Hasta La Gadget!

Mac cloner Psystar has filed for bankruptcy, effectively stalling Apple’s legal case against the Florida-based startup.

Filed with the federal courts in Florida, the voluntary petition for bankruptcy protection temporarily puts Apple’s lawsuit on hold while the bankruptcy court begins proceedings.

Apple in July 2008 filed suit against Psystar alleging copyright, trademark and shrink-wrap license infringement. Psystar opened its Mac clone business in April, selling a PC hacked to run OS X Leopard.

Apple strictly forbids its operating system to be installed on anything but Apple products. The corporation alleges Psystar is violating the Mac OS X end-user agreement, which states, “You agree not to install, use or run the Apple Software on any non-Apple-labeled computer, or to enable others to do so.” The corporation also alleges Psystar is committing copyright infringement by installing OS X on non-Apple hardware.

Psystar did not immediately respond to requests for comment. However, the bankruptcy petition suggests Psystar’s investors may have withdrawn from financially backing the company. The bankruptcy filing also implies that Psystar likely cannot afford a legal team to win its battle against Apple.

Winning the lawsuit would be a large victory for Apple, as it would set a legal precedent enabling the corporation to easily squash other existing Mac cloners.

The Florida court on June 5 will hold a hearing revealing Psystar’s equity creditors, meaning if there any large entities backing the Mac cloner (e.g., Microsoft), we’ll know who they are very soon.

Suggestion of Bankruptcy [PDF via MacObserver]

See Also:

• Apple, Psystar File to Protect Secrets Before Battling in Court …
• Psystar Marches Forward With Beefy Mac Clone
• Mac Copycat Psystar Gets Ammo to Countersue Apple
• Psystar: Apple Is Paranoid for Alleging Conspiracy
• Psystar: Blu-Ray Hackintosh for Sale; MacBook Clones on the Way …
• Psystar Tags Back Apple With Antitrust Suit
• Apple Cries Corporate Conspiracy Behind Psystar
• Apple Finally Sues Mac Copycat Psystar

Image courtesy of Psystar

We all want the same thing right? The ability to watch any show we want, whenever we want, and wherever we want. Sounds easy, but even in this day and age to achieve this easily isn’t possible. Currently there are a few ways this might happen down the road, and one that looks to be coming our way sooner rather than later is Cablevision’s Network DVR. While a traditional DVR has a hard drive in it to store your shows, the Network DVR wouldn’t. Instead it would stream the content from a centralized data store, like VOD. You’d still have to pre-schedule your recordings and presumably you’d still have a set limit, but ordering DVR service wouldn’t require a new box and best of all, you should have access to all the same content in any room of the house. This has been in the making for a long time now — three years actually — but Hollywood has been tying it up in court. Luckily the courts have been on Cablevision’s side, but it does appear that the consumer may still get the shaft. That’s because it seems there’s a chance that the Network DVR won’t let you fast forward through commercials, which would obviously make it a show stopper for most.

Filed under: HDTV, Home Entertainment

Cablevision on track to deliver Network DVR this Summer originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 20 May 2009 14:21:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

There are many tried and true methods for beating your competition in the free-market. Product innovation seems to work as does a proprietary ecosystem of peripherals, media, and services that keep customers locked-in for life. Or you can take Intel’s approach: pay computer makers and retailers “to postpone or cancel” products containing CPUs from AMD, Intel’s chief rival. That’s the allegation it faces in the EU which, according to Reuters, has completed its antitrust investigation and is preparing to announce its decision on Wednesday. According to Reuters’ sources, the European Commission will fine Intel for the violations discovered over the last eight years and order changes to Intel’s business practices. It remains to be seen if the related fine exceeds the $655 million levied against Microsoft in 2004. But given the EU’s distaste for anti-competitive practices, we’re not expecting Intel to get off easy — self-proclaimed “rock star” status or not.

Filed under: Misc. Gadgets

EU expected to rule against Intel in AMD antitrust case: Microsoft points, afraid to laugh originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 11 May 2009 03:57:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Truthfully, we’re having a hard time coming to grips with this. For as long as we wished that these two would stop bickering, it’s actually tough to swallow the fact that we’ll never again be able to write about “yet another lawsuit” between Qualcomm and Broadcom (in theory, anyway). After nearly three full years of fighting with pencils, papers and soulless words, the courtroom throwdowns are finally ceasing. In a shocking development, the two rivals have entered into a settlement and multi-year patent agreement that will “result in the dismissal with prejudice of all litigation between the companies, including all patent infringement claims in the International Trade Commission and US District Court in Santa Ana, as well as the withdrawal by Broadcom of its complaints to the European Commission and the Korea Fair Trade Commission.” The exact terms of the deal are posted after the break, though you should know that Qualcomm will have to shell out $891 million in cash (ouch!) over the next four years. The lawyers may be out of work, but you can rest assured that there’s no shortage of abhorrence between these frenemies.

Continue reading Broadcom and Qualcomm agree to stop suing one another, but not to stop hating

Filed under: Cellphones

Broadcom and Qualcomm agree to stop suing one another, but not to stop hating originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:59:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Looks like CSIRO‘s legal days are over — for the moment, at least. Having already reached an agreement with HP, the Australian government-funded research firm announced this week that it’s settled with the remaining 13 companies it sued for patent infringement, claiming it owned the rights to 802.11a/g. For those who haven’t been keeping track at home, that includes Dell, Intel, Microsoft, Nintendo, Fujitsu, Toshiba, Netgear, Buffalo, D-Link, Belkin, SMC, Accton, and 3Com. The details of any of the settlements are undisclosed, but as iTnews reports, it’s expected CSIRO ended up with some substantial monies now that the dust has settled. Chief Executive Dr. Megan Clark noted that it’ll continue to “defend its intellectual property,” so if you’re a high profile tech company who creates WiFi-equipped gadgets and hasn’t been served a lawsuit yet, we don’t blame you for being a little nervous right now.

Filed under: Wireless

CSIRO’s patent lawsuits conclude with the final 13 companies settling originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:53:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments