Hasta La Gadget!

This article was written on February 18, 2008 by CyberNet.

If you were to take your computer to a repair shop and they ended up losing it, what would you say is fair compensation? I’d say at least the amount it cost to purchase the laptop in the first place, and then maybe a little extra to cover the hassle and time it took to get it replaced would be fair. One woman, Raelyn Campbell has a completely different idea of what fair compensation should be – $54 million.

Campbell purchased a laptop from Best Buy and bought the extended warranty. A year later, the power button broke off and so she took advantage of the extended warranty and brought the computer in for repairs.  She was told it would be ready in two to six weeks but six weeks came and it wasn’t done yet.  To make a long story short, Best Buy lost the computer and offered her a $900 gift card to compensate even though the computer cost $1100.  Campbell thought about her personal data on the machine and said that the info stored on the computer could lead to an identify theft issue.  Not only that, she said she lost thousands of dollars worth of music and thousands of photos that can’t be replaced.

While Best Buy should have offered her more than $900 given that the computer cost $1100, it seems ridiculous that Campbell is taking Best Buy to court and suing them for $54 million. Her biggest issue was regarding the personal data on the machine and the threat of identify theft. As a consumer, it was her responsibility to make sure she had taken sensitive information off of the computer before sending it in. And when she says she lost thousands of dollars worth of music and photos, it’s hard to feel bad when it was again, her responsibility as a consumer to make sure she had back-ups of those files. She could have easily lost those photos and the music if her hard drive failed.

Of course, this is all just my opinion. So what do you think? Is she right for suing Best Buy? If so, is she right to sue them for $54 million or is that dollar amount a little exaggerated? It wouldn’t be surprising in the least if she got before a judge and he just laughed at her, especially knowing Best Buy is offering her over $4,000 to settle out of court.

Source: MSNBC

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:

Get $20 Million for your Yahoo photo!Another RIAA Victim Fights BackAllofMP3.com Responds to the $1.64 Trillion LawsuitWife Discovers Husband is Lottery Winner Thanks to GoogleWindows Genuine Advantage Latest Lawsuit Buzz

We told you it was only a matter of time and, honestly, it took a bit longer than expected. Verizon has officially filed an appeal to the FCC’s net neutrality rules, which are set to take effect on Novemeber 20th. It wasn’t until the regulations were published in the Federal Register on September 23rd that they became fair game for legal challenges — a technicality that resulted in Verizon’s previous attempt to block the rules being tossed out by the US Court of Appeals in April. While Verizon senior vice president and deputy general counsel, Michael E. Glover, assures netizens that the company is “fully committed to an open Internet,” it none-the-less takes issue with the FCC’s attempt to institute new “broad” and “sweeping” regulations on the telecommunications industry. We’re sure this is only the first of several cases that will be brought before the courts challenging the commission’s authority. Stayed tuned to see if and when MetroPCS re-enters the fray, and to find out the ultimate fate of net neutrality here in the US. Check out the brief statement from Verizon after the break.

Continue reading Verizon appeals net neutrality rules, let the legal wrangling begin

Verizon appeals net neutrality rules, let the legal wrangling begin originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:08:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

We’re sure Psystar, its lawyers and its tens of fans, didn’t really expect to win the appeal it filed following the permanent injunction handed down against its commercial hackintoshes, but you can’t blame the company for trying. A little over three years after the drama began, with Apple suing to ban Psystar’s products, it seems the epic tale has come to an end. The company hasn’t really been in business since December of ’09 anyway, so today’s ruling upholding the injunction won’t make much of a difference either way. We’re just sad that this may, in fact, be the last time we ever hear from Eugene Action — let’s take a moment to reminisce, shall we?

Continue reading Psystar loses appeal in battle with Apple, told to ditch Mac clones for-ev-ver

Psystar loses appeal in battle with Apple, told to ditch Mac clones for-ev-ver originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:11:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  CNET  | Email this | Comments

Google drops cloud computing lawsuit against US Department of the Interior originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:01:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  Information Week  | Email this | Comments

Seems like we can’t go a week without another patent infringement lawsuit being filed, and this one’s no different. Apparently, VIA Technologies, maker of fine computational processors, is mad as hell with Apple’s allegedly infringing ways, and it’s not gonna take it anymore. Filed in the US District Court in Delaware, VIA claims that Cupertino’s iThings and Apple TVs infringe patent numbers 6,253,312, 6,253,311 and 6,754,810, which cover various microprocessor functions. A complaint’s also been lodged with the ITC — in order to hasten the settlement talks, no doubt. So, all that’s left is the countdown until these two shake hands, exchange checks and go on about their business… preferably outside the courtroom.

VIA Technologies sues Apple for patent infringement originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:32:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Bloomberg  |  VIA Technologies  | Email this | Comments