Review: Clear Spot Portable WiMax Wi-Fi Hotspot

Today Clearwire yanked the cloth off of its rumored Clear Spot portable WiMax-to-Wi-Fi hotspot, a shiny little battery-powered device that lets you bestow real 4G bandwidth upon anyone in Wi-Fi range.

The $140 thing fits in your pocket, runs for four hours on a lithium-ion battery, connects up to 8 laptops via Wi-Fi, and works like a charm when you’re in a decent WiMax coverage area. (You still need to connect a WiMax modem, which costs $50 and requires a data plan.)

I tested it on the outskirts of Portland, at a Burgerville right off of I-5 in Vancouver, WA, essentially becoming a totally unwired, totally portable wireless hotspot for anybody with a computer or smartphone in the vicinity. Anyone can see the hotspot itself, as it has a standard Wi-Fi SSID, but once on, you have to enter a password, like you do in hotels or airports where the Wi-Fi network itself is technically public.

I can’t make enough of the experience, and how much it could change businesses, sales forces or mobile bloggin’ teams like Gizmodo. You don’t even have to be plugged in, you can just all hop on and work as usual for up to four hours, more if you can find an electric socket. And with WiMax, you’re not nearly as limited as you are with 3G—though there are some constraints, you at least have access to a network that, in certain coverage areas, bestows blistering broadband speeds similar those from today’s wired cable modems.

One big constraint, of course, is that WiMax from Sprint/Clearwire is currently limited to Baltimore and Portland, OR, but is growing this year and next to many cities.

There is also an internal limit to how much WiMax bandwidth you can harness. Since the Clear Spot uses the same Motorola WiMax USB modem that Clearwire sells for its standard WiMax service, I could test how well the bandwidth was passed through.

• What I got when connecting an HP Pavilion dv4 Windows laptop to WiMax: Around 7Mbps
• What I got when connecting the same modem to the Clear Spot, then connected MacBook Pro via Wi-Fi: 3-4Mbps

That does certainly represent a bottleneck, and there’s a reason for it: The wireless hotspot itself—which you might have seen under the brand Cradlepoint for a year or more—was designed for 3G, for whom 3Mbps downstream is a frickin’ miracle. It has a gimped USB port that throttles bandwidth over 5Mbps.

Though that’s a flaw, it’s not a big deal when you consider most Clearwire WiMax plans will be sold with a 4Mbps cap.

Beyond the hardware bottleneck, my other complaints are relatively minor:
• There’s no Ethernet port, so this can’t fundamentally replace home broadband.
• In areas of low coverage, you get an error message saying the modem was not found, which is inaccurate.
• There’s no good way to read WiMax signal strength on the device itself.

The good news for patient people is that, according to Scott Richardson, Clearwire’s chief strategy officer, the company is exploring selling an unfettered WiMax account, so you’d get an experience closer to the one I got in my uncapped testing. Also, Scott tells me there will be another portable WiMax-to-Wi-Fi hotspot device available—probably in the fall—that’s even smaller, and that wouldn’t be restricted by the USB bottleneck.

This is one of those products that’s totally niche but totally cool. Like, even if there are many people who are interested in getting WiMax, or better yet, a combo EVDO/WiMax modem from Sprint, I am not anybody would, at that point, also feel the need to share it with others. Maybe it’s good for bringing your work-supplied modem home, or maybe it’s a good way to split the cost of wireless modem service between a team of people who are always working together, on separate devices.

Regardless of all these scenarios, the fact is, it’s a truly new experience, and hopefully something we see more of in the future. I would say this is one of hell of a reason for Big Cable to be shaking in its boots—that is, if only Comcast wasn’t already part owner in Clearwire. [Clearwire Clear Spot release]

Good Lord, You People Are All Slobs

This week, I asked you to send me in photos of your disastrous workspaces. And man, you people are much, much more disgusting than I thought. And I assumed you were pretty disgusting.

First Place — David Schaefer
Second Place — Grossi Roberta
Third Place — Dudesque

10 of the World’s Smallest Gadgets

The diminishing size of gadgetry is about as certain as Moore’s law, and is generally good for us. But for some, size is an obsession, and smaller is always better. This is what they’ve wrought:

Smallest CRT TV
Although smaller CRT screens can be had (such as those used in old camcorder viewfinders), they won’t hook up to your Wii. This 1.5-inch TV will actually connect to A/V equipment via standard RCA cables. See the video for the tiniest game of Wario ever. Strangely, this little marvel came as part of a miniature living room diorama.

Smallest PC
It’s the world’s smallest Linux PC, or else it’s very close. Smaller than the Gumstix, smaller than the SpaceCube, the PicoTux is horrendously underpowered, has two three connectors: a 5.5v DC input, ethernet jack, and serial port. But none of that matters, because this is pure novelty rendered in silicon and metal.

Smallest 35mm Camera
Anyone can make a tiny digital camera, but matters are a little more complicated when you have to accommodate a 35mm strip of film. The Rollei was built in 1962, and remains one of the smallest fully operational standard film cameras ever made. How small is it? That’s it next to a regular roll of film, inset. Small by 35mm standards, but probably gargantuan to you and your digicam-addled mind.

Smallest Combustion Engine
Sensationally hailed as a battery replacement a few years back, this tiny little butane-powered combustion engine was developed at the University of Birmingham. It promptly fell off the map, probably because people stopped listening to its maker after he suggested using one of these carbon emitters in a pacemaker. Seriously.

Smallest Fuel Cell
Speaking of battery replacements, here’s a plausible one: this 0.7 volt, 3mm fuel cell created at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign won’t do your iPod much good, and actually carries less charge than your average button cell watch battery. But as a proof of concept and a sign of better things to come, this self-contained speck of a fuel cell is thrilling.

Smallest Optical Mouse
Our own John Mahoney put it best when he said of the Z-Nano, “the threshold of practicality here has been violated.” Indeed it has. The Z-Nano may be the only mouse you could buy that would be less comfortable than your netbook’s touchpad.

Smallest Hard Disk Drive
I’m sure there was a time when making teensy hard drives seemed like a great idea. It was a time that spawned such wonders as the Microdrive HDD-in-a-CF-card, and which culminated in this, Toshiba’s .85-inch, 8GB hard drive. As for why they never got any smaller, well, last month I purchased a 16GB Compact Flash card for $24. So.

Smallest Production Car
The smallest production car ever, the Peel P50 was manufactured on Britain’s Isle of Man for an original price of £199. That was in 1962. The P50’s salient features, not to mention its size, are best illustrated on your left, by Jeremy Clarkson’s ill-fated test drive on Top Gear.

Smallest Revolver
A 5.5cm long Swiss revolver that fires actual 2.3mm (that’d be about .09 caliber) bullets at over 300mph, the SwissMiniGun is Guinness-certified. It’s illegal to import due to being technically unclassifiable under US law, and it’s said to be fatal. Possibly just as a choking hazard.

Smallest Netbook
There are smaller UMPCs out there, but they’re a nigh-on impossible pain to use, and most of them run custom-built Linux distributions that can make simple tasks a chore. The UMID mbook doesn’t sacrifice much for its size—it’s Atom-powered, runs XP, has a full keyboard and even a webcam—it’s just scaled down. How far? Well, that screen you see there, that’s 4.3 inches.

What Owning These 15 Gadgets Says About You

You probably haven’t thought about it before, but the gadgets you own can provide deep insights into who you are as a person. That is especially true if you own one of these gadgets.

Ultimate Battle: The Snuggie vs. Slanket vs. Freedom Blanket vs. Blankoat

The Slanket, the Snuggie, the Freedom Blanket or the supremely expensive and extravagant Blankoat? This is the most important question of the millennium. You’re about to know the answer.

