Hasta La Gadget!

It was always curious that Google’s response to the FCC inquiry about Google Voice and the App Store had been redacted, but now we’re starting to see why — El Goog and the FCC have just released the full text of the letter, and it flatly contradicts Apple’s take on the matter. If you’ll remember, Apple claimed that while Google Voice hadn’t been approved, it also hadn’t been rejected, and that its status was in limbo while the folks in Cupertino “studied” the matter. Not so, says El Goog: according to its letter, Phil Schiller himself told Google that GV had been rejected on July 7 for duplication of functionality, following a similar conversation on April 10th during which Schiller rejected Google Latitude in part because it might “offer new features not present on the preloaded maps application.” Yeah, that’s a huge discrepancy, and it makes Apple’s version seem even more divorced from reality that it already is. Things are starting to heat up — we’ll see what the FCC makes of all this.

Update: And here we go — Apple just pinged us to say the following: “We do not agree with all of the statements made by Google in their FCC letter. Apple has not rejected the Google Voice application and we continue to discuss it with Google.”

Update 2: So we’ve been thinking about it, and here’s our question — if Apple didn’t reject GV, and is still studying it, what exactly did Phil Schiller say to Google to make them think it had been rejected? The difference between “rejected” and “on hold pending further discussion” isn’t a subtle one, and Google clearly thought GV had been explicitly rejected. For whatever it’s worth, reports of GV’s “rejection” are how this whole mess got started, so either this is all one huge misunderstanding, or someone here isn’t telling the entire truth.

Read – Google unredacted FCC filing [Warning: PDF]
Read – Google Public Policy Blog explaining decision to release letter

Filed under: Cellphones, Software

Google says Phil Schiller himself rejected Google Voice from the App Store originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:54:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

It’s been awhile since we last saw the xpPhone, a quick, quiet demonstration at Computex that left us doubting whether the thing would ever see the light of day outside a packed showroom floor. It seems our doubts are about to be put to rest as ITG, creator of the thing, has thrown up a pre-order page on the phone’s website. There’s no mention of a price, and indeed you won’t be asked to plunk down any cash right now (it’s not much of a pre-order), but what’s interesting is that it asks you to choose between 3G modules for Vodafone, Orange, or AT&T. That means ITG seemingly has aspirations of a global release for this thing, and while we’re not sure how many people are going to want to lug around a MID-sized monster celly with a “super big” 4.8-inch LCD and a weight of nearly a pound, surely some nation in the world has pockets big enough for this.

[Via Pocketables]

Filed under: Cellphones, Handhelds

ITG’s Windows XP-loving xpPhone now accepting pre-orders worldwide originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:21:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

AT&T has announced plans to bump up the speeds of its 3G network to its new HSPA 7.2 technology. The company is rolling out the upgrades in a number of cities, including LA, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Miami, and Charlotte. Two cities, however, are conspicuously absent from the list: New York and San Francisco.

As Business Insider points out, AT&T doesn’t mention the two cities by name, but does add that the faster 3G will be rolled out in 25 of the 30 largest markets by 2011. That number includes 90-percent of the carrier’s current 3G coverage.

If there’s one thing AT&T’s network could use, it’s more network. Particularly in major cities (we’re looking at you and your dastardly street parking situation, San Francisco), AT&T’s 3G network is perpetually overwhelmed, oftentimes forcing users to switch to EDGE just to tweet about how awful the coverage is. Thankfully, the operator is making good on its earlier promise to roll out HSPA 7.2Mbps to select cities, with Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles and Miami now destined to get lit this year. Potentially more interesting, however, is the deployment of “additional backhaul capacity to cell sites,” which will also support LTE when the time comes. All told, around 2,000 new cell sites should be added before the year’s end, and at least a half dozen 7.2Mbps-capable smartphones should be in AT&T’s portfolio by the same deadline. Feel free to express your joy in comments below — that is, if you can get comments to load on your existing 3G connection.

Filed under: Cellphones, Wireless

AT&T slinging HSPA 7.2 to six cities this year, adding backhaul capacity too originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:44:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Hope you Bold owners out there managed to snag AT&T’s BlackBerry Bold visual voicemail software update while it lasted, because an internal memo leaked to BGR says it’s been pulled due to compatibility problems with “network enhancements being deployed.” That sounds to us like there’s an issue with either those 850MHz 3G rollouts or whatever black magic Ma Bell’s doing to get iPhone MMS up and running, but either way, it’s one more fire for AT&T’s engineers to put out while its customers sit around waiting.

Update: AT&T just sent us their official word on the matter — and they also told us it has nothing to do with MMS or 850. Check it out after the break.

Continue reading AT&T yanks BlackBerry Bold visual voicemail software update

Filed under: Cellphones

AT&T yanks BlackBerry Bold visual voicemail software update originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments