple of bright ones, and then we have three, kind of, neutrals.

And I think the cotton one is kind of bold and neutral at the same time. And I think shale looks good on almost everybody and is a little bit less heavy than charcoal. But then Charles rocked charcoal because of the dark skin, so it looks really good.

Colors are much more important than you would ever imagine. If it’s up to me, I would keep on doing cool colors.

One of the benefits we’ve had with the way we’ve developed this project is that we’ve had these monthly prototypes. Every month we’d come out with a new prototype. And everybody on the team has been wearing them.

So what we did, quite early on, was to produce a range of colors – just two of each – and then I basically looked at which colors are people fighting over. It’s kind of a fun indication. So that was kind of a way to see what was popular and what resonated with people.

google_glass_sergey_bikers

O: But then also seeing – I mean, we have a very diverse team, so we just, by observing people wearing it around, seeing what works, seeing what doesn’t work. I would force people to try on different things.

So it’s kind of an intuition, and having an eye for it, and just kind of experimenting. And again we wanted a few poppy colors for people who are like, “hey, come and talk to me”, and then a few more subdued for people who kind of want to stand out a little bit less.

Each of the images above come from Google I/O 2012, where the platform was given its first major introduction on-stage by Google. While Olsson spoke there as well, the words shared above come from a fireside chat with prospective developers at Google I/O 2013 – photos below show the fireside chat as it occurred, adding a bit of context to a couple of the comments above, specifically the one about Charles.

glass_team

From left to right, those participating in the chat were: Steve Lee, Product Director at Glass, Charles Mendis, Engineer on Glass, Isabelle Olsson, Lead Industrial Designer of Glass, and Timothy Jordan, Senior Developer Advocate at Google for Glass. Here you’ll also find a pre-production Glass unit with a sepia tone as well as a frame for Glass without the computer board attached.

glassesg

Olsson also shared more information on her three design principles central to creating the final Glass product: Lightness, Simplicity, and Scalability. In these, Google created a device that they hope will be easy to incorporate into a user’s everyday life. Color was considered at the same time as social implications.

Is the color of Glass more important than the color of your smartphone? Is wearing glass more apparent to those around you than your use of a smartphone? Consider that!

These articles are part of SlashGear’s Creator Series for Google Glass – please feel free to share what bits and pieces of Glass you’re interested in and what you’d like to know more about while we continue exploring!


Google Glass color choices: will yours be custom coded? is written by Chris Burns & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Glass Nest lets users control their homes from their heads

Glass Nest apps lets us control our homes from our heads

Those who already own Google Glass are more likely than most to embrace new technologies like Nest’s thermostat, so it only makes sense that an especially eager adopter would find a way to combine the two. That would be James Rundquist and his new Glass Nest app: Glass owners now just have to announce that they’re coming home (or heading out) to make their Nest units change the climate. More exacting homeowners can fine-tune the temperature, too. While the utility is both unofficial and quite limited at this stage, Rundquist has posted source code that lets anyone expand on the project. If you’re in the rare position of owning both gadgets, we’d suggest giving Glass Nest and its code at least a cursory look.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: Slashgear, SelfScreens

Source: Glass Nest, GitHub

Google Glass facial-recognition service likely to stoke privacy fears

Google’s Glass wearable could soon be able to recognize faces of those around the wearer, thanks to a dedicated service for human and object recognition that could be built into third-party apps. The handiwork of Lambda Labs, the special Glass facial recognition API will integrate into software and services using Google’s Mirror API for Glass, crunching shots from the camera and spitting out the identity of people and objects it recognizes. Lambda Labs expects the system to be used for real-world social networking and person-location services, though also warns that it could eventually fall foul of impending privacy regulation.

glass_face_recognition

Lambda’s service has been in operation – though not in Glass-specific form – for some time, and is already used by around 1,000 developers, according to the company. It works by using a pre-existing “album” of known faces or objects, for instance your work colleagues, against which new captures from the camera are compared.

What the system can’t do, right now at least, is compare those around you to images not in its own album. So, you couldn’t walk into a room and have Glass flag up those you might be friends with on Google+ based on the publicly-uploaded photos they’ve shared. It’s also not a real-time process: images have to be passed over to Lambda’s engine via the Mirror API, and the results then fed back in the opposite way.

That’s going to involve a delay of around a few seconds, the company told TechCrunch. It’s a similar system to what we saw MedRef for Glass, an app intending to make calling up patient records more straightforward for doctors and hospital staff, use, and indeed Lambda Labs’ API could be integrated server-side for future versions of MedRef or apps like it.

medref_for_glass_facial-recognition-580x306

Despite the fact that, even with functionality like this, Glass wearers won’t be able to roam the streets having names and personal details of those around them hovering in the air like SIMS icons, the facial identification system leads Google’s headset into even murkier privacy issues. Earlier this month, a concerned US Congressional committee fired off a list of privacy-related questions to Google CEO Larry Page, demanding reassurance by June 14 that the wearable wouldn’t collect personal data without the consent of non-users, wouldn’t be unduly intrusive in ways smartphones are not currently, and how it might be updated and its functionality extended in future.

Currently, Glass lacks native face-recognition, hence the opening for third-party services like Lambda Labs’ to step in. Google’s own stance has been that it would require “strong privacy protections” be in place before it would consider adding the functionality itself; exactly what protections would be considered sufficiently “safe” for the public is unclear.

Members of Google’s Glass team touched on the potential for privacy infringement during the fireside chat about the wearable at Google I/O earlier this month. Among the factors built in to avoid any misuse of the camera is an SDK-level requirement that the camera be active if the headset is recording, Glass engineer Charles Mendis revealed; there’s also, product director Steve Lee pointed out, “a clear social gesture” involved in triggering that recording, whether it be physically pressing the button on the upper side of the eyepiece, or giving the “OK Glass, take a photo” spoken command.

Nonetheless, it’s a young segment of the industry and the rules are likely to be fluid as the “what we could do” urge for progress bumps up against “what we should do” restraint. Parallel developments in Google+ are leading Glass down the life-logging path, giving room – and the organizational tools – to store every moment that goes on around you, even if the hardware and software aren’t quite set up that way today.


Google Glass facial-recognition service likely to stoke privacy fears is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.

Google Glass exploration demonstrates a hidden browser and more (video)

Google Glass delve shows hidden browser, omnipresent voice and more video

While it’s known that Google Glass has in-testing features just waiting to be exposed, we haven’t seen many attempts to reveal them all. Zhuowei Zhang has stepped in with a complete list of what’s under the hood, and it turns out that some of those features work… more or less. After modding the latest Glass firmware, Android Police can confirm that there is a functional Chrome browser lurking inside; Google just hasn’t woven it into the user experience. Other Labs features produce similarly mixed results. OK Glass Everywhere lets users easily start a voice command chain from anywhere in the interface, but a video stabilization mode clearly isn’t ready for prime time. Although you’ll want to visit the source links for the full rundown, it’s evident from just a cursory glimpse that Glass has plenty of room to grow.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Via: Android Police

Source: GitHub