Those who haven’t seen the Snuggie ad or one of its many parodies and aren’t aware of the blanket-with-sleeves phenomenon get no sympathy from us. Unless, you’ve just awoken from an eight-month coma, in which case: Welcome back! To recap, the Snuggie is the most famous and widely marketed of the many blanket-with-sleeves. The Freedom Blanket originated the idea, the Slanket followed up, and recently, the Blankoat decided to take it into a ridiculous dimension.

But which is the best for you? We tried each of them the way they were meant to be worn: on the sofa, lying down, with one fist buried in a bag of Doritos and the other cradling a bottle of beer. We gained thirty-five pounds, but it was so worth it.

And for those of you who think that the whole blanket-with-sleeves product could just as easily be accomplished with a robe worn backwards? We tested that too.

Snuggie ($15): Don’t buy this. Having the most ironic value contributes nothing to the final product when it’s constructed out of material that’s one step up from a papery hospital gown. Not only are the sleeves too cramped, the bottom part—the part that keeps your feet warm when you’re lying down—isn’t long enough for anyone of a decent height. I’m only 5′ 10″, and I have to bend my knees to keep all of my body covered. Bend them! This body wasn’t constructed for that.

The Snuggie is also the most static-prone of all the blankets, and comes in such neon colors that surely are not found in nature. There’s a reason why this is the cheapest of the bunch, which means you should only consider this if you have a plus-sized dog you want to dress up as a radioactive Superman. Krypto, if you will. Nobody else should buy it.

At $15, it’s the cheapest

Can be conveniently found at many lousy stores

Generates a lot of static when being taken off

Thin, papery material

Too short for most people

Slanket ($38): The most expensive of the major three, the Slanket is where you turn when you want to make sure you get the best for your blanket money. It’s 60 inches x 95 inches, so it’s long enough even for people over 6 feet, and is made out of polyester microfibers, so it’s soft and thick. Essentially, it’s everything the Snuggie is not.

When someone asks why a regular blanket won’t do, the Slanket is the answer. The sleeves are wizardy enough to keep you warm and allow enough space for maneuverability (gaming is the most prominent example). It has the most variety of colors choices—11 at my count—and is an example of the concept done right. If you’re serious about staying warm while also keeping your hands one extra layer of material away from being able to fondle your genitals, this is it. [Slanket]

Very comfortable, very long, very usable

Comes in a wide variety of couch-matching colors

Most expensive of the 3 normal ones

Still generates a little static when removed

Freedom Blanket ($30): The original blanket with sleeves has become, unfortunately, lost between the media blitz of the Snuggie and the web-presence of the Slanket. But it shouldn’t be. The price, $30, reflects exactly how the Freedom Blanket performs: somewhere in-between the Snuggie and the Slanket.

The Freedom Blanket isn’t quite as comfortable as the Slanket, but comparing it to the Snuggie would be like comparing rubbing your face with a cotton towel to rubbing your face with Joaquin Phoenix’s beard. At 72 inches, it’s also longer than the Snuggie, but still falls slightly short of the Slanket’s 95 inches. And that’s pretty much the whole story.

If you don’t want a piece of crap like the Snuggie but can’t get over the fact that you’re paying a couple Hamiltons for a blanket with sleeves, the Freedom Blanket is a good compromise. Plus, you’ll sleep well knowing that you’re supporting the people who actually invented the idea instead of someone who knows how to copy very well. [Freedom Blanket]

More comfortable than the Snuggie

Not quite as expensive as the Slanket

Also generates spouse-shocking static when removed

Slightly too short for tall people

Sruli Recht Blankoat ($330): The Blankoat is to the other three blankets as getting a full service massage is to setting your showerhead into massage mode. They may sound similar, but it’s an entirely alien concept. If you have enough money to spend $330 on a gigantic 120-inch long blanket made out of wool from Icelandic sheep, you have enough money to run your heater and walk around in your underwear instead.

You know how wool sweaters are itchy? This is a wool sweater for your entire body. If you like wool, great—this will keep you very, very warm. If you don’t, wearing this while watching an episode of America’s Next Top Model is like an hour enduring Gitmo’s mildest torture session.

But if your question is whether or not the Blankoat does its job, the answer is yes. With this much material, you can wrap yourself entirely inside the thing—including your head—with only a small hole left for your face. Having actually never lived in Iceland, or Boston, or anywhere where you actually have to physically move snow away so you can travel, I can’t say whether the Blankoat would be worth the money in those situations. I imagine it would. But you’re still paying $330, which is John Mayer money. [Blankoat]

Provides the most coverage of all the solutions

Wool is scratchy

It’s $330!!

A Bathrobe ($42 or cheaper): You may already have one of these. You may also wonder why you can’t just turn one backwards and be done with it. Two reasons. One, no robe is long enough to cover your feet. People don’t enjoy falling down repeatedly when going for a drink of water. Two, the sleeves aren’t long enough to provide adequate coverage like all of the above options (save for the Snuggie). [Low-priced bathrobe on Amazon]

You may already own one, in which case it’s free

Doesn’t cover your feet when lying down, doesn’t cover your arms adequately

Here’s what you should take away. Get the Slanket if you’re serious about staying warm while lying on your couch, the Freedom Blanket if you’re not. Nobody anywhere should buy the Snuggie. The Blankoat is for rich people who can afford Icelandic wool. Bathrobes do not work, no matter how much you wish them to.

Thank you, Snuggie, for raising blanket-with-sleeves awareness. Now get out.

How To: Use BitTorrent Like a Pro

Even if you’ve been casually Torrenting for years, BitTorrent tools keep getting better. Here’s our guide for getting the most out of what is, slowly but surely, changing forever how people acquire and consume entertainments.

This guide is intended for folks who understand the basics but may have only just started to scratch the surface of what BitTorrent clients are capable of. If you’re even more hardcore than the tips here, feel free to drop some knowledge (and links!) in the comments for everyone’s use. Spread the love.

Throughout this guide we’ll be using two of the most popular multi-platform BitTorrent clients, Vuze (formerly called Azureus) and µTorrent. Both apps take two fundamentally different approaches: Vuze packs in just about every feature you could imagine, including a search tool, social-networking-like sharing among friends, a content guide, and much more. µTorrent on the other hand is the opposite: sleek, simple and barebones. The choice is yours.

Lots of our pointers here will take advantages of some of Vuze’s newest features, but we love µTorrent too. Where applicable, we’ll highlight standalone applications that can help bring some of Vuze’s integrated functionality to µTorrent fans.


Set up Your Router’s NAT and Transfer Limits
This is, without a doubt, the single most important thing you can do to ensure the highest possible BitTorrent performance. And it’s also something often overlooked by casual and even intermediate Torrenters.

BitTorrent clients pipe all of their network traffic through a single “port” on your network. But your router likes to partially or fully block traffic that doesn’t come through on all the “standard” ports (like port 80 for web traffic, for instance). So you want to make sure your computer has a clear and open channel to all that data you’re going to be sucking down by setting up “port forwarding,” which lets your router know to which computer on the network it should send traffic on certain ports instead of blocking it. Make sense?

1. In your Torrent client’s preferences under the “network” or “connection” heading, find out which TCP/UDP port it’s using. Keep the default, but for the record, you can choose basically any number you want (but read Vuze’s “Good Port Choices” article first) and if you have multiple machines on the same network using BitTorrent you’ll want to choose unique port numbers for all of them.

2. Now, open up your router’s admin page. This is pulled up by going to your router’s IP address in a web browser (commonly 192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1 or 192.168.2.1). Sometimes you’ll have to enter a username and password; Google around for your model’s default name/password if you can’t remember it. Users of Apple’s AirPort routers should use the AirPort Utility app.

3. Now, the terminology for what you’re looking for is called different things by all the router companies. Some call it “port forwarding,” others call it “virtual servers” or “port mapping”—the terminology is surprisingly varied, but it’s usually listed under an “advanced settings” tab if there is one. The site Portforwarding.com can help you locate yours if you’re having trouble.

4. Once you’ve found where this all goes down, enter the port number from your client in step 1 for BOTH UDP and TCP fields (you’ll enter the same port number for the “private” or “local” UDP/TCP fields). You’ll also enter your current machine’s IP address (found in Network preferences on both OS X and Windows).

Note: If your machine is a laptop and you’re frequently connecting and disconnecting from the network, you’ll want to set up a static local IP address so you don’t have to switch your router’s settings every time you Torrent.

5. Hit save, and you should be good to go. Your BitTorrent client will have a network test built in somewhere in the preferences—use that to make sure your connection is clear.

6. Now, the final step, is setting a limit to your uploading speeds. As you know, BitTorrent simultaneously uploads to other peers while you’re downloading, and to ensure solid download speeds you must upload. But you don’t want these uploads to take over your limited upload bandwidth, especially if you’re on a cable connection. To be safe, cap your uploads around 20 kb/s. This is a good general ballpark that’ll ensure good download speeds and won’t clog your pipe. If you’re on FIOS you may want to kick that up a bit, but play around.

Vuze has a tool that can help you auto-configure your speeds too—probably worth experimenting with in the prefs.



Cover Your Ass
All the regular disclaimers apply: don’t be an idiot when you’re downloading stuff you probably shouldn’t. Here are some tools and strategies to make sure you keep yourself virus- and subpoena-free. But like always, no guarantees! Proceed at your own risk! Etc.

1. Don’t seed more than is absolutely necessary. The RIAA/MPAA/NARC’s number one priority are heavy uploaders. Not to say that the downloading part is any less illegal, but if you stop seeding and delete your .torrent file after it’s done downloading, your odds of staying safe are significantly higher.

Note: If your carefully crafted code of online morals compels you to continue uploading beyond the amount you shared during the download, feel free, knowing that it increases your odds of getting a friendly note from your ISP. And, please, do seed any files that are intentionally being distributed via BitTorrent, like a Linux distribution or Creative Commons licensed stuff from friends like Nine Inch Nails. You can’t get hurt by that.

You could make an argument that Torrenting is mainstream enough to survive on many thousands of people seeding very small amounts (ie: the amount uploaded while they’re downloading), or you could make an argument about the double (triple? quadruple?) paradoxes that surface when contemplating the morals of consuming vis a vis sharing in the gray to grayish-black Torrent market. But I’m not your dad—what you do is up to you.

2. Go for torrents with a lot of seeds and good comments. If hundreds of people are seeding a file, the odds of it being of good quality and virus free are higher. I know this may seem contradictory to point #1, but you’re not in this for the geek cred. You’re in this for you. So go with the herd. Also, comments on torrent sites will often have some shreds of useful info—if a lot of people report strange behavior with the downloaded file or a mysterious password lock, skip it.

Also, seeking out the geek legends of the Torrent community will go a long way to ensure good downloads. Choose people like aXXo‘s Torrents where possible.

3. Use the Bluetack IP filter to keep known baddies out of your life. The folks at Bluetack maintain a list of IP ranges of known spammers, virus seeders, and undercover snoops like Media Defender who might bust your ass. To add the list to Vuze, go to Preferences -> IP Filgers and type in the following URL into the auto-fill field: http://www.bluetack.co.uk/config/level1.zip

Update: Someone who should know has advised us against using Bluetack for a whole litany of reasons, most shocking of which is that Bluetack is some elaborate ploy to mess with P2P networks from the inside. Over my head, but for what it’s worth, maybe don’t use Bluetack.

4. Look at private torrent sites. Even though Oink’s hallowed days are over, there are still a number of good, private BitTorrent sites, where your odds of getting hit with random malware or a federal subpoena are lessened. But they may take some conniving to get invited to, and you’ll likely be forced to upload a certain amount to keep your membership.

5. Moderation, moderation. When you can, watch on Hulu, or heaven forbid, buy from your favorite artists. And the less massive your bandwidth usage, the less likely you are to draw the ire of your ISP (or their monthly bandwidth cap).


Autodownload Your Favorite Shows via RSS
For serialized stuff like TV shows, you can easily set up Vuze to subscribe to popular series via RSS and auto-download them every week. It’s nice. µTorrent lovers should check out TED, a cross-platform standalone app that does the same thing.

1. In Vuze, search for your favorite show. Once you’ve found the newest episode and added it to your download list, click the orange RSS button under “Subscribe.” The subscribe window can also look at other files in your library and subscribe to those too.

2. You’ll see a lot of different options, all seemingly the same. Choose HD where possible, and if there’s an EZTV option, choose that—it’s a reliably source of good torrents. Then, new episodes will appear in your Subscriptions area automatically, and you can pull them down.


Stream to Your Game Console or Transcode For Your iPod/PMP/Phone with Vuze
The newest version of Vuze added a seriously useful transcoding and streaming tool—just when you thought there couldn’t be anything else crammed into this app. But it’s great, and works perfectly to auto-detect a PS3 or Xbox 360 on your network and stream your downloads to your TV without any annoying configurations.

1. Enable the streaming add-on under the “Devices” option in the left pane.

2. If your PS3 or Xbox 360 is on and connected to your network, it will automatically show up as a device. Simply drag a file from your library to the icon for your console, and it will be available in the expected area (in the Video menu of the PS3’s XMB and the My Video Library, as another PC, on the Xbox 360).

3. The tool will also transcode to iTunes in sizes optimized for iPods, iPhones and Apple TV using the same process. Just drag the file from your Vuze library to the iTunes icon, and after a somewhat slow conversion time, it will be copied to your iTunes library. Pretty sweet.

Next Steps
There are plenty of places you can take it from there. Like setting up a dedicated, always-on torrrent machine, either with a spare PC or a standalone NAS box with a built-in Torrent client. Then you can take advantage of web-only interfaces to access and manage your downloads from the road.

Sounds like pretty good fodder for a future how to, doesn’t it? Keep your eyes peeled.

So that’s about it! Like we said before, if you have more tips and tools to share, please drop some links in the comments—your feedback is hugely important to our Saturday How To guides. And if you have any topics you’d like to see covered here, please let me know. Have a good weekend Torrenting, everyone!

Image courtesy of, you guessed it, Jason Chen.

8 Gadgets That Will Help Woz Win Dancing With The Stars

It hasn’t always been pretty, but Woz has definitely won us over with his appearance on Dancing With the Stars. The following gadgets will help him earn the same respect from the judges.

Photo Credit Robert Accettura

The Beautiful, Scary Robots of Shigeo Hirose


There are plenty of robot builders, but none bring as much elegance to engineering as Shigeo Hirose. His creatures are Star Wars, Iron Giant and Dean Kamen rolled into one cybernetic maki.

Truth is, I’d never heard of Shigeo Hirose or the Hirose-Fukushima Robotics Lab at Tokyo Tech until I read Wired for War—author PW Singer, featured in our interview here, sings the praises of the robot master, possibly the world’s foremost.

As you can see in the montage and the rundown, below, the dude has been building stuff for years, and things he designed 30 years ago, still seem startling compared to the commercial robotics we’ve grown used to. Swimming snakes, tiny velociraptors, and giant hands that close around women’s waists—this guy seems to know that the real fuel of robotic development is a careful combination of humor and fear.

Make sure you watch all three minutes of the video—the last 30 seconds feature a rollerskating robot that quite frankly blew my mind. Here’s a rundown of the featured models, in the order in which they appear in the video:

Active Code Mechanism R5 (2005) – This swimming snake scared the hell out of me. I used to be afraid of sharks, now sharks should be afraid of ACM.

Elastor (????) – What’s cool about this slinky with a claw is that it can easily reach things a human arm can’t. That and it looks like the prototype for the Lost In Space robot. Danger!

Genbu (1995) – This “articulated multi-wheeled mobile robot” is one of many robots Hirose has designed that can navigate over debris. What makes this one special is it’s shiny silver spiky look—like it’s also a lot of fun at S&M parties.

Soft Gripper II (1978) – We have all seen this in movies: The robot hand reaches out and grabs someone, King Kong style, around the waste. But when you see it demonstrated in real life, with a giggling woman, it’s frankly chilling. Where’s the rest of your gargantuan killer robot, Hirose? Wait, don’t answer that.

VmaxCarrier (2000) – This “holonomic omni-directional vehicle” at first reminded me of Eddie Murphy’s Billy Ray Valentine, panhandling the beginning of Trading Places. Then I glimpsed the underside of this lightweight device—with its four omni-discs, each with eight motorized wheels (for a total of 32 wheels)—and realized this was no movie prop.

Titrus III (????) – I think the lack of a page describing this robot confirms that Hirose only did it to show that he could. The shuffling little dinobot may be more cute than practical, but damn if I don’t want six of them.

SMC Rover (1997) – This planetary exploration robot can send its wheeled legs off on autonomous missions, owing to motors and batteries housed in the wheels themselves. It’s brilliant and whimsical, but it also reminds me of John Carpenter’s The Thing for some reason.

TAQT Carrier (1991) – This mechanical wheelchair is no match for Dean Kamen’s pre-Segway one, but it was built many years earlier, and has a rounded styling that reminds me of Star Wars, like it could be found on Tatooine.

Soryu V (1997) – One set of treads, and a robot can fall on its back as it climbs vertical terrain. Two or three, as in this case, and it’s suddenly more adaptable. Here, to prove the point, Hirose shows it on grass and snow.

Roller-Walker (1994) – It’s a rollerskating robot. A rollerskating robot. It’s like Xanadu meets Short Circuit. Somebody call Steve Guttenberg, Olivia Newton-John and Jeff Lynne, pronto.

More fun with Shigeo Hirose:

BBC gallery of his “robot menagerie,” including the wall climbing “Ninja” not included in the video.

Hirose-Fukushima Robotics Lab, website in English

Wired for War book on Amazon and author site

Video montage expertly assembled and edited by our own Mike Byhoff; “Music for a Found Harmonium” and other yodels, airs and preludes by the Penguin Cafe Orchestra available for MP3 download at Amazon.com.

First Look At The Tesla Model S Electric Car’s Giant Touchscreen Dashboard

We just a good look at the crazy touchscreen console in the Tesla Model S electric Sedan, the most interesting feature of which is that it has a 3G connection all the time.

In addition to that, there’s the center console’s controls, which are full touchscreen, can manipulate your iPod, Google Maps as well as streaming radio. There’s HD, AUX, USB and iPod input to the car, so that covers the major device you’d be able to use too. The current design looks really busy at first glance, but that’s probably because the entire console takes the place of what used to be a slew of buttons and knobs and dials.

The RFID tag is also very interesting. When you walk up to the car, the Model S detects your RFID keytag and pops out the handles for you. When you want to start up the car, there’s no start button. You just sit there and wait for the car to detect your RFID presence.

Why Most Gadget Price Comparison Engines Fall Short

If you are a thrifty consumer, you probably already know that using price comparison sites are a great way to save money on gadgets. But I am tired of shopping around for shopping sites.

When it comes right down to it, I want to visit one site with a simple selection of core features that are focused on one thing and one thing only—helping me save money.

Vendors: Naturally, every good comparison engine needs to establish relationships with as many reputable vendors as possible. Giants like PriceGrabber, Shopzilla, Shopping.com, and Yahoo Shopping generally meet this requirement.

Coupons: Sites like RetailMeNot and MyCoupons.com are great, but that data should not be singled out in a standalone site. It should be integrated into standard search results (like Yahoo Shopping).

Price Alerts: Obviously, if I am truly searching for the best deal, I want to be informed when it happens. The tool to set up price alerts should be prominently displayed. PriceSpider does a good job of this. Sites like Become.com even offer price drops via email without registration. On the other hand, sites like Shopzilla don’t even appear to have the feature—or they hide it behind a registration form. Of course, there are numerous sites out there like ZooAlerts, PricePinx and Camel Camel Camel that specialize in price alerts, but I don’t see much value in those—especially when they are focused entirely on one shopping site like Amazon.

Price Trending: This is one of the new features on the block. Some comparison engines like NexTag and PriceSpider have already done a good job of integrating this feature in with search results, and it could help consumers rate the quality of the current deal by comparing it to prices in the past. Again, there are standalone sites like Gazaro that specialize in this feature, but as comparison site expert Brian A. Smith from comparisonengines.com points out, focusing entirely on price alerts and/or price trending is not an ideal strategy:

In this economy, any site that can help a consumer find a great deal is going to get some attention, and I think price tracking is a smart concept, but it’s nothing new. While the sites you mentioned: Gazaro, Zoolert, and PriceSpider have jazzed things up a bit with a web 2.0 look, price tracking has been available on shopping comparison engines (aka price comparison engines) like NexTag and PriceGrabber for a long time. I think that price alerts are a simple feature. I don’t think there is enough meat there to make a real product or business. If you look at Gazaro and Zoolert versus PriceSpider, you’ll see that PriceSpider is generating much more traffic. I think this is partly because PriceSpider has ventured beyond just price alerts to shopping comparison engine listings.

He also offers a warning:

Just because a price tracking site shows you a seemingly great new alert, the buyer should always beware. Most price tracking sites that I’ve looked at do not have a deep depth of merchants, but are rather just joining some select affiliate programs through Commission Junction or Linkshare. Because of this, a price drop from one merchant might look impressive, but in the end might not actually provide a consumer with a great deal.

A Clean, Usable UI: With so many details to keep track of, it’s not easy to keep things clean. Personally, I have never been a fan of NexTag’s layout—it seems kind of text heavy and convoluted to me. On the other hand Shopzilla has taken a more Web 2.0 approach while Google Product Search stays true to the Google design mantra. In the end, this is really a matter of preference.

User and Expert Reviews: Another no-brainer. Again, these should be prominently displayed with the product.

The bottom line is that on their own, the tools listed above give you only part of the picture—but when used together they can be extremely valuable to consumers. None of the websites I have come across are doing everything right—but I feel that sites like NexTag and PriceSpider are headed in the right direction as far as features are concerned while sites like PriceGrabber, Shopzilla and Yahoo Shopping are still tops in terms of overall effectiveness—a sentiment echoed by our expert from comparisonengines:

Consumers should make sure to take a look at a shopping behemoth like Shopzilla or Yahoo! Shopping before making a purchase. Yahoo! Shopping has an extremely comprehensive deal section, and even better, the site integrates coupons right into shopping comparison engine listings so consumers will have greater transparency into the deal (see the listings for Crutchfield, Tiger Direct, and ABT). So using a site like Yahoo! Shopping provides the consumer with a greater number of merchants, a shopping comparison engine experience (sort by price, rating, etc.), and integrates coupons.

Until one site puts all of the pieces together, it will still be necessary to check multiple websites to ensure that you are getting the best deal online. Hopefully, my rant on comparison engines will, at the very least, help you narrow down the search to save both time and money.

Prof. Dealzmodo is a regular section dedicated to helping budget-minded consumers learn how to shop smarter and get the best deals on their favorite gadgets. If you have any topics you would like to see covered, send your idea to tips@gizmodo.com, with “Professor Dealzmodo” in the subject line.