Android photo backup app reveals burglars’ identities, stupidity

Burglaries are an unfortunately commonplace event in daily urban life, but on some very rare occasions their outcomes give cause for celebration and maybe even a smile. Two young men from the Portland area, keen to get on the smartphone bandwagon without paying, broke in and stole a pair of Motorola Android handsets (along with other electronics) from a nearby household. What they didn’t foresee, however, was that one of the phones would have the free Lookout app, which automatically backs up all photos taken with the handset to a user-accessible server every night. So, in the midst of testing out their ill-gotten loot, the criminals provided the phone’s legitimate owner with enough visual clues for the police to swoop in and apprehend one of them. The search for his partner in crime continues, but the “gadget versus man” fight has already concluded with a clear win for what we presume was a Droid.

[Thanks, John]

Android photo backup app reveals burglars’ identities, stupidity originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Slippery Brick  |  sourceWilsonville Spokesman  | Email this | Comments

Samsung and Kodak put an end to patent squabbles

It looks like Kodak and Samsung’s ‘patent squabble’ can be attributed to misplaced affection. According to some newly minted PR, the companies have inked a technology cross-license that will allow each access to the other’s portfolio. Details are scarce, but apparently Sammy has already made a payment to Kodak as credit towards the royalties it will owe once it dives into the classic imaging company’s back catalog. And how about all that alleged patent infringement? The lovebirds have agreed to file joint requests to terminate proceedings and settle their lawsuits against each other, heralding a new era of peace, love, and cooperation — a great way to begin a new decade, don’t you think? Chuck Woolery, you’ve done well. PR after the break.

Continue reading Samsung and Kodak put an end to patent squabbles

Samsung and Kodak put an end to patent squabbles originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

AT&T sued by Washington DC for unused balances on calling cards

Here’s a superficially curious, but fundamentally quite important, bit of legal wrangling for you. Reuters is reporting that the District of Columbia has filed suit against AT&T Corp for the recovery of unused balances on calling cards purchased from the telecom giant. Estimated at somewhere between 5 and 20 percent of the overall value of the cards, the so-called breakage — leftover credit that customers neglect to use — has typically remained with the carrier as a sort of predictable bonus. The DC Attorney General, however, is seeking to have breakages treated as unclaimed property, which under district law means that after three years they must be returned to the state. Whichever side of the fence you sit on, the decision on this case will set a significant precedent for the future of such prepaid services.

AT&T sued by Washington DC for unused balances on calling cards originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceReuters  | Email this | Comments

Ex-Mac Cloner Psystar Opens T-Shirt Business

picture-14Florida startup Psystar has switched its business model from selling ugly Mac clones to selling ugly t-shirts.

Psystar, which recently lost its year-and-a-half-long legal battle with Apple, is selling t-shirts on its website instead of generic PCs hacked to run the Mac operating system. The company is accepting donations, too.

In a blog post, Psystar said it plans to ask the court to clarify legality surrounding Rebel EFI, a downloadable piece of software that enables users to create their own Hackintoshes. Apple in mid-December won a permanent injunction effectively banning Psystar from selling clones and tools that assist consumers in creating Hackintoshes. But alas, Rebel EFI was not explicitly brought up in the case, and Psystar is seeking clarity.

Psystar’s attorney K.A.D Camara told Wired.com that the startup also plans to appeal the summary judgment and proceed with an anti-trust suit filed against Apple in October 2008.

Psystar agreed in a settlement to pay Apple $2.7 million in damages, but it won’t have to give a dime until the appeals process is complete. That means Psystar better hope to sell about 200,000 t-shirts, which cost $15 apiece.

Psystar’s t-shirts read “I sued Psystar…and all I got was a lousy injunction,” meaning their direct audience is Apple staff. And unfortunately Apple only has about 35,000 employees. Somewhat of an oversight, but one you would expect from a company that sold fewer than 1,000 Hackintosh computers after promising investors it would ship millions of units by 2011.

See Also:


E-reader privacy policies compared: Big Kindle is watching you

It’s definitely shaping up to be the year of e-book readers: the Amazon Kindle is flying off (virtual) shelves, and we’d expect the Barnes & Noble Nook to start moving at a decent clip once the kinks get worked out. But any device with an always-on 3G connection to a central server raises some privacy questions, especially when it can broadcast granular, specific data about what you’re reading — data that’s subject to a wide spectrum of privacy laws and regulations when it comes to real books and libraries, but much less so in the digital realm. We’d say it’s going to take a while for all the privacy implications of e-books to be dealt with by formal policy, but in the meantime the best solution is to be informed — which is where this handy chart from our friends at the Electronic Frontier Foundation comes in. As you’d expect, the more reading you do online, the more you can be tracked — and Google Books, the Kindle, and the Nook all log a ton of data that can be shared with law enforcement and various other third parties if required. Of course, we doubt the cops are too interested in your Twilight reading habits, but honestly, we’d rather users weren’t tracked at all. Check the full chart and more at the read link.

[Thanks, Tom]

E-reader privacy policies compared: Big Kindle is watching you originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:04:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceEFF  | Email this | Comments

Psystar to Keep ‘Fighting on,’ Says Cloner’s Lawyer

It’s unclear whether Psystar, a Mac cloner that recently lost a long legal battle with Apple, is dead or alive. The startup was quoted in a news report saying it was shutting down, and then in a followup story the company retracted the statement.

Apple last week won a permanent injunction against Psystar. The injunction effectively banned Psystar from selling Mac clones or distributing tools that would enable consumers to create their own Hackintoshes.

Subsequently on Friday, Dow Jones Newswire quoted Psystar’s company attorney Eugene Action, who said the startup would immediately fire its employees and shut down. Psystar’s website promptly went offline.

However, hours later lead counsel K.A.D Camara said the opposite in an interview with Computerworld, as well as an e-mail statement provided to Wired.com. He said Action had been misquoted and that the company plans to ask the judge to decide the legality of Rebel EFI, a piece of software that enables consumers to make their own Hackintoshes. (Though the permanent injunction effectively banned the functionality of Rebel EFI, Rebel EFI was not explicitly mentioned in the case.) Psystar’s website went back online over the weekend.

“Psystar is fighting on,” Camara told Wired.com in an e-mail. “Psystar will file a motion in Judge Alsup’s court asking him to decide the legality of Rebel EFI.  Judge Alsup invited us to do that in his injunction order. Psystar will also appeal Judge Alsup’s summary judgment to the Ninth Circuit.”

After Apple filed its lawsuit against Psystar in July 2008 alleging copyright infringement, the Florida start-up filed an antitrust suit against Apple alleging the corporation was violating laws discouraging monopolies.

Camara told Wired.com the antitrust suit will proceed.

In a settlement, Psystar agreed to pay Apple $2.7 million in damages. However, the company will not be required to pay a dime until the appeals process is complete.

See Also:

Photo courtesy of Psystar


Joojoo terms of sale violate PayPal rules

It would seem that the Fusion Garage lawyers have become so embroiled in the Michael Arrington litigation that they’ve neglected to read the PayPal User Agreement. There in section II, subsection 4, dubbed “Prohibited Transactions,” it states that the seller agrees “not to use [his] PayPal account to sell goods with delivery dates delayed more than 20 days from the date of payment.” Why does that matter — well, because the sole means to purchase the Joojoo at present is by placing an 8 to 10 week pre-order, payable exclusively through PayPal. We shouldn’t jump to conclusions though — maybe Fusion Garage freed itself from the pesky rules by offering to sell a few special edition PayPads?

Joojoo terms of sale violate PayPal rules originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Gizmodo  |  sourcePayPal, Joojoo  | Email this | Comments

Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung

Good old December, the busiest time of the year for elves, reindeer, jolly old fat guys… and lawyers, apparently. Joining the rush to make momentous decisions before Santa arrives, the International Trade Commission has made a preliminary ruling in favor of Kodak in its dispute over digital camera patents with Samsung. Though the original lawsuit included LG, an out of court settlement has left only Sammy in the firing line, and this early decision has affirmed that two of Kodak’s patents were infringed in the production of its cameraphones. It’s still necessary for the full commission to look at and approve the judgment, but considering Samsung’s vast range of camera-equipped phones, we’d throw legal caution to the wind and start bombarding the ITC with “holiday cheer” pronto.

Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceYahoo! News  | Email this | Comments

Border security guards kill — literally kill — a MacBook (update: video!)

Young American woman travels over to Jerusalem to meet some friends, see the sights, live the life. Overzealous border security officers ask her a bunch of questions, take issue with her answers, and a few well-placed bullets later she is allowed entry into the country with a somewhat altered MacBook in tow. So what can we all learn from this incident? Firstly, back up all the data you consider important; B, Israeli policemen don’t mess about; and 3, distressed laptops look gorgeous no matter how they got there — just look at the way the glass trackpad has wrinkled up from the force of the bullet penetrating near it, it’s a borderline work of art. The young lady in question has been promised compensation, but lest you think this is a one one-off you can see pictures of an equally dead Dell at the Flickr link below. We’ve got a couple more close-ups of the ravaged MacBook after the break.

[Thanks, Itai N.]

Update – We’ve tracked down a video interview with Lily herself, which shows off a few more angles of the former MacBook and current article of modern art — check it after the break.

P.S. – As always, we encourage a discussion. A sensitive, intellectual, worldly discussion. If you can’t infer what it is we’re asking of our dear readers tempted to intone on this matter, then please skip commenting on this thread, mkay?

Continue reading Border security guards kill — literally kill — a MacBook (update: video!)

Border security guards kill — literally kill — a MacBook (update: video!) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:25:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceLily Sussman, Flickr  | Email this | Comments

Psystar Banned From Selling Mac Clones

picture-7Apple on Tuesday afternoon won a permanent injunction against Psystar, a Florida-based Mac cloner. The ruling prohibits the startup from selling hardware hacked to run Mac OS X.

US. District Judge William Alsup issued the ruling, banning Psystar from the following:

  • Infringing Apple’s copyrights in Mac OS X .
  • Circumventing any technological measure used by Apple to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers.
  • Creating or selling a product intended to circumvent Apple’s methods for preventing Mac OS X to be installed on non-Apple hardware.
  • Aiding or abetting any other person or entity to infringe Apple’s copyrighted Mac OS X software.
  • Doing anything to circumvent the rights held by Apple under the Copyright Act with respect to Mac OS X.

In short, that means Psystar can no longer ship generic hardware that’s running Mac OS X. And the cloner can’t sell goods that assist consumers in creating Hackintoshes. Psystar must comply no later than Dec. 31, 2009.

However, it doesn’t spell a complete end to Psystar’s Rebel EFI software, a $50 downloadable utility that enables consumers to create Hackintoshes of their own — even though the ruling about circumvention applies to DIY solutions. Psystar argued Rebel EFI was not explicitly covered in this case and thus should not be included in the injunction. Alsup said Rebel EFI was not covered in the injunction, but the startup could continue to sell its software “at its own peril.”

“What is certain, however, is that until such a motion is brought, Psystar will be selling Rebel EFI at its peril, and risks finding itself held in contempt if its new venture falls within the scope of the injunction,” the final judgment states.

Long story short, even though Rebel EFI was not explicitly mentioned in the case, its functionality is banned by this injunction. So although technically Rebel EFI can be sold, it would be a very, very bad idea.

Psystar opened its business selling Mac clones in April 2008. Apple filed a lawsuit three months later against Psystar, alleging copyright, trademark and shrink-wrap licensing infringements.

Final Judgment [pdf] via AppleInsider via Macworld

Updated 11 a.m. PDT with clarifications regarding the ruling’s effects on Rebel EFI.

See Also:

Photo: Psystar